╌>

The Trump Tariff Circus Is Back

  
Via:  John Russell  •  last year  •  11 comments

By:   Klaus Marre (WhoWhatWhy)

The Trump Tariff Circus Is Back
If you understand what the plan is this week on tariffs, then you're way ahead of the Trump administration.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Klaus Marre07/07/25

If you understand what the plan is this week on tariffs, then you're way ahead of the Trump administration.

Are you yearning for those days in April and May when Donald Trump would make up tariff rates for the world's countries (and some island inhabited solely by penguins) on the fly, just to retract or amend them within days or even hours? Do you fondly remember the promise that the administration would conclude "90 deals in 90 days" that was made 88 days (and less than a handful of anything resembling a trade deal) ago? Do you miss watching the value of your 401(k) plunge in real time?

Well, then you're in luck.

Because, this week, it's all going to happen again… or not.

After setting a bunch of arbitrary "reciprocal" tariff rates on his "Liberation Day" in April, Trump quickly suspended them again when US markets cratered. Supposedly, this 90-day pause was meant to give countries an opportunity to flock to the negotiating table and offer the US awesome trade deals.


"So this is unfolding exactly like we thought it would." — Peter Navarro

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on April 12 that "we've got 90 deals in 90 days possibly pending here," and that everything was going according to Trump's intricate master plan.

"So this is unfolding exactly like we thought it would in a dominant scenario," Navarro told NBC's Meet the Press at the time, adding that the president's unpredictability and tendency to make up policies that could upset global trade and wipe out trillions of dollars in wealth within hours was an asset.

By the way, Navarro is the same guy who also predicted that Trump's erratic behavior would cause "a lot of countries [to] come right to us and want to bargain."

Well, none of that has happened.

And now, after US stocks have finally recouped all of those losses they incurred because of Trump, we're going to do it all over again.

Maybe.

Or not.

Who knows? Certainly not members of the Trump administration, who were all over the place with their predictions of what comes next.

What we do know is that the 90-day suspension of the tariffs that the president announced in April runs out this week, so, in theory, they should be back on.

But maybe they are not.

On Sunday, Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, said that there would be "quite a bit of news this week" on trade, and that the headline would be that some of those 90 trade deals will be finalized.

In a performance that epitomizes the White House's approach to trade, Hassett then provided a bunch of nonsensical and contradictory statements during an appearance of CBS's Face the Nation.

"There are deadlines and there are things that are close," he said when asked whether the July 9 deadline might be extended. "And so maybe things will push back the dead - past the deadline, or maybe they won't. In the end, the president is going to make that judgment."

This type of statement must be music to the ears of companies that crave certainty.


"I think that we have seen lots of deals that have been finalized by negotiators, and then the president finds things that can make them better." — Kevin Hassett

Hassett also hinted that Trump is blowing up a bunch of agreements that have been reached because he is an idiot wants last-minute changes.

"I think that we have seen lots of deals that have been finalized by negotiators, and then the president finds things that can make them better," he said.

By the way, the deals may not be deals at all, but rather a bunch of letters that Trump is going to send to countries to lay out his terms for them.

The letters will be sent in cases where "we're not really satisfied with the progress," Hassett said, while adding that "countries are racing to set deals up with us ahead of the deadline."

Speaking of that deadline, as it turns out, it will not be this week after all, according to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

"President Trump is going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners, saying that, if you don't move things along, then, on August 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level," he told a visibly surprised Dana Bash on CNN's State of the Union, who then asked whether this was a new deadline.

"It's not a new deadline. We are saying this is when it's happening," Bessent said. "If you want to speed things up, have at it. If you want to go back to the old rate, that's your choice."

Of course, telling somebody that something will be happening by a certain date is the very definition of a deadline.

Trump also weighed in on the matter and provided much-needed clarity.


"They're gonna be tariffs are tariffs are going to be the tariffs." — President Donald Trump

"What are you talking about?" the president said when asked whether the tariff rates would change on July 9 or August 1.

When asked again about when the rates would change, Trump set the record straight.

"They're gonna be tariffs are tariffs are going to be the tariffs," he helpfully clarified before predicting that "most countries" will be "done" by Wednesday.

"Either a letter or a deal," Trump added, before Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, who seemed to know more about the deadline than the president, clarified that August 1 is the date, but that Trump "is setting the rates and the deals right now."

All of this is clearly extremely well-thought out, so we are just excited for this week.

Oh, one more thing, in a late-night social media post, Trump threatened "any country aligning themselves with the anti-American policies of BRICS [a group of countries that includes China, Russia, and India] will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10 percent tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy."

What does that mean and who is he talking about?

Your guess is as good as ours.

All we know is that the trade circus is back in town… and the clowns are in rare form.

In his Navigating the Insanity columns, Klaus Marre provides the kind of hard-hitting, thought-provoking, and often humorous analysis you won't find anywhere else.



Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

You've heard the phrase "the cruelty is the point"?  Well, on tariffs and trade policy the chaos is the point.  Trump officials constantly contradict each other , and him, and half the time Trump reacts as if he doesnt know what the topic is. Tariffs against many countries are supposed to into effect tomorrow, but, wait for it, there's every chance in the world Trump will change his mind today. 

Dont despair, we're already 1/8 of the way through the Trump II presidency. jrSmiley_30_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

good lord

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    last year

I like watching trump so aggressively chasing the camera lens, as he mentally deteriorates before it ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.1.1    last year

The best part is he doesn't even know he's making a fool of himself

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.2    last year

If Biden had conducted such a scattershot, incoherent , confusing , trade policy the republicans would have called him senile and demanded impeachment. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.3    last year

They would have impeached him

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2  Tacos!    last year

Don’t bother him. He’s busy working on his concepts of a plan for healthcare, and it’s due in two weeks.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @2    last year

Ah! I get it! It's that 9th grade science project he never finished!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.1.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1    last year

"Maxwell house, good to the last drop." I just didnt know that last drop would come shooting out my nose after reading that ..... 

Thanks Trout .

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.1.1    last year

You're welcome?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

why are americans putting up with this

Trump Gives Head-Scratching Response When Bluntly Asked, ‘What Happened to 90 Trade Deals in 90 Days?’ 

President   Donald Trump   offered a strange response when asked about the state of the 90 trade deals he promised three months ago, with the self-imposed deadline looming this Wednesday. He claimed that the deals are “all done” before immediately contradicting himself.

In April, Trump announced “Liberation Day,” on which he   rolled out tariffs   on dozens of countries. The president said the moves were meant to bring U.S. trading partners to the negotiating table in the hopes of lowering the U.S. trade deficit. Trump has long fixated on trade deficits, which occur when countries import more than they export.

Reporters have occasionally asked Trump about the status of his “90 deals” pledge, and those questions have become more frequent as Wednesday approaches. On Monday, Trump unveiled a new round of tariffs via a series of form letters to various countries – mainly U.S. allies – informing them that the U.S. will tariff their goods at even higher rates.

“If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,” Trump   wrote   to the leaders of several countries.

On Monday, Trump   hosted   Israeli Prime Minister   Benjamin Netanyahu   at the White House, where a reporter asked a blunt question.

“On tariffs, what happened to 90 trade deals in 90 days?” she asked.

Trump responded by saying that, despite the added tariffs he just slapped on imports, the deals are done. He then explained that actually, no, that is not the case:

Oh, we’ve spoken to everybody. We know every– it’s all done. I told you. I told you we’ll make some deals, but for the most part, we’re gonna send a letter. We’re gonna saying, “Welcome to the United States. If you’d like to participate in the greatest, most successful country ever” – I mean, we’re doing better than ever. We have– I don’t think– and you’re gonna see these numbers soon. We’ve never had numbers like this. We’ve never had investment like this.

Uh, we have more than 90. We’re gonna have much more than 90. But most of those are gonna be sent a letter. This is gonna be exactly what I sent. Now, we’ve made a deal with United Kingdom. We’ve made a deal with China. We’ve made a deal with– we’re close to making a deal with India.

Others, we’ve met with, and we don’t think we’re gonna be able to make a deal. So, we just send them a letter. “Do you wanna– do you wanna play ball? This is what you have to pay.”

So, we’re– as far as I’m concerned, we’re done with sending out letters to various countries, telling them how much tariffs they have to pay. Some will maybe adjust a little bit depending if they have a, you know, cause. We’re not gonna be unfair about it. And actually, it’s a small fraction compared to what we should be getting. We should– we could be asking for much more. But for the sake of relationships that we’ve had with a lot of really good countries, we’re doing the way I do it. But we could be getting a lot more. We could ask for a lot more than what we’re asking for.

Trump has long insisted that tariffs are paid by the countries that export the tariffed goods to the U.S. However, tariffs are paid by the business that is importing those products.

 
 

Who is online


CB


292 visitors