╌>

Some 83,000 members of the U.S. military are missing. This group tries to bring them home.

  
Via:  Split Personality  •  5 years ago  •  12 comments


 Some 83,000 members of the U.S. military are missing. This group tries to bring them home.
How elite military and scientific teams bring home fallen U.S. soldiers.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




June 4, 2018




E

arly on the morning of January 25, 1944, eight young American airmen strode across the gravel of an airfield in Kunming, China, toward a B-24J bomber. Their mission was to fly the 67-foot-long aircraft, its nose bedecked with a picture of a pinup girl and the slogan “Hot as Hell,” over the Himalayas to pick up supplies from British-held India. It was a routine run but still plenty dangerous. The weather over the mountain route, known as the Hump, was fearsomely unpredictable and severe. Some 600 American planes would crash in the area by the war’s end. The men settled into their positions: two pilots, a navigator, a bombardier, a radio operator, a flight engineer, and two gunners. At 7:40 a.m., the plane roared up into the sky. Smooth sailing as they climbed to 15,000 feet. But three hours into the trip, thick clouds rolled in. The pilots could barely see a mile in front of them. Somewhere in that vast mountain range, out of sight and out of touch with their base, the Hot as Hell went down. In 1947, with the fighting over, the United States mounted a campaign to find the bodies of the more than 300 Americans who had gone missing in plane crashes on the Hump. The searchers traveled by truck, mule, and foot, fording rain-swollen rivers and fending off malarial mosquitoes, but never found the spot where the Hot as Hell fell to Earth. The area in which it presumably lay, the search party’s official report declared, “encompasses many thousands of square miles of mountainous jungle terrain, some of it inaccessible, unexplored, and uninhabited.” Their conclusion: “Any further attempt for the recovery of their remains would prove unsuccessful.” Sixty-eight years later, on a sunny October morning, Meghan-Tómasita ­Cosgriff-​­Hernández came clambering along a rocky trail 9,400 feet up in the Indian Himalayas. The anthropologist and her 12 teammates had hiked uphill under a glaring sun for more than two days to reach the spot where they now stood. Before them was a steep gully, thick with trees, brush, and boulders—and littered with a weather-beaten propeller, wing, engine, and the other ragged pieces of what had been the Hot as Hell. The group’s mission was as straightforward as it was daunting: search through acres of that jungly growth and unstable scree for the remains of the airplane’s crew. Well, thought Cosgriff-Hernández, looking over the expanse, let’s get to it.

800







Cosgriff-Hernández’s team was one of many the United States military regularly dispatches all over the world—but these are squads of scientists as well as soldiers. Their task is not killing enemies but rather finding dead Americans. Some 83,000 American military personnel have gone missing in conflicts since World War II—presumed to have died in plane crashes, ship sinkings, and chaotic battles. Dozens of times a year, the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (which goes by the initialism DPAA) sends teams of forensic archaeologists, anthropologists, ­aircraft experts, and others to scour Vietnamese jungles, European forests, Pacific islands, and other former battle zones for those service members’ remains. Finding the bodies is just the first hurdle; next comes the challenge of using forensic dentistry, DNA analysis, and other techniques to identify to whom those bone fragments and broken teeth belonged. The agency boasts a $112 million annual ­budget and a staff of about 700, working out of a center in Hawaii and a network of far-flung labs and field bases. At any given time, investigators are working on about 1,200 cases.





The project began after the Vietnam War , when families of missing soldiers pressured the government to figure out what had become of their loved ones. Hundreds of remains from that conflict have since been found and returned to relatives. "Because of that success, later on Congress added the Korean War," says Kelly McKeague, a former Air Force major general who is director of the DPAA. "Then other families started asking, 'What about us?'"





The agency is now officially tasked with providing “the fullest ­possible accounting” of the fates of missing personnel from the ­Second World War through today’s conflicts. As many as 39,000 of the total were lost at sea, and the agency does not expect to ever ­recover their remains. But that still leaves a staggering caseload.

read complete article here









Article is LOCKED by moderator [smarty_function_ntUser_get_name: user_id or profile_id parameter required]
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Split Personality    5 years ago

Good article about a typical recovery of enough bones to make a positive ID by the DPAA. The article is a mixture of adventure,

a small victory for the DPAA and the emotional return of one airman's remains to what is left of his family and friends.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @1    5 years ago

all of our service people deserve to be brought back home to their families no matter how long it takes or how much it costs. although probably impossible in some extreme cases because of the lapse of time, not a one deserves to be left behind.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
2  sandy-2021492    5 years ago

Thanks to those working to bring closure to military families.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3  seeder  Split Personality    5 years ago

Not everyone, however is impressed with the DPAA, but especially the stone wall known as J-PAC.

Here is a second article about the actual ordeal of trying to get bones exhumed from hundreds of John Doe graves throughout the world,

and the agency's current "logic" for refusing to do so.

At the center of the military’s effort is a little-known agency, the Joint Prisoners of War/Missing in Action Accounting Command, or J-PAC, and its longtime scientific director, Tom Holland. He alone assesses whether the evidence J-PAC has assembled is sufficient to identify a set of remains: A body goes home only if he signs off.

Over Holland’s 19-year tenure, J-PAC has stuck with an outdated approach that relies primarily on historical and medical records even as others in the field have turned to DNA to quickly and reliably make identifications.

Though finding missing service members can be difficult — some were lost deep in Europe’s forests, others in Southeast Asia’s jungles — Holland’s approach has stymied efforts to identify MIAs even when the military already knows where they are. More than 9,400 service members are buried as “unknowns” in American cemeteries around the world. Holland's lab has rejected roughly nine out of every 10 requests to exhume such graves.

Holland’s cautious approach is animated by a fear of mistakes.

Millions of Dollars, Few ID's

This chart shows how many identifications are made each year by J-PAC, compared to the agency’s budget. Including the other agencies involved in finding remains of missing service members, the Pentagon has spent nearly $500 million over the past five years.

  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
ID's 105 62 65 80 60 372
Budget (in millions) $54 $65 $69.9 $95.7 $88.5 $373.1million

Source: Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office

“Our credibility is only as good as our last misidentification,” he said in an interview. “It doesn't matter that I've identified 500 people correctly. If I misidentify one, that’s what going to be the focus. That’s what's going to be on the news. That is what is going to erode the credibility. That’s what I go home with every night.”

The top military official at J-PAC, Gen. Kelly McKeague, said he believed the standards for laboratory work to identify a veteran should be higher than the FBI lab’s standard for a death penalty case. With what J-PAC does, he said, there’s “a lot more at stake.”

Needless to say, this second article expresses the frustration of dealing with the military while both supportive of the body of Hollands work,

it also points out his shortcomings, the typical red tape and ridiculous mistakes by everyday people.

Another long worthwhile read.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     5 years ago

I've read a few article about DPAA before. This article was simply wonderful as it gave the reader a very inside view of the importance and danger of this work...

Kudos to all at DPAA and especially Hernandez and her crew on this mission. 

Is it worth the cost..Oh, hell yes it is. 

Excellent article SP.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
4.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Kavika @4    5 years ago

Excellent article SP.

YES, YES it IS!

Surprised Fish isn't here  /S

Thank you SP

for posting a seed of substance.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
4.2  cobaltblue  replied to  Kavika @4    5 years ago
Is it worth the cost..Oh, hell yes it is.

You're right .... aaaaagain.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6  cobaltblue    5 years ago

This is a fabulous read, despite it breaking my heart thinking of those who have lost their lives for us. It's the families and their aching souls that reach me the most. 

I know this is swerving off topic, but I can't help it. Every man or woman who signs up to give their lives to our military joins the service without knowing where they will be. Their families are just as heroic. This about the civil war:

No one was prepared for death on such a scale, says Drew Gilpin Faust in her fascinating 2008 book,   This Republic of Suffering . What to do with so many bodies? One week after Antietam, with the dead still unburied, a Union doctor described a line of “at least a thousand blackened bloated corpses with blood and gas protruding from every orifice, and maggots holding high carnival over their heads.” Gettysburg, meanwhile, yielded an estimated six million pounds of flesh, both human and animal.

Battlefield burials were often improvised affairs. To fit the bodies into graves, men stomped on arms and legs stiff with rigor mortis. One observer of mass burials said that bodies were “covered over much the same as farmers cover potatoes and roots to preserve them from the frost of winter; with this exception, however: the vegetables really get more tender care.”

Such an ignominious end to life troubled many. Faust notes that Americans of the mid-19th century fervently believed in some variant of the Protestant notion of a Good Death: Men should die with dignity and grace, facing the end resolutely and surrounded by family. Yet the typical death of a soldier in the Civil War was nothing like that. Men at the front saw the treatment of the dead and begged for a burial at home should they die. “It is dreadful,” wrote one, “to contemplate being killed on the field of battle without a kind hand to hide one’s remains from the eye of the world or the gnawing of animals or buzzards.”

A year into the war, the bodies could no longer be ignored. On July 17, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln signed a law authorizing the creation of new national cemeteries to bury the war dead. Famously, one of these was sited on Robert E. Lee’s Virginia estate near Washington, now Arlington National Cemetery.

The choice of Lee’s former home for a graveyard was a bit of revenge orchestrated by Montgomery C. Meigs, the Union’s quartermaster general. But Meigs took his job as guardian of the fallen soldier seriously. After the war, collecting from Union commanders whatever burial records were available, he sent teams of soldiers throughout the South and into Maryland, Pennsylvania, and the West to collect the dead from their battlefield gravesites, identify the bodies, then give each a proper burial in a spot of honor. (The few efforts to recover the Confederate dead were largely organized by women volunteers.)

Cite . Interesting that the Confederate recovery was driven by women volunteers. 

Great article, SP. One that everyone should read. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
6.1  seeder  Split Personality  replied to  cobaltblue @6    5 years ago
Interesting that the Confederate recovery was driven by women volunteers. 

Surviving women, mothers, sisters, wives and daughters had to pick up the pieces of their lives and move on. They located their loved ones who had fallen in battle and brought them home to veterans cemeteries that they funded privately at first.  After that they started building memorials and statutes to their fallen heroes, one bake sale at a time.

The General Organization of the United Daughters of the Confederacy was founded in Nashville, Tennessee, on September 10, 1894, by Mrs. Caroline Meriwether Goodlett of Tennessee as Founder and Mrs. Lucian H. (Anna Davenport) Raines of Georgia as Co- Founder. The UDC is the outgrowth of numerous ladies’ hospital associations, sewing societies and knitting circles that worked throughout the South during the War Between the States to supply the needs of the soldiers. After the War, these organizations kept pace with the changing times and evolved into cemetery, memorial, monument and Confederate Home Associations and Auxiliaries to Camps of Confederate Veterans. Out of these many local groups, which for nearly 30 years rendered untold service to the South and her people, two statewide organizations came into existence as early as 1890: the Daughters of the Confederacy in Missouri and the Ladies Auxiliary of the Confederate Soldier’s Home in Tennessee. The association with these two organizations makes the UDC the oldest patriotic lineage organization in the country.
 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
7  1stwarrior    5 years ago

256

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
7.1  seeder  Split Personality  replied to  1stwarrior @7    5 years ago

Increasingly ( it seems ) death on active duty is an inconvenience to some when the body of a fallen hero is aboard a common carrier flight.

smh...

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
7.1.1  cobaltblue  replied to  Split Personality @7.1    5 years ago

I wonder how many "inconvenienced" passengers think Colin Kaepernick should have been fired for kneeling since it was an affront to their sensibilities.  All I know is that every person I've talked to who has served this country regarding the matter believes strongly that they joined the service to keep totalitarians out of our country and keep each of us free to peacefully protest. 

Watching these videos made my heart break for these families. 

 
 

Who is online



37 visitors