╌>

Biden admin under fire for pursuing diversity over merit: They're finding people 'who aren't highly-skilled' | Fox News

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  2 years ago  •  28 comments

By:   Ashley Carnahan (Fox News)

Biden admin under fire for pursuing diversity over merit: They're finding people 'who aren't highly-skilled' | Fox News
Project 21 co-chairman Horace Cooper reacts to President Biden's judicial nominees and reports that out of 97 confirmed federal judges, only five are white on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana

Qualifications are so passe.........................


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



President Biden has nominated a record number of diverse judges to the federal judiciary, with nearly 65% being people of color, according to an analysis by Balls & Strikes.

The outlet found that out of 97 confirmed federal judges, five are White men and 22 are Black women. Female judges make up 66% of the confirmations compared to 24% under former President Donald Trump and 42% under former President Obama.

Project 21 co-chairman Horace Cooper called out the Biden administration for its seemingly race-based confirmations Monday, arguing it is trying to replace excellence and merit with diversity.

"What we're seeing from the Biden administration, and which is what we're seeing generally from the progressive movement, is this idea that we just need to reshape the judiciary in a way under color," he said on "Tucker Carlson Tonight."

"I use that term in a duplicative way by pretending that we're making the courts look more like America. But the truth of the matter is we're finding people - they aren't talented, they aren't highly-skilled, but they know progressive vision just like the back of their hand."

Cooper added that America ultimately "suffers" because of this practice.

Host Tucker Carlson highlighted an exchange between Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., and Biden judicial nominee Charnelle Bjelkengren.

Bjelkengren could not answer Kennedy's questions about what different parts of the U.S. Constitution do, saying certain articles were not "coming to mind."

Carlson said the response was "unbelievably degrading" and wondered why Biden nominated a judge who "knew nothing" about the Constitution.

Judge Charnelle Bjelkengren of the Spokane County Superior Court in Eastern Washington. (Fox News)

Cooper agreed, adding he does not want people to be hired to prestigious positions only on the basis of race.

"I don't want the cardiologist to be chosen by his color. I don't want the pilot to be chosen by his race. And I don't want the judiciary to be chosen that way," he explained. "We need excellence. And this administration doesn't want that criticism."

Ashley Carnahan is a production assistant at Fox News Digital.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    2 years ago

Who needs credentials when we can have virtue signal check boxes...................

Trump and supporters are off topic in any way, shape, or form.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.4  Snuffy  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    2 years ago

It seems to get even worse with this one...

Beyond her legal knowledge, at issue is Bjelkengren's experience.

On her Senate Judiciary questionnaire for her nomination, Bjelkengren was asked to provide details about the "10 most significant litigated matters which you handled." Bjelkengren listed only six , including one case in which she lost to someone on appeal who forewent legal counsel and was representing herself. 

"At no stage of her professional career has this judge focused on federal law. At no point has she ever even appeared in federal court," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said on the Senate floor last week. "Is this the caliber of legal expert with which President Biden is filling the federal bench? For lifetime appointments? Is the bar for merit and excellence really set this low?"

Bjelkengren worked for several years as an assistant attorney general in Washington state. She primarily served as an administrative law judge, representing the Department of Licensing in drivers' license revocation hearings and the Employment Security Department in unemployment benefits cases.

Never even appeared in federal court?  How the fuck can she be considered for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench when she has zero experience at the federal court level?  This really takes diversity far beyond any logical point.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.4.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @1.4.1    2 years ago

Very true, but it is more than highly acceptable to many on the liberal left of today! It just does not matter any more today on how knowledgeable one is about their chosen field as long as you can fill in the blanks on a job application. So totally disgusting!

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.4.3  Split Personality  replied to  Snuffy @1.4    2 years ago
Never even appeared in federal court?  How the fuck can she be considered for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench when she has zero experience at the federal court level?  This really takes diversity far beyond any logical point.

Seemed to be a common complaint during the last Administration with mostly partisan objections to the lack of both diversity and real legal experience, now resulting in real crackpot decisions by certain Appeals Judges.

[ The GOP has already confirmed five judicial nominees rated "not qualified" by the American Bar Association, and more are coming. Great! ]

[ DELETED ]

384

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.4.4  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @1.4.1    2 years ago

Physics?

Every action has a logical and equal reaction?

Senate Republicans have filled the nation's highest courts with dozens of white men — and zero Black appeals court judges.

[DELETED]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1.4.5  Gsquared  replied to  Split Personality @1.4.3    2 years ago

Several of the previous Administration's judicial nominees had never tried a case, taken a deposition, examined a witness, or argued a motion in court.  In other words, they had absolutely no experience that would qualify them for any judgeship much less a lifetime appointment to the federal bench.  What they did have was an extremist right wing political philosophy and the backing of the ultra-reactionary Federalist Society.  I don't recall seeing NT's so-called "conservatives" registering an objection to any of those completely unqualified nominees.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

Bjelkengren could not answer Kennedy's questions about what different parts of the U.S. Constitution do, saying certain articles were not "coming to mind."

Seeing Senator Murray promote and defend her on the basis of her skin color is pretty sickening.  That's apparently her only qualification. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

"A champion of liberty, Tocqueville was no determinist. He nevertheless understood that once particular habits become widespread in elite and popular culture, the consequences are difficult to avoid. In the case of democracy—perhaps especially American democracy—Tocqueville wondered whether its emphasis on equality might not eventually make the whole thing come undone."


 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
4  Sparty On    2 years ago

Just one more flawed policy brought to you by goober and his Bidenettes.

 
 
 
user image
Freshman Silent
5      2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6  JBB    2 years ago

True, the Biden administration is less white, less evangelical and less binary than the gop wants!

Under fire from whom? The gopass magahats?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @6    2 years ago
administration is less white, less evangelical and less binary than the gop wants!

And most importantly, less competent. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Quiet
6.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1    2 years ago

“And most importantly, less competent. “

So more white, more evangelical, and more discriminatory is the plan…

….let’s just hope you are wrong and that we can move passed the biases that would rather divide than accept our differences and somehow coalesce, making this a much better place. 

 
 
 
George
Senior Expert
6.1.3  George  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.2    2 years ago

Anybody who thinks the color of a persons skin is relevant for any job, other than casting an actor to play a historical figure is a racist by definition. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.1    2 years ago

do you think only white evangelical judges are capable of understanding  the structure of the constitution?  Or white Evangelical press secretaries are  able to speak in complete sentences when answering from the press?  

Funny you immediately associate white evangelicals with competence. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
7  Sparty On    2 years ago

People who have white guilty crack me up.

Woke dumbasses!

 
 

Who is online

CB
shona1


40 visitors