╌>

Grassley letter slams pathetic DOJ Biden corruption coverup

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  last year  •  48 comments

By:   Post Editorial Board (New York Post)

Grassley letter slams pathetic DOJ Biden corruption coverup
The Grassley letter alleges that 40, count 'em 40, sources dimed out Biden corruption by Hunter, Joe and even Uncle Jim while the DOJ desperately covered up. For Shame!

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana


 "largely because of bogus findings that it was all "foreign disinformation."

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Post Editorial Board

Bad as the evidence of Biden family sleaze is, the growing signs of Justice Department and FBI malfeasance in covering it up are far more disturbing.

In a bombshell letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray, Sen. Chuck Grassley alleges that top Justice and FBI officials repeatedly, over the course of years, moved to shut down investigations into the Biden family.

Grassley says more than 40 confidential sources provided "criminal information" related to Hunter Biden and others in the clan to the FBI — with those cases rapidly closed, largely because of bogus findings that it was all "foreign disinformation."

Per the senator, the FBI's Washington Field Office's Foreign Corrupt Practices Act squad began investigating Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings in January 2016 — when Joe Biden was still vice president.

In 2017, a source referred to Hunter Biden being on the board of Burisma, which "the handling agent deemed at the time non-relevant information to the ongoing criminal financial case," Grassley notes.

The office then closed the case in December 2019 — at the very time Hunter Biden's Burisma's ties were all over the news thanks to then-President Donald Trump's impeachment over his infamous phone call asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into Joe Biden's role in the firing of former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, who'd been investigating Burisma.

Meanwhile, the FBI's Pittsburgh Field Office opened a "guardian" assessment of info Rudy Giuliani had provided on the Bidens, which came across the info the DC office had ignored on Hunter and Burisma. It had that source re-interviewed, producing in June 2020 the now-well-known claim that Zlochevsky had said he bribed Hunter and Joe $5 million apiece so Joe would get Shokin fired.

The Pittsburgh office recommended that the investigation continue; FBI HQ instead shut it down.

Crucially, FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten, per Grassley, engineered a finding "to improperly discredit" the bribe claim as merely "foreign disinformation."

Grassley also cites whistleblower claims that FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Tim Thibault — the bureau's "point man" on Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski — ordered that another 2020 probe into Hunter's alleged "criminal financial and related activity" be closed after pressure from "an FBI HQ and FBI Baltimore element."

All this, before the 2020 election.

On top of Grassley's letter came news that Scott Brady, who as US Attorney oversaw that Pittsburgh FBI investigation, told the House Judiciary Committee that the FBI hindered his Hunter Biden probe and that Delaware US Attorney David Weiss (the guy in charge of the main Justice investigation of Hunter) even skipped his team's final briefing on the bribery allegations.

Instead, Weiss sent Assistant US attorney Lesley Wolf, now repeatedly fingered by other whistleblowers as shutting down any lines of investigation that might threaten Joe Biden.

"I think there was reluctance on the part of the FBI to really do any tasking related to our assignment," Brady testified.

He also said he'd never been alerted to info from Hunter's laptop, which the FBI had had for months.

Again, all this happened in the Trump years, meaning top FBI and Justice officials were working to protect the Bidens on their own initiative — with Team Trump utterly oblivious.

We have utmost regard for Grassley and the House investigators who are finally exposing these outrages, and we hope Republicans nominate a 2024 candidate who's actually competent to root out this rot — not just rant about it.


Red Box Rules

No Trolling or Fascist nonsense


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    last year

And the plot thickens?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    last year

What plot?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    last year

Read the article.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    last year
What plot?

No plot, Just right wing wet dreams.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.2    last year

What DOJ Biden Corruption Cover-up?

There was no corruption to cover up.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.3    last year

There was no corruption to cover up.

Details...details...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.4    last year

I guess paying attention to those details is a bit too much for some.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.5    last year
I guess paying attention to those details is a bit too much for some.

The reason that all those House committees have come up with nothing is because there are no details.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.6    last year

Thanks for confirming 1.1.5.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.8  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.7    last year

Thanks for confirming 1.1.5.

And thank you [deleted]

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.9  Ozzwald  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.8    last year

And thank you [deleted]

And Jeremy's is not?  Partisan rules?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.9    last year

[x]  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.11  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.9    last year

If you feel that way, you should flag it. His was not flagged?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.12  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.11    last year

He may have morons on ignore, I have a lot of them on ignore, but not all.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.13  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.11    last year
If you feel that way, you should flag it. His was not flagged?

So if you see a rule being broken you ignore it unless someone flags you on it?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    last year

Big problem is that the Biden's have no shame.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2    last year

Or morals, integrity, ethics or even common sense.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.1    last year

True dat.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    last year

'Bad as the evidence of Biden family . . . . '

What evidence?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @1.3    last year

So you at least read the first sentence of the article. Impressive.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.1    last year

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.3.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.1    last year

So you at least read the first sentence of the article. Impressive.

Are you going to answer her question, or just ignore it?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.3.4  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @1.3.3    last year

Considering the source and knowing the reaction of poo pooing whatever would be presented, why bother. Therefore the answer to your query is.......................ignore it. I guess chivalry isn't dead after all.......

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @1.3    last year
What evidence?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.3.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.4    last year
Considering the source and knowing the reaction of poo pooing whatever would be presented, why bother.

A simple "no I will not provide evidence to my claim", would have sufficed.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @1.3    last year
What evidence?

Then  there's this.  

Biden received $40,000 from family after Chinese payments, Oversight Committee says

But you all go ahead and keep your head in your 4th POC.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.8  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.3.6    last year

Why present anything when you don't believe anything negative about your hero?

One must suspend reality in order to pretend that the Biden Family did nothing wrong.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.3.6    last year
A simple "no I will not provide evidence to my claim", would have sufficed.

I can't help but notice YOU haven't provided any evidence to anything here.  Yet here you are flapping your lips about the SEEDER not providing anything.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.3.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.3.9    last year
I can't help but notice YOU haven't provided any evidence to anything here.

When I make a claim I back it up with links supporting that claim, however I have made no claims in this thread.  You have.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.11  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.3.10    last year

One must be willfully blind to facts to not believe that the Biden Family was involved in some shady business. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.12  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.3.10    last year
When I make a claim I back it up with links supporting that claim

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.3.13  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @1.3.11    last year

You don't honestly expect the hard core lefty lib Bidenites to admit existence of any solid proof against the Big Guy do you? That's anathema to the max to them.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.14  Texan1211  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.3.13    last year
You don't honestly expect the hard core lefty lib Bidenites to admit existence of any solid proof against the Big Guy do you?

Of course not!

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.3.15  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.4    last year

One member in particular has admitted on more than one occasion that they do not read articles by conservatives and then comments on them anyways.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    last year

Where are the loan docs and bank records detailing joe Biden loaning 200,000 to his brother?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    last year

I dont even bother to do more than skim through this constant nonsense. 

The article has multiple references to FBI and DOJ decisions made in 2020.  Who was president in 2020? Who had his appointees in charge of both the FBI and the DOJ at that time?  And yet we are supposed to believe that the "deep state" favorable to Biden conspired to protect him even though Bill Barr was running DOJ and Trump controlled the FBI from 2017-21.  All these FBI and DOJ people must have really hated Trump , which should tell you something in itself. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year

The article was written by a right leaning publication, therefore it just has to be filled with falsehoods, innuendo, and errors right?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3.1    last year

Who controlled the DOJ in 2020 , when all these alleged DOJ misdeeds took place ? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    last year

Yes, the Trump DOJ had a  policy against interfering in an election, as opposed to the current DOJ which times its prosecutions for the maximum political effect. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.2    last year

Nonsense, the former 'president' and turd has been 'campaigning' to stay out of prison for how long now?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year
I dont even bother to do more than skim through this constant nonsense.

That explains so much.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.3  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year
I dont even bother to do more than skim through this constant nonsense. 

I realize that.

Seems to be the go-to play whenever Biden isn't praised.

The Biden Family schemes are coming to light, and it will expose Joe.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Guide
3.3.1  goose is back  replied to  Texan1211 @3.3    last year
The Biden Family schemes are coming to light, and it will expose Joe.

The bigger question is, will Joe just be impeached or will he go to jail?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @3.3    last year
The Biden Family schemes are coming to light, and it will expose Joe.

And the Bidenistas run around with their heads in their 4th POC oblivious to everything.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4  Hallux    last year

Isn't Chuck, at 90, a card carrying member of the Senile Senator Fossil Club?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Hallux @4    last year

He wants people to remember him when he's gone. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    last year

As a racist asshole.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
4.1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    last year

Most folks with any degree of intelligence just wish Joe was gone.

 
 

Who is online


Gazoo
Bob Nelson
Right Down the Center


207 visitors