Biden Names John Kerry Climate Envoy
By: Jean Chemnick (Scientific American)
Joe Biden has created a cabinet level position of Climate Envoy and appointed John Kerry to the position. Kerry wasn't elected to be Climate Envoy. Kerry doesn't need Senate confirmation as Climate Envoy. Apparently the Climate Envoy will wield as much (or more) authority over foreign policy than will the Secretary of State. And the Climate Envoy will wield considerable authority over domestic policy, as well.
A President creating positions that are separate from the democratic process is problematic. The position of Climate Envoy was not created in a democratic manner and obviously will not use government authority in a democratic manner. As the War on Terror showed, once power has been given to politically independent bureaucrats it will be difficult to take that power away.
Joe Biden is establishing dictatorial powers for the Presidency. Time will tell if Joe Biden is the dictator America needs or wants. But the dictatorial bureaucracy will be here to stay. So much for defending democracy.
Former Secretary of State John Kerry would become the highest-ranking U.S. official ever to have a portfolio exclusively devoted to climate change when he joins President-elect Joe Biden's White House next year.
The new title for Kerry, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee who represented Massachusetts in the Senate for 28 years: special presidential envoy on climate change.
While Biden's transition team offered few specifics about Kerry's role yesterday, he'll be the first climate official ever with a seat on the National Security Council. And "presidential" in his title suggests Kerry will report directly to Biden, while "envoy" marks him as a senior diplomat.
White House climate leads under President Obama—former Clinton EPA Administrator Carol Browner and counselor to the president John Podesta—had a hand in molding domestic and international policies. Kerry's role would be focused internationally. Kerry's stature and close relationship to Biden, with whom he served with for decades in the Senate, ensures he would represent the U.S. climate agenda in the highest diplomatic circles, including meetings with foreign leaders.
His appointment also affirms Biden's commitment to climate change as a foreign policy issue, despite focusing on domestic aspects of his plan on the campaign trail.
"America will soon have a government that treats the climate crisis as the urgent national security threat it is," Kerry said on Twitter yesterday.
The Biden transition team yesterday telegraphed that a domestic climate official with a similarly high profile would be announced in the coming weeks. And incoming White House chief of staff Ron Klain hinted as much in a Twitter post of his own yesterday.
"Stay tuned!!" he tweeted in response to a post by the Sunrise Movement's Varshini Prakash, who said she was keeping her "eyes peeled for a domestic equivalent" to Kerry.
"If you look at the stature and reputation of the former secretary of State, you can imagine that whoever is going to lead the domestic agenda will have to be able to match that to the extent it's possible," said Christy Goldfuss, senior vice president for energy and environment at the Center for American Progress and an alumna of the Obama White House. "They clearly will need to be partners, given that the domestic agenda and the international agenda are so closely aligned when it comes to climate change."
Kerry's resume on climate change is long and deep, spanning both his time in Foggy Bottom and on Capitol Hill.
In the Senate, he was a lead sponsor of the highest-profile carbon cap-and-trade bill of the Obama era, although it never came to the floor for a vote. And as secretary of State he helped land the Paris climate agreement.
Kerry is now expected to help the U.S. navigate back into the climate accord. He'll also help shape the United States' Paris pledge for 2030, which must demonstrate renewed commitment to global climate cooperation after President Trump's withdrawal from the compact.
Kerry's post may be Cabinet-level, but it is not subject to Senate confirmation.
While a few progressive climate advocates expressed concern about Biden tapping Kerry, noting his support for market-based approaches to limiting carbon, others applauded the appointment. Prakash, who worked with Kerry on the Biden-Bernie Sanders climate task force earlier this year, said on Twitter that he "really does care about stopping climate change."
"That's something we can work with," she said.
Top foreign policy priority
Nathaniel Keohane, a former Obama White House official who is now senior vice president of climate for the Environmental Defense Fund, said Kerry's post sends an important signal about Biden being serious about tackling climate change.
"We—not just the climate community, but the world—have been looking for a sign as to whether the incoming Biden administration will make climate change central to foreign policy in the way that clearly President-elect Biden has said he will on domestic policy," he said. "This gives a resoundingly clear answer of 'yes.'"
Goldfuss said: "John Kerry can pick up the phone and talk to people that he worked with not but five years ago on the most [important] climate agreement in global history. The relationships continue, and the reputation to speak on behalf of the president in those conversations is huge.
"Secretary Kerry has had a long relationship with President Biden and will be able to carry the message of how high a priority climate is for him on the international agenda," she added.
Jake Schmidt, managing director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's international program, said he'd expect Kerry to use his White House perch to convene officials from across the federal government—not just the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development, but also the Commerce Department, EPA, the Energy Department and other agencies—to emphasize how climate change is considered in international programs and policy.
"This is a sign to me that they get that climate change has emerged as a top foreign policy priority, and that has to be accomplished through all arms of the U.S. government, not just the usual suspects," Schmidt said, adding that Kerry's experience running the State Department would ensure that climate considerations would not be siloed at a few of the department's offices.
The NSC chair will also give Kerry a platform to help ensure that climate change is integrated into national security issues. Prior to the election, the idea of creating a new deputy national security adviser position was floated with the same aim. Kerry is an elevated version of the same role.
Said Schmidt, "You don't make a former secretary of State a deputy."
Reporter Scott Waldman contributed.

The political class is pandering away democracy. Establishing autocratic and dictatorial government authority isn't democracy even if the pandering justifications satisfy public opinion. That's how Fascism really works.
Now there's no reason to be upset with this appointment. Kerry can always hop into his wife's private jet and head over to Nashville to consult with Al Gore. He can get all sorts of good ideas on climate change and how to save the planet. /s (sad that I have to use the sarcasm tag but I know there are still people who will bitch)
It's not really about John Kerry. It's about creating a cabinet position without any sort of democratic process or oversight.
The made up position of Climate Envoy isn't an elected office. And the people's representatives in the Senate have no say over the authority of the office let alone who fills the office.
Joe Biden has vested the position of Climate Envoy with as much authority as the Secretary of State and as much authority as other cabinet members. Voters and Congress had no input in that decision. Isn't that how Fascism really works?
I understand the concern, but how much different would the position really be if he was a czar rather than a cabinet position? Presidents have been appointing czar's for a long time, some of them had tremendous power. I don't know how much different they are outside of one actually being a cabinet member.
For myself I'm much more concerned about the roughshod way the current administration seems to be running over the existing systems. I think we can all agree that as oil is a finite resource we do need to work to move away from it as an energy source and it does make sense to move towards "green" energy sources. But I think it's a catastrophic approach to kill off old sources until you have the new process built up. The disruption to the economy and to people's lives, especially in the middle of a pandemic, just seems the wrong approach. The US has reduced it's carbon footprint over the years using the current capitalistic system, it just seems to make more sense to me to allow that process to continue. We all see the news stories out of CA where they had power brownouts last summer due to high demand and low availability due to political pressures. Is that the type of lifestyle we want over the entire US?
Joe Biden appointed Gina McCarthy to be Climate Czar. Ali Zaidi has been appointed as Assistant to the Climate Czar.
Biden has essentially created a new Department within the executive branch without any input or oversight from voters or their representatives. Apparently these positions will be responsible for making national policy, authority to direct activities in other Departments, and will have some sort of veto authority over other cabinet level policies and decisions.
He doesn't need oversight or approval. He is within his power to create departments and personnel nominations. Biden scores points for nominating people who are experts in their field to certain positions within the administration, such as: an environmentalist as Climate Czar, an actual scientist as Science Advisor, and a public school teacher as Education Secretary.
No vote for the position nor the person that got it... good to know.
An envoy is a person delegated to represent a government in its dealings with another. Kerry doesn't need oversite as he's little more than a glorified messenger strictly there to discuss details of global warming with other functionaries. He can neither make rules nor policy.
Are you saying that they're a liaison and that it's NOT a democratic position that should be voted upon? I'm seriously asking; I'm not being facetious.
Yes. He's internationally respected mouth piece for the WH to other climate dignitaries. Think of him as the US Ambassador of Climate... which sound ridiculous, but pretty true.