Why Don't We Cover Every Parking Lot with Solar Panels?

Via:  Nerm_L  •  3 months ago  •  9 comments

By:   Andrew Blok (CNET)

Why Don't We Cover Every Parking Lot with Solar Panels?
Solar panel parking lot covers are a win for drivers and the environment, yet they're still pretty rare. Here's why.

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

Yeah, covering parking lots with solar panels sounds like a good idea.  After all, parking lots are essentially dead space only used to store vehicles.  But the numbers sprinkled throughout the story suggests that good idea isn't necessarily practical.

First of all, covering parking lots with solar panels requires a supply of solar panels and construction materials.  The idea requires factories and an extensive industrial base to transform the idea into reality.  So, the transformation of the energy supply to alternative sources requires a robust industrial policy.  Governments simply cannot achieve climate goals using alternative sources without revitalizing and strengthening the manufacturing capacity and capability of their economies.  Dependence upon imports won't be sufficient.  Without a robust manufacturing base these ideas will only be words on paper.

Second of all, the numbers sprinkled throughout the article suggest that solar panels will be woefully inadequate to maintain current levels of energy consumption.  The Michigan State University example shows that installing 45 acres of solar canopy over five parking lots supplies 5 pct of the campus' energy consumption.  That indicates Michigan State University would need 900 acres of solar panels to supply all of its energy needs.  Obviously solar canopies will reduce the institution's carbon footprint (which is a good thing) but won't be adequate for achieving zero emissions.  

The good idea of solar canopies over parking lots wouldn't be enough to drastically lower carbon emissions.  The argument would be that every little bit helps.  And that's true.  But we're spending a lot of money for little bits that aren't sufficient to achieve stated goals.  We need to address fundamental government policy that revitalizes manufacturing if there is any hope of adequately addressing climate change.  Drastically reducing carbon emissions will require a robust industrial economy.  These ideas look good on paper but we can't paper over the problem with good ideas.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T

If you park in one of several commuter lots on Michigan State University's campus, you'll likely score a premium parking spot. That's because each parking lot is sheltered from the sun, snow and rain by solar panels. They're mounted above the lot on steel structures tall enough for tailgaters in RVs to park beneath. Besides providing a more pleasant parking experience, the university gets cheaper, cleaner solar energy from the solar panels.

It's a great thing to not have to scrape your car free of snow in 20-degree weather. I know, because I was a commuting student at Michigan State for two years and gladly took advantage of the covered parking.

So why don't all parking lots have solar panels over them? We need to rapidly transition away from fossil fuels to avoid the worst effects of global warming. And, as extreme weather becomes more common, shade and shelter from downpours would be a welcome development for drivers.

Each solar panel installation has a different energy and financial evaluation. Rooftop and ground-mounted solar panels produce differently based on their latitude and the angle they're installed at. Parking lot owners may forego solar panels for reasons including cost and inconvenience. However, some solar experts think increased interest in sustainability (90% of Americans wanted more solar farms in 2020, according to Pew) could mean more solar parking lots are headed our way.

The high upfront costs of solar

For many homeowners, installing solar panels will save them money in the long run. The same is true for large institutions.

Michigan State estimated the parking lot panels (located over five lots) would save $10 million over 25 years. The university gets the electricity from the panels under a power purchase agreement, which means it doesn't own the panels but agrees to purchase the power. It saves by getting the power for a lower price than from an alternative source.

While the economics of a power purchase agreement are a bit different, for the company that absorbs the construction costs, building elsewhere would be a better deal.

"A carport is roughly 40% more expensive compared to a ground mount system," said Tim Powers, a research and policy associate for Inovateus Solar, the company that built Michigan State's system. It costs more because of extra materials (it takes taller, stronger structures to get solar panels that far off the ground), extra labor (it takes longer to build) and extra engineering costs, he said.

If the only motivation is getting solar for the cheapest possible price, carports aren't the way to go. But there are other reasons an institution might adopt solar in their parking lots.

Michigan State's carports have won national and state awards, and account for 5% of the energy consumption on campus -- a step towards the university's sustainability goals and a nice round of good publicity. Several people I interviewed for this story suggested it might make the university more attractive to incoming students, though empirical evidence of the impact of a school's sustainability on a student choosing it is harder to find.

Recent research suggested that while 65% of consumers (not necessarily students) said they were interested in buying sustainable or green products, only 26% actually did so. While shopping habits and college choice might seem like apples and oranges, carport solar panels and green consumerism could be a perfect match where you get your literal apples and oranges.

Electric cars on the rise

The threat of climate change requires reducing greenhouse gas emissions rapidly. While many of the problems require systemic solutions, individuals are adopting green technology, like rooftop solar panels and electric cars, at accelerating rates. On top of the green benefits, both solar panels and electric vehicles are likely to save money over time. It's possible that stores with big parking lots could take economic advantage of both.

For example, a solar carport covering an average Walmart parking lot would have a capacity of about 3.1 megawatts, said Joshua Pearce, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Western University in London, Ontario.

Pearce modeled the viability of solar carports at big box stores, choosing Walmart for its ubiquity. The chain has also made public commitments to sustainability and is one of the leading corporations in solar capacity installed. Walmart says it has 600 onsite renewable energy installations, but didn't share information about planned or installed parking lot solar canopies. It has reportedly installed at least seven throughout California.

While it's hard to say if someone would opt for one retailer over another because of the environmental messaging of a large, visible solar array, would they if it meant parking out of the sun, snow or rain?

Pearce has a hunch they might, though his research hasn't looked at this question directly. He thinks stores might attract even more customers by providing discounted or free electric vehicle charging to shoppers.

An average Walmart parking lot could support about 100 electric vehicle chargers if covered in solar panels, Pearce's research found.

"I believe that if you're given free parking underneath the canopy that can charge your electric vehicle, you'll spend a little bit more time in the store because you're going to wait for it to get charged," he said. "Even if you only buy one thing, that will be a net profit for the store."

Pearce is looking to investigate this hunch in the near future by seeing what happens when charging is actually provided. Do nonelectric vehicles park there? Do people spend longer in the store?

In a future with free electric charging at Walmart (or another big-box store), shoppers could return home not just with their shopping haul but with more charge in their vehicle than when they left. According to a study by Pearce and a colleague, 90% of Americans live within 15 miles of a Walmart, and a one-hour shopping trip could provide a car with 20 miles of charge.

"This means that for many shoppers with an EV, the trip to Walmart and back would potentially have zero automobile-related energy costs," the researchers wrote.

While a world in which stores charge their customers' electric vehicles for free and make more money in the process sounds great, it's still hypothetical at this point.

There are hurdles to overcome, especially in retrofitting an existing parking lot with a solar canopy. It involves closing off parts of the parking lot while construction occurs, which potentially makes a store a more inconvenient choice, at least for a time.

Pearce echoed what Powers from Inovateus said: Accounting just for installation cost, right now it makes more sense to install on the store's roof than a solar farm on open ground.

"But then, if I don't want to take additional land, maybe I'm land constrained for some reason, then the parking lot is the way to go," Pearce said.

Potential change coming

"We see doing the carports in the parking lots as a great dual-use story," said Tyler Kanczuzewski, vice president of sustainability for Inovateus. Dual-use refers to the practice of using land for two things, for example, solar power and growing crops.

According to a study published in Nature, large-scale solar in the US is largely sited outside of cities. Fifty one percent of it is installed in deserts, 33% is on farmland and 2.5% is in urban areas.

Land use decisions are often fraught. Putting solar in deserts raises cultural and ecological concerns. Rural solar farms have stirred debates. Michigan State's installation kept 45 acres of agricultural land in production, a fact Michigan State called out in promoting one of the several awards it won for the array.

Parking lots, on the other hand, are mainly good for one thing -- parking -- and solar canopies arguably improve that experience.

Will increasing interest in sustainability make solar parking lots more common in the future?

"It's hard to project," Kanczuzewski said. While they're more common in the Southwest, installing solar over parking lots isn't terribly common in the Midwest where Inovateus does most of its business. By solar capacity, 95% of Inovateus's installations are ground-mounted utility projects. By number of projects, 65% are ground-mounted, 30% are rooftop and about 5% (just three projects total) are over parking lots.

"They're not a terribly common option," Powers said.

They could be a particularly sustainable one, though.

"I think it's super sustainable," Kanczuzewski said. "Rather than taking up new land or additional property, why not take an existing space and do solar?"


jrGroupDiscuss - desc
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Nerm_L    3 months ago

Yet another good idea that can't withstand practical scrutiny.  We're only trying to paper over the problem of climate change with good ideas.  If we are to succeed in drastically reducing carbon emissions then a fundamental shift in government policy will be required.  We can't address climate change without factories.  That should be the first priority of governments.

Professor Quiet
1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Nerm_L @1    3 months ago

That should be the first priority of governments.

If the government created factories to manufacture solar panels (for example), wouldn't that qualify the government as a socialist government?

Socialism is an economic system in which the government owns and controls manufacturing and is responsible for planning the economy.
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    3 months ago
If the government created factories to manufacture solar panels (for example), wouldn't that qualify the government as a socialist government?

Another idea that cannot be practically rectified with the governments' relationship with defense industries.  The military simply cannot fight wars without factories.  The government has adopted industrial policy to maintain and protect that manufacturing base.

Freshman Guide
1.1.2  George  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    3 months ago
If the government created factories to manufacture solar panels (for example), wouldn't that qualify the government as a socialist government?

Can you point out where he said that, because what I read was,

If we are to succeed in drastically reducing carbon emissions then a fundamental shift in government policy will be required.  We can't address climate change without factories.

We need to make it easier for private companies to build and operate factories. Not have an inefficient piece of crap like government operate them.

Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  George @1.1.2    3 months ago
Can you point out where he said that, because what I read was,

I could, but since it is the 1st comment in the thread, I think you can find it for yourself.

We need to make it easier for private companies to build and operate factories.

By throwing tax payer money at them?  

Freshman Guide
1.1.4  George  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.3    3 months ago
I could,

Then point out where he specifically said,

the government created factories to manufacture solar panels.

Not what you imagined he said, but that specific direction.

Freshman Guide
1.1.5  George  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.1    3 months ago

But they are still private industries suppling a need, the government says i need X and industries compete for that business, the same needs to happen with renewables. The argument can easily be made that the Grid is part of national security.

Freshman Silent
2  bccrane    3 months ago

I wonder what safeguards there are for putting high voltage, high amperage, DC circuits so close to the public.  We leased our land to a company that installs solar farms and the entire area where they may go has to be fenced in with three strand barbed wire on top to keep people out because of the dangers of electrocution.

Professor Participates
2.1  Freefaller  replied to  bccrane @2    3 months ago

I'm sure we can trust the general populace to behaive in a safe, responsible manner around these facilities :p


Who is online

pat wilson

32 visitors