╌>

The Trump era is one of GOP decline

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  last year  •  8 comments

By:   Timothy P. Carney (Washington Examiner via MSN)

The Trump era is one of GOP decline
 

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

Ignoring Hillary Clinton on the ballot in 2016 and the fact that Trump was on the ballot in 2020 doesn't encourage confidence in this political analysis.  Trump was a protest candidate in 2016 for the Republican base who had been betrayed by the party establishment and the TEA Party turncoats.    Like it or not, Clinton was a huge motivator for Republican turnout in 2016 when the Republican base was already pissed off and ready for an internal party fight.

Trump was on the ballot in 2020 and did not win.  Trump didn't provide coattails for Congressional candidates or down ballot Republicans by being on the ballot, either.  How could an incumbent President lose to a candidate that campaigned from their basement running on a 'not Trump' strategy?  

In just nine months following Trump's reelection in 2024, the MAGA movement has been totally replaced by TEA Party politics.  The TEA Party only had one good election in 2010.  The TEA Party has been a drag on Republicans since 2010.  Trump turning TEA Party now means Republicans won't be competitive in the 2026 mid-term election.  The TEA Party Republicans have already killed all their 'culture war' talking points so what are they going to run on?  Their record of the longest government shutdown in history?  After the mid-terms Trump will be a lame duck President with Democrats controlling one or both chambers of Congress.  And Trump's propensity for TEA Party strong-arm politics won't improve Republican prospects for 2028.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


President   Donald Trump   has dominated the   Republican Party   for a decade, and in many ways, it has been good for the GOP and conservatism.

Republicans won two of the three presidential elections (after losing two straight and four of six). Republicans control Congress, and for the first time in forever, the Supreme Court has a conservative majority. It even struck down Roe v. Wade.

Trump’s policy accomplishments are also real. Taxes are lower, especially for the middle class. Illegal immigration was controlled for four years, and it's getting under control again. And for the first time since the Cold War ended, we are avoiding senseless wars of choice.

But just as Trump’s policy record is mixed (increased spending, federal support for in vitro fertilization, oodles of corporate welfare), so is the Trump-era political record. If you step back from the current political balance in Washington, D.C., you see a troubling trend, highlighted by the recent blowouts in New Jersey and Virginia:

Republicans, in the Trump era, are mostly losing.

Yes, Trump wins. Yes, when Trump is on the ballot, the downballot Republicans get some lift from Trump. But when Trump isn’t on the ballot, the Trump era is a story of GOP loss.

This is a big problem for Republicans because Trump will never be on a ballot nationwide again. It’s very possible that after Trump is gone, Republicans will experience their darkest hour and lowest point since the New Deal.

Trump wins. Other Republicans lose

Here’s one measure of the partisan shift in the Trump era: In 2016, Republicans controlled 31 governorships and 68 legislative chambers. Come January, the GOP will control only 26 governorships and 57 legislative chambers (more than a 15% reduction on both scores).

In the Trump era, here’s the rule: Elections in which Trump is on the ballot, the GOP does fine. In elections in which he is not, the GOP does poorly.

This isn’t just about incumbent disadvantage in midterm elections. Even during former President Joe Biden’s presidency, when Trump was the head of the GOP, its most recent nominee, and its next nominee, Democrats historically performed well. For instance, in 2022, they gained trifectas in four states, taking control of the legislatures in   Michigan   and Minnesota, and winning the governorships of Maryland and Massachusetts — all while their party controlled the White House.

The best place to see Trump’s impact on realignment may be in the Great Lakes states.

Trump won in 2016 by pulling off upsets in three blue-leaning Rust Belt states — Michigan,   Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin. He won those states in large part by pulling in labor union voters and other non-college voters, a demographic that had been used by Democrats but had been politically homeless since the Clinton era.

But an interesting thing happened in 2018. The counties in Michigan that swung hardest from former President Barack Obama to Trump swung back to the Democrats in the midterm elections.

A dozen counties in Michigan flipped from Obama in 2012 to Trump in 2016. Half of them flipped back to Democrats in 2018. Almost all of them gave back a majority of the GOP gains.

Trump made the working-class whites of Macomb County into Trump voters, but he never made them into Republicans.

In 2016, Republicans controlled both legislative chambers and the governorship in Michigan. They had held this trifecta since the 2010 elections and had held the state House for basically forever.

During Trump’s first term, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) won the governorship, and her party won most of the other statewide positions. In 2022, Whitmer won easily, and Democrats took over both chambers and won every statewide office. By 2024, with Trump at the top of the ballot, Republicans were able to regain control of the lower chamber.

Likewise, consider the trajectory of Pennsylvania.

In 2014, the last midterm elections before Trump, Pennsylvania Democrats had a very good year. Former Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf knocked off incumbent Republican Tom Corbett. In 2022, the most recent midterm elections, Democrats also had a good year, as Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA) won a second term.


Over those eight years, you can see some of the realignment of the Trump era. The blue-collar counties in coal and steel country moved toward Republicans, while the white-bread counties outside of Philadelphia have moved toward Democrats.

These opposite shifts have not been symmetric, though. Pre-Trump, Republicans won the rural coal and steel counties of southwestern Pennsylvania (Westmoreland, Fayette, and Greene) by 6 points, and eight years later, the GOP won those counties by 8 points.

Compare that to the Trump-era blue shift in the suburbs.

Before Trump, in 2014, Republicans lost Philadelphia’s wealthy, heavily educated collar counties (Bucks, Chester, and Montgomery) by a combined 11 points. Eight years later, the GOP is losing them by 30 points.

Blue-collar Pennsylvania shifted 2 points toward the GOP, while white-collar Pennsylvania shifted 20 points toward the Democrats.


There are numerous special circumstances at play here, and the realignment — Democrats picking up the upper middle class while Republicans picked up the working class — had been underway for more than a decade before Trump arrived.

But this is the pattern. For Trump, the realignment nets out to a small win, which may trickle down the ballot. When Trump isn’t on the ballot, though, the net result is a massive gain for Democrats.

Liberal shift

Americans hold more liberal views today than they did when Trump came into office.

Back in 2015, only a slight majority of voters believed abortion should be legal in most or all cases, according to   a Pew Research survey . After 2016, the trend became more and more pro-choice, and by the time the Supreme Court struck down Roe in 2022, pro-choicers were at 61%. (The numbers have not moved much since then.)

Young women are becoming more Democratic and more liberal, especially on social matters. It’s easy to see how Trump could cause this.


If the man at the head of the pro-life army is a twice-divorced serial philanderer who brags about grabbing women by the private parts, then the pro-choice attack — that opposition to abortion is just about controlling women — sounds believable.

Likewise, as the marriage and birth rate collapse, there is a risk that a Trump-led GOP could polarize young women away from family formation. That would be a problem far more profound than the GOP’s political struggles.

As Matt Continetti wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “Independents have drifted away from [Trump] and his party” over the past 10 years. “He lost independents by 13 points in 2020 and by 3 points in 2024. Republican House candidates ... lost independents nationally by 12 points in 2018 and 2 points in 2022.”

Trump’s unique charisma carried him to victory twice, but at the same time, his demands for personal fealty, character, and lack of convictions changed the GOP in a way that will likely make it weaker in   the long run .


Red Box Rules

Be a good human.  Grossly derogatory comments, blatantly inflammatory comments, excessive trolling, mean-spirited taunting and insults, scamming, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed in compliance with the site's Terms of Service and the Code of Conduct.  The moderators have the final word.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    last year

The TEA Party has killed MAGA.  And MAGA was the only hope for Republicans in future elections.  Trump has Trumped himself; the ultimate screwup.  The TEA Party has run its course, there's nothing left.  There aren't any more taxes to cut, there isn't any 'culture war' to fight.  Do Republicans turn back the clock to neoliberal/neocon politics that weakened the country with Free Trade sellouts?  Do Republicans follow Trump's lead and double-down on destroying America to become a mirror image of Europe?  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2  Greg Jones    last year

The radical left wackos are destroying any advantage they might have gained over the Republican. . Not every right winger is a MAGA (whatever that word means) The Dems simply don't have the number of wackos they need to succeed, except in isolated and scattered races.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
2.1  George  replied to  Greg Jones @2    last year

What MAGA means to intelligent people who aren’t socialist or TDS sufferers is Make America Great Again, not continuing on the path of turning the country into a socialist shithole.

People stood in the streets and cheered when Chavez came to power, now their kids are eating out of trash cans. Democrats won’t be happy until the makers are as miserable and poor as the takers.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  George @2.1    last year
What MAGA means to intelligent people who aren’t socialist or TDS sufferers is Make America Great Again

MAGA has proven itself to simply be Trump defenders, they don't give a fuck about the country. All the MAGAites care about is supporting Trump and owning the libs. The "libs" they so desperately want to "own" are of course, actual Americans that the ignorant bigoted scum bags are jealous of, resent or hate simply because they don't bow down to the white conservative Christian patriarchy. But there is nothing "Great" about MAGA or "Great" about their disgusting Christo-fascist vision for America.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1.2  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.1    last year
MAGA has proven itself to simply be Trump defenders, they don't give a fuck about the country. All the MAGAites care about is supporting Trump and owning the libs. The "libs" they so desperately want to "own" are of course, actual Americans that the ignorant bigoted scum bags are jealous of, resent or hate simply because they don't bow down to the white conservative Christian patriarchy. But there is nothing "Great" about MAGA or "Great" about their disgusting Christo-fascist vision for America.

I live in TRUMP country.  But there aren't nearly as many signs on barns now.  Trump has already started to fade.  

You are aware that Biden kept some of Trump's MAGA policies.  And Biden shaped some of his own policies to be MAGA.  Trump is already a lame duck so running against Trump is rapidly becoming an obsolete strategy.

What is Democrats' vision for the future?  Are Democrats going to double down on globalization?  Are Democrats going to open the borders again?  At some point Democrats need to explain what they're for; not just what they're against.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2  Hallux  replied to  Greg Jones @2    last year
The Dems simply don't have the number of wackos they need to succeed,

That is matched by the 'republicans' having the number of "wackos" to fail. Welcome to the United States of SNAFU.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.3  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Greg Jones @2    last year
The radical left wackos are destroying any advantage they might have gained over the Republican. . Not every right winger is a MAGA (whatever that word means) The Dems simply don't have the number of wackos they need to succeed, except in isolated and scattered races.

That's one of the most amazing things about the situation.  Now is the perfect time to open the doors and revamp their party platform to address the drastically different electoral landscape.  But Democrats seem to be doubling down on stupid.

Even Joe Biden was smart enough to adopt some MAGA ideas.  But, nooooo ...  Zohran Mamdani ran on a 'not Trump' agenda.  But Trump is already a lame duck, he's just not that relevant any longer.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.3.1  Hallux  replied to  Nerm_L @2.3    last year
Zohran Mamdani ran on a 'not Trump' agenda.

He ran on a populist agenda, it's the road to success for all 'extremists' be they right or left.

 
 

Who is online