╌>

FBI Seizes $86 Million From Safe-Deposit Boxes, "Permanently Confiscated" | Wealth of Geeks

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  2 years ago  •  15 comments

By:   Claire Conway (Wealth of Geeks)

FBI Seizes $86 Million From Safe-Deposit Boxes, "Permanently Confiscated" | Wealth of Geeks
The FBI raided nearly 1,400 safe-deposit boxes at the U.S. Private Vaults store in Beverly Hills.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America

Holy shit. More deception.......................


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



September 28, 2022by Claire Conway

The FBI raided nearly 1,400 safe-deposit boxes at the U.S. Private Vaults store in Beverly Hills.

Invasion of Privacy


The Feds rummaged through the personal belongings of a jazz saxophone player, an interior designer, a retired doctor, two Century City lawyers, a flooring contractor, and hundreds of others. They took photos of items like password lists, credit cards, prenuptial agreements, pay stubs, immigration and vaccination records, heirlooms, bank statements, and even a will. Agents even discovered cremated human remains in one of the boxes.

Newly unsealed court documents have shown that FBI agents misled the judge who signed the warrant to raid the safe-deposit boxes. They did not disclose the fact that they planned to permanently confiscate everything inside every box that had at least $5,000 in cash or goods. The justification for the confiscation was the presumption that hundreds of unknown box holders were storing assets that may or may not be tied to unknown crimes.

Where's the Proof?


It took a total of five days for agents to finish filling their evidence bags. They collected more than $86 million in cash, gold, silver, rare coins, gem-studded jewelry, and plenty of expensive watches. The U.S. attorney's office tried to block public disclosure of court papers that exposed the deception, but the judge rejected the request to keep the documents sealed.

The deception originally came to light in FBI documents and depositions of agents in class action lawsuits by box holders who claim the raid violated their rights. Court filings also revealed that the federal agents defied restrictions put in place by U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim by searching through the owners' belongings for evidence of crimes.

Robert Frommer, a lawyer who is representing nearly 400 of the box holders, had this to say about the situation:

"The government did not know what was in those boxes, who owned them, or what, if anything, those people had done. That's why the warrant application did not even attempt to argue there was probable cause to seize and forfeit box renters' property."

The Original Investigation


The two-year investigation opened in 2019. The FBI LA office leaders believed that U.S. Private Vaults had become a magnet for criminals hiding their stolen goods in their boxes. The business was formally charged with conspiracy to sell drugs and launder money.

Denial of Wrongdoing


The FBI and the U.S. attorney's office deny any wrongdoing, saying that they had no obligation to disclose their plans for indiscriminate confiscation to the judge. They defended their actions on the blanket assumption that every customer was hiding crime-tainted assets.

FBI spokeswoman Laura Eimiller said the warrants were lawfully executed "based on allegations of widespread criminal wrongdoing."

"At no time was a magistrate misled as to the probable cause used to obtain the warrants," she said.

U.S. Private Vaults plead guilty to conspiracy to launder drug money, and the investigation is ongoing. Plaintiffs in the class-action suit have asked District Judge R. Gary Klausner to declare the raid unconstitutional. If the judge grants the request, the FBI will be forced to hand over all of the assets that it confiscated in the raid.

The ruling would also block any criminal investigations by preventing prosecutors from using any evidence or information acquired in the raid, including guns and drugs.

This article was produced and syndicated by Wealth of Geeks.

Claire Conway

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    2 years ago
"Newly unsealed court documents have shown that FBI agents misled the judge who signed the warrant to raid the safe-deposit boxes. They did not disclose the fact that they planned to permanently confiscate everything inside every box that had at least $5,000 in cash or goods. The justification for the confiscation was the presumption that hundreds of unknown box holders were storing assets that may or may not be tied to unknown crimes.

What in the holy shit!!!!!!!

No Trump or supporters.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    2 years ago

The FBI are a criminal organization unto themselves.

The law has been thrown out the window. I suggest they watch that "evidence" very closely so that it doesn't be a part some agents' retirement funds.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
1.2  Drakkonis  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    2 years ago

It's hard to believe that this case, if accurate, won't do a thing to educate the Left on why the Second Amendment exists. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    2 years ago
"Newly unsealed court documents have shown that FBI agents misled the judge who signed the warrant to raid the safe-deposit boxes" - wealthofgeeks.com

vs

"At no time was a magistrate misled as to the probable cause used to obtain the warrants," - FBI spokeswoman Laura Eimiller
"U.S. Private Vaults plead guilty to conspiracy to launder drug money"

And yet all the right wing conservatives who claim to support law enforcement are declaring the FBI are the "real criminals" just because they had the gall to investigate a conservative politician.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
1.3.1  pat wilson  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.3    2 years ago

We see this all the time, a rush to outrage over a story long before the entire story comes to light.

I'm sure a lot of these safe deposit boxes were owned by people innocent of crimes and that all needs to be sorted out. That's when we'll get the factual story.

Bottom line, if you want to use a safe deposit box, go to an established bank, not some fly-by-night money laundering set-up fronting as a legitimate business.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.3.2  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  pat wilson @1.3.1    2 years ago

What didn’t you understand about permanently confiscated. They aren’t getting their stuff back. You REALLY okay with that??

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
1.3.3  pat wilson  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.2    2 years ago

I don't think we have the whole story yet.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
1.3.4  pat wilson  replied to  pat wilson @1.3.3    2 years ago

Besides if it turns out the stuff was stolen and or part of a laundering scheme then the FBI will keep it...as do many police departments across the country in other asset seizure cases.

I do think there a lot these cases where law enforcement was in the wrong.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.3    2 years ago
"Newly unsealed court documents have shown that FBI agents misled the judge who signed the warrant to raid the safe-deposit boxes" - wealthofgeeks.com

And as we all know...IT WOULDN"T BE THE FIRST TIME!

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.3.6  Ronin2  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.3    2 years ago
They did not disclose the fact that they planned to permanently confiscate everything inside every box that had at least $5,000 in cash or goods. The justification for the confiscation was the presumption that hundreds of unknown box holders were storing assets that may or may not be tied to unknown crimes.

The FBI still has to prove that every last person that rented a lock box was a part of a criminal activity. They don't get to "assume" that everyone is guilty. 

Or doesn't innocent until proven guilty mean shit to the left these days?

It sure as hell doesn't to the FBI.

 
 
 
MonsterMash
Sophomore Quiet
2  MonsterMash    2 years ago

Under Democratic party rule FBI=KGB

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2.1  Gsquared  replied to  MonsterMash @2    2 years ago

The scheme was initiated in 2019 under the fascist Republican regime.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Gsquared @2.1    2 years ago

You think Trump or Republicans control the FBI? jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

In case you missed it 2019 plus 2 years equals what again?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  MonsterMash @2    2 years ago
FBI=KGB

Correction - FBI = Gestapo.  Seems more accurate.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3  George    2 years ago

It’s hard to steal from the producers to redistribute to the takers without actually stealing the wealth first. 

 
 

Who is online

Vic Eldred
Sean Treacy
Jeremy Retired in NC
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
JBB


98 visitors