Jen Psaki dealt a blow in free speech court case | Washington Examiner
By: Big Tech (Washington Examiner)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki was dealt a legal blow Friday in her bid to quash a subpoena pertaining to a free speech case championed by Big Tech skeptics.
A federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, spurned her arguments, which were backed by the Justice Department, that she had nothing significant to offer the attorneys general, and the case was returned to Louisiana where the deposition demand against Psaki was approved.
FAUCI, JEN PSAKI, AND TOP BIDEN OFFICIALS TO BE DEPOSED IN FREE SPEECH CASE
At the heart of Psaki's argument was the notion that the subpoena for deposition amounted to an undue burden on her.
"How much time does it take to prepare a witness for deposition when she doesn't really have anything to say?"U.S. Magistrate Ivan Davis asked, per CBS.
Last month, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana approved the bid from the Republican attorneys general to depose Psaki, alongside Dr. Anthony Fauci and a handful of other Biden administration officials. The judge who gave the go-ahead had been appointed by former President Donald Trump.
Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry sought the deposition for a free speech case filed in May. The pair has alleged the Biden administration collaborated with Big Tech to quell speech about COVID-19, election integrity, and other topics unfairly.
Psaki had stoked ire from conservatives last year when she claimed at the White House podium that the administration was "flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation." The Republican pair has sought additional information about the Biden administration's content flagging apparatus.
Attorneys for Psaki maintained that the two attorneys general have already amassed most of what they needed from materials that have been given to them, CBS reported.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Eleven lawyers for Psaki reportedly participated in a courtroom hearing Friday on the matter, but she was not present.
A DOJ lawyer has hinted he will appeal the ruling, per reports. The Washington Examiner reached out to representatives for Schmitt and Landry for comment.
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed
Tags
Who is online
33 visitors
I guess flat out stating your are censoring free speech from the WH is not what you are supposed to say (or do).
Anything that goes against the left's narrative is classified as "disinformation."
And if you go against that narrative, you will be shouted down, trolled, stalked or even prosecuted.
Remember all the ex-Intell officials who claimed in a letter that the Hunter Laptop story seemed to be Russian disinformation?
Bret Baier actually caught up with one of them:
Would love to know WTF the overly partisan DOJ has to do with this case; and why they are defending Psaki on the tax payer's dime?
She was the spokesperson for this dumpster fire administration. Her mistake was actually saying what they are doing out loud.
Chicken shit...
Were the words, statements, accusations by 'The Big Tech Skeptics' true or accurate?