╌>

Judge slashes millions in damages due by hate groups that participated in Charlottesville rally | Washington Examiner

  
Via:  Jeremy in NC  •  2 years ago  •  10 comments

By:   Washington Examiner

Judge slashes millions in damages due by hate groups that participated in Charlottesville rally | Washington Examiner
A federal judge has drastically reduced the amount of money in damages that some of the country's most prominent white supremacist groups were ordered to pay for their participation in the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



A federal judge has drastically reduced the amount of money in damages that some of the country's most prominent white supremacist groups were ordered to pay for their participation in the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Judge Norman Moon ruled last week that the $24 million in punitive damages ordered by a jury in November 2021 be reduced to $350,000. Moon kept the compensatory damages at $2 million, bringing the total owed to $2.35 million — $23.65 million less than what the jury awarded.

In his ruling, Moon cited a 1988 law that that caps the limit of civil damages to $350,000, saying that juries should not be told of the limit and that even if a jury returns a much harsher financial punishment, the judge should reduce it in accordance with the law.

Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond School of Law professor, told the Washington Post that the drastic cut could cripple the purpose of punitive damages, which are in place to rebuke a defendant's bad behavior.

"The whole point is to send a message to society, to other people who might engage in similar future behavior of that sort," he said. "And in this particular moment in time, that's really important with the rise of white supremacists. That's what's really at stake."

Hundreds of white nationalists showed up in Charlottesville on Aug. 11-12, 2017, for a rally pitched publicly to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee. During their march on the University of Virginia campus, white nationalists chanted, "Jews will not replace us," circled counter protesters, and threw tiki torches at them.

The lawsuit that followed was funded by Integrity First for America, a nonprofit organization formed in response to the Charlottesville rally.

The federal trial in Charlottesville, which began in the fall of 2021, lasted more than a month. The defendants repeatedly used the n-word, praised Adolf Hitler, and called for an all-white ethnostate.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 years ago
In his ruling, Moon cited a 1988 law that that caps the limit of civil damages to $350,000, saying that juries should not be told of the limit and that even if a jury returns a much harsher financial punishment, the judge should reduce it in accordance with the law.

Sounds like somebody overstepped.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    2 years ago

$24 million would be symbolic. Where are these people ever going to come up with that kind of money. Even the maximum of $350,000 would be a stretch.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
2  bbl-1    2 years ago

Judge Norman Moon, huh?  Speaking of 'activist courts'.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bbl-1 @2    2 years ago

Keeping things within the law is a problem for you?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1    2 years ago

When it doesn't match what the left wants; always.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.2  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1.1    2 years ago

Thats usually when those SJW idiots come crawling out like roaches.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  bbl-1  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1    2 years ago

No.  But apparently it is a problem for you.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.4  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bbl-1 @2.1.3    2 years ago

And exactly where did I indicate this?

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
2.1.5  bbl-1  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.4    2 years ago

The jury rendered a decision based with a specific purpose.  The judge over ruled that decision.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  bbl-1 @2.1.5    2 years ago

As was his legal right to do so, since the amount awarded violated the law.

 
 

Who is online



75 visitors