╌>

House removes Ilhan Omar from Foreign Affairs Committee in party-line vote | Washington Examiner

  
Via:  Jeremy in NC  •  2 years ago  •  8 comments

By:   Washington Examiner

House removes Ilhan Omar from Foreign Affairs Committee in party-line vote | Washington Examiner
The House passed a resolution to remove progressive Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) from her position on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs in a party-line vote on Wednesday.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The House passed a resolution to remove progressive Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) from her position on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs in a party-line vote on Wednesday.

Top Republicans had vowed to remove her from the panel, citing her inflammatory remarks made in 2019 about Israel, with the Minnesota Democrat having suggested politicians who support the Jewish state are motivated by campaign dollars — remarks that were slammed as antisemitic by members on both sides of the aisle.

The House voted 218-211, with one Republican, Rep. David Joyce (R-OH), a member of the Ethics Committee, voting "present."

Ahead of the vote, Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS) said Democrats set a "dangerous precedent" in removing two Republicans from their committee assignments last session of Congress but argued the Thursday vote on Omar was not comparable because the GOP resolution was narrowly tailored and allows her to remain on other panels.

"Today's resolution as it relates to Rep. Omar details six statements she made as a sitting member of Congress that, under the totality of the circumstances, disqualify her from serving on the Committee on Foreign Affairs," he said on the floor.

"The Committee on Foreign Affairs is a prestigious committee viewed by nations around the world, both allies and adversaries, as speaking for Congress on matters of international importance and national security," he added. "All members, both Republican and Democrats alike, who seek to serve on Foreign Affairs should be held to the highest standard of conduct due to the international sensitivity and national security concerns under the jurisdiction of this committee."

Top Democrats slammed the move as "political retribution" in the wake of their 2021 decision to remove Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and Paul Gosar (R-AZ) from their committee assignments after a string of controversies.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) blasted the resolution, noting a handful of Republicans have made similar comments during a press conference ahead of the vote on Thursday. He brought up how the House previously voted on a broad resolution condemning antisemitism shortly after Omar's remarks four years ago.

"Rep. Omar certainly has made mistakes. She has used antisemitic tropes that were clearly and unequivocally condemned by House Democrats when it took place four years ago. But what's going to take place on the floor today is not a public policy debate. It's not about accountability. It's about political revenge," he said while surrounded by signs showing past inflammatory remarks of GOP members.

"It's a double, triple, quadruple, and beyond standard when you think about all of the members. These are just three who have engaged in highly offensive and, at times, antisemitic behavior, rhetoric, hate, including making reference, the gentlewoman from Georgia, to Hitler and Nazis and drawing an incredibly dangerous and false equivalence between Hitler, Nazis, and President Joe Biden," he added.

The decision to bring the measure to the floor comes after days of uncertainty over whether it had enough GOP support to pass, with multiple members voicing reservations about the move.

Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN) opted to change from a "no" to a "yes" after language was added to provide the removed member with the "right to bring a case before the Committee on Ethics as grounds for an appeal to the Speaker of the House for reconsideration of any committee removal decision." It is unclear how the appeal would work since the House, not the speaker, approves standing committee positions. Reps. Ken Buck (R-CO) and Nancy Mace (R-SC), the other two public holdouts, also changed their votes in the hours before it came to the floor.

McCarthy previously removed Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA) unilaterally from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, citing Schiff's handling of the investigations into former President Donald Trump's alleged ties to Russia and Swalwell's relationship with an alleged Chinese spy. Schiff and Swalwell have repeatedly insisted they did nothing wrong.

While McCarthy has the ability to remove members from a select committee, taking a member off of a standing committee requires a full House vote.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 years ago
"The Committee on Foreign Affairs is a prestigious committee viewed by nations around the world, both allies and adversaries, as speaking for Congress on matters of international importance and national security," he added. "All members, both Republican and Democrats alike, who seek to serve on Foreign Affairs should be held to the highest standard of conduct due to the international sensitivity and national security concerns under the jurisdiction of this committee."

So it only makes sense to remove an anti-Semite from the committee.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    2 years ago

A move that is long overdue.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    2 years ago
"It's a double, triple, quadruple, and beyond standard when you think about all of the members. These are just three who have engaged in highly offensive and, at times, antisemitic behavior, rhetoric, hate, including making reference, the gentlewoman from Georgia, to Hitler and Nazis and drawing an incredibly dangerous and false equivalence between Hitler, Nazis, and President Joe Biden," he added.

The brazen hypocrisy of leftists.

However, Rep. Brad Schneider, D-Ill., who introduced the resolution Thursday, and those who joined him must have short memories. For more than four years, several of his Democratic congressional colleagues, multiple members of the political party's friends in the media and hundreds of others in the Democratic intelligentsia made it a practice to compare President Donald Trump to Hitler, his followers to Nazis and his plans to the Holocaust.

The Illinois congressman had introduced another censure resolution against Greene in 2021 when she compared COVID-19 mask mandates to the Holocaust, but he dropped it when Greene apologized for the remark after visiting the Holocaust Memorial Museum.

On Thursday, Schneider was joined by four colleagues in sponsoring the resolution, including Rep. Nikema Williams, D-Ga. Williams was in Chattanooga Saturday as the featured speaker at the Hamilton County Democratic Party's Kefauver Dinner. But we're sure none of fellow Democrats asked her if her sponsorship of the resolution seemed hypocritical given what was heaped on Trump.

How widespread was it when Trump was in office? Here are just a few instances:

› In 2020, U.S. Rep. Harley Rouda, D-Calif., in a virtual chat with supporters, said he'd visited the National Museum in Berlin, where the displays noted that Hitler had come to power through an election and that he'd then begun criticizing minorities and the press. And now that's what Trump was doing, he said.

"I'm scared by it," he said. "I am scared that every single day we are taking one more step towards fascism."

› In 2019, U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., told an NAACP gathering that "Americans, particularly Black Americans, can't afford to make [the] same mistake about the harm that could be done by a man named Hitler or a man named Trump."

It was one of several comparisons to Trump and Nazis he made during the speech.

In 2019, in an interview with NBC News, U.S. Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., noted that he had previously brought up the rise of Hitler while discussing America's political climate.

"Adolf Hitler was elected chancellor of Germany," he then told NBC. "And he went about the business of discrediting institutions to the point that people bought into it. Nobody would have believed it now. But swastikas hung in churches throughout Germany. We had better be very careful."

› In 2019, U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said Trump had talked about immigrants bringing in drugs and being responsible for crime.

He then said: "This is the same type of propaganda that we heard in the 1920s and World War I against Jews. 'Jews are Bolsheviks. Jews are thieves. Jews are violent' -- that was the propaganda. ... Now, we're hearing it against this generation's immigrants -- and it's just as false now."

In 2018 when asked about Trump proclaiming himself a "nationalist," U.S. Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., said, "It reminds me of the kinds of words that came from people like Hitler, who thought that in Germany he was a nationalist, and the kinds of people that this president seems to like, and those who are repressive dictators, those are the individuals that generally use that kind of phrase and those kinds of words."

› In 2016, U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., said the U.S. electorate should read up on how German people elected Hitler in the 1930s to gain a better understanding of how an educated society "can elect a demagogue."

Defensively, he added, "I'm not saying that Donald Trump is necessarily Hitler. I'm not saying that."

Such citations are legion.

Democrats can STFU and take their damn medicine! They created the rules under which their party members are being removed. Did they think McCarthy was just going to drop those rules now that Republicans control the House and let Democrats slide?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ronin2 @2    2 years ago

The Democrats don't like it when their rules are applied to them.  In reality, this has been fun watching how out of touch the Democrats are.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Ronin2 @2    2 years ago

Cue certain members telling us that Omar never said those things and that she and the others of the squad are not amti Semitic and have just been misunderstood.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

Always a good day when an anti American racist loses some power.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    2 years ago

It's even better when they lose it by their own rules.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

She was a bigot!

 
 

Who is online

fineline
Sean Treacy


58 visitors