House Republicans unveil proposed cuts amid debt limit fight | The Hill
By: Aris Folley (The Hill)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Republicans on the House Budget Committee recently unveiled potential areas of spending the party could target as a battle over raising the nation's debt limit heats up Capitol Hill.
The Republicans released a list of proposed items they targeted as "wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary federal spending" on Wednesday, including proposals like recapturing unspent pandemic response funds and ending so-called woke funding.
"President Biden must acknowledge the spending crisis he helped create and responsibly negotiate with House Republicans on a new budgetary framework oriented around fiscal restraint," the lawmakers said in a statement.
One featured proposal sought to save about $65 billion by capping ObamaCare subsidies "at 400 percent of poverty and below while recovering overpayments," while other pitches were aimed at clawing back funds for the Environmental Protection Agency in the Democrats' Inflation Reduction Act.
Other proposals include targeting "fraud" in the child tax credit (CTC) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by requiring Social Security numbers for the CTC recipients and income verification for SNAP beneficiaries — an idea GOP lawmakers estimated could save "roughly $70 billion."
The GOP lawmakers are also pushing to cut "woke-waste" — what they described as "woke policies that American taxpayers shouldn't be footing the bill for" — that were a part of the bipartisan $1.7 trillion government funding bill passed in December.
That section specifically details $1.2 million for "LGBTQIA+ Pride Centers," $1 million for a "space for gender-expansive people of color" and $750,000 for "Transgender and Gender nonconforming and Intersex (TGI) immigrant women in Los Angeles." It also noticeably targets $3.6 million for a trail named after former first lady Michelle Obama in Georgia.
"Probably because it had something to do with Michelle Obama and less they just are against nature in general," Rep. Dan Kildee (D-Mich.), a member of the House Budget Committee, told The Hill.
The release also featured other proposals that Republicans have floated in recent days, including additional work requirements for certain welfare programs like SNAP, as well as the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.
Republicans argued the nation could "save tens of billions and spur economic growth" by bringing more Americans into the workforce. But the proposal didn't include further details about the proposed work requirements.
The push came a day after Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) led a group of four other conservatives — Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Dan Bishop (N.C.), Lauren Boebert (Colo.) and Norman — in a letter to President Biden ahead of his State of the Union on Tuesday urging "structural reforms" for SNAP to cut spending amid debt ceiling talks.
The letter urged Biden to "enact work requirements as a feature of welfare reform," while structural reforms to SNAP would "better position funding for people in need while incentivizing able-bodied people to return to the workforce."
However, other Republicans are skeptical of the plans.
In comments with The Hill on Wednesday, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.) called the letter an "irrelevant proposal," while noting people have a requirement for SNAP benefits "based on financial distress."
"God bless them, you know, one of the things that everybody suffers from here from time to time, and I get it because I've done it, is you don't know what you don't know," he said, adding: "We already have them. They have work requirements."
The proposals come as House Republicans have been facing pressure to present firm ideas over where the party wants to curb government spending amid a partisan, high-stakes battle over the raising the debt limit.
Tags
Who is online
67 visitors
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Trump and his supporters are off limits.
No, that's not divisive in the least.
WTF is that?
No, THAT'S not a waste of taxpayer money?
This is the way "the people's business" is to be done. Budgets are to be negotiated, out in the open, long before a budget is put on the table for a vote.
The biggest problem with the debt limit is that too many in Congress view it as permission to spend. Increasing the debt limit does not provide additional revenue. But too many in Congress make plans to increase spending up to the new debt limit as though it were new revenue.
Prudent governance would establish spending limits to stay under the newly increased debt limit. But that's not what Democrats want. Democrats want a 'clean' increase to the debt limit without any fiscal constraints. Which only indicates that Democrats view the newly increased debt limit as additional revenue with permission to spend it all.
That doesn't foster trust on other areas such as taxes. If Democrats view taxes the same way they view the debt limit then there will never be enough. Democrats would waste revenue from new taxes the same way they plan to spend to the new debt limit. Taxing the rich 100 pct wouldn't satisfy Democrats' desire to spend; eventually they'd have to raise taxes on everyone and everything the same way Democrats want a 'clean' increase in the debt limit.