Congress takes first shot at federal censorship: a moratorium on DOJ payments to social media | Just The News
By: John Solomon (Just The News)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Stunned by a growing body of evidence showing federal pressure to silence Americans' voices online, House Republicans have unleashed their first legislation to slow government requests to Big Tech to censor content.
The ELON Act, introduced this month by Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) and backed by nine other cosponsors, would impose a one-year moratorium on taxpayer payments from the Justice Department to social media firms as well as require an audit on how much money changed hands since the start of 2015 between DOJ and Big Tech firms.
The legislation comes weeks after the blockbuster revelation that the FBI paid more than $3 million to Twitter to compensate that firm for handling a large number of censorship requests dating to the 2020 election.
"Who would ever have thought that the FBI would be paying Big Tech companies, you know, for their 'advice' or their counsel to the tune of millions upon millions of dollars?" asked Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) in an interview with Just the News.
"What they're doing is what the government cannot do directly," he added. "And that is they are doing government by proxy, or censorship by proxy. And this is 100% a violation of the Constitution."
Boebert said the body of evidence that has emerged in the Twitter Files released by Elon Musk shows the FBI and other agencies have engaged in far deeper censorship than just the October 2020 blocking of stories related to Hunter Biden's laptop.
"Big Tech is in bed with the FBI and other agencies to the point where Congress can't tell where one ends and the other begins," Boebert said. "The millions of dollars sent to Twitter that we know of during an election cycle, when they were at the same time censoring the Hunter Biden laptop from hell, is incredibly concerning.
"We must expose the incestuous relationship between Big Tech and the federal government. My bill does exactly that."
At a hearing earlier this month, former Twitter executives said it was an egregious mistake to have censored the true stories about Hunter Biden's laptop. But the censorship exposed by Musk since he took over the social media giant goes far deeper.
"Government paid Twitter millions of dollars to censor info from the public," Musk tweeted, referring to a bombshell report by independent journalist Michael Shellenberger that exposed an internal Twitter email with the subject line "Run the business - we made money!" The message informed then-Twitter Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker that the FBI paid Twitter $3.42 million between October 2019 and February 2021.
The FBI confirmed payments, saying they were a "reimbursement" for the "reasonable costs and expenses associated with their response to a legal process ... For complying with legal requests, and a standard procedure." FBI officials also stated that Twitter wasn't the only social media company to get tax dollars. "We don't just reimburse Twitter," the bureau said.
The Exposing Lewd Outlays for Social Networking Companies Act, or ELON Act, requires the U.S. comptroller general to submit a report to Congress on all taxpayer payments made by DOJ since Jan. 1, 2015, to Twitter, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Apple.
The proposed legislation also places a one-year moratorium on any new DOJ payments to these companies.
Tags
Who is online
40 visitors
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed.
"Just the News" is a far right wing fascist propaganda source.
When you can't dispute a damn thing in the article go after the source.
Any chance you can comment on the actual article? Maybe offer some insight as to why you think it should not be done or is false?
The Twitter Files show exactly what transpired. Who reports it is irrelevant.
And we are supposed to NOT think this was some form of election interference on the part of a partisan branch of the DOJ?
I love how all the worst most derpended rightwingers get all excited about every hairbrained nitwit nincompoop krazyass thing the gop proposes, as if the Senate would pass it and Biden will sign off on it.
And I love how the worst most derpended leftwingers get all excited and bent out of shape by every crazy nitwit hairbrained nincompoop thing that members of the GOP proposes, as if even the House would pass it much less the Senate or Biden signing off on it. Case in point, the idea of a national divorce from MTG.
Maybe don't live in glass houses...
You could have just said that you agreed!
Or I could have just said that idiots from both the GOP and the Democrats get all excited over the stupid ideas that come from members of each party and then get their sycophants to harp on about it.
ditto
Would that be like posting article after article about "smoking guns" that turn out to be less than a fizzle?
Yup. It just wasn't government requested censorship like Trump asked them to do.
In the land of false equivalencies Democrats and leftists reign supreme!
Requesting isn't the same thing as acting on. Brandon and his administration requested Twitter silence people as well; and guess what- as the articles show Twitter acted on those requests! Also, the Trump administration never paid Twitter 3 million dollars to block political opponents content like the FBI did.
But keep up the spin; it is all you have.
Oh how cute. The "they did it too" whining has started.
Not at all. I pointed out that they (democrats) DID NOT do it, but that the Trump administration DID.
I'd agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
See post 5.1. Democrats not only did it. Their requests were listened to and acted on.
Now prove any Trump or Republican requests were acted on.
We can wait.
Acted on???????????
Pretty sure that I wiil always fight against all far-right fasism
So you will do that by supporting the government giving millions of taxpayer dollars to a billion dollar corporation to suppress political speech?
You might want to look up the definition of fascism.
To the left, Fascism can only apply to the right. no matter how fascist their behavior is.
Yawn, glad to see they are going after actual problems.