╌>

Former Jurupa Valley High School teacher says she was fired for not hiding students' gender preferences from parents - ABC7 Los Angeles

  
Via:  Jeremy in NC  •  2 years ago  •  22 comments

By:   abc (ABC Los Angeles)

Former Jurupa Valley High School teacher says she was fired for not hiding students' gender preferences from parents - ABC7 Los Angeles
"And I said, 'Are you asking me to lie to parents?' And they said 'Yes,'" Tapia said outside Jurupa Valley High.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


JURUPA VALLEY, Calif. (KABC) -- A former Jurupa Valley High School teacher is speaking out after she says she was fired for not hiding students' gender transitions and identities from parents.

Jessica Tapia was fired for refusing to follow a state law that forbids teachers from talking to parents about their child's gender choices without consent from the student.

"And I said, 'Are you asking me to lie to parents?' And they said 'Yes,'" Tapia said outside Jurupa Valley High.

AB 1266 was passed in 2014. It says schools can't tell parents about their children's gender identity without first asking the student.

Assemblyman Bill Essayli from Riverside is now introducing new legislation. He says he wants to protect parental rights so parents know what's going on with their children.

"Concealing information from parents is not only wrong, it's dangerous and harmful to the emotional and physical safety of trans minors," Essayli said, standing next to Tapia during a press conference.

Tapia said parents need to be involved during this time.

"We are talking about minors. Their brain is not fully developed. The decision-making portal in that brain is not fully developed, and they need their parents at this time for everything," she said. "Everything they're going through, mentally, emotionally physically, spiritually, you name it."

Tapia is planning to sue the school district for wrongful termination.

The Jurupa Unified School District sent a statement that said, in part: "...all students and staff enjoy the right to privacy under the Constitutions of the United States and California. While individuals may elect to disclose their personal information to the public, the District is prohibited from doing so."

"The District's actions related to Ms. Tapia were based on its obligations under current state and federal law which protects student privacy and requires the District to provide a discrimination-free learning environment to students."

"The law will reset the appropriate relationship between educators and parents, and reaffirm that children are the domain of their parents, not the government," Essayli said.

Some parents at the school think they need to know what their children are doing.

"Parents should absolutely be involved in all the decisions that their kids make," parent Peggy Bigby Lamberth said. "Right now, kids are influenced by the media, by their friends, by just a lot of mixed messages."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 years ago

So, tell me again how schools aren't targeting children again.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    2 years ago

Targeting? Schools were literally created for the benefit of children. People go into the teaching business because they care about that mission. Stop spreading this nonsense that schools are out to hurt children.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @1.1    2 years ago
People go into the teaching business because they care about that mission.

Then explain why a school administration would want to keep ANY information from parents.  

Stop spreading this nonsense that schools are out to hurt children.

Please feel free to prove it as nonsense.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.2  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.1    2 years ago
Then explain why a school administration would want to keep ANY information from parents.  

They’re afraid parents will abuse kids. That actually happens, you know. 

But that does not mean schools are “targeting” kids. 

Please feel free to prove it as nonsense.  

No, I think it’s on you to prove that schools are out to hurt kids. I don’t need to disprove obvious bullshit.

When you went to school, were you “targeted?” Sheesh!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.3  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.2    2 years ago
They’re afraid parents will abuse kids.

That's a pathetic stretch and you know it.  Do better.

No, I think it’s on you to prove that schools are out to hurt kids.

And there's the answer I was expecting.  You CAN'T show it's nonsense.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.4  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.3    2 years ago
That's a pathetic stretch and you know it.

You’re wrong.

Disparities in Childhood Abuse Between Transgender and Cisgender Adolescents

Transgender adolescents (TGAs) exhibit disproportionate levels of mental health problems compared with cisgender adolescents (CGAs), but psychosocial processes underlying mental health disparities among TGAs remain understudied. We examined self-reported childhood abuse among TGAs compared with CGAs and risk for abuse within subgroups of TGAs in a nationwide sample of US adolescents.
RESULTS

Seventy-three percent of TGAs reported psychological abuse, 39% reported physical abuse, and 19% reported sexual abuse. Compared with heterosexual CGAs, TGAs had higher odds of psychological abuse (odds ratio [OR] = 1.84), physical abuse (OR = 1.61), and sexual abuse (OR = 2.04). Within separate subgroup analyses, transgender males and nonbinary adolescents assigned female at birth had higher odds of reporting psychological abuse than CGAs.

CONCLUSIONS
In a nationwide online sample of US adolescents, TGAs had elevated rates of psychological, physical, and sexual abuse compared with heterosexual CGAs. Risk for psychological abuse was highest among TGAs assigned female at birth. In the future, researchers should examine how more frequent experiences of abuse during childhood could contribute to disproportionate mental health problems observed within this population.
 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.5  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.3    2 years ago
You CAN'T show it's nonsense.

You made a claim that schools are targeting kids and it’s somehow up to me to prove you wrong? Horseshit! Why isn’t it up to you to prove your own claim?

That’s not how this works. You don’t just go around saying whatever outrageous bullshit you can imagine and then challenge other people to disprove it.

Suppose I called you a child molester. Would it be up to me to prove it? Or up to you to disprove it?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.6  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.5    2 years ago
You made a claim that schools are targeting kids and it’s somehow up to me to prove you wrong?

The article is my proof.  You're the one that claimed it was nonsense.  So lets see why you think it's nonsense.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.7  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.6    2 years ago
The article is my proof.

No it isn’t. You continue to say empty, unsupported bullshit. If you care to persuade people, have a take and support it with evidence. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    2 years ago

Democrats think their indoctrination centers know what is better for children than their parents. 

This is proof of it.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    2 years ago

So many leftist run school districts seem willing to fall upon their swords in their determination to indoctrinate little kids with harmful progressive propaganda. This is very similar to what happened in Germany with the Hitler Youth.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

The state takes over parenting. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    2 years ago

And punishing parents and teachers who dare stand against them.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
4.2  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    2 years ago

I blame the teacher unions.    Strong lobbies that threaten politicians that don’t goosestep to their narrative.   

Pitting teachers agains parents and worse yet the kids they are suppose to be teaching not indoctrinating.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
5  Sparty On    2 years ago

The unforeseen side effect of COVID-19.

Parents discovery of their children’s schools indoctrination programs

Doh!

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
7  charger 383    2 years ago

If they can't tell parents about something this important, why do they bother sending home report cards? 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  charger 383 @7    2 years ago

They are giving 50% credit for doing no work, well that, is unless they mention that a somebody born female is female and somebody born male is male.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

Where are all the liberals telling the state of California to stop telling them how to raise their kids? 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8.2  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    2 years ago

That’d be me. I don’t approve of laws like this, and I have said so here.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9  Tacos!    2 years ago

We’ve had seeds on this topic before, so I’ll briefly summarize what I said then. I am not in favor of hiding gender issues from the parents. Parents should have a chance to parent.

I understand the fear that parents will be abusive or unsupportive, but kids already have rights in the face of parental abuse. The healthiest thing can happen is for parents to be engaged, hopefully in a loving and supportive role.

I also don’t think teachers should be put in a position where they need to be anything other than honest with a parent. in the 

 
 

Who is online








Igknorantzruls
Kavika
JohnRussell
George


37 visitors