Harvey Weinstein's felony sex crime charges overturned by NY's highest court
By: New York (New York Post)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Harvey Weinstein's New York rape conviction was overturned Thursday by New York state's highest court, which ordered that the disgraced Hollywood mogul should face a new trial.
In a 4-3 ruling, the New York State Court of Appeals found that a Manhattan judge "erroneously" allowed testimony from three women whose allegations weren't connected to the case.
The trial judge, James Burke, also "compounded that error" by ruling that the former Hollywood producer, if he chose to testify, could be grilled on the witness stand "about those allegations as well as numerous allegations of misconduct that portrayed defendant in a highly prejudicial light."
3New York's highest court ordered Thursday that Weinstein should face a new trial. AP
"The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial," the appeals court said.
The court was looking to see whether allowing the other women to testify would be valuable for jurors to understand Weinstein's "intent" to carry out the crime — something Weinstein's lawyers said would unfairly "prejudice" the jury.
Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, told the New York Times that the decision was "not just a victory for Mr. Weinstein, but for every criminal defendant in the state of New York, and we compliment the Court of Appeals for upholding the most basic principles that a criminal defendant should have in a trial."
Harvey Weinstein's sex crime conviction overturned: Key facts
- Harvey Weinstein's New York rape conviction was overturned in a 4-3 ruling by New York state's highest court.
- The New York State Court of Appeals found that Manhattan Judge James Burke "erroneously" allowed testimony from three women whose allegations weren't connected to the case.
- The 72-year-old has been serving a 23-year sentence in a New York prison following his conviction on charges of criminal sex act for forcibly performing oral sex and raping two women.
- Weinstein will remain behind bars because of a February 2023 conviction, sentencing him to 16 years in prison for raping an Italian model in 2013.
Weinstein, 72, has been serving a 23-year sentence in a New York prison following his conviction on charges of criminal sex act for forcibly performing oral sex on former "Project Runway" production assistant Miriam "Mimi" Haleyi in 2006 and raping hairstylist Jessica Mann in 2013.
In spite of Thursday's decision, Weinstein will remain behind bars because he was separately sentenced in February 2023 to 16 years in prison in a Los Angeles criminal case for raping an Italian model. She testified that he threw himself onto her after appearing uninvited outside her hotel room during an Italian film festival there in 2013.
3Harvey Weinstein leaving Manhattan Criminal Court on February 21, 2020, in New York City. Kristin Callahan/ACE Pictures / SplashNews.com
He was acquitted of sexual battery by restraint of a Jane Doe 3 and the jury was hung on whether he was guilty of sexual battery by restraint of Jane Doe 2.
Reps for Weinstein did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
A spokesperson for the Manhattan District Attorney's Office told The Post, "We will do everything in our power to retry this case, and remain steadfast in our commitment to survivors of sexual assault."
In a scathing dissent, Judge Madeline Singas wrote that the majority was "whitewashing the facts to conform to a he-said/she-said narrative," and that the appeals court was continuing a "disturbing trend of overturning juries' guilty verdicts in cases involving sexual violence."
"The majority's determination perpetuates outdated notions of sexual violence and allows predators to escape accountability," Singas wrote.
"This conclusion deprives juries of the context necessary to do their work, forecloses the prosecution from using any essential tool to prove intent, ignores the nuances of how sexual violence is perpetrated and perceived, and demonstrates the majority's utter lack of understanding of the dynamics of sexual assault."
"Because New York's women deserve better, I dissent," she concluded.
The reversal of Weinstein's conviction is the second major setback to the #MeToo movement in the last two years, after the US Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of a Pennsylvania court decision to throw out Bill Cosby's sexual assault conviction.
Weinstein has vehemently maintained innocence despite the tidal wave of women, including famous actresses such as Ashley Judd and Uma Thurman, who came forward with allegations about the studio boss behind Oscar winners such as "Pulp Fiction" and "Shakespeare in Love."
3Weinstein has been serving a 23-year sentence since the conviction. AP
The one-time Hollywood power player — who is incarcerated in New York at the Mohawk Correctional Facility, about 100 miles northwest of Albany — insists that any sexual activity was consensual.
The Court of Appeals agreed last year to take Weinstein's case after an intermediate appeals court upheld his conviction.
Weinstein's lawyer, Aidala. told The Post at the time: "We will ask the Court of Appeals to remind trial courts throughout the state that a defendant cannot be tried based on his character — but must be tried based on the conduct for which he has been accused.
"The trial judge disregarded basic rules of NY law and allowed into evidence acts of misconduct which prevented Mr. Weinstein from testifying in his own defense to powerfully proclaim his innocence."
Prior to their ruling, judges on the lower appellate court had raised doubts about Burke's conduct during oral arguments. One observed that Burke had let prosecutors pile on with "incredibly prejudicial testimony" from additional witnesses.
Burke's term expired at the end of 2022. He was not reappointed and is no longer a judge.
In appealing, Weinstein's lawyers sought a new trial, but only for the criminal sexual act charge.
They argued the rape charge could not be retried because it involves alleged conduct outside the statute of limitations.
No personal insults..
Stay on topic. The source is NOT THE TOPIC.
No death wishes of any individual
Post your meme's on your own articles. They will be ticketed and deleted.
Calling members "trolls" or ""dishonest" will result in your comment being deleted.
Tags
Who is online
523 visitors
And it starts all over again.
Yeah, Weinstein is a scumbag. But even scumbags are entitled to fair trials with impartial juries. Won't happen in Manhatten.