There's a new sheriff in town, and his name is Donald Trump
By: Christopher Tremoglie
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The Left has gone apoplectic because a Republican president has finally stood up to their violent activism. For decades, the Left has used organized violent demonstrations and domestic terrorism to bully conservatives and Republicans to influence public opinion, pressure political decisions, and manipulate legislative actions. For the most part, their bullying has worked. Democrats have used protests and riots to create havoc, and Republicans were too timid to stand up to these kinds of antics. However, that's all changed.
There's a new sheriff in town. And his name is President Donald Trump.
Trump sending in 4,000 National Guard members and deploying 700 Marines to Los Angeles to subdue the massive left-wing activist riots was the correct thing to do. It was a wise and prudent choice, and despite what every Democrat is saying, it was completely legal. They are lying about that part, however, because they want the chaos and destruction the rioters bring. Trump's deployment of troops threatens the Left's thirst for violence.
Consider how rogue a politician one must be to ardently oppose the implementation of law and order, as Democrats such as Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass did. It's fanatical behavior by elected officials. They willingly and purposely chose the side of crime and chaos over law and order. They chose destruction over protection. It's indicative of just how corrosive Democratic politicians have become and exemplifies how little they genuinely care about the country, especially the innocent people.
Democrats, liberals, and others on the Left believe they can do whatever they want, whenever they want to do it, and however they want to do it. It stems from an indoctrinated belief that they are morally and ideologically superior to anyone who thinks differently than they do. And they hate Trump the most because he is an existential threat to their way of thinking.
Consider the ramifications of Trump's decision.
At various points over the last 25 years, people have watched left-wing political violence rear its ugly head through extreme civil disobedience throughout the country. Starting with violent disruptions and antics during the inauguration of former President George W. Bush in January 2001, to organizations such as Not In Our Name or Act Now Stop War End Racism, which protested the Iraq War, and the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations.
Then came the violence and destruction of the Black Lives Matter movement, in which riots began after the deaths of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown. Then there was antifa. And, within the last year, there were the Left's anti-Israel and anti-ICE riots. At their core, all of them are fueled by contemporary left-wing political orthodoxy. Yet, unlike Democrats, who enabled and encouraged them, Trump has said "no more."
NINTH CIRCUIT HALTS COURT ORDER FOR TRUMP TO RETURN NATIONAL GUARD CONTROL TO NEWSOM
Trump should be applauded for his efforts and the actions he has taken to no longer be bullied by the Left's activist foot soldiers.
In the past, these agitators and agitprops would have had a clear path to destroy whatever they wanted without any accountability or consequences. In 2025, there is a new sheriff in town, and he will no longer tolerate that.
Tags
Who is online
78 visitors
Well, when the next democratic president puts the "shoe on the other foot" using these Trump "creative" expressions of presidential powers. . .we will want to see what conservatives feel, say, and emote about it.
Wait, we won't have to wait. . . we know some conservatives are self-interested and selfish and will "Karen" just like they do when they hold complete power and control over the systems of government. Why? Because apparently some conservatives can not live and breath properly without trying to stamp out the joy in those they otherize.
When was the last time activists from the right rioted?
Maybe we need a memorial on the capitol grounds to commemorate (lest we forget) this day? What say you?
No, although a plaque, at least, outside the door where Ashli was executed would be nice....
She was forcing her way into the capital,[✘]
Sadly, Ms. Babbitt lost her life needlessly. It accomplished nothing positive. What a waste. I wish she was still here with us (all). A life sacrificed (over bs) is never a good thing. Point taken, nevertheless.
She was unarmed and no danger to the coward that shot her.
The lefties only seem to be concerned with power, their actions prove they really don't care about people.
There is no comparison between the minimal violence of J6 and all the riots that have been going on all across the country, organized and paid for by the leftists
Would you feel the same if a vet from the June 13 protest had received the same?
So let's play this scenario....
Yesterday it was reported that about 60 protestors made up of supposed veterans and their family members, protesting the Army parade and supporting the "no kings" protest, breached a police barricade and started to make it up the steps of the rotunda.
If they made it through the barricades and into the Capitol, and one of them was shot, would you say they had it coming to them and deserved to get shot?
My guess is that because they are more than likely leftists, those of you on the left would be screaming bloody murder and demanding Trump get arrested.
Damn you beat me to it.
That comment is delusional and denies the facts of the videotape.
Your 'hypothetical" assumes several things that you yourself did not check for validity.
That said, I will presume you mean if the CIRCUMSTANCES WERE THE SAME WITH A DIFFERENT SET OF PARTICIPANTS would I, we, be just as saddened over the SCENARIO as when Ashley Babbitt (say her name) was shot and died? My perspective - Yes.
I've seen the tape where she was trying to crawl through a broken window with both hands. It was murder, plain and simple
Sadly, if memory serves me from past and repeated viewings. . .she was standing on the frame of the window and attempting to 'carry herself forward' while holding both sides of the window frame when she was unfortunately shot. But you can correct me if I am wrong with a posted copy of the incident. . .or an isolated photo.
So if someone is breaking into your house, you'll let them?
Better yet, she is breaking into my house... Want to guess the end result?
Notice the silence?
if they were shot, yes they deserved it, now what?
If they were shot unarmed, they deserved it?
If they are breaking in, yes....
Let me guess...you disagree....again...
If they are trying to break in to do me harm? Yes.
[✘]
[✘]