Healthy birth by brain-dead mother should be celebrated
Adriana Smith, who was declared brain dead in February while nine weeks pregnant, gave birth this week to a baby boy named Chance, ending a murky ethical situation in which Smith was kept on life support on the premise that her unborn child could survive. According to Smith's mother, April Newkirk, Chance is expected to be fine despite his premature birth via cesarean section.
Critics of the decision to keep Smith on life support have rushed to blame her care plan on Georgia's heartbeat law, despite assurances from Republican Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr that "there is nothing in the LIFE Act that requires medical professionals to keep a woman on life support after brain death."
Rather, Smith was kept on life support due to Georgia's advanced directive law, which says a pregnant woman can specify ahead of time that she wants to avoid life support if her pregnancy is not yet viable, but no one else is allowed to make the choice to remove life support on her behalf. This is Georgia case law, and it's a precedent that existed alongside Roe v. Wade for decades.
Advocates have used this case to speak out against Georgia's anti-abortion laws. However, there is no evidence that Smith even considered ending her pregnancy. Significantly, Newkirk, though frustrated that she did not have a say in her daughter's life support, explicitly said before Chance was born that he was wanted and she saw him as "a part of my daughter." This family's tragic situation should never have been used as a cudgel in the debate surrounding abortion in the United States.
In addition to misinformation about the rationale for Smith being kept on life support, critics of the decision have also said — falsely, it turns out — that Chance would not be able survive or that, in the event that he did survive, his quality of life would be sufficiently low that his life would not be worth living.
These claims ignore medical research, which shows that, in instances where pregnancy continues in the event of a brain-dead mother, 77% of babies are born alive. Of those, 85% had normal health outcomes by the time they were 20 months old.
Wherever you fall on the abortion debate, to care about Chance's life is to acknowledge that two things can be true at the same time: It's not that Smith's life doesn't matter, it's that Chance's life does, too. Now that this baby boy was born, I hope that advocates will be able to put aside their differences and welcome this new life into the world with the joy that every child deserves to be greeted with.
Tags
Who is online
78 visitors

Party of death would diasgree
You cannot legislate morals. PERIOD.
What do you think laws are, then?
This was NOT a healthy birth.
The baby weighed less than two pounds and is in the NICU.
Delivery occurred via emergency c-section because, despite being on life support, the mother's body was falling apart.
"Healthy" is a damn lie.
So where's the evidence that she wanted to be put on life support in the event that the hospital's negligence led to her death in order to be an incubator? The author is stretching.
So, is Newkirk going to raise and pay for this child?
What bullshit. Her body started to ROT!!! That's why the monsters were forced to deliver the baby from a rotting corpse. The baby is in desperate shape. This entire this christo fascist extremism written large. Monsterous behavior by the state. Absolutely no respect for this poor woman and her family.