Trump federal salary adviser quits post over executive order reclassifying workers - POLITICO
By: ELEANOR MUELLER
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Trump federal salary adviser quits post over executive order reclassifying workers
The executive order stripped job protections for many federal workers in a move that unions and Democrats denounced.
President Donald Trump looks at an executive order he signed. | Evan Vucci/AP Photo
The head of an advisory council on federal pay resigned from his post Monday in protest over President Donald Trump's recent executive order stripping civil service protections from key federal workers.
"I have concluded that as a matter of conscience, I can no longer serve him or his Administration," Federal Salary Council Chair Ron Sanders, a Trump appointee, wrote in his resignation letter to the director of the Personnel Executive Office of the President, the text of which was obtained by POLITICO.
"[I]t is clear that its stated purpose notwithstanding, the Executive Order is nothing more than a smokescreen for what is clearly an attempt to require the political loyalty of those who advise the President, or failing that, to enable their removal with little if any due process," he wrote.
Trump named Sanders, who also served under the Bush administration, to the position in December 2017. The advisory group is responsible for providing recommendations to the White House on how best to tailor federal pay depending on regional costs of living.
The executive order, issued Wednesday, stripped job protections for many federal workers in a move that unions and Democrats denounced as an attempt to politicize the civil service.
Agencies are required to place any worker responsible for the handling of policy — a number that one union leader said could be hundreds of thousands — under a new category, called Schedule F, by Jan. 19, the day before the presidential inauguration.
These include "positions of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character" that are "not normally subject to change as a result of a Presidential transition," including those who supervise attorneys or report to presidential appointees, the order reads.
Employees under the new schedule will be exempt from some hiring and firing protections, making it easier for them to be taken on and dismissed. Agencies must also "expeditiously petition" the Federal Labor Relations Authority to remove the positions in question from any bargaining unit, preventing union participation.
The White House labeled the order as a move toward efficiency, speeding the removal of what the order dubbed "poor performers."
But critics say that, if Trump wins reelection on Nov. 3, the change would make it easier to remove civil servants who do not agree with the administration's policies. If he loses, it could, in theory, make it easier for political appointees to transition into civil servant roles — allowing them to stay beyond the transition.
Sanders, who described himself as a lifelong Republican, said he cannot be part of an administration that seeks "to replace apolitical expertise with political obeisance. Career Federal employees are legally and duty-bound to be nonpartisan; they take an oath to preserve and protect our Constitution and the rule of law…not to be loyal to a particular President or Administration," he wrote.
Tags
Who is online
86 visitors
I am kinda torn on this. Not his executive order, that is bullshit. On the act of the man resigning. If seemingly decent people resign then that leaves the positions open for donald to fill will his yes men.
Then again, with his EO he can fire them anyway...
Obama in office...Um EO's are bad..umkay..
donald in office...(silence)
we actually do not give a shit about what democrats or unions think.
don't do your job as ordered, get your ass fired...
this kinda puts a damper on the lefts resistance huh? LOL
Then why is Trump touting his police union support ad nauseam?
You know that won't kick in until Trump is Jan. 19th right? So Biden can just kick Trump's minions to the curb without due process. Still all for it 8? Then he can revoke it...
Nope. Those resisting have been embedding evidentiary data.