╌>

Mar-a-Lago Raid: FBI Affidavit Signals Trump Could Get Indicted

  
Via:  Devangelical  •  2 years ago  •  26 comments

By:   Sonam Sheth, Camila DeChalus (Business Insider)

Mar-a-Lago Raid: FBI Affidavit Signals Trump Could Get Indicted
The affidavit is damning for Trump and throws a wrench into his claim of innocence because "it was all declassified," national security veterans said.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads

bwah ha ha ha ha, lock him up!


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



A federal magistrate judge on Friday unsealed a redacted version of an FBI affidavit that legal experts said is a damning blow to former President Donald Trump as he's criminally investigated over his handling of official government records.

Significant portions of the document were blacked out to conceal information that might reveal:

  • The identities of people (witnesses, law enforcement agents, and uncharged parties) involved in the DOJ's investigation into Trump's handling of national security records
  • Sources and methods
  • Grand jury information
  • The overall size, scope, and direction of the department's inquiry

Still, the affidavit contained telling clues about why investigators took the extraordinary step of executing a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate earlier this month, and the extent to which officials tried using less intrusive measures to get Trump to hand over government records that were improperly stored at his Florida residence.

"There certainly existed probable cause to believe that the former president retained classified documents in violation of the applicable statute in a place that was not secure according to the regulations," David Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of Florida, told Insider.

"This hurts him more than this helps him," he added.

Norm Eisen, the ethics czar under former President Barack Obama, wrote after going through the affidavit that "even redacted it is absolutely damning."

"People are likely going to jail for this conduct," he said.

Some national security veterans went a step further, directly calling out the 45th president and suggesting there may be a first-ever criminal case against a former chief executive.

"I have seen enough, folks," Bradley Moss, a prominent Washington, DC, national security lawyer, wrote on Twitter. "Donald Trump will be indicted in the classified documents matter. I'm placing my marker."

Here are some key details from the affidavit:

  • A National Archives review of 15 boxes of government records that Trump turned over in January found that they contained "newspapers, magazines, printed news articles, photos, miscellaneous print-outs, notes, presidential correspondence, personal and post-presidential records, and 'a lot of classified records.'"
  • The "most significant concern" for NARA was that "highly classified records were unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and otherwise unproperly [sic] identified."
  • There were 184 documents with classification markings in the 15 boxes: 25 were marked top-secret, 92 were marked secret, and 67 were marked confidential.
  • "Several of the documents contained what appears to be [Trump's] handwritten notes," the affidavit said.

Perhaps just as noteworthy, the Justice Department revealed in a brief accompanying the affidavit that it is keeping portions of the search records related to the Mar-a-Lago raid under seal to protect a "significant number of civilian witnesses."

The brief also indicated that the government has probable cause to believe "that a statute prohibiting obstruction of justice has been violated," and that there is a heightened risk of violence against FBI agents and other law enforcement personnel in the wake of the Mar-a-Lago search.

A footnote undermines Trump's main defense


Alan Dershowitz, the conservative lawyer who represented Trump in his Senate impeachment trial, told Insider that "there's no doubt" the FBI had probable cause to search Mar-a-Lago.

He added "there may be enough there for an indictment," but he doesn't think Trump will ultimately be charged because in the past, "people who have done similar things have not been indicted."

Dershowitz also predicted that Trump's legal team will try to argue that he had declassified all the documents stored at Mar-a-Lago, but that such a defense "will have to be based in fact."

Indeed, the details contained in the redacted affidavit appear to fly in the face of Trump's claim that he had declassified everything. CNN also spoke to 18 former White House aides and advisors this month, none of whom had heard of any standing declassification order.

Moreover, even if Trump had declassified the materials in his possession, it likely wouldn't matter — and the FBI's affidavit said as much.

Specifically, it pointed out that Section E of the Espionage Act, one of the three laws Trump is suspected of having violated, makes it a crime to retain any government records pertaining to the US's national defense, regardless of classification level:

A footnote from the FBI's affidavit points out that information does not have to be classified to be covered under the Espionage Act. Department of Justice

The other two federal statutes Trump's suspected of having broken — 18 USC Section 2071 and 18 USC Section 1519 — criminalize the concealment, removal, and destruction of government records, also regardless of classification level.

Shanlon Wu, a longtime former federal prosecutor, told Insider that Trump's lawyers are "barking up the wrong tree by focusing only on classification."

He noted that in addition to the fact that the laws Trump is suspected of violating don't depend on classification, the redacted portions of the affidavit could detail why federal officials didn't believe they could trust Trump's lawyers when they said that all classified material had been turned back over to the government.

Overall, the FBI recovered more than two dozen boxes of official government records between January and this month, when they searched Mar-a-Lago.

Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart ruled to release the affidavit on Thursday, a decision that was in and of itself significant.

Typically, affidavits aren't released until formal charges are filed in an investigation. But former prosecutors say the unusual circumstances of this case, coupled with intense public interest in the matter, likely weighed in favor of the document's release for Reinhart.

"This is huge," said one former DOJ official, who requested anonymity to candidly discuss the case. "But there's so much distrust in the Justice Department and the FBI, and if you keep a document like this hidden, the conspiracy theories just breed themselves."

"Let it out and show it the light of day," they added. "Of course it has to be redacted, but people need to see that [US officials] tried multiple times to get these highly classified documents, that Trump wouldn't give them up, and they were just sitting in a basement in Florida."

Trump, for his part, had repeatedly and publicly called for the release of the FBI's affidavit.

He put out a statement after it was released on Friday, accusing the FBI and DOJ of a "public relations subterfuge" and recycling claims of political persecution and bias.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1  seeder  devangelical    2 years ago

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @1    2 years ago

tsk, tsk, tsk, it just gets harder and harder for the super patriots to defend the indefensible...

it really must suck being a trumpster...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     2 years ago
tsk, tsk, tsk, it just gets harder and harder for thesuper patriotsto defend the indefensible..

But, but Hillary, Obama.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @3    2 years ago

witch hunt!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @3.1    2 years ago

Grew up in the 60s and many friends came back from Nam with that thousand yard stare. They had seen way too much for their minds to deal with. PTSD it's called now.

Used to march against that useless war. 

Many in government called our protests 'witch hunts'.

Those in the weather underground thought that they were justified.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  devangelical @3.1    2 years ago

MAGA is Latin for witch.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
3.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.2    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4  Greg Jones    2 years ago

Passages from the article.....

[deleted]

"This is huge," said one former DOJ official, who requested anonymity to candidly discuss the case. "But there's so much distrust in the Justice Department and the FBI, and if you keep a document like this hidden, the conspiracy theories just breed themselves."

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.1  cjcold  replied to  Greg Jones @4    2 years ago

One does not need to be a conspiracy theorist to know that Trump is evil personified.

Trump's whole life has been wrapped around evil deeds and thoughts.

Narcissism to the hilt. His followers are just as insane as he is.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
5  JBB    2 years ago

original

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6  bbl-1    2 years ago

The Trump indicted?  I doubt it.  He knows too much about certain foreign people and he'll squawk to save his arse.  A contaminated doorknob awaits.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  bbl-1 @6    2 years ago

...yeah, I don't see that bloated sack of shit going thru an upper floor window too easy. /s

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
6.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @6.1    2 years ago

Yeah.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.2  arkpdx  replied to  bbl-1 @6    2 years ago

Epstein know things but they managed to get to him. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
6.2.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @6.2    2 years ago
Epstein know things but they managed to get to him.

They?

You mean Trump and Barr? 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.2.2  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.2.1    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.2.3  cjcold  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.2.1    2 years ago

Trump obviously killed Epstein to keep his mouth shut about them raping children.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.2.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.2.1    2 years ago

The only one who got to Epstein was Epstein himself.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.2.5  arkpdx  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.2.4    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6.2.6  JBB  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.5    2 years ago

Are baseless false accusations of murder and paedophilia as low down as you can go?

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
6.2.7  pat wilson  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.2.4    2 years ago

He was on suicide watch so it's curious that the two guards on duty fell asleep for thirty minutes when he "killed himself". Also the cameras happened to be off during that time for some reason.

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
6.2.8  Hallux  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.2.1    2 years ago
You mean Trump and Barr?

Weren't they busy offing Valentin Broeksmit?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.2.9  Greg Jones  replied to  pat wilson @6.2.7    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.2.10  arkpdx  replied to  JBB @6.2.6    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6.2.11  bbl-1  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.2.4    2 years ago

So it was Epstein that sabotaged the cameras?  And it was Epstein that got the guards to be somewhere else?  That is very interesting.

 
 
 
Revillug
Freshman Participates
7  Revillug    2 years ago

But apparently the FBI overlooked this room in Trump's basement:e0cc47daf2b4db9f31f06c1bd6f7f9a5

 
 

Who is online

Igknorantzruls


80 visitors