╌>

Judge shoots down Trump effort to halt lawsuit trying to disqualify him from ballot

  
Via:  Devangelical  •  7 months ago  •  1 comments

By:   Alex Henderson

Judge shoots down Trump effort to halt lawsuit trying to disqualify him from ballot
Some of Donald Trump's critics — including conservative legal figures — have been arguing that his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results were not only illegal, but also, disqualify him from running for president in 2024 under the insurrection clause in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment....

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show

sorry, on a national ballot isn't exactly where unamerican traitors probably belong in colorado...


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Some of Donald Trump's critics — including conservative legal figures — have been arguing that his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results were not only illegal, but also, disqualify him from running for president in 2024 under the insurrection clause in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment.

Trump's allies were hoping that a lawsuit trying to keep him off the 2024 ballot would be thrown out in court, but in Colorado, Judge Sarah Wallace has ruled that the lawsuit can go forward.

Law & Crime's Matt Naham reports that Wallace "sided with a group of voters represented by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) who, citing January 6, sued in September to 'challenge the listing of Respondent Donald J. Trump as a candidate on the 2024 Republican presidential primary election ballot and any future election ballot, based on his disqualification from public office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.'"

Trump's lawyers, Naham notes, tried to make an "anti-SLAPP" argument against the lawsuit, but Wallace disagreed. SLAPP stands for "strategic lawsuit against participation."

Wallace noted that anti-SLAPP laws "are intended to enable courts to dismiss frivolous cases brought with the intent to chill a person's constitutional rights."

According to Naham, "After concluding that the anti-SLAPP statute Trump cited did not apply to the case, the judge said that a scheduled October 13 anti-SLAPP hearing has been changed to a status conference, as the case speeds toward a trial on the merits on October 30."


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments removed. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", or any variation thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1  seeder  devangelical    7 months ago

it's important to note the 6 voters that filed this suit are 3 republicans and 3 independents...

 
 

Who is online


GregTx


41 visitors