Farmers hit by a federal funding freeze scramble to respond ahead of spring thaw
By: Suzy Khimm (NBC News)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
By Suzy Khimm
Farmers across the U.S. are struggling to make critical decisions ahead of the spring thaw, as billions of dollars in promised federal payments remain frozen by the Trump administration.
Ang Roell, a farmer and beekeeper in Massachusetts, had planned to begin installing deer-proof fencing, mulch and an irrigation system for a recently planted orchard — an initiative supported by more than $30,000 in federal grants that are now on hold.
Without that money, Roell worries that when the chestnut trees and elderberry bushes begin to sprout leaves in just a few weeks, there will be nothing to stop deer from chewing up the baby leaves. And Roell said the farm will struggle to keep the plants regularly watered and weeded without the infrastructure it had been counting on.
Ang Roell owns an orchard and apiary in Massachusetts.Courtesy Ang Roell
"We risk losing the plants because we can't keep up with the watering schedule," Roell said. "The delay of time might not seem like a big deal for someone who is not a farmer. But it actually is."
On his first day of office, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that paused the disbursement of all funds linked to former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which included $19.5 billion in agriculture-related conservation programs. The Trump administration also froze funds related to a separate $3.1 billion investment in "climate-smart" farm projects made under Biden.
The frozen funding was set to support projects including rotational grazing systems to improve soil health, waterways to reduce erosion, the installation of solar panels, and conversion from diesel to electric irrigation systems. Thousands of farmers have made plans and investments based on the promised funding, leaving some in financial peril, according to several groups that support farmers.
The timing adds to that challenge: Spring marks a key moment in the seasonal cycle of many farms, with seeds planted and animals born, and it can be difficult — if not impossible — to pause or reverse course.
Brian Geier and his partner, Elizabeth Tobey, shown with their sheep on Bundle Sticks Farm in Indiana, are taking out a private loan to make up for the promised USDA funding they haven't received.Courtesy Brian Geier
On Thursday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that it would be releasing the "first tranche" of funding paused under the administration's review of the Inflation Reduction Act, totaling $20 million.
"It's a pittance," said Mike Lavender, policy director for the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, a farm and food advocacy group. "There is some semblance that this is moving, but it's clearly not fast enough. The timing matters."
Small farms may be especially vulnerable, as they tend to have tighter profit margins and more limited access to credit than larger operations. They also make up a large proportion of the farms participating in some of the federal grant programs that have been frozen, according to a recent USDA report.
"With this uncertainty, they are pulling out of farmers markets, canceling contracts already because they do not think they will have the capacity to meet them," said Vanessa Garcia Polanco, government relations director for the National Young Farmers Coalition, an advocacy group for farmers and ranchers. "When all that funding is frozen, it sends a signal to them that their business plan is not safe."
In a press release, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said on Thursday that "it is clear that some of this funding went to programs that had nothing to do with agriculture — that is why we are still reviewing." She criticized what she described as the previous administration's "disastrous policies of over-regulation, extreme environmental programs, and crippling inflation."
The USDA did not say when additional money would be released.
Brian Geier, a farmer in Indiana, had been counting on a $10,000 grant from the USDA to expand the grazing area for his sheep, which he would then rotate with his farm's hayfields to conserve the soil quality over time. Based on the expectation of receiving the grant, he agreed to purchase lambs this spring from a local sheep breeder.
Nine weeks from now, the lambs are expected to be born. But Geier still doesn't know if or when he will receive the funds he was promised to build the fencing and water lines that he needs, so he scrambled to secure a loan from a friend to make sure the lambs will have a place to graze.
Brian Geier owns Bundle Sticks Farm in Indiana.Courtesy Brian Geier
"Farmers have to shift when timelines change," Geier said. "We have to adapt given the biological situations going on with animals and the seasons."
Having received no updates from the USDA on his grant as of Friday afternoon, he is now rethinking his plan to purchase more sheep this summer for his farm, which he and his partner founded two years ago. "We'll just have to scale that back and slow it down."
Those receiving grants explicitly related to climate change are especially concerned, as the Trump administration has made targeting such programs a political priority.
Pasa Sustainable Agriculture, a nonprofit supporting farmers, manages about 200 climate-related projects funded by the USDA in 15 states, including the upgrades to Roell's orchard in Massachusetts.
The group is now owed close to $2 million in reimbursement from the USDA, according to Executive Director Hannah Smith-Brubaker, who fears she will have to lay off staff if the freeze continues for much longer. "There are not going to be people to help those farmers and process those payments," she said.
Roell sought out USDA funds to support a new orchard after Hurricane Helene destroyed beehives they were keeping in western North Carolina — just one of many extreme weather events that disrupted their beekeeping and honey production business.
"The point of this orchard was to make us more resilient," Roell said. "We are able to have a diversified farm that has other products to offer and can offset losses when catastrophes like this happen. But instead, now, we have the federal government as a catastrophe."
Suzy Khimm
Suzy Khimm is a national investigative reporter for NBC News based in Washington, D.C.
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted. Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted. Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion
Red State Farmers FAFO...
The scary thing is that we're all going to FO. Even though some of us already knew.
No, no. You have it all wrong. The government isn't costing us money, it is saving us money by destroying the infrastructure to disburse already legislated and approved funding... /S
If farmers would have just sold last year’s bounty for three times as much as they did then they wouldn’t need help from the government. 🙄
Read no further. Musk and his gang certainly have not. They neither know nor care what all these projects actually do, and the impact they have. Neither does Trump. They cut for the sake of cutting and tell themselves they are good administrators of government.
Our fruit and flower farmers in Michigan control their deer populations the old fashion way.
They shoot them.
So you recommend "shooting" is the remedy for government over- reach?
I recommend the age old practice of managing the resource.
By shooting the problem?
You need to study up on management of deer populations.
The article is about the federal funding freeze on farmers, not the management of deer populations.
From the article:
My point is federal funding is not necessarily required to “deer proof” crops. Like I said, sounds like you need to study up on population control strategies. These strategies are nothing new and are successfully practiced all over the country without requiring federal funding.
... as if the honey sales will be returned to the Treasury.
or at least allow hunting .
having grew up in Ma. and hunted middle and western parts of that state . it is rather difficult to get permission as a hunter to hunt private property even with its shotgun only rules , so that leaves state land .
Our farmers can get crop damage permits. It works quite well.
out here they have a land owner coupon attached to the lic , as well as give out a certain number of landowner permits which they can sell themselves .
But what they end up doing is selling those to outfitters close the land down for trophy hunting , and still get to claim feed or crop damage through the state because there are too many animals .
I will keep my thoughts to myself about that situation .
Yeah, I know what you’re thinking. Always going to be shitbirds gaming an otherwise good system.
Add the lack of seasonal migrant workers at large farms and egg prices are just the beginning of the price pain we will all feel.
Maybe we can ask the DOGE boys to come help out since they don't want migrant workers.