MAGA wants to launder political donations — through God
By: Andrew Daugherty
organized religion is business, not a charity, and should be taxed as a business.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The most efficient campaign finance vehicle in American history is tax-exempt, requires no donor disclosure and is available in virtually every zip code in the country. For 70 years, it has operated under one rule: It cannot endorse a political candidate. The Religious Liberty Commission, which delivered its report to President Donald Trump on June 26, would like to remove that rule. They're calling it religious freedom.
As a Christian minister of an American Baptist congregation, I've spent more than 20 years in a pulpit — long enough to know the difference between protecting a church and conscripting one. A government that wants to free the church, to borrow Trump's language, is usually trying to use it.
Since 1954, the Johnson Amendment has restricted churches, religious organizations and other tax-exempt nonprofits from endorsing political candidates or funneling tax-deductible donations into partisan campaigns. Pastors and faith leaders can preach on any moral or social issue, including justice, poverty, immigration, war. The only line is at the intersection of tax-exempt status and candidate endorsements. In other words, the amendment is the last structural barrier between the American church and full absorption into the machinery of partisan politics.
The claim that this constitutes religious suppression is the oldest con in the game. Every American pastor has the same First Amendment rights as any other citizen. What the Johnson Amendment restricts is tax-exempt dollars in partisan politics. Churches pay no federal taxes. In exchange, they stay out of the candidate-endorsement business. Void it, and that deal ends — and every church in America becomes a PAC with better branding and transparency requirements and endorsed by a divine mandate.
Here is how the mechanism would work — and in some places, already does. A donor writes a check to their congregation. Takes the full federal tax deduction. The church endorses the candidate of their choice, bundles contributions, runs voter registration drives for one party — and does all of it without the disclosure requirements that apply to actual political action committees. This is tax-exempt political spending, passed through the offering plate and invisible to the public record.
Since Trump promised at the 2017 National Prayer Breakfast to "totally destroy" the Johnson Amendment, churches that went all in on the MAGA model have provided a nine-year case study in what happens when a religious institution trades independence for political access. The flags of the nation and party beside the cross. The candidate's name from the pulpit. The congregation sorted by loyalty to the pastor's politics rather than anything resembling a common good.
Church attendance has collapsed at a pace that would have seemed impossible just a generation ago. According to a 2024 Pew Research study, the fastest-growing religious identity in America is "none." The research on why people leave does not point to boredom or busyness. It points to disgust at what organized religion has become.
The Christian right has spent five decades getting closer to power and losing the one thing it cannot buy back: The credibility to speak to anyone outside its own coalition.
The commission is not discouraged by any of this data. And their report does not even stop at the Johnson Amendment. It proposes replacing the principle of separation of church and state with what it calls "bridges between church and state." In Trump's Washington, "bridge" is apparently the new euphemism for "merger."
The separation has existed because both institutions require protection from each other. When such safeguards are removed, the bridge comes with a toll booth, and the commission is waving one side through.
This is state power reinforcing evangelical Christianity, and evangelical Christianity legitimizing state power. The commission calls it "partnership." History calls it a state church.
Without the Johnson Amendment, every offering plate in America becomes a campaign contribution box.
The stakes here are not merely theological. They are democratic. A fully politicized American church — operating tax-free, endorsing candidates, bundling political donations without disclosure — is not a more faithful institution. It is a more powerful one. Unchecked religious power fused to political authority, and with no structural wall left between them, is a problem for anyone who votes, pays taxes or prefers their government to represent the whole country rather than the congregation of whoever raised the most money last Sunday. Without the Johnson Amendment, every offering plate in America becomes a campaign contribution box.
Jesus was not being clever when he said in Matthew 22:21 "Give to the emperor the things that are the emperor's, and to God the things that are God's." That verse has been cited in American political arguments for more than two centuries — usually by whoever needs it to mean something different. Christ was cornered — pay taxes to Rome, or be branded a traitor — and so he turned the trap into a statement about the limits of power. Caesar's name is on the coin; give him the coin.
But not everything belongs to Caesar. Jesus was not brokering a deal between two powers. He was drawing the line past which no empire's authority can reach. Empires have always wanted everything, including the sacred — especially the sacred — because religion is the oldest instrument for making political power look like it came from God. The commission has proposed erasing that line, rebranding the erasure as religious liberty and consecrating it in the Oval Office.
The commission's report had a lot of words for this: "bridges," "liberty," "partnership." The legal word is laundering.
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted. Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted. Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©
Tags
Who is online
86 visitors
gee, how did the thumper savior feel about money changers?
I've always believed that allowing thumpers to claim a tax credit for contributions to a church was a violation of the 1st amendment in a secular, by law, america.
America is not secular. The government is. America is whatever it wants to be. A secular government telling its citizens that they must be secular is the same as a theocracy telling its citizens they must be religious.
regarding the 1st, how is it possible for a secular gov't to offer a tax advantage to the religious that isn't available to the non-religious?
I do not understand what you are referring to. If you mean individuals, that tax advantage of donating to a 501(C)(3) is available to anyone. If you mean of the 501(C)(3), they have the same as any other. So, I do not know what you are referring to as not being available to others.
Churches could spend ten trillion dollars trying to influence politics but it wouldn’t influence a single person I know. How telling is it that while they push the teachings of Jesus they would choose to spend their money on that fruitless effort rather than helping the needy?
Because they are not following the teachings of Christ. Their savior has become money
Maybe they should prove god exists before passing laws based on their delusions.
not very shocking that those gullible enough to believe thumper mythology, are also devoted to someone totally opposite of that spectrum ...
trump will probably blow another $100 billion in taxpayer dollars on that next, with a 50% kickback built in ...
That's true for quite a few things:
The Johnson amendment (which is not a Constitutional amendment) applies to all tax-exempt non-profits -- not just churches.
" The Johnson Amendment is a provision in the U.S. tax code prohibiting all 501(c)(3) nonprofits—including charities, universities, and houses of worship—from endorsing or opposing political candidates. Tied to their tax-exempt status, the rule requires these organizations to remain strictly nonpartisan in exchange for tax-deductible donations."
In fact, Senator Lyndon Johnson introduced the amendment to defend himself from primary challenges by secular non-profits ( the Committee for Constitutional Government and the Facts Forum ). Johnson's amendment intended to strip the tax-exempt status from these political non-profits.
The Sierra Club lost its tax-exempt non-profit status for violating the Johnson amendment in the 1960s. Today the NRA and ACLU operate captive 501(c)(4) PACS intended to skirt the Johnson amendment.
Several universities have violated the Johnson amendment by imposing restrictions on free speech by staff and students. However, the free speech issues have received more public attention.
evangelical maga churches will be the front line in the civil war trump triggers ...
Maybe. All depends on how many votes the Democratic Party needs.
The current civil war within the Democratic Party is Israel which is a religious secular democracy. It seems Democrats are fighting among themselves over Abraham and Muhammed.
Is that a Christian God or a Jewish God or a Muslim God? Or perhaps a secular God?
israel has the same problem america has, at the moment. a corrupt power-crazed buffoon, supported by religious hypocrites, and is hoping that the distraction of a war will keep the legal wolves at bay over his corruption, until he can salvage his political legacy, which he never will ...
how can israel afford to wage war when america's largest outlay of foreign aid goes to them? once israeli voters realize that those welfare checks may stop if bibi stays in power, the democrat problem you're suggesting just may solve itself. the maga half of america doesn't seem to understand that trump is wasting taxpayer money on his illegal iran war, but the taxpayers are also picking up the tab for israel's participation in it too.
the only reason maga thumpers are supporting israel now, is so they can kill jews later, which they preach is their sole privilege.
What apparently escapes some concerning this meme is that St. Peter is asking an individual what they themselves did concerning those things, not whether they made others do those things. Like when government takes taxes from people's paycheck and gives it to immigrants, illegal or otherwise, whether they consent or not.
That is ridiculous! "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and render unto God what is God's", seems clears to me...
It is clear. It's only "unclear" to those that want to make us all bow down to their "god"
11,780. We need 11,780 votes. Are the maga churches the front line in the civil war now?
The author of this article is correct, in my opinion. Churches should not be endorsing candidates or giving money to candidates. That is outside our lane.
100% agree.
but they do