╌>

Ron DeSantis Declared War on Mexico at Debate

  
By:  al Jizzerror  •  last year  •  158 comments


Ron DeSantis Declared War on Mexico at Debate
DeSantis said he would send US armed forces into Mexico on “DAY ONE” of his administration

Sponsored by group The Banned Played On

The Banned Played On

Ron DeSantis Declared War on Mexico at Debate




After pretending to be a Navy SEAL in Iraq early in the debate, Ron “Combat” DeSantis said he would send US armed forces into Mexico on “DAY ONE” of his administration to deal with the Mexican cartels.

It is illegal to use the US military as law enforcement personnel and, of course, the US has no jurisdiction to make arrests in Mexico.

Some of the other Republicans on the stage advocated using diplomacy (with both China and Mexico) to deal with the fentanyl problem. DeSantis was the only one who advocated an invasion of Mexico. He also said anyone who crosses our border would end up “stone cold dead.” Is it me, or does that seem to be a slightly aggressive immigration policy?



512









DeSantis Vows to Send US Military Into Mexico to Stop Fentanyl Labs




https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-24/desantis-vows-to-send-us-military-into-mexico-to-stop-fentanyl#xj4y7vzkg


Red Box Rules

We don't need no stinking rules.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1  author  al Jizzerror    last year

Military Service

In 2004, during his second year at Harvard Law, DeSantis was commissioned as an officer in the U.S. Navy and assigned to the Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAG). He completed Naval Justice School in 2005. Later that year, he reported to the JAG Trial Service Office Command South East at Naval Station Mayport , Florida, as a prosecutor . He was promoted from lieutenant, junior grade to lieutenant in 2006.

In the spring of 2006, DeSantis arrived at Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO), working directly with detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp . [32] [33] [34] [35] The records of his service in the Navy were often redacted upon release to the public, to protect personal privacy, according to the Navy. [36] Mansur Ahmad Saad al-Dayfi , who was held at Guantanamo, alleged in 2022 that DeSantis oversaw force-feeding detainees. [37] [38] [39] [40] [35]

In 2007, DeSantis reported to the Naval Special Warfare Command Group in Coronado, California , where he was assigned as a legal adviser to SEAL Team One ; he deployed to Iraq in the fall of 2007 as part of the 2007 troop surge . [41] [42] He served as legal adviser to Dane Thorleifson, the SEAL Commander of the Special Operations Task Force-West in Fallujah . [32] [33] [34]

DeSantis returned to the U.S. in April 2008, reassigned to the Naval Region Southeast Legal Service. The U.S. attorney general appointed him to serve as a special assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Middle District of Florida . [41] DeSantis was assigned as a trial defense counsel until his honorable discharge from active duty in February 2010. He concurrently accepted a reserve commission as a lieutenant in the Judge Advocate General's Corps of the U.S. Navy Reserve . [43]

During his military career, DeSantis was awarded the Bronze Star Medal , the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal , the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal , and the Iraq Campaign Medal . [32] [33] [34] He was still serving in the U.S. Navy Reserve as of his transition to the governorship. [1] His U.S. Navy service ended on February 12, 2019, a month after his gubernatorial inauguration, with the rank of lieutenant commander . [1] [2]

Thanx for your service, Ron, butt you were NOT a fucking Seal.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ronin2  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    last year

Please show where he claimed to be a Navy Seal?

The 30-second spot titled “Oath” notes DeSantis’s decision to volunteer to go to Iraq with the Navy after graduating from Yale and Harvard Law. The ad also highlights that DeSantis earned a Bronze Star as a lieutenant and assisted Navy SEALs. 

“Service to country is Ron DeSantis’ story. That’s the American story,” the ad’s narrator says. 

The super PAC’s ad comes less than a week after the DeSantis campaign also released an ad highlighting his military service. The Florida governor has spoken frequently about his experience in the Navy on the presidential campaign trail. If elected president, DeSantis would be the first president since George H. W. Bush to have served in a combat zone. 

There is a huge difference in saying that he "assisted" Navy Seals (which he did) and being one.

As for using the US Military in Mexico- what do you call extra judicial killings by the US military in Pakistan, Libya, and throughout the ME? The US has forces across the world- many serving in countries that don't even want them such as Iraq and Syria. Some on this site were even calling for the US to invade Saudi Arabia to take control of their oil when the Saudi Royal Family wouldn't kiss Brandon's ring and increase oil production.

Negotiate with China/Mexico to stop sending illegal drugs to the US that are killing people. China doesn't give a fuck about us- they just want our money. The Cartels run Mexico- they care even less about us. We are just the cash cow for their drug, gun, coyote, and sex slave trade. Negotiate- what a fucking joke.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    last year

What did he get a Bronze Star for?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Kavika   replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2    last year

For meritorious service. There are two Bronze Star awards one for meritorious service (I did a good job) and the Bronze Star for Valor in combat which is different in that it has a V for Valor on the award.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @1.2.1    last year

I didn't think one got a Bronze Star just for meritorious service. There is a medal for that one already. Unless the Navy is different from the Air Force

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @1.2.1    last year

didn't tom cotton also get a bronze star for doing paperwork?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.2.3    last year

Probably

All I ever got was an achievement medal with one device

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.5  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.4    last year

I hope that device was a rifle or pistol...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.2.5    last year

No...I wasn't a combat troop. It was an oak leaf cluster (?) because I had 2 of them

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.7  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.6    last year

you should've been...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.2.8  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @1.2.3    last year

Cotton was deployed to Baghdad in 2006  as a infantry platoon leader  with the 101st Air Mobile Division. There he led an infantry platoon on daily combat patrols.  Two year later, he deployed to Afghanistan. He served with the Train Advise Assist Command – East at its Gamberi forward operating base as an operations officer planning counter-insurgency and reconstruction operations.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.9  devangelical  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.2.8    last year
He served with the Train Advise Assist Command – East at its Gamberi forward operating base as an operations officer planning counter-insurgency and reconstruction operations.

maybe he suffered a life threatening paper cut defending army desks and filing cabinets...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.2.10  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @1.2.9    last year

I don't think that he ever received a Purple Heart.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.2.11  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.2.9    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.12  devangelical  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.2.10    last year

he was probably awarded a purple helmet from a dadt private in the latrine...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.13  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @1.2.11    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.2.14  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.2.13    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.15  Sean Treacy  replied to  devangelical @1.2.12    last year

as probably awarded a purple helmet from a dadt private in the latrine.

Not like Joe Biden, who will tell a group of  purple heart veterans  he understands their sacrifice because he was awarded 5 purple hearts and a Medal of Honor while personally capturing  Hitler to defeat the Russians in WWII. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.16  devangelical  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.15    last year

but, but, but whatabout..

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.17  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.4    last year

All I ever got was an achievement medal

Thank you for your service, Trout.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.18  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.2.8    last year

I want to thank Tom Cotton for his service.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.19  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.15    last year

Not like Joe Biden, who will tell a group of  purple heart veterans  he understands their sacrifice because he was awarded 5 purple hearts and a Medal of Honor while personally capturing  Hitler to defeat the Russians in WWII. 

See comment #1.1.1

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.2.20  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.2.13    last year

[removed]   

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1.2.21  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Sparty On @1.2.20    last year

[removed]

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.22  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.2.21    last year

removed for context by charger

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.23  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @1.2.9    last year

Where did you serve?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.24  devangelical  replied to  bugsy @1.2.23    last year
 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.25  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @1.2.24    last year

OK.....and?

Didn't answer my question

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.26  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  bugsy @1.2.23    last year

Where did you serve bugsy?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.27  bugsy  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.2.26    last year

Very easy to answer.

20 years active Navy. Retired E7.

Ships included USS Midway, USS Independence, USS John F Kennedy, battleship New Jersey and Destroyer Connelly. Also 2 shore duty units in Long Beach and Jacksonville.

Any other questions?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.2.28  George  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.2.26    last year

I don't see Bugsy disparaging veterans, do you?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.29  bugsy  replied to  George @1.2.28    last year

It is an expectation for leftists to disparage veterans.

Most still believe they are baby killers, dontcha know?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.30  devangelical  replied to  bugsy @1.2.29    last year

because of the oath taken to defend the constitution, veterans that continued to support trump based upon his actions after the 2020 election and on 1/6/21 have voluntarily disassociated themselves from their branches of service, their past service records, and any honor or respect deservedly given to those that stayed true to that oath. the established boundary is crystal clear.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.2.31  George  replied to  devangelical @1.2.30    last year

So you never served, you could have just said that. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.32  devangelical  replied to  George @1.2.31    last year

my recruiter tried to pull a fast one. I caught him and walked out without inking the deal. I figure that probably turned out better than ending up at leavenworth for fragging any 90 day nixonites.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.2.33  Kavika   replied to  bugsy @1.2.29    last year

I don't disparage vets nor do I think that they are baby killers and have been called a progressive/liberal/democrat many times on NT so both your assumptions are wrong. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.34  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.4    last year

20 years of Naval service with 5 rows of ribbons/medals and a Navy Achievement medal. That included operational WESTPAC deployments on two ships , one A-6E Intruder squadron at Whidbey Island, WA, a four year tour with "Operation Deep Freeze" going to Antarctica six months out of the year, Fleet Marine Force qualified Corpsman with MCCRTG-10 at MCAS Yuma, and four years at the US Naval Hospital at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA. I am also a member in good standing of the Royal Order of Shellbacks for crossing the equator on board ship. I can hohestly say I've been around the block a time or two. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.35  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  bugsy @1.2.27    last year

20 years active Navy. Retired E7.

Thank you for your service, bugsy.

I served on the USS Independence, too (VF-102).

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.36  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  George @1.2.28    last year

I don't see Bugsy disparaging veterans, do you?

I didn't say bugsy disparaged anyone.

Where did you serve, George?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.2.37  George  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.2.36    last year

Nobody said you did. Sorry Army. Beyond that it isn’t any bodies business.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.2.38  GregTx  replied to  devangelical @1.2.30    last year
that stayed true to that oath.

As determined by who? You?...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.39  devangelical  replied to  GregTx @1.2.38    last year

the US constitution. 14th amendment section 3.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.40  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @1.2.30    last year

OK......and?

Still did not answer my question.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.41  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @1.2.32    last year

Yea.....right....

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.42  bugsy  replied to  Kavika @1.2.33    last year

Well, I did say most, so, unless you are part of most................

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.43  bugsy  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.34    last year

Such good times cross in the equator.

Probably still have a few permanent marks I can't see.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.44  bugsy  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.2.35    last year

Thank you, al...right back atcha.

I can't remember the squadrons that deployed with us since I was ship's company, however, I was on her from 93-96 in Yokosuka.

Second best duty station only behind the Midway when she was also in Yokosuka.

If I could afford Japan, I would probably still be there.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.45  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @1.2.30    last year

try telling that to someone who ACTUALLY served.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.2.46  Kavika   replied to  bugsy @1.2.42    last year

Your comment:

It is an expectation for leftists to disparage veterans.

That states that it is expected for leftists to disparage veterans...

Most still believe they are baby killers, dontcha know?

Most mean the majority and that is pure speculation on your part. 

Your comment 1.2.42

Well, I did say most, so, unless you are part of most................

Since I did two combat tours in Nam, do you think I'm a baby killer, bugsy? 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2.47  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @1.2.30    last year

"enemies both foreign and domestic"

During Nam the enemies of the troops were domestic arms billionaires.

Joined the SDS to help shine a light on those anti-American traitors.

A news crew filmed me on campus once burning my draft card.

(It was actually an expired Philadelphia drivers license)

Still have my draft card from way back in the day. It says 1H.

The "police action" was winding down at that point. they ran out of body-bags.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.2.48  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @1.2.47    last year
During Nam the enemies of the troops were domestic arms billionaires.

Do you have names?

A news crew filmed me on campus once burning my draft card. (It was actually an expired Philadelphia drivers license)

Honesty in protest or civil disobedience is so over rated.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.49  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Kavika @1.2.46    last year
Since I did two combat tours in Nam

Thank you for your service, Kavika.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2.50  cjcold  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.2.49    last year

So all these years later do you know what you were fighting for?

Except, of course, for the guy fighting next to you?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.51  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cjcold @1.2.50    last year
So all these years later do you know what you were fighting for?

Kavika was in 'Nam.

I was on the USS Independence (and at Naval Air Stations in the US).

The only fighting I did was in the ring or on a mat.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.52  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Kavika @1.2.46    last year

When I came back to the world from Southeast Asia in the early 70's, I remember going through LAX wearing my cracker jack dress blues and having some long haired punk trying to kick me and spit on me and calling me a warmongering baby killer. It made no difference that I had a Navy Hospital Corps cadeus on my uniform sleeve. Heck of a welcome home.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.53  TᵢG  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.52    last year

Too many people operate on emotion and trust in talking heads rather than critical thinking.   Your long haired punk asshole was one of those.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.54  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.53    last year

nicely done.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.2.55  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.52    last year
I remember going through LAX wearing my cracker jack dress blues and having some long haired punk trying to kick me and spit on me and calling me a warmongering baby killer.

That kind of shit pisses me off.

I understand being "anti-war" butt when people attacked the returning soldiers, it illustrated how ignorant they were.

The soldiers were victims of the war.  

The policy makers in Washington were responsible.  

Politicians (from both parties) used propaganda to coerce people to support the war.

They also drafted soldiers and forced them to fight.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2.56  cjcold  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.2.51    last year

I guess I'm younger than you guys. Like I said, my draft card said 1H.

Earned my first black belt at 16 and my fighting was also in the ring.

Worked as a bouncer for years and now have PTSD.

I had nobody to back me up and couldn't back down.

Took some beatings and had to pull the pistol a time or two.

Here I am at 68 and still alive. Whood a thunk it?

Spent most of my life as a bassist in rock and roll bands.

Don't even get me started about my 10 years as a paramedic.

And then there were those fruitless years as an EPA investigator.

All I do these days is lay on the sofa and borrow DVDs from the library.

A highly modified AR-15 is my best friend (next to a few online friends). 

Have been suffering from long covid for the last 3 years with no end in sight.

"Smoking cigarettes and watching Captain Kangaroo, don't tell me I've nothing to do".

But I at least have Mahomes and the Chiefs to look forward to tomorrow.

Thankfully nobody will ever read this pathetic rant.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.2.57  Kavika   replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.52    last year

On my first return to ''The World'' there wasn't much protesting the second time was different, Nam was front page news and full swing no one spit at me but there were plenty of protestors. Unless you were in Nam and experienced that hell hole and lived through it and the turmoil in the US caused by it you are simply reading history, experiencing it live is a whole different animal, and that animal lives with you for the rest of your life and can devourer you in a heartbeat. 

Currently, my neighbor and friend who was in the same unit that I was in, 2/327th GIR 101st Airborne (No Slack) was released from Moffett Cancer Center in Tampa, the result of Agent Orange. He has undergone surgery, chemo, and now proton radiation. Part of his jaw has been replaced because of Nam. That is what some of us have to live with and of course the dreams or a sound/smell/sight that will trigger a memory. 

There are a few NT members that I'm aware of that know exactly what I'm talking about. Doc and 1stwarrior. There may be others and I apologize if I missed you in my rant. 

Last week we lost an NT member to Agent Orange, Marine24. Semper Fi, Marine.

So all the political BS re who served, who didn't and the accusations regarding such is nothing but BS and my comment to that and them is ''FUCK YOU''. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.2.58  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.2.8    last year
Please cites source in the future. [Perrie Halpern R.A.]    

WILCO.  Assumed that it was common knowledge among the informed commenters here.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.59  bugsy  replied to  Kavika @1.2.46    last year
Since I did two combat tours in Nam, do you think I'm a baby killer, bugsy? 

Why would I think that?

I myself was still a baby at the beginning of Nam.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.2.60  Kavika   replied to  bugsy @1.2.59    last year
Why would I think that? I myself was still a baby at the beginning of Nam.

So you were a baby at the beginning of Nam, yet you made this comment that is directly related to Vietnam.

Most still believe they are baby killers, dontcha know?

So either you were a child prodigy or you were blowing smoke.

Either way my question only required a yes or no response, which seems to have escaped you.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.61  Trout Giggles  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.2.17    last year

And thank you for yours

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.62  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.34    last year

Impressive record, Ed. Thank you for your service

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    last year

And he has never claimed to be one.

It sounds like you support the cartels and their continuing quest to kill Americans with fentanyl and other drugs, in addition to all their other crimes. What has Biden ever done to stop it?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.1  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @1.3    last year

goodbye junkies and rich white kids with more money than sense...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.3.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @1.3.1    last year

Exactly, in 2020 only 17% of the fentanyl deaths were Black and only 12% were Hispanic.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.3.3  Kavika   replied to  Greg Jones @1.3    last year

If the US were not the major buyers of drugs we would not be experiencing the deaths resulting from using illegal drugs. Simple process of supply and demand, time we looked at ourselves and tried to figure out why in the hell we are so determined to kill ourselves with illegal drugs.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.3.4  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Greg Jones @1.3    last year

What has Biden ever done to stop it?

What did Trump do to stop it?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.3.5  arkpdx  replied to  Kavika @1.3.3    last year
If the US were not the major buyers of drugs we would not be experiencing the deaths resulting from using illegal drugs. Simple process of supply and demand, time we looked at ourselves and tried to figure out why in the hell we are so determined to kill ourselves with illegal drugs.

I guess that makes it Ok to smuggle in highly deadly drugs into the country./s For you it is obviously our problem. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.6  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.3.4    last year

don jr and kim try to help out as much as they can...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.3.7  Kavika   replied to  arkpdx @1.3.5    last year
I guess that makes it Ok to smuggle in highly deadly drugs into the country./s For you it is obviously our problem. 

In reality it is our problem, we are the users and if we didn't have such an appitate for drugs the problem we have today would not exist. 

I never said in any form that it was OK to smuggle in highly deadly drugs, that is you making shit up. If you want to discuss the problem then get reality based before calliing for a war with Mexico.

And as long as we have the problem if it isn't gangs from Mexico it will be gangs from somewhere else. If the demand remains the supply will just come from a different location.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.3.8  arkpdx  replied to  Kavika @1.3.7    last year
. If you want to discuss the problem then get reality based before calliing for a war with Mexico.

I am looking at reality. Right now the majority of drugs are being smuggled in from the cartels in Mexico. The Mexican government is doing squat to stop it and may even be complicit. If they won't do anything about it we need to. When it starts coming in thru another source we need to do what it takes to stop that also. As far as I am concerned the amount of illegal immigration allowed by Mexico may also be justification to invade. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.3.9  Kavika   replied to  arkpdx @1.3.8    last year

First off the Cartels operate in almost every country in North/Central/South America with the exception of Panama and Nicaragua. If you blow up their operation in Mexico then you have to go to El Salvador, and Guatemala, Peru, and Ecuador are both controlled by the cartels and Argentina is another haven for them. 

Good luck with that.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.3.10  arkpdx  replied to  Kavika @1.3.9    last year

Which one of the countries you named have a border with the US and is much easier to smuggle drugs into the country. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.3.11  Kavika   replied to  arkpdx @1.3.10    last year

Actually, the cartels being multi-national have drugs coming into the US from most of Central and south America, Hondarus and Ecuador are huge suppliers of drugs to the US and neither borders the US. Do not be under the mistaken view that most drugs originate in Mexico and come into the US over the southern border. Some research will tell you that it can be shipped from South America to Africa then to Europe and on a container ship to the US. The routes are many so striking the cartels in Mexico will not stop the flow of drugs into the US. 

Many of the Caribbean countries are a haven for drugs coming into the US via the maritime route.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.3.12  cjcold  replied to  Kavika @1.3.3    last year

I've always been happy with a little ganga. See no need for more.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.3.13  cjcold  replied to  Kavika @1.3.3    last year

Could it be that the CIA made it so attractive back in the day?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.3.14  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cjcold @1.3.13    last year
Could it be that the CIA made it so attractive back in the day?

The hawks were playing dominoes instead of chess.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    last year

He never claimed to be a SEAL, but you and I both know it is possible to be assigned to the special warfare community in a ancillary support capacity and not be a special warfare fighter. As a JAG officer that is what he did.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.1  devangelical  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.4    last year
As a JAG officer

looks like he's still a jag off-icer...

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.4.2  George  replied to  devangelical @1.4.1    last year

But he actually stepped up and served, when was the last democrat that had the stones to do that? Carter?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @1.4.1    last year

Like Beau Biden?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.4.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  George @1.4.2    last year

 when was the last democrat that had the stones to do that? Carter?

Joe Biden saved his community from Corn Pop.  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @1.4.1    last year

I'm sure that you've served your country in a meaningful way.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @1.4.1    last year

What value do you think you have added?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.4.7  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.4.4    last year

Where did you serve Sean?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.4.8  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.4.5    last year

Thank you for your service, drinker (and thanx for drinking).

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.4.9  George  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.4.7    last year

What business is it of yours where or if Sean served? Is he disparaging veterans while not having the courage to step up? 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.4.10  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.4.1    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.4.11  Sparty On  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.4    last year

Spot on but the triggered must attack him with lies and disinformation.

It’s all they got.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.4.12  Texan1211  replied to  George @1.4.9    last year

Some folks pretend no one but service members should have opinions.

until you ask them about some Democrats who they proudly support.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.4.13  Sean Treacy  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.4.7    last year

I didn't. I also don't spend my time on this site fantasizing about  murdering American troops or mocking people for serving their country honorably. You seem okay with that though. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.4.14  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.4.13    last year

I didn't. I also don't spend my time on this site fantasizing about  murdering American troops or mocking people for serving their country honorably. You seem okay with that though.

I like to thank vets for their service.

I'm a vet.

You said, "I also don't spend my time on this site fantasizing about  murdering American troops or mocking people for serving their country honorably. You seem okay with that though."

I have never, nor would I ever, say shit like that.

Please stop putting YOUR WORDS in my mouth.  They taste like shit.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.4.15  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  George @1.4.9    last year

What business is it of yours where or if Sean served?

Bugsy said it by his question #1.2.23

I notice you didn't say shit when bugsy asked the same fuckin question.

Look back through this thread.  I was thanking vets for their service without disparaging their political leanings.

Those who didn't serve (like Donald Trump) missed out on a valuable life experience.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.4.16  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Texan1211 @1.4.12    last year

Some folks pretend no one but service members should have opinions.

Everyone has (and is entitled to) opinions.

512

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.4.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.4.14    last year

have never, nor would I ever, say shit like that.

Yet when people on your seed did, you didn't say anything. You just get pissy when people who didn't serve (Joe Biden) were mocked. 

Given the stock you put in people serving, why don't you challenge  those mocking and denigrating people's service records not to posting fantasies of killing American troops? 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.18  devangelical  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.4.13    last year

you should hear what I have to say about devout catholics...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.4.19  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @1.4.18    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.20  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @1.4.19    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.4.21  cjcold  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.4.14    last year

Back in the 60s many of my friends were indoctrinated, recruited and died in Nam. For no reason other than more money for the military industrial complex.

The bay of pigs never happened. It was just a recruitment poster.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.22  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @1.4.21    last year
For no reason other than more money for the military industrial complex.

Is that why JFK and LBJ sent us there?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.4.23  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cjcold @1.4.21    last year
The bay of pigs never happened.

The Bay of Pigs was a CIA inspired action in Cuba.  It had nothing to do with Vietnam.

I suspect you were thinking of the Gulf of Tonkin incident that was used to justify escalating the War in Vietnam

This is what Google says:

What happened in the Gulf of Tonkin?
In early August 1964, two U.S. destroyers stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam radioed that they had been fired upon by North Vietnamese forces. In response to these reported incidents, President Lyndon B. Johnson requested permission from the U.S. Congress to increase the U.S. military presence in Indochina.
It turns out that the USS Maddox was involved in intelligence activities against North Vietnam.
 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.4.24  Texan1211  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.4.16    last year

pompous asses who have served are still pompous asses.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.25  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @1.4.24    last year

... and real texans were born there.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.4.26  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @1.4.25    last year
and real texans were born there.

Such a startling revelation!

Are you trying to say that people born in Texas are Texans?

Wow..........earth-shattering news!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.4.27  GregTx  replied to  Texan1211 @1.4.26    last year
Are you trying to say that people born in Texas are Texans?

But are they still Texans if they run away from Texas clutching at their pearls?....

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.4.28  GregTx  replied to  devangelical @1.4.25    last year

Interesting take.... no doubt you also believe that real women were born female and real men were born male right?...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.29  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @1.4.25    last year

Do you think that naturalized migrants aren’t “real Americans”.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.4.30  bugsy  replied to  GregTx @1.4.28    last year
no doubt you also believe that real women were born female and real men were born male right?...

Whoa, whoa, whoa there, Greg.

Me thinks you are going a little too far with that one.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.4.31  GregTx  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.4.29    last year

Interesting question...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.4.32  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @1.4.27    last year
But are they still Texans if they run away from Texas clutching at their pearls?....

Texans wouldn't give a damn, trust me.

We don't want or need a bunch of hysterical pearl clutchers anyways.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    last year

During and as a result of that debate, DeSantis ended up looking like Vivek Ramaswamys little brother or sidekick. Ramaswamy completely over shadowed DeSantis and undoubtedly won hearts and "minds" among the ultra MAGA crowd.  As long as Republican fanatics forget to remember that they despise Hindus and "towel heads" Ramaswamy should enjoy a brief moment in the MAGA sun (until Trump decides to bigfoot him). 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    last year

Finally! A policy from him!

It's a bad one but it's a policy besides "Kill Woke!"

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     last year

Ah yes, let's invade a neighboring country against their will and all the world will be right. How fucking stupid can one get, Does he think that American servicemen and women are not going to die? That we will be welcomed with open arms. 

How have our invasions turned out in the last couple of wars...Not so good would be an understatement of epic proportions.

A Mouse is kicking his ass and Mickey doesn't have a weapon.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @4    last year

well to be fair, mickey mouse is taller than ronda santis...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @4.1    last year

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
4.1.2  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  devangelical @4.1    last year

well to be fair, mickey mouse is taller than ronda santis...

                jrSmiley_100_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.2  cjcold  replied to  Kavika @4    last year

Have to think that Grenada worked out fairly well.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2.1  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @4.2    last year

it's helpful to know what size country republicans were able to invade and defeat quickly, for the future.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
5  arkpdx    last year
. DeSantis was the only one who advocated an invasion of Mexico

There is precedent for invading Mexico. We invaded  in 1846 to stop raids from Mexico into Texas and in 1914 to stop Poncho Villa from raiding across the border. Send troops across the border to stop the drug cartels from smuggling across the border if the Mexican government does not do anything about it doesn't sound like a bad thing to me. 

. He also said anyone who crosses our border would end up “stone cold dead.”  

That's what you do to invaders. You kill them 

Is it me, or does that seem to be a slightly aggressive immigration policy?

It's you. I think that is a sound policy. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
5.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @5    last year

It's you. I think that is a sound policy. 

            jrSmiley_55_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1    last year

I take it you disagree. Why,? What is your solution? Let them in willy- nilly?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
5.1.2  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @5.1.1    last year

I take it you disagree.

Do you actually advocate war with Mexico?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1.2    last year

You think it would be actually a war?

The Mexican Army wouldn't last a day against the US military. The Cartels would last longer if they dug in really hard; and then turned to Guerilla tactics. They would still lose badly in a few weeks- and be driven out of Mexico.

The real problem would be rebuilding Mexico afterwards- we suck at nation building. It has been proven time and time again. 

Once we leave Mexico would go back to being a shithole; maybe even a worse one that it is now- as the cartels would only have a weak, unpopular, government installed by the US to deal with. The people might even look at them as liberators for a short period of time.

What I love is everyone thinks there are only two options- all out war- or doing nothing. The US government has conducted extrajudicial drone killings all over the planet (many in countries hostile to the US); we also have special forces operating in countries that do not want us there. How long would the cartels last if their leaders were too afraid to show their faces in public? Their supply lines can be constantly destroyed; their people killed; and families forced into hiding.

Simply make it too expense for them to continue to do business.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
5.1.4  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Ronin2 @5.1.3    last year
The Mexican Army wouldn't last a day against the US military.

So do YOU advocate invading Mexico?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.2  Hallux  replied to  arkpdx @5    last year

            We invaded  in 1846 to stop raids from Mexico into Texas

That's what President Polk and his love affair with Manifest Destiny would have you believe. Lincoln never bought into it.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
5.2.1  arkpdx  replied to  Hallux @5.2    last year

Don't care what some think his reasoning was it happened. As far as Lincoln is concerned it happened well before his presidency and his opinion of the matter does not matter. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Hallux  replied to  arkpdx @5.2.1    last year

Lincoln became President less than a generation after Polk making them contemporaries and yet one should care what you think coming 8 or so generations later. Such hubris!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Hallux @5.2.2    last year

stop making sense

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.4  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.3    last year

Abraham Lincoln lost his reelection bid for the House of Representatives mainly because he opposed the war with Mexico. Obviously he had a well known opinion about it based on the facts at the time. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
5.2.5  Kavika   replied to  Hallux @5.2    last year

We also invaded Canada and took a whipping. We should have learned a long time ago that when you invade another country for whatever reason you will have united the population against you for as long as it takes for us to be forced out. Look at Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan or what is happening right now in Ukraine with Russia invading. Never underestimate those defending their country. One hell of a lot of American servicemen and women would die if we invaded Mexico on whatever pretext DeSantis would use. 

A good place to start is getting the American public off drugs, no one from Mexico is forcing us to be a drug-induced nation, that is on us. The demand is here and if it isn't drug gangs in Mexico supplying the drugs then it will be gangs from somewhere else. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.2.6  Hallux  replied to  Kavika @5.2.5    last year

            We also invaded Canada and took a whipping.

Let's call it a draw else certain mavens of history will have fits of histrionics. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
5.2.7  Kavika   replied to  Hallux @5.2.6    last year
Let's call it a draw else certain mavens of history will have fits of histrionics. 

I'm sure that they would, but that is their problem. LOL

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.8  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @5.2.6    last year

maybe they'll all leave and go edit the wikipedia data on the story...

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.2.9  Hallux  replied to  devangelical @5.2.8    last year

I thought they were all busy cribbing notes over at Conservapedia.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.10  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @5.2.9    last year

no troublesome citations needed there...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.3  cjcold  replied to  arkpdx @5    last year

So killing immigrants "stone cold dead" is the policy of a psychopath. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
5.3.1  arkpdx  replied to  cjcold @5.3    last year

They are not immigrants they are invaders. That's what you do when someone invaded your country. You kill them stone cold dead. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.3.2  devangelical  replied to  arkpdx @5.3.1    last year

please go find the closest native american pow wow and tell them that, word for word...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6  Greg Jones    last year

I suspect DeSantis is thinking of Special and Co-Ops missions with the permission and participation of the Mexican government.

Also, it would be helpful if armed regular troops were sent to the border to supplement and assist the overwhelmed border agents.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @6    last year
it would be helpful if armed regular troops were sent to the border to supplement and assist the overwhelmed border agents

oh look, another demonstration of US constitution comprehension by the right...

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.1.1  arkpdx  replied to  devangelical @6.1    last year

There is nothing in the Constitution that precludes putting troops on the border and the Posse Comitatus act is not part of the Constitution. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.2  devangelical  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.1    last year
if armed regular troops were sent to the border
 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.1.3  arkpdx  replied to  devangelical @6.1.2    last year

As I said, there is nothing in the Constitution that prevent putting as tmed troops on the border especially if they are going there to repel invaders which they would be doing. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.4  devangelical  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.3    last year
As I said, armed regular troops
 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.1.5  arkpdx  replied to  devangelical @6.1.4    last year

And again I said nothing in the Constitution says anything that stops the government from sending armed troops to the border. What part of that confuses you?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.2  evilone  replied to  Greg Jones @6    last year
...it would be helpful if armed regular troops were sent to the border to supplement and assist the overwhelmed border agents.
  • If border agents are overwhelmed then it would be up to the Republican run House to appropriate the funding to increase the amount of border agents. They have that power. 
  • Putting armed troops on the border is in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. Which is why National Guard troop are only sent to help in support positions when assigned as border duties.
  • By far the most often way drugs are sent across the border is at normal checkpoints with US Citizens. Additional agents, nor troops, aren't necessary for these actions.
  • Crossing the border 'illegally' is a civil misdemeanor, unless one has been processed and sent back to their country of origin before. Killing someone for the equivalent of rolling through a stop sign is a much. 
 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  evilone @6.2    last year

Congress can't force the Biden Admin. to use the funds appropriately.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
6.2.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  evilone @6.2    last year
it would be up to the Republican run House to appropriate the funding to increase the amount of border agents. They have that power. 

No, after the House and Senate Appropriations Committees agree on an Appropriations bill, it heads to the House and Senate floors where it may be further amended and eventually passed. Most times, the bills passed by House and Senate differ in some significant ways and must be reconciled.   Once a final bill has been negotiated between the two chambers, it must then pass the House and Senate and be signed by the President.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.2.3  arkpdx  replied to  evilone @6.2    last year
Putting armed troops on the border is in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. 

Not if the country is being invaded which it obviously is. 

Crossing the border 'illegally' is a civil misdemeanor, 

Wrong again. Crossing ye border illegally is a criminal event. It may be either a misdemeanor or a felony and both can be penalized by civil penalties as well as jail time. Civil crimes such as you are saying do not incur jail time, therefore are not civil crimes, like running a stop sign or speeding but actual criminal offense. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.2.4  evilone  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @6.2.2    last year
No, after the House and Senate Appropriations Committees agree on an Appropriations bill, it heads to the House and Senate floors where it may be further amended and eventually passed.

True. Usual politics apply, but since they have not even put forth the effort it shows it's not a priority.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.2.5  evilone  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.1    last year
Congress can't force the Biden Admin. to use the funds appropriately.

Congress writes laws and can earmark funds for specific purposes. The have earmarked money for increased border agent pay, and additional agents in the past, they can certainly do so again if it really were necessary. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Greg Jones @6    last year

Maybe he watched "Clear And Present Danger" too many times.😏

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
6.4  Kavika   replied to  Greg Jones @6    last year
I suspect DeSantis is thinking of Special and Co-Ops missions with the permission and participation of the Mexican government.

That is already happening and has been for quite some time. CIA/DEA/FBI is very involved and the cooperation has cooled quite a bit since an FBI agent arrested ex-Mexican Defense Minister Salvador Cienfuegos without the knowledge of Mexican authorities. The US dropped the case against him in 2020 and relations have been stalled every since.

The many covert ops we have been involved in both South and Central America have not been good and have built up a wealth of anti-American feelings. 

A book with insight into the ops there would be a book entitled, ''Killing Pablo'' The Medellin Cartel in Columbia. There are many others and anything written about ''Operation Condor'' would be a good insight into a very dark period in our history with Central and South America.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.4.1  cjcold  replied to  Kavika @6.4    last year

A few traditional farm workers trying to escape narco traffickers and AGW hardly amounts to an invasion. Only far right wing fascists care.

Most everybody else appreciates the extra labor pool.

 
 

Who is online




280 visitors