╌>

'The Hidden History of Coined Words' Review: Saying It Another Way

  
Via:  Vic Eldred  •  4 years ago  •  1 comments

By:   Henry Hitchings (WSJ)

'The Hidden History of Coined Words' Review: Saying It Another Way
Inventing words was once thought pretentious. Now it is considered an achievement, though it may still induce 'coiner's remorse.'

Leave a comment to auto-join group Books

Books


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Inventing words was once thought pretentious. Now it is considered an achievement, though it may still induce 'coiner's remorse.'


Joseph-Ignace Guillotin demonstrates a model of his guillotine.


Photo: Alamy Stock Photo By Henry Hitchings Feb. 16, 2021 6:25 pm ET

The children's author Theodor Geisel, otherwise known as Dr. Seuss, was often asked where he drew inspiration for his verbal inventiveness. Surely there had to be some enchanted source for the words he dreamed up—the ones that caught on, notably "grinch," and the ones that might pleasingly have done so, such as "punkerish" and "flubbulous." He would solemnly reply that in August each year he traveled to have his cuckoo clock serviced in a tiny Alpine village called Uber Gletch. "I wander around and talk to people in the streets," he explained. "They are very strange people, and I get my ideas from them."

Dr. Seuss is one of the heroes of "The Hidden History of Coined Words," in which Ralph Keyes—the author of more than a dozen books, including "Euphemania" and "I Love It When You Talk Retro"—explores the byways of etymology. But, as this eloquent and instructive survey shows, the stories behind coinages are seldom so zany or romantic. Mr. Keyes makes clear how hard it is to create a word and get other people to adopt it—even if it has the virtues of brevity, vividness, a playful air and a memorable sound. Although new nouns, verbs and adjectives are forever coming into being, most make no impression. Some sparkle for a while, then fade from view. Only a few succeed, and they are "as likely to be created by chance as by intention."

The first person to refer to "coining" words seems to have been George Puttenham, a 16th-century English courtier. Although quite a coiner himself—"insect," "predatory," "indecency"—he was ambivalent about the habit. For many of his contemporaries, new words were as unwelcome as bad smells, and 300 years after Puttenham complained about semi-educated students getting snared in new-fangled verbiage, it was still common to think that coining words was shamefully pretentious. Mark Twain was at pains to tell a correspondent that he'd never done it, though he conceded that he might have called attention to a few previously obscure terms. Theodore Roosevelt was relieved to think he bore no responsibility for any coinage. This from the man who minted "bully pulpit" and "lunatic fringe."

Today it's a different story. We prize the ability to give a phenomenon a catchy handle, and people's coinages are regarded as part of their legacy. Take the New York Times obituaries of psychologists George Weinberg and Herbert Freudenberger, which even in their headlines identify the deceased as the coiners of important words: "homophobia" and "burnout," respectively. But in many cases the person who takes credit for a word—or is awarded credit—isn't the first to have used it. The term "emotional intelligence" wasn't invented by Daniel Goleman, whose first book on the topic was so popular in the mid-1990s, and "tipping point" predates Malcolm Gladwell's bestseller of a few years later.

Mr. Keyes admires several writers whose originative powers seem beyond dispute. One is the poet John Milton, who gave us "jubilant," "depravity," "echoing" and "fragrance." Another is Milton's contemporary Sir Thomas Browne, who came up with "suicide," "ferocious" and "misconception." But the abiding impression of Mr. Keyes's account is that a coinage is a happy accident, often the result of a prank or a moment of whimsy—and that in most cases the person behind it will have left no other mark on the language.

One-off coiners are particularly common in computing. By the early 1950s the word “hardware” was widely used in that field, yet when Paul Niquette, a programmer, first referred to “software” in 1953, he had no ambition for it beyond making his colleagues smirk. Almost half a century later, designer Peter Merholz was in a similarly sportive mood when he commented on the jottings that an acquaintance liked to spew forth online. “Weblog” was the usual term for writing of this kind, but Mr. Merholz believed it should have a name that would make people think of the act of vomiting—hence “blog.”

Mr. Keyes’s range of reference is admirable, and only very occasionally does he find himself on shaky ground. A story about the rapper Snoop Dogg and his name for potent marijuana (“chronic”) is mangled, suggesting that he misheard the actor Seth Rogen saying “hydroponic,” when in fact he told Mr. Rogen in a 2014 interview about mishearing the word more than 20 years before. Confusion about who coined “meritocracy”—the contenders are Michael Young and Alan Fox—isn’t helped by the dates of both the relevant works being misstated. Yet every page contains toothsome detail. Mr. Keyes is as happy recalling the (imaginary) Brooklyn hoodlum Evil-Eye Fleagle, exponent of the “double whammy,” as he is describing Victorian neurologists, though the reader may sometimes feel rushed along: from the Czech origins of “robot” via “The Stepford Wives” to a brief history of dystopian fiction, in less time than it takes to eat a doughnut (a word apparently popularized by Washington Irving).

One striking feature of Mr. Keyes’s “hidden history” is what he calls “coiner’s remorse.” Alan Greenspan wished he’d never spoken of “irrational exuberance,” and the physicist Thomas Kuhn rued introducing “paradigm shift,” which he was right to call “hopelessly overused.” The journalist Henry Fairlie came to be especially troubled by his one memorable coinage. He wasn’t the first person to use “the Establishment” to denote the members of society who wield power; that honor seems to belong to Emerson. But Fairlie was haunted by popularizing the word, which “diverted attention from what really needed to be changed to a nonexistent conspiracy.” His experience is cautionary: When we think up a word for something we’d like to curtail, or even just shepherd such a word into wider use, we risk adding luster or heft to it instead.

Mr. Hitchings is the author of “The Secret Life of Words” and “The Language Wars: A History of Proper English.”


Who is online


48 visitors