╌>

Humanist Manifesto I

  
Via:  CB  •  6 years ago  •  28 comments


Humanist Manifesto I
The quest for the good life is still the central task of mankind.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Doubting Thomas' Lazaretto

Doubting Thomas' Lazaretto

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



FIRST: Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.

SECOND: Humanism believes that man is a part of nature and that he has emerged as a result of a continuous process.

THIRD: Holding an organic view of life, humanists find that the traditional dualism of mind and body must be rejected.

FOURTH: Humanism recognizes that man’s religious culture and civilization, as clearly depicted by anthropology and history, are the product of a gradual development. This implies cultural evolution and cultural relativity.

FIFTH: Humanism asserts that the nature of the universe depicted by modern science makes unacceptable any supernatural or cosmic guarantees of human values.

SIXTH: We are convinced that the time has passed for theism, deism, modernism, and the several varieties of “new thought”.

SEVENTH: Religion consists of those actions, purposes, and experiences which are humanly significant. Nothing human is alien to the religious. It includes labor, art, science, philosophy, love, friendship, recreation–all that is in its degree expressive of intelligently satisfying human living.

EIGHTH: Religious Humanism considers the complete realization of human personality to be the end of man’s life and seeks its development and fulfillment in the here and now.

NINTH: In the place of the old attitudes involved in worship and prayer the humanist finds his religious emotions expressed in a heightened sense of personal life and in a cooperative effort to promote social well-being.

TENTH: It follows that there will be no uniquely religious emotions and attitudes of the kind hitherto associated with belief in the supernatural.

ELEVENTH: Man will learn to face the crises of life in terms of his knowledge of their naturalness and probability.

TWELFTH: Believing that religion must work increasingly for joy in living, religious humanists aim to foster the creative in man and to encourage achievements that add to the satisfactions of life.

THIRTEENTH: Religious humanism maintains that all associations and institutions exist for the fulfillment of human life.

FOURTEENTH: The humanists are firmly convinced that existing acquisitive and profit-motivated society has shown itself to be inadequate and that a radical change in methods, controls, and motives must be instituted.

FIFTEENTH AND LAST: We assert that humanism will: (a) affirm life rather than deny it; (b) seek to elicit the possibilities of life, not flee from them; and (c) endeavor to establish the conditions of a satisfactory life for all, not merely for the few.



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
CB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  CB    6 years ago

Man is the measure of all things for the secular humanist.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
2  seeder  CB    6 years ago
The quest for the good life is still the central task of mankind.
 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3  epistte    6 years ago

As a secular humanist, I disagree with many of these statements because they seem to be falsely made from the position of a theist. 

FIRST: Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created. The universe had a beginning and will have an end but it wasn't created by a supreme deity.
 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  CB  replied to  epistte @3    6 years ago

Hi Epistte, Where did you get this "FIRST" in your comment?  Is it from Humanist Manifesto I?

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.1.1  epistte  replied to  CB @3.1    6 years ago

If you read your own post it will be obvious where the FIRST came from because I quoted the text of your original statement.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  CB  replied to  epistte @3.1.1    6 years ago

1. You wrote superfluous information. Consequently, I ask.

2. As to your quote:

As a secular humanist, I disagree with many of these statements because they seem to be falsely made from the position of a theist. 

I am confused about why you disagree with the statements. They are from Humanist Manifesto I.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.1.3  epistte  replied to  CB @3.1.2    6 years ago

There are multiple Humanist Manifestos and only the 3rd version that was published in 2003 has been endorsed by the American Humanists. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4  seeder  CB    6 years ago

Why are you attempting to steer this discussion onto a personal track (of American Humanists)?  The statement:

FIRST: Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.

Is undeniably the 'first' principle in Humanist Manifesto I. It is a cemented fact. Other "endorsed" versions are not the point of this article.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
4.1  epistte  replied to  CB @4    6 years ago

I am a Humanist and I disagree with what this statement says. The universe has not always existed. Statements much change when facts are known.

Age may only be a number, but when it comes to the age of the universe, it's a pretty important one. According to research, the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old. How did scientists determine how many candles to put on the universe's birthday cake? They can determine the age of the universe using two different methods: by studying the oldest objects within the universe and measuring how fast it is expanding.
 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.1  seeder  CB  replied to  epistte @4.1    6 years ago

1. Good 'catch.' The universe does have a beginning.

2. I know the scientific dating for universe; this is not my first brush with the information either.

3. It is well-known that when humanists of various stripes use the phrasing: "the universe [is] self-existing"  something more along the lines of continuous universe beginnings is meant.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
4.1.2  epistte  replied to  CB @4.1.1    6 years ago
3. It is well-known that when humanists of various stripes use the phrasing: "the universe [is] self-existing"  something more along the lines of continuous universe beginnings is meant.

The concept of a continual universe(s) is being discussed but it has not been proven.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.3  seeder  CB  replied to  epistte @4.1.2    6 years ago

Okay,

FIRST: Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.

Is undeniably the 'first' principle in Humanist Manifesto I. True or false?

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
4.1.4  epistte  replied to  CB @4.1.3    6 years ago
FIRST: Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created. Is undeniably the 'first' principle in Humanist Manifesto I. True or false?

Is this an extra credit question?

True.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.5  TᵢG  replied to  epistte @4.1.4    6 years ago

Interested to see where this is going.   I suspect this will lead to Humanism being deemed a belief system.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
4.1.6  epistte  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.5    6 years ago
Interested to see where this is going.   I suspect this will lead to Humanism being deemed a belief system.

I do believe in logic and the ethic of reciprocity. 

We'll need to invent a shrine, a feast day and maybe a scandal or two before we are seen to be a legitimate religious group on par with Christians, Jews and Muslims. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.7  TᵢG  replied to  epistte @4.1.6    6 years ago

So here you go (from the Manifesto):

Humanists recognize nature as self-existing.

'Given you have claimed to be a Humanist, do you believe that nature just came into existence on its own?   Where is your evidence that this was not the result of a sentient entity?'

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
4.1.8  epistte  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.7    6 years ago
'Given you have claimed to be a Humanist, do you believe that nature just came into existence on its own?   Where is your evidence that this was not the result of a sentient entity?'

The trigger of the Bing Bang is unknown. There is no evidence to suggest that a grand supernatural sentient being exists or has ever existed.

(did I pass?)

If we are now a religion does that mean that I can write off my library fines and books that I buy at B&N and used bookstores as religious worship? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.9  TᵢG  replied to  epistte @4.1.8    6 years ago
did I pass?

I was just predicting a question.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.10  seeder  CB  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.9    6 years ago

Predictable.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5  TᵢG    6 years ago

Looked into this briefly and found that you have listed the Humanist Manifesto from 1933.   Since then there has been a new version - Humanist Manifesto II - published in 1973 and the most resent version - Humanist Manifesto III - was published in 2003.

Each version is stated to supersede its prior version.   Thus the Humanist Manifesto III is what characterizes Humanists (according to Humanists).   Here is the most recent Manifesto:

Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without supernaturalism, affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity.

The lifestance of Humanism—guided by reason, inspired by compassion, and informed by experience—encourages us to live life well and fully. It evolved through the ages and continues to develop through the efforts of thoughtful people who recognize that values and ideals, however carefully wrought, are subject to change as our knowledge and understandings advance.

This document is part of an ongoing effort to manifest in clear and positive terms the conceptual boundaries of Humanism, not what we must believe but a consensus of what we do believe. It is in this sense that we affirm the following:

Knowledge of the world is derived by observation, experimentation, and rational analysis.   Humanists find that science is the best method for determining this knowledge as well as for solving problems and developing beneficial technologies. We also recognize the value of new departures in thought, the arts, and inner experience—each subject to analysis by critical intelligence.

Humans are an integral part of nature, the result of unguided evolutionary change.   Humanists recognize nature as self-existing. We accept our life as all and enough, distinguishing things as they are from things as we might wish or imagine them to be. We welcome the challenges of the future, and are drawn to and undaunted by the yet to be known.

Ethical values are derived from human need and interest as tested by experience. Humanists ground values in human welfare shaped by human circumstances, interests, and concerns and extended to the global ecosystem and beyond. We are committed to treating each person as having inherent worth and dignity, and to making informed choices in a context of freedom consonant with responsibility.

Life’s fulfillment emerges from individual participation in the service of humane ideals.   We aim for our fullest possible development and animate our lives with a deep sense of purpose, finding wonder and awe in the joys and beauties of human existence, its challenges and tragedies, and even in the inevitability and finality of death. Humanists rely on the rich heritage of human culture and the lifestance of Humanism to provide comfort in times of want and encouragement in times of plenty.

Humans are social by nature and find meaning in relationships.   Humanists long for and strive toward a world of mutual care and concern, free of cruelty and its consequences, where differences are resolved cooperatively without resorting to violence. The joining of individuality with interdependence enriches our lives, encourages us to enrich the lives of others, and inspires hope of attaining peace, justice, and opportunity for all.

Working to benefit society maximizes individual happiness.   Progressive cultures have worked to free humanity from the brutalities of mere survival and to reduce suffering, improve society, and develop global community. We seek to minimize the inequities of circumstance and ability, and we support a just distribution of nature’s resources and the fruits of human effort so that as many as possible can enjoy a good life.

Humanists are concerned for the well being of all, are committed to diversity, and respect those of differing yet humane views. We work to uphold the equal enjoyment of human rights and civil liberties in an open, secular society and maintain it is a civic duty to participate in the democratic process and a planetary duty to protect nature’s integrity, diversity, and beauty in a secure, sustainable manner.

Thus engaged in the flow of life, we aspire to this vision with the informed conviction that humanity has the ability to progress toward its highest ideals. The responsibility for our lives and the kind of world in which we live is ours and ours alone.


Humanist Manifesto is a trademark of the American Humanist Association
© 2003 American Humanist Association

The following works have been declared by the AHA board as historic, and are superseded by Humanist Manifesto III:
 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  CB  replied to  TᵢG @5    6 years ago

I know what Humanist Manifesto I, II, and III say and have known for several years now. My intention was and remains to display this one, as the original relic.

Please discuss, accordingly.
 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  CB @5.1    6 years ago

Given you know this relic has been superseded twice, why are you asking epistte about the 1933 version? 

Further you state:

FIRST:Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.   Is undeniably the 'first' principle in Humanist ManifestoI.  It is a cemented fact.

It really does not matter what the first Manifesto states since it has been obsolete since 1973 and superseded again in 2003.    I suspect contemporary Humanists have no problem stating that they are entirely unconvinced that the universe was created but even so the original language questions are for the Humanists of that era.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6  seeder  CB    6 years ago

You're mistaken, epistte 'contacted' the thread with a comment:


  epistte     yesterday

As a secular humanist, I disagree with many of these statements because they seem to be falsely made from the position of a theist. 

FIRST : Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created. The universe had a beginning and will have an end but it wasn't created by a supreme deity.

My question stemmed from a curious modification she made to the original document. Nothing more. The obvious question is this: Why are you addressing me along these lines instead of epistte, for she wrote the comment which drew the question?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  CB  replied to  CB @6    6 years ago

And, then there is that! Silence when I ask a question of you, Tig.  What about reciprocity? Yes, I observe that I did not connect my comment to yours, but all the same it is telling on it own who between the three of "us" is being addressed.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  CB @6.1    6 years ago

Maybe I do not respond to avoid getting into a petty argument.   Sometimes it is best to be silent and wait for something interesting to show up.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.2  seeder  CB  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.1    6 years ago

"Maybe."  I see now. Yet, you appear to have no qualms or concerns about getting "petty" by steering epistte's comment onto me?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  CB @6.1.2    6 years ago

See Cal, look what you are doing.   I respond out of courtesy to explain why I chose to bypass this thread and you go ahead and illustrate why I sometimes ignore your comments / questions.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.4  seeder  CB  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.3    6 years ago

The longer you take to offer a proper explanation, it sends the message you hold expectation you are ABOVE questioning by others!


I want fairness in any discussion I have with you and others on NT. You have any number of examples of this coming from my side of the 'aisle.' You recently accused my of ignoring your questions while being insistent I always take seriously any single question you put "in front" of me.

I repeat:

Why are you addressing me along these lines instead of epistte, for she wrote the comment which drew the question?

Let it be noted, the longer you take to offer a proper explanation, it sends a message that you expect yourself to be ABOVE questioning by others!

 
 

Who is online



540 visitors