Prehistoric cave prints show most early artists were women
Category: Anthropology & Archeology
Via: loretta-mashkawidee-kemsley • 11 years ago • 11 commentsAlongside drawings of bison and horses, the first painters left clues to their identity on the stone walls of caves, blowing red-brown paint through rough tubes and stenciling outlines of their palms. New analysis of ancient handprints in France and Spain suggests that most of those early artists were women.
This is a surprise, since most archaeologists have assumed it was men who had been making the cave art. One interpretation is that early humans painted animals to influence the presence and fate of real animals that they'd find on their hunt, and it's widely accepted that it was the men who found and killed dinner.
But a new study indicates that the majority of handprints found near cave art were made by women, based on their overall size and relative lengths of their fingers.
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/prehistoric-cave-prints-show-most-early-artists-were-women-8C11391268
Like much of history, it was researched and presentedby white males, who cannot comprehend that anyone other than a white male could possibly have the skills to accomplish a task that they deemed done by males.
Modern nerd art is done strictly by white males ...
''nerd art''...LMAO, well that settles it. Nerds R White.
Ain't that the truth. Back in the 1990s, Jeanine Davis-Kimball took a new look at skeletons found on the Steppes. They were assumed to be male because they were buried with weapons. Nope. They were female.
She took DNA from the skeletons and proved at least one young Mongolian woman was descended from one of the women warriors. She's written five books on these and other finds proving women had a larger role in society than white male archaeologists ever imagined.
What a wonderful article and quite fascinating! So, since Neolithic times, when women were important, how oh earth did we become "chattel"?
I think it's also surprising that the reason for the art in the first place has to be ritualistic or spititual in it's interpretation. just how do we know that they didn't do it because it was entertaining, or individualistic, or part of a story , or who knows what.
The upper class men, who couldn't stand the competition, began debasing them - and no one stopped them.
Makes one wonder, doesn't it?
Sigh...
Good point! Maybe it was just to make their surroundings prettier!
I've always thought that I'd make a terrible astronaut-- there is no art in space.