My wife and I talked about this. With so many fewer parts and using no oil and no gas, there are many that would be out of jobs. From assembly line works, oil field personnel, gas stations, parts makers.....the list is very, very big.
What I have noticed about this film, is that it seems that the film was made about in the 70's, which means that this guys work wassuppressedfor a very long time, instead of being further investigated. And in my mind, the only people who would want to do that is the oil industry (OPEC) at that time.
As for people loosing jobs, I think that it could create new ones in a different field!
It wouldn't actually create new jobs as much as replace old ones. Assembly line works (for the auto plants) would just switch over to installing this engine. You would still need transmission repairs, but the engine is much simpler then a combustion engine (from what I can tell).
Yet, think of all the muffler shops that would no longer be needed. Think of the gas stations that wouldn't be needed or the gas truckdeliveries. Gas pump inspectors wouldn't be needed by states anymore and those special construction workers that install the tanks at the stations wouldn't be required either. There would be a minor loss of jobs from the tank makers too. All of the employees that make spark plugs, wires,alternators, fuel injectors, oil, air & Gas filters, fluid gaskets, etc would be out as would most auto parts business.
Maybe if it was a slow change over it would work. I don't really know, but IMHO, the economic impact seems to be very large.
Bill Gates and friends apply for electromagnetic engine patents
If you scroll down the comments, you will see that someone else makes comment to this video.
I am trying to find information that my dad told me about, that Grumman was working on one of these also in the 60's and 70's but the project was scrapped after the gas crisis of the 70's.
[[In the illustrated embodiment, each end includes an intake valve 118 and an exhaust valve 120, which are configured to admit reactants and to expel reaction product, respectively. ]]
It seems to be something that burns fuel (reactants) to produce electric power . That power is then stored in either batteries or capacitors . That energy can then run an electric motor . In other words its a hybrid vehicle like the Chevy Volt or the Toyota Prius .
The economic impacts when most people started driving cars instead of using horses was huge, too-- but we all adjusted.
Someone still has to make them. Someone will still have to repair and/or replace parts. Someone will have to do other work on cars. I think it could be a solution...
Usually, things like this are very expensive in the beginning, and gradually become less expensive so that it becomes affordable for most people. The change may be a slow one!
My wife and I talked about this. With so many fewer parts and using no oil and no gas, there are many that would be out of jobs. From assembly line works, oil field personnel, gas stations, parts makers.....the list is very, very big.
What I have noticed about this film, is that it seems that the film was made about in the 70's, which means that this guys work wassuppressedfor a very long time, instead of being further investigated. And in my mind, the only people who would want to do that is the oil industry (OPEC) at that time.
As for people loosing jobs, I think that it could create new ones in a different field!
It wouldn't actually create new jobs as much as replace old ones. Assembly line works (for the auto plants) would just switch over to installing this engine. You would still need transmission repairs, but the engine is much simpler then a combustion engine (from what I can tell).
Yet, think of all the muffler shops that would no longer be needed. Think of the gas stations that wouldn't be needed or the gas truckdeliveries. Gas pump inspectors wouldn't be needed by states anymore and those special construction workers that install the tanks at the stations wouldn't be required either. There would be a minor loss of jobs from the tank makers too. All of the employees that make spark plugs, wires,alternators, fuel injectors, oil, air & Gas filters, fluid gaskets, etc would be out as would most auto parts business.
Maybe if it was a slow change over it would work. I don't really know, but IMHO, the economic impact seems to be very large.
Before I reply, I'd like to think of other industries it would create.
Electric Motor Design [taught by hot blonde]
How would you like to get her motor running ?!
Bill Gates and friends apply for electromagnetic engine patents
If you scroll down the comments, you will see that someone else makes comment to this video.
I am trying to find information that my dad told me about, that Grumman was working on one of these also in the 60's and 70's but the project was scrapped after the gas crisis of the 70's.
[[In the illustrated embodiment, each end includes an intake valve 118 and an exhaust valve 120, which are configured to admit reactants and to expel reaction product, respectively. ]]
It seems to be something that burns fuel (reactants) to produce electric power . That power is then stored in either batteries or capacitors . That energy can then run an electric motor . In other words its a hybrid vehicle like the Chevy Volt or the Toyota Prius .
Rich,
There is noting new about this technology:
Electric cars ? No they're not new , only greatly improved . But what does that have to do with the seeded article ?
Nope. Not real. It's a perpetual motion machine.
It was all fake. He was looking for investors to give him money.
The economic impacts when most people started driving cars instead of using horses was huge, too-- but we all adjusted.
Someone still has to make them. Someone will still have to repair and/or replace parts. Someone will have to do other work on cars. I think it could be a solution...
Usually, things like this are very expensive in the beginning, and gradually become less expensive so that it becomes affordable for most people. The change may be a slow one!