╌>

Meta on CoC: An Omission from the last update

  

Category:  Other

Via:  perrie-halpern  •  12 years ago  •  21 comments

Meta on CoC: An Omission from the last update

Apparently, there was an omission from the current CoC when it was voted on and cleared. Here was the part that was missing:

Section 3:

The author can also request that members who are apparently, with intent, disrupting an article by being arbitrarily argumentative, to leave the article. Should the author choose not to direct a another member to leave an article, that author should contact administration so that all comments pertaining to that argument can be deleted by administration.

Please read the article in it's entirety here:

http://thenewstalkers.com/forum/topics/the-updated-coc

It will be restored to the CoC, since it was supposed to be there in the first place.

This is just a notice of the change.



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Arch-Man
Freshman Silent
link   Arch-Man    12 years ago

Chicanos On Crack!Smile.gif

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
Professor Quiet
link   Larry Hampton    12 years ago

That was section 8?

Dang it's easy to lose track. I thought that was 11?

 
 
 
Pedro
Professor Participates
link   Pedro    12 years ago

Ummm....it's "Oh no you di'int"

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    12 years ago

That may be, but it was supposed to be there. I have to say, that it took me by surprise, too. I had totally forgotten about it.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    12 years ago

That was Dana's idea. I thought it was kind of cleaver. I'm surprised no one caught that sooner.

 
 
 
Pedro
Professor Participates
link   Pedro    12 years ago

If you disagree with the author's moderation, you can request a moderator to review it. As long as you are on topic and not making personal attacks, there wont be any reason for the author to ask you to leave.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    12 years ago

For instance disagreeing with the "author" is by it's very nature being argumentative, so the "author" can order someone who disagrees with them to leave the article.

No. They can't do that, and I want to be clear about this. Members making legitimateargumentspertaining to the topic, can't be told to leave. If this happens, please get one of the mods.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    12 years ago

Trouble Maker! ;-)

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    12 years ago

Peter, exactly! Hey... your kind of smart. ;-)

 
 
 
Pedro
Professor Participates
link   Pedro    12 years ago

I dont know. My mom called me a smart ass, but then again, she also says I'm a son of a bitch.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    12 years ago

Peter,

Son of a bitch? Well, I guess your mom could take it as well as she gave it! Good for her!

Mike,

I don't mind swearing. There is new evidence that it's good for you!

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
link   Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    9 years ago

You guys really killed this site in my absence!

What absence?

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
link   Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    9 years ago

Can you please find a meta article from when Perrie was still attached to her mother's uteral wall?

Hahahahahahaha!!! That was so deliciously hilarious, I forgot to be depressed about mygetting-worse-by-the-minuteunder-arm flabwobble. True story.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
link   Bob Nelson    9 years ago

Can you please find a meta article from when Perrie was still attached to her mother's uteral wall?

;-))))))))

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
link   Nowhere Man    9 years ago

Even that probably wouldn't be far enough back for some.

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
link   Nowhere Man    9 years ago

Really?

How would you know, you weren't here... Grin.gif

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    9 years ago

Huh? and why is a an update from 3 years ago being discussed?

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    9 years ago

Still a part of #3 in the COC, re-worded.

Go for it. Terry/wmolaw was the one who worded it, and he's a lawyer.

Can you please find a meta article from when Perrie was still attached to her mother's uteral wall?

LMAO!!

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    9 years ago

Robert,
LOL, more than NV? Even better than that, go check out "Debate Politics". They rules on top of rules and even separate rules to engage in their Middle East Forum with a list of no go words.

And while we are shortening up subjective stuff, maybe the Constitution could be shortened... it's very subjective and requires the pesty SCOTUS to interpret it. We should leave it as
We the people.

 
 

Who is online

GregTx
Bob Nelson
JohnRussell
Right Down the Center
Gazoo
zuksam


399 visitors