Do Jews, Christians and Muslims Believe in the Same God?
http://www.arcamax.com/politics/fromtheright/dennisprager/s-1820707?fs
Dennis Prager
Most Americans say they believe in God. Around the world, religious Jews, Christians and Muslims say they believe in God, as do many people who do not identify with any formal religion.
But this statement is actually meaningless.
To cite one example, the God in whose name some Muslim extremists cut innocent peoples' throats and violate women cannot be the same God as the God of those who believe God condemns such actions.
Who then argues that all those who say they believe in God believe in the same God?
Two groups make this argument. The first consists of people who have an anti-religious agenda: They say that all religious people believe in the same God in order to discredit God and religion. The second consists of people who have an inclusion agenda and wish to depict Muslims as believing in the same God as Jews and Christians (as indeed, some do - see below).
So, how are we to know whether any two people who say they believe in God in fact do?
I will answer as a believing Jew: How do I know if another person believes in the same God that I do? I ask the following three questions:
--Do you believe in the God of Israel?
Those who cannot answer this question in the affirmative do not believe in the same God that believing Jews and the majority of believing Christians do. As for Muslims, they should have no problem answering in the affirmative, but in our time many wouldn't.
The God of Israel is, among other things, the God introduced to the world by the Jews and their Bible: the God who created the world, revealed himself to the Jews, and made his moral will known through the Ten Commandments and the Hebrew prophets.
--Does the God you believe in judge the moral behavior of every human being?
There are many people today who say that they believe in a God who does not judge peoples' actions. As such, they do not believe in the same God as traditional Jews and Christians. In fact, a God that is indifferent to the moral behavior of human beings is so different from the God introduced by the Jews that these believers might as well use a word other than "God."
Now, this does not mean that such people cannot be fine, upstanding individuals (just as not everyone who believes in a morally judging God is a fine, upstanding person). But in general, these people are less likely to be moral for the obvious reason that most human beings act better when they believe their actions will be judged either by God and/or by man.
At the same time, one need not be a Jew, Christian or Muslim in order to believe in a God who judges morality. Benjamin Franklin was one such individual: He did not affirm the Christian creed that Jesus was God, but he did believe in the moral teachings and judgments of God introduced by the Bible.
One might argue that violent Muslims believe in a judging God, and that Tomas de Torquemada, the infamous head of the Spanish Inquisition, did, too. But this argument is not valid, for it seems that violent Muslims believe God will judge them by their faith and pursuit of justice -- not their moral conduct. They act according to what they themselves believe God approves of.
For the record, Jews never believed -- and the Jewish Bible never suggested -- that one must believe in Judaism or be Jewish in order to be favorably judged by God.
--Do you believe in the God who gave the Ten Commandments?
This question needs to be asked. After all, if God never revealed his moral will, how would we know what behaviors he demands from us and what he judges?
And what about people who say "yes" to these questions but have additional theological beliefs? Do they believe in the same God as those who also answer "yes" but have no additional beliefs?
For example, what about Christians who believe in the God of Israel but also believe, by definition, in the Christian Trinity? Do they believe in the same God as Jews and other non-Christians who solely believe in these three criteria? I think they do. And the same would hold true for a Muslim who believes in these three notions but also believes that the Quran is the only fully valid revelation.
Whether or not one uses these three criteria, we should all at least acknowledge that saying one believes in God tells us nothing about the God one believes in. And regarding faith, that is what matters.
Tags
Who is online
79 visitors
Dennis Prager, while a conservative and religious right ideologue, is an intelligent man. He should know better than what he is saying here. I think he does, but can't say it and maintain his "theology".
Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all monotheistic religions. They all believe that there is one and only one God. If we give the sincere members and followers of each of these religions the benefit of the doubt and stipulate that theirs are honest beliefs, then the only possible logical conclusion is that they all worship the same God.
Within each of these beliefs , and thus within all of them in combination , is the affirmation of ONE God. Since there is only one, by definition it has to be the same ONE.
Go to the source!
In the OT or Torah, there is only one god for everyone, even pagans. You are judged on your deeds, not your belief.
If you want to believe a book written by man.
God has only made itself known through it's creation (as far as we can tell). So any inspiration or revelation from God has to come through the words of man. Different men, different places, different times, different expressions of belief in God. Still, only one God.
Good comment Perrie.
Agreed Perrie.
Or a book judged my a man to be the one true revelation.
KJV = King James Version = Approved by the king for use in all churches that believe in the christian faith. And that was after his religious scribes decided what should be in it and what shouldn't.
Prior to open publishing in society, all bibles had the royal seal of England imprinted on them and a bible couldn't be printed without it. they also had a foreword from the king that ascribed that this was the one true version as personally approved by him.
So there is the MAN that wrote it some century after the events happened, and MAN that decided what is in it, and the MAN on royal authority, (supposedly anointed by god) to approve it. That does beg the question doesn't it? I mean if god is as omnipotent as the book claims, why does he need Man to approve his ideals?
Can anyone answer that for me?
Yeah, poor God
If there is a God, he/she must be shaking his/her head right now, thinking did I really create a whole planet of idiots? I shouldn't have worked overtime, working Saturday wasn't a good idea at all.