For me, a candidate must meet minimum requirements: a reputation for honesty, a commitment to transparency in government, sound judgment, and basic knowledge of the issues we face as a country to hit the ground running on day one.
Hillary has the knowledge but she lies incessantly, has been involved in numerous scandals, has exhibited extremely poor judgment in the Middle East, and used private servers to frustrate transparency in government. I oppose her positions on illegal aliens and same sex marriage. She is completely unacceptable to me.
Trump does not have the same baggage as Hillary because he was not in government. However, he is an anti-intellectual to the point of being an ignoramus. He has no core principle that I can discern other than to do that which serves himself. He babbles nonsense like a drunk on a bar stool with seemingly no comprehension of whether what he's saying is true or false and doesn't really care. I would have no idea what he might do but it may not be as bad as what Hillary has already done. Still, his not taking clear and consistent positions makes him completely unacceptable to me as well.
I will not be marched to the poles like a sheep to choose between the lesser of two evils when the result of either choice is the same -- terrible governance. I will write in "nobody."
A big dog.
A big dog....
gathers no moss?
For me, a candidate must meet minimum requirements: a reputation for honesty, a commitment to transparency in government, sound judgment, and basic knowledge of the issues we face as a country to hit the ground running on day one.
Hillary has the knowledge but she lies incessantly, has been involved in numerous scandals, has exhibited extremely poor judgment in the Middle East, and used private servers to frustrate transparency in government. I oppose her positions on illegal aliens and same sex marriage. She is completely unacceptable to me.
Trump does not have the same baggage as Hillary because he was not in government. However, he is an anti-intellectual to the point of being an ignoramus. He has no core principle that I can discern other than to do that which serves himself. He babbles nonsense like a drunk on a bar stool with seemingly no comprehension of whether what he's saying is true or false and doesn't really care. I would have no idea what he might do but it may not be as bad as what Hillary has already done. Still, his not taking clear and consistent positions makes him completely unacceptable to me as well.
I will not be marched to the poles like a sheep to choose between the lesser of two evils when the result of either choice is the same -- terrible governance. I will write in "nobody."
Too many Floofs?