╌>

It's 'Disastrous' for Wealthy to 'Hand Their Money Over to Government'

  

Category:  Stock Market & Investments

Via:  xxjefferson51  •  9 years ago  •  5 comments

It's 'Disastrous' for Wealthy to 'Hand Their Money Over to Government'

Understanding how the world's economy works may seem daunting, but in reality, it's as easy as knowing the facts and figures of sports, rock 'n roll and even Paris Hilton, John Tamny, who covers economics and politics for Forbes.com and is editor-in-chief of RealClearMarkets.com, told Newsmax TV.

"The idea behind the book was that economic growth is so simple and everyone knows it, thats because they know the world around them," Tamny author of "Popular Economics: What the Rolling Stones, Downton Abbey, and LeBron James can Teach You About Economics," published by Regnery told "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.

A prime example: LeBron James, the 6-foot-8 small forward for the Cleveland Cavaliers.

"If you want to understand free trade, Lebron James is a very good example of it. He is the best basketball player in the world. Thats how he can create the most wealth for himself," Tamny said.

"But it is said by football players that he can also be a tight end in the NFL. So I make the argument, if he did so, that would be a disaster because it would be at the expense of him being the best basketball player It actually reduce his income if he did both.

"Free trade is no different. Its entirely possible that youre the best chef and the best tailor and the best builder in the world, but if you were to do all three of those things, it would be at the expense of doing what youre best at which is being the host of a TV show."

Tamny also a senior economic advisor to the Fresno, California-based Toreador Research & Trading said since individuals all trade freely, "we let others do things theyre good at and we concentrate on what were best at because that allows us to command the most in the economy."

Tamny said he believes giving money to the government the worst thing that can be done in growing the economy.

i.gif?e=eyJhdiI6NzI4ODIsImF0IjoxMywiYnQiOjAsImNtIjoyNDExMjEsImNoIjoxNzgzNywiY3IiOjU0NDExMCwiZGkiOiJjYjRiODI4NDlkMjU0NDNlYjc3ZWEzMTJjZWJiYTEwZCIsImRtIjoxLCJmYyI6ODgyMzQ5LCJmbCI6NTc2Njc2LCJpcCI6IjEwOC44My4xOTEuODMiLCJrdyI6Im5hdGl2ZSIsIm53Ijo5NjUwLCJwYyI6ODE1MDAsInByIjo2MTI1OSwicnQiOjEsInJmIjoiaHR0cDovL3d3dy5uZXdzbWF4LmNvbS8iLCJzdCI6NjcxNDMsInVrIjoidWUxLWM5NTFmN2UyYTFhMDQxNDc5YjliODQxMTM4NzE4OTBlIiwiem4iOjExODY3MywidHMiOjE0Mjk3OTg0NjI5MTEsImJmIjp0cnVlLCJwbiI6ImF6azE3ODYzIn0&s=IuUwwLqR8S0ggp-MdSXXsTX2Oz4


"Its a disaster for the economy and its particularly disastrous when the rich hand their money over to the government rather than holding on to it," he said.

"The reason for this is basic, when Paris Hilton gets $100,000 to deejay a show in Las Vegas, she puts that money into the bank. In short, her wealth is immediately redistributed to those who are not Paris Hilton and thats why we want the rich to hold onto their wealth.

"They put it in the bank, its lent to someone who needs a car loan or needs a college tuition or who needs a small business loan. If they invest it in the stock market theyre providing capital to businesses."

With the other option, "we know [the government is going to consume it," Tamny said. "At least when the rich hold onto it, they redistribute it to us."

But what choice do individuals have when it comes time to pay taxes?

"Thats the problem When government is taxing us, it is robbing us of future ESPNs, future Intels, Googles, all these great companies," Tamny explained.

"Thats what were missing out on when government is taking too much of our money."


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTalk/wealth-economy-taxes-john-tamny/2015/04/19/id/639409/#ixzz3Y8rvsA6w


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    9 years ago

"In the 1970s the top tax rate in England was 83 percent. Well, as Keith Richards pointed out, that was the equivalent of being told to leave the country," Tamny said.

"Guess what? Thats what they did. They made 'Exile on Main Street' in France, one of their best albums ever. Now, the Stones were able to move. They were rich. They could escape the tax.

"But what about all the sound engineers, all the caterers, all the people who work on the creation of the album? They didnt have the means to go with the Stones. So its the poor and the middle class who pay for the high income tax rates levied on the rich."

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    9 years ago
Do you really expect people to just give money away? How would the economy work if there was no investment capital to Tap into to start a business or expand one? Who would create jobs then if there was no capital to lend?
 
 
 
Petey Coober
Freshman Silent
link   Petey Coober    9 years ago

Spamming the same comment repeatedly is a violation of the CoC . I guess the rules are not your concern .

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    9 years ago
And again some can only attack the source or the seeder. Progressives are simply not capable of rational economic thought patterns. Their hatred of capitalism, free markets, and investment as the source of job growth is well known. No one is going to give away money for free. Government stealing too much through taxation leaves less capital for investment in job creating new small companies and expansion of existing ones. The concept of avoiding American political views differing from ones own is one of intellectual shallowness.
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    9 years ago
An open confession that the CoC is not a concern when personally attacking one who seeds and posts an opposing point of view. Follow the rules when posting here. It is interesting that seeds on economic and tax issues get far more vitriol from progressives here than an outright anti Obama editorial does.
 
 

Who is online

Snuffy
Igknorantzruls


69 visitors