╌>

Time for Justice for Children in New York

  

Category:  Other

Via:  nona62  •  9 years ago  •  5 comments

Time for Justice for Children in New York

Time for Justice for Children in New York

Under New Yorks juvenile justice system a child as young as 7 can be arrested for a crime, and a 16-year-old is automatically charged as an adult.

These laws are shockingly behind the times bad for children and bad for public safety. New York is one of only four states to create a juvenile jurisdiction for little children who are barely old enough to shed their baby teeth and still believe in the tooth fairy. And they are expected to have the cognitive development necessary to participate in and understand a trial?

New York is one of only two states to ignore the latest neurological research underscoring the fact that 16- and 17-year-olds are still children developmentally . Their brains will not be fully formed until age 25, and they lack the ability to control impulsive behavior by focusing on its consequences.

This key developmental period is an important opportunity for rehabilitation. Research shows that adolescents are highly receptive to change in a way that adults are not. They respond very well to proven interventions and with them can learn to make more responsible choices.

Ignoring evidence-based interventions proven to reduce recidivism and continuing to ship teens off to crime school (adult prison) are mistakes we cant afford to keep making. In adult prisons, youths are more likely to suffer physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and be molded by other prisoners, often hardened career criminals. Studies have found that youths in the adult criminal justice system are 36 times more likely to commit suicide and are rearrested 34-percent more often for felony crimes than their peers in the juvenile justice system.

This sobering fact, that automatically charging 16- and 17-year-olds as adults makes them more likely to commit violent crimes, is proof that this policy is a threat to public safety. The evidence shows that children should be treated as children, particularly since these teen arrests are overwhelmingly for nonviolent crimes like shoplifting, turnstile jumping, or drug possession. The racial disparities in policing youths of color (over 70 percent of the children arrested and 80 percent of the children sent to prison statewide are Black and Latino) compound the harm that these unfair laws are inflicting on our children and communities.

Earlier this year, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo included recommendations from his Commission on Youth, Public Safety & Justice in his 2015-16 executive budget. His proposal raises the minimum age of juvenile jurisdiction from age 7 to 12 (age 10 in rare cases of homicide). It also raises the overall age of juvenile jurisdiction to 18 and broadens the list of eligible circumstances in which young offender status can be assigned to age 21. Importantly, this means that 16- and 17-year-olds would never again be housed with adult criminals. Instead, the justice system would focus on proven services and interventions that the most current research has demonstrated result in better outcomes for youths and reduce recidivism and keep communities safer from violent crime.

CDFs work to raise the age in New York builds on our early work to keep children out of adult jails recognizing inhumane conditions and great harms to children. In the foreword to our 1976 report "Children in Adult Jails," Judge Justine Wise Polier , the state of New Yorks first woman judge, who presided in New York Citys family court for 38 years and at the time was the director of CDFs Juvenile Justice Division, chided states that continued to prosecute and jail children in the adult criminal justice system: It has been over three-quarters of a century since states began to legislate that children should be treated as children.

Today New York and North Carolina are the only two states left that automatically treat children as adult criminals, but how pleased Judge Polier would be that Gov. Cuomo has put forward a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to juvenile justice reform that would change that. Now is the time for the New York state legislature to join him by adopting this important, long-overdue change. Then North Carolina, as the last outlier, should join the rest of the states in seeking justice for children.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marian-wright-edelman/time-for-justice-for-chil_b_6957818.html



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Nona62
Professor Silent
link   seeder  Nona62    9 years ago

New York is one of only two states to ignore the latest neurological research underscoring the fact that 16- and 17-year-olds are still children developmentally . Their brains will not be fully formed until age 25, and they lack the ability to control impulsive behavior by focusing on its consequences.

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Participates
link   Randy    9 years ago

Automatic anything's in the legal system bother's mean (that's why I oppose the three strikes law as STUPID!) so automatically charging them as adults is just plain wrong, especially for minor offense. Why hang a conviction on the neck of a kid who could turn out to become a good kid, go to college, become a productive member....you know, for a minor offense. Of course there are exceptions. If someone commits murder at 16, then it should be up to a judge to charge him or her as an adult. Automatic anything not only takes the power of being a judge out of the judge's hands, it makes for lazy judge's and justice.

As for 7 year old's? If a child that young is committing crimes there is something a lot worse then the crimes going on in that kid's life. Like abuse or neglect or mental illness. It makes no sense whatsoever to ever charge a 7 year old with any crime. ANY crime at all!

 
 
 
Nona62
Professor Silent
link   seeder  Nona62    9 years ago

MM....I couldn't have said it better. I agree with you 100%....

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
link   Kavika     9 years ago

Charging a seven year old is beyond stupid. And charging 16 and 17 year olds as adults is equally as stupid.

If the crime is that serious, in other states a 16 or 17 year old can be charged as an adult, it is not automatic nor should it be.

 
 
 
Nona62
Professor Silent
link   seeder  Nona62    9 years ago

Kav....Charging a seven year old is beyond stupid. And charging 16 and 17 year olds as adults is equally as stupidThat's for sure!!

 
 

Who is online

Drinker of the Wry
Thomas
Kavika
JBB
Mark in Wyoming
CB


255 visitors