The RNC uses the unhinged left to win in November
The left is now advocating violence. The senior political party is now in the hands of radicals itching for another Civil War. Socialism is rising through its ranks. How does the GOP respond? By capturing the words and deeds of leading progressives on film so that voters don't forget what the left is doing to this country.
This film, which I think deserves credit as documentary of the year features the great hate monger & race baiter Maxine Waters in all her fury, advocating for her vicious followers to "harass" people who are trying to eat a meal or watch a movie or gas up their cars. "Form groups & harass" are the watch words for the woman who was instrumental in the violence of the LA riots.
We also get more samples of the distinctive hate filled rhetoric of the left for all us to think about as we go to the polls .
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Who is online
101 visitors
Enjoy
I see a strong resemblance, don't you.
Fake foto.
Seems that the righties are easily triggered by their comments on this article...
Don't worry about them, tell us what you think of the ad
I did above with the photo of Trump....Seems two of a kind don't ya think.
Pictures of faces twisted in anger? That is a cute way to make them appear similar.
Waters has always been an advocate for violence. Trump's rhetoric, on the other hand, can be best described by the words of Barry Goldwater:
" I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
Is cute and reality the same in your world?
LOL, now that is a bridge to far....Trumps rhetoric which is vile in many cases and his promise to support those that commit a act of violence are well known no mater how much you don't want to believe it.
Waters is a nut case IMO, but she represents one district of one state. Trump is a big a nut case but represents the entire US. See the difference, Vic.
You are referring to when individuals on the left were violently infiltrating Trump rallies during the Presidential campaign? Fighting fire with fire or violence with violence is far different that the side that initiates the violence.
Waters is a nut case IMO, but she represents one district of one state
Not much to fear? Tell that to the white truck driver that had his head smashed with concrete blocks.
There's your difference
So the black guy that was sucker punched by a white guy at a Trump rally was violently infiltrating the rally..LMAO, now that is funny Vic. He initiated no violence and was being escorted out when the white POS sucker punched him...
I don't believe that I said ''not much to fear''...That's on you Vic, don't try to put words in my mouth. As for the white guy whose head was smashed with blocks, his name was Reginald Denny and I was living in LA when the riots took place. It's interesting that you seem to have a mental block as to why that happened...Does the name Rodney King ring a bell?
Then maybe you can explain it to us. Why was he at a Trump rally? Why did he have to be escorted out? And why is Trump to blame for him being sucker punched? and finally why is the race of the individuals so important to you?
I don't believe that I said ''not much to fear'
Just like she stopped just short of saying assault Trump officials.
You played her down as just a "nut case". Actually she is a racist with blood on her hands, still beating the drum of division
It's interesting that you seem to have a mental block as to why that happened...Does the name Rodney King ring a bell?
I have no memory problems. King was the one who led the LA police on a merry chase and was beaten when the LA police over reacted. He was awarded $3.8 million as I recall. And it was NO REASON for Waters and her fellow racists to go out and riot and murder, nor was it an excuse for the Simpson Jury to give him a pass, as they have admitted.
That was a true example of the racism that now exists in this country. I hope Iv'e made myself clear.
He was there to protest, as far as I know that isn't deserving of a sucker punch. Race isn't that important to me, until it used by some as a weapon...If you have a concern about my thoughts on race perhaps you should do a little self evaluation on your thoughts about it...
She is a nut case much like your hero Trump...Did she kill anyone, did she call for anyone to be killed, no she didn't. When you speak of beating the drum of division you should add Trump in, he's very good at it whether you can see it or not.
Just to refresh your memory a bit more. A change of venue was granted and the trial was moved to Simi Valley 99% white and a jury that had no blacks on it. The not guilty verdict was a long long long list of minorities being screwed in LA. If need be Vic I can take you though what transpired for decades in LA with minorities. I probably have a better grip on it then you do since I lived there and was a minority...BTW over reacted is one hell of an understatement. As far as I know Waters didn't riot. So those that rioted are racists and the cops the beat King weren't, is that what you saying?
Sadly you have.
Unfortunately, America seems to have recently become a country of racism and discrimination based upon place of birth. Skin color and place of birth has not been as much the primary focus as it has come to be in the last year. America seems to have returned to the days of yesteryear when the value of human beings in our country were based upon their skin color and place of birth.
While America may have progressed in technology, we have now seriously regressed in our tolerance and acceptance of others who share this world with us based upon the color of their skin and where they are born. It does not speak well of those who are leaders of our country who should be those who set a positive role model for American citizens. There is nothing positive about what America has now become.
I'm afraid he can't protest anywhere he wants, just like he can't protest in my home. Race was important enough to you to identify both people by race.
She is a nut case much like your hero Trump...Did she kill anyone, did she call for anyone to be killed, no she didn't. When you speak of beating the drum of division you should add Trump in, he's very good at it whether you can see it or not.
What were her comments during the LA riots?
Just to refresh your memory a bit more. A change of venue was granted and the trial was moved to Simi Valley 99% white and a jury that had no blacks on it.
Yes, I know
The not guilty verdict was a long long long list of minorities being screwed in LA. If need be Vic I can take you though what transpired for decades in LA with minorities.
Not necessary, I know that too. That is still not justification for mob violence and the Simpson verdict which followed
I probably have a better grip on it then you do since I lived there and was a minority
Who are the minorities in LA?
.BTW over reacted is one hell of an understatement. As far as I know Waters didn't riot. So those that rioted are racists and the cops the beat King weren't, is that what you saying?
You chase somebody (who may be high on something) in a high speed chase, all over the city and maybe we will see how reserved & controlled you are by the time you get to the jerk. Waters didn't riot. She encouraged others and celebrated with them afterwards. (Just like Al Capone didn't actually do the killing). Evidently you don't remember as much as you think you do. And yes I'm saying those that rioted ARE in FACT RACISTS just as much as it can be said of the enraged cops.
Sadly you have.
GOOD
That kind of thinking led to the civil war.
enforcing our borders is not racism.
but I think the left calling people "racist for enforcing the law is the point of the article.
I never said that he could. He was being escorted out and was sucker punched, that's what a coward does. The police departments nationwide identify by race as do other institutions. I don't see the problem, but evidently you do. You might want to discuss with the LEO's why they ID by race.
She didn't call for anyone to be killed or encouraged that behavior. She did say, ''I maintain it was somewhat understandable, if not acceptable." In her view, the violence, was “a spontaneous reaction to a lot of injustice.” If you have a record of Waters calling for killing please post the evidence.
For someone that claims that they know most everything about this, it's interesting that you don't know or choose to ignore my comment in 5.1.7 ''I don't condone the rioting but I sure as hell understand how and why it happened.''
For someone that claims they know so much about the riots, King, LAPD and you don't know who the minorities in LA are!! LMAO now that sounds like a set up question Vic...
I thought that LEO's were trained to handle high stress engagements. Silly me. King was on ground, not fighting back and handcuffed when the beating took place. If Waters did what you said she did please provide proof. As I said before she is nutty, like Trump, but not that nutty to call for killings. BTW the LAPD was put under a ''consent decree'' in 2001 by the DOJ.
Remember what your fearless leader said...''There are good people on both sides''...LOL
So Vic, since you don't remember what you think you remember I don't see much use in continuing the discussion. You can have the last word...
Forgot to add this link about the investigation of the LAPD after the riots. It shows quite well the racism and corruption in the LAPD...Really worth watching.
I see a problem with it. Your'e saying it was racial. Let's not pretend otherwise.
'I maintain it was somewhat understandable, if not acceptable."
For more than 50 people were killed during the riots, with thousands more injured and over $1 billion in property damage? There is your RACIST!
For someone that claims they know so much about the riots, King, LAPD and you don't know who the minorities in LA are!! LMAO now that sounds like a set up question Vic..
Then let me inform you, White is part of the minority in LA. Hispanics are the majority at 1.84 million
I thought that LEO's were trained to handle high stress engagements. Silly me. King was on ground, not fighting back and handcuffed when the beating took place. If Waters did what you said she did please provide proof. As I said before she is nutty, like Trump, but not that nutty to call for killings. BTW the LAPD was put under a ''consent decree'' in 2001 by the DOJ.
Oh, Ya, they are supermen who never feel emotions after chasing morons through the streets of LA...Ya, he was on the ground when he was finally stopped. Why didn't he just pull over in the beginning? Why resist arrest? How come some in our society don't know to do that?
Remember what your fearless leader said...''There are good people on both sides''...LOL
Both sides of the statue controversy. He wasn't talking about Antifa or the Klan, but that's the way the REAL HATERS have interpreted that. You are so concerned about RACE and look at what it's done to you.
Since you offered your opinion and little in facts I'll simply say that if you look at the 1990 census it a bit different than what you posted. 1990 is the era we are discussing.
And no comment about the corrupt, racist LAPD...Hmmmm
Now that is an interesting comment from someone that seems to avoid any suggestion that racism played the major part in the Rodney King riots and the racist/corrupt LAPD. And a somewhat personal comment about race and what it's done to me...BTW, what has it done to me, I'm curious.
As I explained to you earlier race isn't something that is foremost in my mind except when it's used as a weapon. That probably went over your head but that's it for me. As in the riots, race and racism was a weapon used by the LAPD. I would suggest that you read the Christopher report. I would suggest you take the time to do a little self reflection on your problem with race, it seems to have consumed you and that isn't a good thing at all.
I had to respond to your ''race'' comment to me. Now you can have the last word. Try to use some facts this time.
Oh, now I can have it. How many "Last Words" do I get? I said what needed to be said about the 50 murdered during the riots! The very thing you never found important enough to mention and that is what resentment does to one's soul.
Thanks again for all the "Last Words"
I have to admit, the Democrats seem to be fairly clueless at this juncture. My problem is the GOP is no better, they just happen to have a plan at least.
The Dems seem to be flailing about in a darkened room with blindfolds on, better get busy if they expect to have a chance in Nov.
That statement may be more true than you know. Wasn't it the Republicans in Congress who promised to control government spending, repeal regulations, fix Obamacare and secure the borders?
It would seem that there is only one man taking all that on and he isn't really a "Conservative".
Trump's supporters are a minority of the population and need to stop acting like this ignorant asshole Trump has been anointed to speak for "the people". If we take the phrase "the people" to represent the majority, then "the people" oppose Donald Trump.
Actually it is those who believe in liberalism that are in the minority:
Only 24% of the population classify themselves as liberal
I know that poll is from 2015, so if you would like to provide a more recent poll feel free.
You can take some comfort in knowing that although liberals are only 24% of the population, they by and large, have a hold on the msm, the entertainment sector, a few Circuit Courts and the University. For 8 years they even had the White House.
If we take the phrase "the people" to represent the majority, then "the people" oppose Donald Trump.
Do they oppose or did a lot of Californians vote for Hillary Clinton? I think your'e getting a little confused by protests. Protests usually represent a minority view and are designed to inflate the groups numbers. The true test will come this November.
As liberals used to say, the President is the President of all the people who are citizens and or who live here (legal resident aliens).
This ad might be effective in getting Trump’s base to the polls but, as an independent, it didn’t move me much. The “unhinged” is a good title but the video is emphasizing that they’re a physical threat to us by opening with broken windows, a burning car, and a severed head. I felt like I was watching the opening of some old “wild in the streets” movie where the youth go crazy and terrorize old people. Am I really supposed to panic over a broken window a burning car, and a fake severed head? Then it makes a clumsy transition to Maxine Waters and I guess it’s trying to say that people like her are driving the violence that the video depicts. Long story short, I would have done it differently if the idea is to get support from independents.
I think people once asked a similar question; Am I really supposed to panic over some broken windows, a burning pile of books and a group of guys parading around in brown shirts?
Don't you think they've crossed a line?
Not in that regard. A totalitarian state can begin with a broken window but all broken windows don’t lead to a totalitarian state. If the point of the video is to suggest that brown shirts are next and that old fool Maxine Waters is the next Hitler, then the response may be laughter rather than concern.
You only need to have survived the LA riots
Like I said, the video may get a good reaction from Trump supporters but I don’t know about anybody else. Time will tell.
We will know in 5 months
It will get the desired reaction from those the ad highlights and their fans as well and that’s the best part. As to the broken glass, burning cars, and blackshirts, anyone recognize Antifa as the connection here?
Let's hope the sensible are still the majority.
Maybe they can catapult Hillary into the election again and watch her splatter against a brick wall.
I think it is great. Pelosi inciting uprising and Waters inciting violence. At this point I hope they get what they ask for. It will destroy the party. Undoubtedly there will be more to add to the video before November.
For the record, they are not getting their crumbs back. We deplorables are going to be bitterly clinging to those tax cuts.
yep
/the left went off the hook and pushed un-electable candidates "because, during, and after reagan they then shifted back to the center with clinton for the win.
history asserts the same thing is happening today... after trumps second term will be another rightwinger and then the dnc will be forced to come back to the middle again.
this phenomena is nothing new and is likely to be repeated again.
which is why I always say.. it will be a decade or more until the left gets its shit together again.
when the left puts our people, our country first? they will win again.
until the left realizes that? (today is way too soon) just vote and enjoy the show.. it will be fun
side note: today's left has this international / globalist bent which was not overly present before.
might be 20yrs or more until they get their shit together
will be interesting to watch, and take notes
Given their track record it is probably safe to say more than 10