Trumps' Barbed Comments Upset British Hosts
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Trump's barbed comments upset British hosts
TAMER FAKAHANY, Associated Press 2 hours 51 minutes ago 
A six-meter high cartoon baby blimp of U.S. President Donald Trump is flown as a protest against his visit, in Parliament Square in London, England, Friday, July 13, 2018. Trump is making his first trip to Britain as president after a tense summit with NATO leaders in Brussels and on the heels of ruptures in British Prime Minister Theresa May's government because of the crisis over Britain's exit from the European Union. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)LONDON (AP) — There's a character called Don Logan, played by Ben Kingsley in the British film "Sexy Beast" — a bullying and mercurial individual who wreaks havoc on the life of a retired former underworld cohort when he visits him in exile in Spain. He intimidates, humiliates, taunts and worse. He is a most unwelcome house guest.
Many Britons who awoke to the visiting U.S. President Donald Trump's fusillade against the country, its prime minister's EU exit strategy, its immigration policy and personal attacks on London's mayor Sadiq Khan — effectively blaming him directly for terror attacks in the capital city — may feel they are in a similar situation as they roll out the red carpet to a world leader seemingly intent on denigrating their nation.
The red carpet officially, at least.
Tens of thousands will protest Trump's visit in London Friday, and their numbers could well be swelled by Trump's interview to The Sun newspaper which emerged as British Prime Minister Theresa May was hosting him at an opulent black-tie dinner in the leafy splendor of Blenheim Palace — the birthplace of wartime leader Winston Churchill, whom Trump is said to admire greatly.
He doesn't seem to admire the current British leader a great deal based on the interview he gave in Brussels at the end of a chaotic NATO summit, to Britain's biggest selling tabloid.
Trump accused May of ruining what her country stands to gain from the Brexit vote to leave the European Union and said her "soft" blueprint for the U.K.'s future dealings with the EU would probably "kill" any future trade deals with the United States.
Though White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was quick to issue a statement saying Trump "likes and respects Prime Minister May very much, the prime minister, already on a back foot, will have needed his intervention as much as losing a vote of confidence in parliament.
The president came down firmly on the side of the Brexiteers, those seeking a hard split from the European Union. He said Boris Johnson, May's now ex-foreign secretary, "would be a great prime minister. I think he's got what it takes."
To Britons this will smack of direct interference in their internal affairs — something a proud island nation that often harks back to the World War II Dunkirk spirit, building victory out of defeat as it struggled to keep Nazi Germany at bay, is loath to tolerate.
Despite their daily differences, even the British opposition party stepped up to defend May against Trump's comments.
Labour Party foreign affairs spokeswoman Emily Thornberry told ITV's Good Morning Britain on Friday that it was "extraordinarily rude of Donald Trump to behave like this."
"She is his host. What did his mother teach him? This is not the way you behave," she said.
Britain, not unlike the United States, is a country with a strong immigrant presence built over the last century where multi-culturalism is praised but has also in recent years been used by those on the right as a divisive dynamic. Trump's immigrations views may be applauded in some quarters in Britain, but they have appalled many others.
It was London Mayor Khan himself who gave the go-ahead for the "Trump baby" giant balloon, that portrays him as an angry infant in a diaper with a mobile phone in his hand, to be flown over Parliament Square in London on Friday.
It seems to have infuriated Trump.
"I guess when they put out blimps to make me feel unwelcome, no reason for me to go to London," he said.
Speaking on BBC radio on Friday, Khan defended his decision.
"I shouldn't be the arbiter, as a politician, of what's in good taste or bad taste, what's important is it to be peaceful, and for it to be safe," he said.
"And, frankly speaking, the idea that we limit the rights to protest, we limit the rights to free speech because it may cause offense to a foreign leader is a very, very slippery slope."
Two days ago, the country was beside itself with excitement at the prospect of a first World Cup final in football's showcase tournament in 52 years, celebrating in the sustained sunshine — a rarity for a country often connected with granite skies and rain.
It wasn't to be. And as the feelgood factor fades away, Trump's barbed words are likely to provide a focus for British anger toward their house guest.
Tags
Who is online
105 visitors
But they like him, they really, really like him.
I think that the floating balloon showing him as a child is absolutely perfect.
Trump just gave us another example on how to destroy a relationship with a close ally..
An orange man baby. I think that will give me nightmares.
Got to give it to the British, when they protest they go all out.
They wasted $40,000 on a 20’ balloon to fly for two hours as an insult to Trump and it attracted only a tiny crowd of 1000 people in a huge city. And that was after all the press hype. Pitiful. I’d rather have a bunch of hot women paint their asses orange and moon Trump. That would be cheaper and draw a much bigger crowd. lol
There are demonstrations all over the UK - just not the one that I have pictured here.
I don't understand why any citizen of the UK, living in the UK, would give two shits about Trump. I sure as hell don't care what the British Prime Minister is doing and saying unless it actually impacts me, which it pretty much never does.
Because the crap Trump is doing, DOES impact them.
Fuck them.
Make sure they lose our number the next time need the US to do all the heavy lifting on some third world dictatorship they want to take out for oil; or whatever other reason.
In fact NATO as a whole should lose our number. Might force them to get off their asses and build and maintain a military that will actually be able to protect their countries. The only time the US should be needed is if there is a direct threat from Russia or China. NATO still needs to be able to hold up their fair share then as well.
Too many of our "allies" treat the US as their personal attack dog. They command, we attack. Of course we are an attack dog that comes with added benefits. A great place to screw over on trade deals. Always good for military and other aide packages. Of course it allows them to shake a finger at us for not being socialist enough for their liking. No government paid for universal health care for shame; you can't have that and maintain the massive military needed to protect their pampered asses.
The only time I respected Obama was when he told NATO, and Britain, they needed to honor their commitments to NATO- and up their military budgets. Lost that respect the second they brow beat him into backing down.
They don't like Trump? Who cares? They need the US far more than we need them.
They don't like Trump? Who cares? They need the US far more than we need them
Totally agree. Other than Great Britain, no European country has carried it's weight in recent memory.
I doubt if Trump loses any sleep over it either