╌>

Judge OKs $3.5M settlement between IRS, tea party groups

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  96ws6  •  6 years ago  •  30 comments

Judge OKs $3.5M settlement between IRS, tea party groups

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



A judge this week approved a settlement between the IRS and hundreds of tea party groups, in which the federal agency agreed to pay out $3.5 million, reports said. 

The conservative groups were the subjects of illegal and unwarranted scrutiny by the federal agency for political purposes, the Chattanooga Times Free Press   reported

"It shows that when a government agency desires to target citizens based on their viewpoints, a price will be paid," said Edward Greim, a lawyer who led the class-action case in federal court in Cincinnati, according to the   Washington Times .




The tea party groups received a "sincere apology" from the IRS, and the government agreed to a declaratory judgment that "it is wrong" to srutinize a tax return because of a taxpayer's name or political philosophy, the report said. 

"I'm not frankly aware of any other class-action lawsuit against the IRS for anything where the IRS paid money," Mark Meckler, who as president of Citizens for Self Governance funded the class-action challenge, previously told the Times when the settlement was submitted for final approval a few weeks ago. 




Lois Lerner, then-senior executive of the IRS, allegedly "put in place new processes that guaranteed even more delay," Greim told the Times, referring to tea party groups' attempts to secure tax-exempt status. 

But Lerner denied that she encouraged the targeting. In fact, a U.S. Justice Department review cleared her and called her one of the "heroes of the saga," saying she attempted to stop it, according to the newspaper. 

The litigation for Wednesday's settlement lasted about five years, the Times reported. 

The decision over whether Lerner's deposition explaining her behavior would be shielded from public view is still being argued in court, the report said. 

Conservative groups are reportedly calling for testimony to be unsealed. 





Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
1  seeder  96WS6    6 years ago

Wow.  So when Democrats are found guilty of using the IRS to bully political opponents "I'm sorry" 3.5 million and no MSM coverage is an adequate penalty?  WTF?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  96WS6 @1    6 years ago

Just make that check out to the RNC, that's where the original laundered money was headed anyway.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
1.1.1  seeder  96WS6  replied to  devangelical @1.1    6 years ago

Right.  Nothing to see here...winking

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.4  devangelical  replied to    6 years ago
like banana republics maybe military strongman to punish your political enemies

like removing security clearances of outspoken critics exercising their Constitutional rights?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1.4    6 years ago

Brennan has his 1st Amendment rights. His security clearance privileges have been revoked. He politicized the CIA, lied to congress, has been on a crusade against the President and may have helped to launch a baseless investigation (a coup)

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
1.1.7  seeder  96WS6  replied to    6 years ago

bingo

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.8  Ozzwald  replied to    6 years ago

It's the best thing to do when those "outspoken critics" have become a possible threat to national security and the general welfare of the nation by becoming partisan and lying political hacks.

Why hasn't Flynn had his removed???

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.9  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.6    6 years ago
Brennan has his 1st Amendment rights. His security clearance privileges have been revoked.

No they haven't. 

Trump tweet does not make the law, plus most of his people have learned to ignore his 2 am toilet tweets.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.11  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.10    6 years ago
Have you called out these news outlets for reporting fake news?

They reported what Trump said.

Like so many other things, what Trump says is different from what he says.  Have you called Trump out for being a liar yet?  He said that he did it.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.13  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.12    6 years ago

It was.

Was it??

White House insists former CIA chief Brennan has no security clearance, says paperwork ‘delayed’

Like his transgender ban, it doesn't count until he does it the proper way.  Tweets do not make policy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  96WS6 @1    6 years ago

Agreed!

Lerner got away with her pension and what about the Obama Justice Department review?  They should be charged with obstruction of justice

 
 

Who is online




shona1
Ed-NavDoc


434 visitors