Hannity Guest: Science Proves Trump Is The 'Most Sound-Minded' President Ever
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Politics
Hannity Guest: Science Proves Trump Is The 'Most Sound-Minded' President Ever
Ed Mazza, HuffPost 3 hours ago 
> Gina Loudon: "My book actually uses science and real data and trueThis iframe is not allowedExcerpts from Bob Woodward ’s upcoming book, Fear , claim that White House Chief of Staff John Kelly described President Donald Trump as “ unhinged ” and “an idiot .”
An op-ed by an anonymous senior official published in The New York Times on Wednesday called Trump’s instability has prompted talk in the Cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment to remove him from office.
But a guest on Fox News said Trump ― a self-described “ stable genius ” ― was of sound mind.
Gina Loudon , a member of Trump’s “media advisory board” and author of the book Mad Politics , told Fox News host Sean Hannity :
“My book actually uses science and real data and true psychological theory to explain why it is quite possible that this president is the most sound-minded person to ever occupy the White House.”
“Literally, liberals’ heads are going to explode at what you just said,” Hannity replied.
“They’re exploding right now,” she laughed.
On Twitter, Loudon repeated her claim in somewhat less scientific terms.
“ The country is better than its ever been, but Trump is mean waaaaah wahhhhh !!” she wrote, followed by some crying emojis and “can we move on?”
- This article originally appeared on HuffPost .
Tags
Who is online
60 visitors
“ The country is better than its ever been, but Trump is mean waaaaah wahhhhh !!” she wrote, followed by some crying emojis and “can we move on?”
Well 'nuff said!
Who the hell is this crazy bitch?
This is an amazing article. On the day that the walls are closing in on Trump from within his own administration, with claims that he is mentally erratic and not fit for office, Gina Loudon says he may have the soundest mind ever.
Let's look for a brief moment at Dr. Gina Loudon's background, and why she might have a slight predisposition (lol) to praise Trump like this.
She is considered a founding member of the Tea Party movement.
She was a founding writer for Breitbart News.
She was a national media surrogate for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
She was a delegate to the Republican National Convention in 2016.
She was a close associate of Andrew Breitbart.
She is an avid supporter of gun rights.
She is a member at Mar-A-Lago, the Florida resort owned by Donald Trump.
wikipedia
Do you think there is a slight chance she is not objective?
Sean Hannity's show has become self-parody.
Objective? She's not objective enough for you? Suddenly the left wants objective?
Now THAT is hilarious. The bias coming from the left wing media the last two years has been pervasive and heinous.
Now you want objective? Thx for the laugh John
What kind of Dr. is this skank ho bimbo?
Oh yeah, she's objective, sure she is
I wish your comments were funny, then they would at least serve a purpose.
Anything that comes out of this woman's mouth, given her background and position in the Trump administration, can be seen as no more than a paid political announcement for President* Trump.
For Hannity to being this laughable nonsense on to a "news" channel is pathetic.
Good, they weren't intended to be funny but rather factual, which they are.
Too bad for the narrative you're pushing .... such is life eh?
Factual? I've yet to see that anywhere in your postings.
Opinions aren't facts.
Seed an article about left wing bias then.
This article is about a Trump lackey, who works for his administration, feigning some sort of insight into the soundness of his mind, while at the same time saying her comments destroy Woodward's book. She has a resume which makes her COMPLETELY unable to be objective about Trump. It is actually ludicrous.
You can't address the actual topic so you bleat about "left wing bias"
No need to. There is always a plethora of them being posted here on NT.
You need to pay attention to notice them though John ......
'You can't address the actual topic so you bleat about "left wing bias"
In other words - sparty - ya got nothin'! Why post when you can just troll?
Fielding GU reviews are "mixed", on a scale of five there are as many 1's as there are 5's or people who wish they could give a higher rating. It's an online "distance learning" institute with one small building in California. Unlike most PHD programs which last five to nine years with extensive contact with professors, Fielding gives education and "life experience" credits to shorten the track to 3 years at a cost of $9,560.00 per term. So in essence $$60,000.00
This is an interesting read about this "ultra famous family".
What can I say about her and her family but
A psych major. That's a joke in and of itself.
TV Analyst on Fox News, Fox Business, others in politics, business, psychology.
TV News Host/News AnalystDr. Gina specializes in the interplay of psychology, politics, and business. She holds two master's degrees and a Ph.D. in psychological/business fields (Human and Organizational Development), she also has extensive campaign experience that lends insider knowledge to her on camera analysis.
There ya go, Tessy. She's not like a real doctor who can set your broken ankle
"Ultra-famous"?
I never heard of her until I opened this seed
So she payed for her PhD for $60k and fast tracked it. What did she do....phone it in?
The only famous Loudon I know of
is Loudon Wainwright III
Looks like she has a 42DD IQ
Thanks TG. I kinda figured she wouldn't have an M.D. behind her name.
So essentially she paid for those degrees and didn't really earn them. Also it's not like she can use that 'knowledge' towards any actual career.
That takes $200K and 12 years of school
So this guy John Loudon was a republican member of the senate and went to being on reality TV? Sounds like all of the failed republican presidential candidates going to Faux 'news'.
What a batshit crazy family.
Yup, college, med school, then residency, then a fellowship if they're going into a specialty - I work for a University Hospital with the 3rd and 4th year Internal Medicine students.
Her teen daughter is supposedly a virgin too until marriage.
My big fat ass she's a virgin.
In political matters, partisans are -by definition- not objective.
More than a slight chance.
I, for one, am very glad to see this healthy skepticism when it comes to examining the source of comments or other supposed data.
I do hope this practice will become the norm. I presume this means we'll start to take people like Paul Krugman or Steffie Woolhandler with a huge grain of salt.
And.....perhaps.....she is also one of the women that Trump has graced with his 'sound' one track mind a few times while 'playing golf' at his favorite inter.....er..... golf course.
Wait, stop the presses! Hold The phone! Her book is based on "knowing President Trump and his family" ! Now I believe her.
My new book, # MadPolitics DESTROYS # Woodward ’s drivel about @ realDonaldTrump . My book is based on solid scientific research, fact, & knowing President Trump & his family. His book is based on gossip, inuendo, & partisan fantasy.
Isn't that ass backwards JR? Her book is based on gossip, inuendo, & partisan fantasy?
I feel a little bit sorry for the FOX women that weren't able to cash in on past sexual harassment payoffs and had to settle for book promotion deals.
Yeah, #metoo --
Finally, we can put this issue to bed. I'm glad that's settled.
Yeah, the latest issue of Rightwing Clown News.
[No Value]
How exactly are us secular leftists anti-science? Bring out your strawmen to support your revisionist claims.
Tsk. Don't derail the seed. I hear people frown on that.
It does my heart good to see you worked up over nothing.
You made the previous claim that lefties are anti-science, so either prove it or admit that it is a lie.
I will do neither. I have already proved it in other seeds anyway. This seed is not about that. It was a throwaway jab offered in jest. [deleted]
If you had any proof to support your previous claim you would post it. You know that you have nothing and you are trying to deflect from a claim that you know is partisan BS.
Maybe
You should unbunch your panties,
she's just asking you to back up your assertion
And my answer was that she can pound sand. I could post 500 links backing up my assertion and she would reject every last one. She is incapable of conceding a truth no matter how many links you post. It's a waste of time.
The fact that I can and will refute every one of your hypothetical 500 links should be a strong hint that they aren't true, despite the fact that you may agree with them. That is the critical difference between empirical logic and emotional belief. You need to learn to stop being emotionally invested in your arguments and instead follow the truth wherever it takes you.
[Removed]
My use of the pronouns you and your are proof that I was replying to you, despite your very attempt to deflect.
Your personal attack of claiming that I am mentally ill and talking to myself is noted. The fact that you chose to reply with a personal attack is a capitulation of the argument.
[Deleted]
Only 6% of scientists claim to be conservative/republican. For the most part that 6% are all social scientists (not actual scientists who do research using the scientific method).
What juicy reply from Tacos did I miss?
Apparently the laughing emoji is "juicy" and needs to be deleted. You obviously have an ally with power.
A promise made without even seeing them. No protests of "not at all Tacos! I promise to have an open mind on the topic." I rest my case.
I didn't see what you posted, hence my previous reply. Obviously, I also didn't report it.
Your claim that the left is anti-science is all that I needed to read. The progressive left embraces science, but not your strawman version of it.
That's how it is in upside-down rightwing reverse world, Tess.
And she'd be correct on every damn one of them.
He's just posting his usual insults and trolling on my seeds. I reported the insult which are constant. I don't have any ally with "power'. What nonsense. Stop trolling and insulting Tacos. You need to follow the COC like the rest of us.
You're the one who keeps derailing Tacos. Knock it off!
He can't back it up that's why he keeps ducking, dodging and deflecting
[Deleted]
You're the one derailing. Knock it off!
You obviously don't know dick about science so again KNOCK IT OFF!
You keep accusing me of these things and I have asked you to explain what you are talking about. I can't stop it if I don't know what it is.
Is this serious? I have been trying to not extend this part of the conversation, but you literally just attacked me for not backing up what I said. This is you:
[deleted]
it seems the conservative minded have to do everything possible to convince the population that President Trump is "sane" - makes one wonder why they can't let Trump do that himself ? this constant defending of Trump and the need for this constant defending seems to be troubling...
And, here all this time I thought trumpsters hated it when Scumbag's mental status was analyzed by "professionals" who hadn't examined him. That must have changed when some poser finally came up with adequate BS for them to use.
And this bubble headed twit knows this how.....what a moronic imbecile.
Anybody think those boobs are real?
You read my mind, as usual TG. Looks like she has an IQ of 42DD.
Nothing is more amusing to me than leftist misogyny.
Tacos, the woman got a doctorate from an accredited university, so she deserves credit for that.
Now, as to today, she is a joke.
That's just the way it is. If she doesn't want to continue to be a joke she needs to stop doing ridiculous things like going on tv and saying trump has the soundest mind of any president in history.
Tessy is obviously female.
Is that supposed to matter? The Left accuses conservative women and minorities of prejudice all the time. Slamming a woman based on her female features is misogyny every day of the week and twice on Sunday - no matter who does it.
Don't get your knickers in a twist. I don't take her seriously any more than you do. I was joking.
You apparently don't know what misogyny is. Context is everything in this situation because a man couldn't make that statement but another woman can.
Good definition. The two of you are exhibiting it in spades. Congratulations. Maybe you'd like to make some more attacks based on her physiology? Please, don't let me stop you.
[ removed ]
I would respect your comments if you had just once went after your compadres who make misogynistic comments regarding liberal women such as Michele Obama, Hilary Clinton, and most especially Rachel Maddow. But you don't.
Proof? Yeah, I thought not.
I think you should prove that you have. It will make you look like the better person and me like a dumbass
1) I'm not the one who made the claim and 2) You're engaging in whataboutism. I'm here to say that it's wrong no matter who does it. Do you disagree with that? Seems to me like you're only upset about where my finger is pointed, not what they're doing. That makes it look like you're prepared to defend it as long as it's done by people you like against people you don't like.
Her sex doesn't matter. Her ignorance does.
Aww....you figured it out!
I still stand by what I said, whataboutism or not. I don't see you standing up for liberals....ever. I don't stand up for conservatives, it would just be nice to see a little honesty from some of you people every once in awhile
Then you should follow more of my comments. I actually consider myself to be very liberal about a lot of things. [deleted]
Now, here I am advancing the idea that we should not attack women based on their physiology and you - claiming to be liberal - want to give me a hard time for it. Perhaps you think I'm being too PC? smh
That's fine. I think what she said was silly. Can't we attack her on the content of her speech? Why does it have to be for her boobs?
I just don't think you're being honest with yourself, with me, or the good people of Newstalkers
Well thank goodness I have you to figure out for me what's really going on in my head!
Removed for context
You're welcome
[deleted] I'm tired of your insults and trolling on my seeds.
These are all women you're attacking, Taco. And I don't think you're a leftist.
I am disagreeing with them. I have not attacked anyone on the basis of them being female. I have not ridiculed anyone's uniquely female characteristics. My words are about issues and content. Theirs are rooted in female physical features. See the difference?
What insult?
Nope. The only thing I see with you is rank hypocrisy and someone trying to squirm away from it.
Real silicone or real saline?
If you're referring to She and Donny,
unfortunately, they are.
LOL!
Does it matter?
No. it doesn't really matter. It was just obvious snark.
Trump Is The 'Most Sound-Minded' President Ever
Sure...
IMO: If president trump does not pay more attention the the details of what he's undertaking this wont be the last thing to blow up in his face and against our best interests.
Good Luck America !
Well, right after Putin
Trump is the most sound-minded President since the Neanderthals.
However, I don't think that's being fair to the Neanderthals.
Deafinitely
They misspelled, "mentally ill".
Heh, oh those soft sciences and soft scientists, they try so hard to pretend they are on an equal footing with the hard.
The good doctor is a graduate of the Betsy DeVos home schooling educational system.
Doctor Feel Good.
Her unplundered vagina breeds mites.