╌>

Stormy Daniels: Michael Avenatti Filed Defamation Case Against Trump Against My Wishes

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  spikegary  •  6 years ago  •  64 comments

Stormy Daniels: Michael Avenatti Filed Defamation Case Against Trump Against My Wishes
He has spoken on my behalf without my approval.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Michael Avenatti sued Donald Trump for defaming Stormy Daniels against her wishes, Daniels told The Daily Beast in a statement on Wednesday.

Avenatti also started a new fundraising site to raise money for her legal defense fund without telling her, Daniels said. She said she is not sure whether or not she will keep Avenatti on as her lawyer.

Here is her full statement, provided to The Daily Beast:

“For months I’ve asked Michael Avenatti to give me accounting information about the fund my supporters so generously donated to for my safety and legal defense. He has repeatedly ignored those requests. Days ago I demanded again, repeatedly, that he tell me how the money was being spent and how much was left. Instead of answering me, without my permission or even my knowledge Michael launched another crowdfunding campaign to raise money on my behalf. I learned about it on Twitter.

“I haven’t decided yet what to do about legal representation moving forward. Michael has been a great advocate in many ways. I’m tremendously grateful to him for aggressively representing me in my fight to regain my voice. But in other ways Michael has not treated me with the respect and deference an attorney should show to a client. He has spoken on my behalf without my approval. He filed a defamation case against Donald Trump against my wishes. He repeatedly refused to tell me how my legal defense fund was being spent. Now he has launched a new crowdfunding campaign using my face and name without my permission and attributing words to me that I never wrote or said. I’m deeply grateful to my supporters and they deserve to know their money is being spent responsibly. I don’t want to hurt Michael, but it’s time to set the record straight. The truth has always been my greatest ally.“My goal is the same as it has always been—to stand up for myself and take back my voice after being bullied and intimidated by President Trump and his minions. One way or another I’m going to continue in that fight, and I want everyone who has stood by me to know how profoundly grateful I am for their support.”

The Daily Beast shared this statement with Avenatti. He provided the following statement:

“I am and have always been Stormy’s biggest champion. I have personally sacrificed an enormous amount of money, time and energy toward assisting her because I believe in her. I have always been an open book with Stormy as to all aspects of her cases and she knows that. The retention agreement Stormy signed back in February provided that she would pay me $100.00 and that any and all other monies raised via a legal fund would go toward my legal fees and costs. Instead, the vast majority of the money raised has gone toward her security expenses and similar other expenses. The most recent campaign was simply a refresh of the prior campaign, designed to help defray some of Stormy’s expenses.”Stephen Gillers, a New York University Law School professor and expert on legal ethics, said Avenatti could face serious problems if he sued Trump against Daniels’ wishes.

“If he filed the case with her name when it was clear that she told him not to, then he could be sued for that,” Gillers said. “He could be sued for malpractice. If true, she has a malpractice case against him. I emphasize if true. And if true, he would be subject to discipline but not as serious as disbarment.”

The current CrowdJustice site is one of just three fundraisers highlighted on CrowdJustice’s homepage as of Wednesday afternoon. An earlier CrowdJustice site raised more than $580,000 for Daniels’ legal defense and no longer accepts contributions.

Avenatti’s legal work for Daniels hasn’t always succeeded. In the April defamation lawsuit against the president, Avenatti argued Trump hurt her by tweeting that she participated in a “total con job.” But in November, a judge dismissed the suit and ordered Daniels to pay the president’s legal bills. Trump’s lawyers asked for almost $350,000 in legal fees; Daniels is now fighting to try to lower that bill.

Daniels and her lawyer have become household names since the revelation that Michael Cohen—then Trump’s personal attorney—paid her hush-money during the presidential campaign. Daniels says she had an affair with Trump years before he ran for office (a claim Trump denies), and accepted $130,000 from Cohen to stay quiet.

Cohen admitted in court in August that he made illegal payments during the campaign at Trump’s direction. He pleaded guilty to eight criminal counts and is awaiting sentencing.

Avenatti, meanwhile, has become a darling of the #Resistance, traveling to Iowa, raising money for Democratic candidates, and openly touting a potential 2020 presidential bid. But his White House dreams have faced major challenges; earlier this month, he was arrested under suspicion of domestic violence—allegations he roundly denies. And when he represented migrant children whom the Trump administration separated from their parents earlier this year, long-time immigration lawyers told The Observerhe was “fantastically irresponsible.”

And as The Daily Beast reported in October, court records reveal that the lawyer and his companies owed millions to the IRS in unpaid taxes and judgments.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
1  seeder  Spikegary    6 years ago

More evidence that Avenatti is just an ambulance chasing, self-promoting, fame seeking horses ass.  Good luck on his run for the 2020 election........

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Spikegary @1    6 years ago

Yep. Avenattti is just a scum bag shyster who makes alot of ambulance  chasing lawyers look like choirboys!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Texan1211  replied to    6 years ago

LOL!!!

Good one!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4  Jasper2529    6 years ago
Michael has not treated me with the respect and deference an attorney should show to a client. He has spoken on my behalf without my approval. He filed a defamation case against Donald Trump against my wishes. He repeatedly refused to tell me how my legal defense fund was being spent. Now he has launched a new crowdfunding campaign using my face and name without my permission and attributing words to me that I never wrote or said.

Stormy's now playing Miss Innocent? She's allegedly a smart woman. Looks like she never heard the adage, "If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas".

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @4    6 years ago

"If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas".

How original.  LOL!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @4.1    6 years ago
How original.  LOL!

Since I used quotation marks I didn't claim originality, Tessy.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2  Texan1211  replied to  Jasper2529 @4    6 years ago
Looks like she never heard the adage,

Looks like your response was a little too sophisticated for all readers.

LOL!

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    6 years ago

ad·age
[ˈadij]

NOUN
a proverb or short statement expressing a general truth.
"the old adage “out of sight out of mind.”"
synonyms:
saying · maxim · axiom · proverb · aphorism · saw · dictum · precept · epigram · epigraph · motto · truism · platitude · cliché · commonplace · words of wisdom · [more]

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4.2.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    6 years ago

Deleted by Jasper.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.2.2    6 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
4.2.4  Cerenkov  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    6 years ago

I blame the liberal education system. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.2.2    6 years ago
'How original.  LOL!' 
Some have never heard of sarcasm eh Tex?

Like no one has ever heard that one before right Tex?

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4.2.6  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @4.2.5    6 years ago

Stop commenting to me using yours and other people's comments.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.7  Texan1211  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.2.6    6 years ago

Not really my business, (other than her directly addressing me in a post to you) but you might let a moderator know.

We aren't supposed to communicate with each other, at her request, but this still happens. I am unable to flag the comments myself.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4.2.8  Jasper2529  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.7    6 years ago
you might let a moderator know

I have. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.  No big deal.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.9  Texan1211  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.2.8    6 years ago

Ok. Thanks!

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5  Sparty On    6 years ago

Lol if we had a nickel for every time someone here praised this shyster here on NT we could forward those funds directly to Stormy so she could fully fund a couple former SEALs as her security.

Absent here are most of those voices who have been praising him for months.

Will the loopy lefts hypocrisy never end?

 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
5.1  lib50  replied to  Sparty On @5    6 years ago

I think you mistake our Avenatti praise for support.  The only reason I even know his name is because he got under Trump/gop skin and fought the same dirty fights, I give zero fucks otherwise.   The guy is as useful as a hemorrhoid on Trump's ass as far as I'm concerned.  One not responsive to medication.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  Jasper2529  replied to  lib50 @5.1    6 years ago
I think you mistake our Avenatti praise for support. 

"praise" and "support" are closely related synonyms.

Words Related to   praise
 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
6  It Is ME    6 years ago

Oh NOOOOOO !

Trouble in Paradise ?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    6 years ago

I think it would be an entertaining spectacle watching Avenatti run against Trump in the 2020 presidential election. I am not advocating it, but it would be great laughs.

Avenatti would destroy Trump in any debate, simply because he doesnt have the need to defer to 'niceties' the way a traditional politician would inevitably do. He can be very blunt about Trump. He is also much more intelligent than Trump and a far better speaker. 

Avenatti has baggage now though, much of his own doing, and his chance to be on a debate stage with trump appears slim.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7    6 years ago

Avenatti--arrested.

Trump--not arrested.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1    6 years ago

The difference between the Republicans and Democrats is that the Republicans would (and did) nominate a piece of shit for president, and the Democrats won't. Avenatti has no chance to be the Democratic nominee in 2020. If he was a conservative and promised to appoint right wing judges conservative voters would elect him president in a heartbeat.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.1    6 years ago
nominate a piece of shit for president, and the Democrats won't.

Man, if you really believe that you need help and lots of it there brother.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.1.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.1    6 years ago

Yeah, the Democrats nominated one too, and the bigger one lost!jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
7.1.4  KDMichigan  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.1    6 years ago
nominate a piece of shit for president, and the Democrats won't.

Have the democrats already revised history to show that Hillaryious Hillary never ran?

That's funny shit right there JR I don't care what anyone says.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.1    6 years ago
'Trump--not arrested.'

Not yet

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.4    6 years ago

Too true!!!

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.1    6 years ago
The difference between the Republicans and Democrats is that the Republicans would (and did) nominate a piece of shit for president, and the Democrats won't.

Kudos and extra bonus points for you if you managed to type that with a straight face!

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
10  MrFrost    6 years ago

Does this mean trump didn't fuck her behind his wife's back? Oh wait..

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
10.2  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @10    6 years ago
Does this mean trump didn't fuck her behind his wife's back?

Oh, the left is now worried about marriage infidelity?

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Quiet
11  96WS6    6 years ago

These type of scum always end up eating their own.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12  Vic Eldred    6 years ago

Does this mean that everything that Tucker Carlson said to Avenatti's face is true?   That Avenatti used Daniels?   Remember what Avenatti told Carlson when asked why Daniels had to do shows in seedy strip joints - Avenatti said she does it because "she wants to".  

So I take it CNN won't have any more air time for Avenatti.

Amen.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12.1  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @12    6 years ago

Never bet against CNN taking the lowest road possible!

 
 
 
tomwcraig
Junior Silent
12.1.1  tomwcraig  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1    6 years ago

Wait, they have a road?  I thought they were using the sewer...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1    6 years ago

I have only 3 words for Avenatti - "Buckle Up Buttercup!"

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
12.1.3  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @12.1.2    6 years ago

Bubba's gonna love him ....

 
 

Who is online




Snuffy
jw
Igknorantzruls


105 visitors