Self-Inflicted Medical Misery

Via:  bob-nelson  •  4 months ago  •  10 comments

Self-Inflicted Medical Misery
Red America’s homemade rural health crisis

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Over the weekend The Washington Post published a heart-rending description of a pop-up medical clinic in Cleveland, Tenn. — a temporary installation providing free care for two days on a first-come-first-served basis. Hundreds of people showed up many hours before the clinic opened, because rural America is suffering from a severe crisis of health care availability, with hospitals closing and doctors leaving.

Since the focus of the report was on personal experience, not policy, it’s understandable that the article mentioned only in passing the fact that Tennessee is one of the 14 states that still refuse to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. So I’m not sure how many readers grasped the reality that America’s rural health care crisis is largely — not entirely, but largely — a direct result of political decisions.

The simple fact is that the Republicans who run Tennessee and other “non-expansion” states have chosen to inflict misery on many of their constituents, rural residents in particular. And it’s not even about money: The federal government would have paid for Medicaid expansion.

So if rural America is suffering, a large part of the explanation is gratuitous political cruelty. This cruelty has denied health insurance to millions who could have had it with a stroke of the pen. And rural hospitals are closing, rural doctors leaving, in large part because people can’t afford to pay for care.

To see what I mean, just compare Tennessee with its neighbor Kentucky. As recently as 2013, just before the Affordable Care Act went into full effect, the two states looked similar in terms of health care: In both states, about 20 percent of nonelderly adults lacked insurance. But unlike Tennessee, Kentucky did expand Medicaid, and it also did its best to make Obamacare work.

The result was a two-thirds drop in the uninsurance rate. At the same time, progress in Tennessee was far more limited. At this point, adults in Tennessee are twice as likely as their neighbors to lack health insurance.

And the divergence in destinies was even greater for rural residents. According to a Georgetown University study that covered a seven-year period spanning the introduction of the A.C.A., the percentage of low-income rural adults without health insurance fell 27 points in Kentucky, only six points in Tennessee.

Of course, if the U.S. were like every other wealthy nation, and provided some kind of universal health care, there would be no uninsured at all. Those heart-rending scenes in Cleveland would be inconceivable anywhere else in the advanced world. But the A.C.A. isn’t a future aspiration, it’s an already-existing program — and a lot of rural America’s medical misery could be avoided if states like Tennessee were willing to take advantage of that program.

And we’re not just talking about having insurance; we’re talking about whether there are doctors and hospitals available to provide care. True, rural hospitals have been closing in many states as the nonmetropolitan population declines. But a project that tracks rural hospital closings since 2010 finds that a great majority have taken place in states that didn’t expand Medicaid. Four rural hospitals have closed in California, but 17 have closed in Texas. Tennessee has had three times as many closings as Kentucky.

The point is that much of the collapse of rural health care could have been avoided, and could be easily reversed, if so many state governments hadn’t chosen to impose misery on their own rural constituents.

While rural Americans often tell reporters that they feel neglected and ignored by big-city coastal elites, the people preventing them from getting health care aren’t in New York or D.C., they’re in their own state capitals. And these state politicians hold power in large part thanks to the strong Republican leaning of rural voters.

But why are Republican state-level politicians so determined to punish their own base? As I said, it’s not about the money: Rejecting the Medicaid expansion actually costs a state jobs and hence revenue.

Some of it may reflect the general meanspiritedness, the embrace of cruelty, that was already infecting the G.O.P. even before Donald Trump, and has now become one of the party’s defining traits. Yes, that’s harsh, but you know that it’s true.

There’s also, I suspect, an element of cynical calculation. As I said, rural voters often complain that national elites don’t care about their needs. Well, one way to make people feel hostile toward those elites is to block their access to federal benefits, and hope they don’t realize who’s actually causing their misery.

Is it conceivable that conservative politicians have that much contempt for their base? Yes.

In any case, the point is that while rural decline in general is a hard problem, with no easy answers, rescuing rural health care isn’t hard at all. We know how to ensure that rural Americans get the health care they need. This isn’t a problem of policy, it’s a problem of politics — and most of the blame lies with Republican state governments.

Initial image: Patients waited to receive assistance at a Remote Area Medical Clinic in Knoxville, Tenn., in February.    Spencer Platt/Getty Images


jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
Bob Nelson
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    4 months ago

And they applaud.

And they give their absolute allegiance to the people who kill them...

Greg Jones
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Bob Nelson @1    4 months ago

If the Democrats would work with the Republicans and Trump to devise a health insurance plan and program that works, the problem would be on the way to being solved.

ACA was falling apart and losing money since it was started. The states can't afford the costs with expanded Medicaid.

2  evilgenius    4 months ago
...rescuing rural health care isn’t hard at all.

It's damned expensive. Expanding Medicaide will help, but it's a band-aide on a hemorrhage. Even in progressive states like MN rural care is in serious decline. The problem is so bad and wide spread Minnesota Public Radio recently did some serious in-depth reporting about the closing of clinics in rural MN areas. It's often a matter of number of patients vs costs of keeping clinics open.

2.1  katrix  replied to  evilgenius @2    4 months ago

The Washington Post just had an article on a 2-day traveling clinic and what they are trying to address.  It truly is a Band-Aid on a hemorrhage.  Hospitals have closed due to bankruptcy, the one mental health provider moved away, GYNs are facing such high malpractice insurance that doctors don't want to go into that field ...

3  Nerm_L    4 months ago

Amazingly these two day clinics provided health care without requiring insurance.  What does that say about the health insurance industry?

Trout Giggles
4  Trout Giggles    4 months ago

I noticed that when Arkansas expanded Medicaid a bunch of urgent care clinics opened up in my small town. Now they're building an "emergency hospital" which means that they can stabilize you then transport you to Little Rock for more comprehensive care.

Little Rock has a bunch more specialty clinics opening up. This Medicaid expansion has been a good thing...but what happens when the ACA is disbanded and destroyed?

Bob Nelson
4.1  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    4 months ago
but what happens when the ACA is disbanded and destroyed?

People die.

Trout Giggles
4.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Bob Nelson @4.1    4 months ago

Well...yeah...but then there's all those jobs that opened up in the health care industry

5  JohnRussell    4 months ago

When people never go to the doctor, a certain number of them are going to develop diseases and conditions that go untreated. Some of those could even be serious. 

There are literally people putting their well being at risk because they cant afford to pay the cost. 

This should not happen in America. 

6  Kathleen    4 months ago

They don't seem to understand that "preventative care" costs much less then when people develop the diseases and need the operations with the treatments. There are people that skip doctors visits and medications because of the cost and no insurance.  It's a sad affair when we have to resort to these measures because of our healthcare crisis.


Who is online

Save Me Jebus
Dean Moriarty


88 visitors