╌>

Nearly 3 billion birds have disappeared from North America since 1970

  

Category:  Fields and Streams

Via:  buzz-of-the-orient  •  5 years ago  •  20 comments

Nearly 3 billion birds have disappeared from North America since 1970

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Nearly 3 billion birds have disappeared from North America since 1970

By Mary Jo Dilonardo, Mother Nature Network, September 20 2019

eastern-meadowlark.jpg.653x0_q80_crop-sm

Grassland birds like meadowlarks were particularly affected over the past half-century. (Photo: Jack Dean III/Shutterstock)



If your backyard bird feeder seems a little less popular these days, it's not your imagination.

The number of birds in the U.S. and Canada has plummeted over the past 50 years, dropping by 29%, according to a   study published in the journal Science . That's an overall decline of 2.9 billion birds since 1970.




The study found there were large losses for every type of bird, from songbirds to those that migrate long distances.

"Multiple, independent lines of evidence show a massive reduction in the abundance of birds," lead author Ken Rosenberg, a senior scientist at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and American Bird Conservancy, said   in a statement . "We expected to see continuing declines of threatened species. But for the first time, the results also showed pervasive losses among common birds across all habitats, including backyard birds."

For the analysis, researchers included citizen scientist data from information collections such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey and the   Audubon Christmas Bird Count . They also used data from 143 weather radar stations to look for declines in migratory bird populations. Additionally, they studied 50 years of data collected from on-the-ground monitoring.

Grassland birds, such as meadowlarks and sparrows, were particularly affected. They experienced a 53% drop in population — more than 720 million birds — since 1970. So many of these birds have likely disappeared due to modern agriculture and development, as well as pesticide use.

"Every field that's plowed under, and every wetland area that's drained, you lose the birds in that area," Rosenberg told   The New York Times .

Shorebirds were also hard hit because of their sensitive coastal habitats. Their populations were already "dangerously low," researchers said, but they've since lost more than one-third of their numbers.

The researchers tracked spring migration using radar in the night skies. They found that in just the past decade, it dropped by 14%.

"These data are consistent with what we're seeing elsewhere with other taxa showing massive declines, including insects and amphibians," said coauthor Peter Marra, senior scientist emeritus and former head of the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center and now director of the Georgetown Environment Initiative at Georgetown University.

"It's imperative to address immediate and ongoing threats, both because the domino effects can lead to the decay of ecosystems that humans depend on for our own health and livelihoods — and because people all over the world cherish birds in their own right. Can you imagine a world without birdsong?"

Success stories


two-swans.jpg.838x0_q80.jpg Swans and other waterfowl have recovered due to conservation efforts and wetland protection. (Photo:  Phil Wood [CC BY-ND 2.0] /Flickr)

It wasn't all bad news, as researchers found a few promising bright spots.

They said waterfowl, like ducks, geese and swans, have made a "remarkable recovery" over the past 50 years. Researchers credit conservation efforts made by hunters, as well as government funding for wetland protection and restoration.

The study also found that the bald eagle has made an amazing comeback since the 1970s, when the pesticide DDT was banned and   endangered species legislation began offering protection to the birds.

"It's a wake-up call that we've lost more than a quarter of our birds in the U.S. and Canada," said coauthor Adam Smith from Environment and Climate Change Canada.

"But the crisis reaches far beyond our individual borders. Many of the birds that breed in Canadian backyards migrate through or spend the winter in the U.S. and places farther south — from Mexico and the Caribbean to Central and South America. What our birds need now is an historic, hemispheric effort that unites people and organizations with one common goal: bringing our birds back."




Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient    5 years ago

Blame it on Trump. It's all his fault.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1    5 years ago
Blame it on Trump. It's all his fault.

He sure isnt helping the birds. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    5 years ago

Millions have been killed by those humungous windmills in California and elsewhere.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.1    5 years ago
Millions have been killed by those humungous windmills in California and elsewhere.

" Wind turbines kill an estimated  140,000 to 328,000  birds each year in North America"

Solar:   Anywhere from about 1,000 birds a year, according to BrightSource, to 28,000 birds a year, according to an expert at the Center for Biological Diversity.

Wind:   Between 140,000 and 328,000 birds a year in the contiguous United States, according to a December 2013   study   published in the journal Biological Conservation. Taller turbines tend to take out more birds.

Oil and Gas:   An estimated 500,000 to 1 million birds a year are killed in oil fields, the   Bureau of Land Management   said in a December 2012 memo.

Oil and gas kill far more birds that wind energy so it's rather disingenuous for the defenders of dirty non-renewable's complain about the avian death toll from wind farms.

 
 
 
bccrane
Freshman Silent
1.1.3  bccrane  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.2    5 years ago
Wind:   Between 140,000 and 328,000 birds a year in the contiguous United States, according to a December 2013   study   published in the journal Biological Conservation. Taller turbines tend to take out more birds.

So millions have been killed by windmills, since they already knew this in 2013 and you add on the years since, Greg was correct.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.1    5 years ago

Millions have been killed by those humungous windmills in California and elsewhere.

Flat out lie. Do you believe EVERYTHING trump says? SMFH. 

Do you think they cause cancer too? LOL

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.1.6  MrFrost  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.2    5 years ago
Oil and gas kill far more birds that wind energy

Exactly. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.7  Sparty On  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.6    5 years ago

Katrix has it right ..... cats kill more than all of those.   My last cat had a scorched earth policy in my yard when it came to birds ..... bird genocide .... stone cold killer she was.

Doubtful we'll get a ban on cats any day soon.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    5 years ago

They are all at my mother's house. Trust me. She puts out enough bird food, dried bread, and rotten fruit to feed that many birds- plus any neighborhood skunks, possums, wood chucks, squirrels, chipmunks, and one very lost porcupine. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Ronin2 @2    5 years ago

Great idea for a Christmas present for her - earplugs.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2.1    5 years ago

For her, or for me?

She loves the wildlife.  OK, so she can't stand the skunks (her youngest dog a boxer/retriever mix is nicknamed skunk bomb he has been sprayed so many times), possums, or crows. She is also scared to death of the porcupine; but it is easy to spot, and outside of taking way too long to eat has never done any damage outside of the tree bark and fencing.

I can't stand any of it, including her dogs. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1.2  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1.1    5 years ago

Well, considering the environment there, I didn't think that if you visited you would stay too long - it would give you an excuse to leave.  In her case, it's permanent.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3  Split Personality    5 years ago

It certainly isn't a secret about chemicals affecting bird eggs and the success of bringing back eagles and other predators, but the continuous spraying of insecticides on a national and global level is inevitably going to kill more birds and upset the invisible balance of nature.

While many past Administrations have slowly attempted to rein in the worst offenders, Trump simply stopped any pending or future restrictions, so there won't be any improvement in North America anytime soon.

Interesting reading...

 
 
 
bccrane
Freshman Silent
3.1  bccrane  replied to  Split Personality @3    5 years ago
and the success of bringing back eagles and other predators

Just that alone could be why meadow-land birds are suffering those losses.  Just how many small birds need to be eaten everyday to keep those predators alive? 

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Participates
3.1.1  katrix  replied to  bccrane @3.1    5 years ago

Cats are the number one cause of bird deaths. And they hunt for the fun of it sometimes.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  katrix @3.1.1    5 years ago

My last cat was a stone cold killer.  

In her prime their we no birds, mice, chipmunks, moles, etc in my yard.

I miss that cat .....

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5  Sparty On    5 years ago

I think some folks here are forgetting (or never experienced) the DDT spray truck "spritzing" through the neighborhood.   Think Agent Orange for bugs.   We were safe as long as we staying in the house for a few hours to let the DDT settle.   At least that was what they told us ....... then the birds started dropping out of the sky.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6  Sparty On    5 years ago

Not all the news is bad.

As a Life Member of Ducks Unlimited i follow the waterfowl population closely.   This is what those studies to have say:

Much of that success is due to DU's efforts at habitat improvement.   The people paying for this are mainly Duck Hunters not people like who wrote this article.

It's important to note that this is a long term study, going back to the fifties and while some populations are down, most of the long term averages (LTA's) are up.

Wildlife estimates don't get better than this.

 
 

Who is online








415 visitors