‘They are PUBLIC GOODS’: AOC says she’s not just promising people ‘free stuff

  
Via:  it-is-me  •  2 weeks ago  •  90 comments

By:   Washington Examiner - by Madison Dibble

‘They are PUBLIC GOODS’: AOC says she’s not just promising people ‘free stuff
“It’s not that we deserve it because it’s a handout. People like to say, ‘Oh, this is about free stuff.’ This is not about free stuff,”

The "New" word for "Free" is now "Public Goods". jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

The "Folks" will "LOVE IT" ! jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


https://twitter.com/freedlander/status/1198760932446539777

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unloaded on those who qualify her policy propositions as “free stuff.”

Ocasio-Cortez, the 30-year-old socialist New York representative elected to Congress last year, expressed her frustration with critics who write off her policies, such as tuition-free college, "Medicare for all," and expanding public housing, as “handouts” or “free stuff” to rope in voters.

“It’s not that we deserve it because it’s a handout. People like to say, ‘Oh, this is about free stuff.’ This is not about free stuff,” Ocasio-Cortes said at a Bronx town hall over the weekend. 

The freshman Democrat claimed those in her party who believe in free-market orientated policies try to paint her policies in a negative light. 
These are public goods . They’re public goods. So I never want to hear the word or the term ‘free stuff’ ever again ... because I’m tired of already hearing some of these neoliberal folks who are trying to like flip the script on us,” she explained.

She added, “Like when we’re talking about tuition-free public college or when we talk about public housing they say, ‘Oh, well, I don’t want to pay for a millionaire’s kid to go to college.’ That’s their like jujitsu on us that they’re trying to pull.”

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
It Is ME
1  seeder  It Is ME    2 weeks ago

She's still cute when she tries to "Socialize" !

 
 
 
It Is ME
2  seeder  It Is ME    2 weeks ago

"This is not about free stuff"

I noticed her comment "DIDN'T" say ….. This is NOT "Free stuff" !

 
 
 
Tacos!
2.1  Tacos!  replied to  It Is ME @2    2 weeks ago

"free stuff" is exactly like the n-word. Exactly. You're not allowed to use it anymore.

 
 
 
It Is ME
2.1.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tacos! @2.1    2 weeks ago

It's the same ol' "Liberal" ploy !

"Change" the name, and their folks will love it !

Kinda like "Quid-Pro-Quo" is now "Extorsion" and/or "Bribery" !

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.1.2  XDm9mm  replied to  It Is ME @2.1.1    2 weeks ago
Kinda like "Quid-Pro-Quo" is now "Extorsion" and/or "Bribery" !

And lest you forget, impeachment is morphing into censure.

 
 
 
It Is ME
2.1.3  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1.2    2 weeks ago
And lest you forget, impeachment is morphing into censure.

When the main subject fails AGAIN...go to a "Simpler" go-to ! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
TTGA
2.1.4  TTGA  replied to  Tacos! @2.1    2 weeks ago
"free stuff" is exactly like the n-word. Exactly. You're not allowed to use it anymore.

Maybe now we can start using the real term for "free stuff".  That term would be "stolen goods".  Whether stolen by a private thug or by governmental jack booted thugs under the name of "taxation", they're still stolen goods that you worked to get.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.1.5  Ozzwald  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1.2    2 weeks ago

And lest you forget, impeachment is morphing into censure.

Impeachment is staying impeachment in the House.  Censure is a possibility in the Senate because of the corrupt Republicans refusal to address the charges.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
2.1.6  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.5    2 weeks ago
Censure is a possibility in the Senate

try again.. 

the senate will not be playing along with the leftwing games.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.1.7  Ozzwald  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @2.1.6    2 weeks ago
the senate will not be playing along with the leftwing games.

So you are claiming that the Senate will reject the impeachment proceedings outright?  Refuse to even consider any evidence?

Personally, I hope you're right.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
2.1.8  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.7    2 weeks ago
So you are claiming that the Senate will reject the impeachment proceedings outright?

actually I think they can't wait to dig into the schiffs bs... perhaps even the bidens

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/06/republicans-debating-whether-call-bidens-witnesses-impeachment-trial/

they will question everyone who has testified in the house uninterrupted by schiff. including the whistleblower and all the people schiff does not want us to hear from.

personally,  I don't think schiff is dumb enough to pass his clown show to the senate.  but time will tell.

cheers :)

 
 
 
Tacos!
2.1.9  Tacos!  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.5    2 weeks ago
the corrupt Republicans refusal to address the charges

What are you talking about? They haven't even been presented with charges to consider yet.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.1.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.9    2 weeks ago

They haven't even been presented with charges to consider yet.

They've heard them the same as you.

 
 
 
Tacos!
2.1.11  Tacos!  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.10    2 weeks ago
They've heard them the same as you.

The only way I hear about them is in the news. Constitutionally, that is not presenting charges to the Senate. Thus, they are not empowered to act on them or ignore them. The Senate has nothing to do right now regarding impeachment. Impeachment hasn't happened yet. They are not yet in a position where "refusing to address charges" is even possible.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.1.12  Ozzwald  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.11    2 weeks ago
Constitutionally, that is not presenting charges to the Senate.

Why do you continually try to insist people say things that they don't?  I never claimed they "presented charges", but since you are unable to explain away from the publicly advertised charges that everyone with a computer or tv knows about, you try to move the goals.

Republicans HAVE responded to the charges that Trump is facing and have all come up with pitiful excuses that do not address them.

 
 
 
Tacos!
2.1.13  Tacos!  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.12    2 weeks ago
I never claimed they "presented charges"

What you said was:

Censure is a possibility in the Senate because of the corrupt Republicans refusal to address the charges.

Your words describe procedures in the Senate.

This has been explained to you, but I will say it again. Senate Republicans are not in a position to address or "refuse to address" charges until the full House has voted to impeach the president on specific charges.

It is false to accuse them of being corrupt for refusing to address charges that have not been submitted.

The internet, the news, and shit congressmen say on TV is irrelevant.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.1.14  Ozzwald  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.13    2 weeks ago
Your words describe procedures in the Senate.

Bullshit and you know it!

Senate Republicans are not in a position to address or "refuse to address" charges until the full House has voted to impeach the president on specific charges.

You continue to claim I have said things, which I have not, because otherwise you have no defense.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.15  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.14    2 weeks ago

Your words:

impeachment is staying impeachment in the House.  Censure is a possibility in the Senate because of the corrupt Republicans refusal to address the charges.

Now, if you aren't talking about Republicans in the Senate, why the hell did you specifically mention them?

Fact is, the GOP Senators don't have to "address" any charges because none have been presented by the House to the Senate.

Which is what has been pointed out to you several times now.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3  XDm9mm    2 weeks ago
So I never want to hear the word or the term ‘free stuff’ ever again

Well tell me oh socialist bartender....  exactly what is it called when you get something for nothing and demand more of something for nothing when the original something for nothing provides exactly what the nothing was originally valued at....   nothing?   The simple way to say that is  FREE SHIT.

Oh, what would have happened to your place of employment if you gave all the people in the bar their drinks for nothing?  How long do you believe your employer would have  kept you working and how long would you have received a paycheck?

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.1  Heartland American  replied to  XDm9mm @3    2 weeks ago

So who pays for these public goods AOC wants to dole out to whom she deems worthy of her largesse at our expense? 

 
 
 
Tacos!
3.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Heartland American @3.1    2 weeks ago
So who pays for these public goods

Nobody damnit! Pay attention! What part of "free" don't you understand? /s 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

By the way, I got a "public" parking ticket the other day. Somebody wanna take care of that for me?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.2  XDm9mm  replied to  Tacos! @3.1.1    2 weeks ago
Somebody wanna take care of that for me?

Sure.  Tell them that everyone says you should just tear it up.

 
 
 
Ronin2
3.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  Tacos! @3.1.1    2 weeks ago

No, it is the rich that pay! Don't you know that.

Wait, there is not enough of the rich to pay for everything; so we need to hit the middle class.

Still not enough money?!

Well, they know how to spend our money better than we do!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Heartland American @3.1    2 weeks ago
So who pays for these public goods AOC wants to dole out to whom she deems worthy of her largesse at our expense? 

MEXICO!!!

61sIDOD1ajL._SX466_.jpg

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4  1stwarrior    2 weeks ago

safe_image.php?d=AQDQ7HRrp2Q_FSYW&url=ht

 
 
 
Tacos!
5  Tacos!    2 weeks ago

Yeah, a lot of times people hate when you call stuff what it is because that honesty tends to expose the stupidity of their idea.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
6  Ed-NavDoc    2 weeks ago

Funny, not one word from the lefties o NT on this yet... 

 
 
 
It Is ME
6.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @6    2 weeks ago
Funny, not one word from the lefties o NT on this yet... 

AOC is one of those they'll support, just because, but have a hard time supporting what she says !

 
 
 
Tessylo
7  Tessylo    2 weeks ago

The Washington Examiner?

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
bugsy
7.1  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @7    2 weeks ago
The Washington Examiner?

Just the opposite of The Independent, or in other words, more truthful

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
7.1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  bugsy @7.1    2 weeks ago

Yep. I'll take the Washington Examiner over The Independent, a blatantly leftist liberal Russian owned and British run online news site that a certain somebody here is so fond of using as their only source of info on many of their seeds.

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @7.1    2 weeks ago
Nope.

The Independent

 factual search   reveals they have not failed a fact check.

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @7.1    2 weeks ago

No, the Examiner replaced the Washington Times and the Independent is more truthful.  The Independent has NEVER FAILED A FACT CHECK.  The Examiner HAS.  

right041.png?resize=600%2C67&ssl=1https://i1.wp.com/mediabiasfactcheck.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/right041.png?resize=300%2C34&ssl=1 300w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" >

RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.   See all Right Bias sources.

 

  • Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting:   MIXED
Country:  USA
World Press Freedom Rank:   USA 48/180

History

Founded in 2005 , The Washington Examiner is an American political journalism website and weekly magazine based in Washington, D.C. that covers politics and policy in the United States and internationally. The current editor is Hugo Gordon. 

Funded by / Ownership

The Washington Examiner is owned by  Clarity Media Group , which is in turn owned by  Philip Anschutz,  who is  an American billionaire entrepreneur who describes himself as a “conservative Christian.” Anschutz is also the owner of the right leaning  Weekly Standard  and has donated millions of dollars to right leaning causes, including  anti-LGBT groups,  such as the  Family Research Council , which has been labeled a hate group. The Washington Examiner is funded through an advertising and subscription model.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the format and content of the Washington Examiner has been compared to   The Hill , albeit with a   right leaning tilt . They generally report political news as well as local Washington DC news stories. The Washington Examiner frequently utilizes loaded wording in sensationalized headlines such as:  Trump’s manic Monday amid the Kavanaugh storm . While the headlines may be sensational, the content of articles are written with less bias and tend to be properly sourced to credible media outlets. Editorially, the Washington Examiner is 100% right. It is virtually impossible to find a single editorial that offers some form of balance. Most editorials have anti-left loaded headlines such as this:  Obama, the Great Divider when in office, lacks the credibility to lecture America .

A   factual search   reveals several failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks. (7/18/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 7/26/2019)

Source:   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/

 
 
 
bugsy
7.1.4  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.3    2 weeks ago

So what? The Independent is owned by Russians. I thought the loons on the left didn't like Russia now.

How many scary Russians do you have under your bed?

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @7.1.4    2 weeks ago

They've never failed a fact check unlike the source of this seed.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.1.6  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.5    2 weeks ago
the source of this seed.

This "SEEDED ARTICLE" provides you with a vid of AOC actually saying what the Examiner wrote about ! jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
bugsy
7.1.7  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.5    2 weeks ago

When you are a far left loon fact check site, you will never fail one of your own.

 
 
 
Tacos!
7.1.8  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.5    2 weeks ago
They've never failed a fact check

How many have they been subject to? How many have they passed?

 
 
 
Tessylo
8  Tessylo    2 weeks ago

They Are Credible Doc.  You TRump Supporters Live In An Alternative Fact Based Bizarro World.  

 

LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.      See all Left-Center sources.

  • Overall we rate the The Independent Left-Center Biased due to story selection that moderately favors the left and High for factual reporting based on proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting:      HIGH
Country:      United Kingdom
World Press Freedom Rank:      UK 33/180

History

Founded in 1986, by Newspaper Publishing, The Independent is a daily newspaper from the United Kingdom. The Independent was    launched    by former  Telegraph   staffers Andreas Whittam Smith, Matthew Symonds, and Stephen Glover.  It is headquartered in London. In 1990, The Independent on Sunday was launched and edited by Stephen Glover. In 1994, the founders left the paper and Ian Hargreaves became the editor of the paper. A year later Newspaper Publishing was restructured, with Mirror Group and    Tony O’Reilly’s    Independent News & Media (INM) becoming joint owners of Newspaper Publishing. In 1998, INM took full control of the The Independent.    O’Reilly    bought out the company for £30m and in 2010 and then Russian billionaire  Alexander Lebedev    and his son Evgeny Lebedev    acquired      The Independent. In 2016, the paper moved to a digital-only format. Simon Kelner is currently the editor-in-chief of the Independent titles. Andreas Whittam Smith, the founder of The Independent, has also joined the board of Independent Print Limited. In 2017, Saudi Businessman    Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel      bought a 30% stake in the Independent online newspaper.  

Funded by / Ownership

The Independent is owned by    Independent Print Limited,    a company owned by the Lebedev family (Alexander Lebedev and his son Evgeny Lebedev). In 2017, Saudi Businessman Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel bought a 30% stake in the Independent online newspaper. The paper is funded through advertising and subscriptions.  

Analysis / Bias

The Independent recently joined up with a media group that has close links to the Saudi royal family to launch websites across the Middle East. Its partnering with a publisher that has strong links to the Saudi government has been   criticized   by the   Guardian  .

In review, The Independent tends to publish stories utilizing minimally loaded language in their headlines such as:    “Theresa May insists Brexit deal is not dead despite EU leaders refusing to make further concessions”     and US news “   Mueller investigation: Special counsel attacks Flynn criticism of FBI interview”   . The Independent also republishes news from other credible sources such as the   Associated Press  :    “Five things you didn’t know about Germany’s diesel ban”.    In general, most stories   favor the left   and tend to be sourced properly utilizing credible sources such as   USA Today   and the  Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.

According to a 2017 survey conducted by      You Gov UK   , The Independent is viewed as having a center-left bias in reporting with 79% saying it was either Center or Left and only 21% saying it leaned right.

 factual search   reveals they have not failed a fact check.

Overall we rate the The Independent Left-Center Biased due to story selection that moderately favors the left and High for factual reporting based on proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.    (5/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 10/24/2019)

Source:      https://www.independent.co.uk/us

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8    2 weeks ago

I'm sure you watched the AOC Vid that actually shows her "SAYING" what the article notes.....right ? jrSmiley_87_smiley_image.gif

Or was it dubbed. jrSmiley_25_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

Soooooo…..how 'bout that renaming "Free Stuff" ?

Are you For or against it ?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
8.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @8    2 weeks ago

Totally hilarious how you automatically label anyone that disagrees with you and does not share your political views a "trump supporter"! You cannot seem to accept the fact that it is possible to not support Trump but disagree with progressive leftist liberal viewpoints. That is a extremely narrow minded viewpoint on your part.

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @8.2    2 weeks ago

tRump loves the poorly educated because they're just like him.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
8.2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.1    2 weeks ago

Good attempt at deflection, but you lose....

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.2.3  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.1    2 weeks ago
tRump loves the poorly educated because they're just like him.  

I gotta "Dumb" myself down then. jrSmiley_19_smiley_image.gif He's done better than I have. jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @8.2.2    2 weeks ago

Nope.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.5  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.3    2 weeks ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.2.6  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.5    2 weeks ago
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

Did you get a pretty diploma to hang on the wall too ?

 
 
 
Texan1211
8.2.7  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.1    2 weeks ago
tRump loves the poorly educated because they're just like him.  

Do you think Trump is unique in loving the poorly educated? 

DO Democrats NOT love them?

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.8  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @8.2.7    2 weeks ago

tRump's base is the poorly educated whom he loves.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.9  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.6    2 weeks ago

'Did you get a pretty diploma to hang on the wall too ?'

No, I didn't go to tRump University.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.2.10  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.9    2 weeks ago
No, I didn't go to tRump University. 

It wasn't a "FREE PUBLIC GOODS" thingy available to you ?

 
 
 
Texan1211
8.2.11  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.8    2 weeks ago

I have already proven that to be wrong. Figured you would ignore it--I even called it!

LMMFAO!

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.13  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.10    2 weeks ago

I don't know what a free public goods thingy is.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.2.14  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.13    2 weeks ago
I don't know what a free public goods thingy is.  

Maybe Read the seeded article ?

AOC explains it for you.

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.15  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.14    2 weeks ago

Why would I do that?

You know I don't read what you post.

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.2.16  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.15    2 weeks ago
Why would I do that? You know I don't read what you post

Whaaaaaa…… jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

Why would you admit you "Don't Read" ..... again ? jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
8.2.17  Texan1211  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.16    2 weeks ago

She was too busy calling me a feckless cunt to actually bother to read before commenting.

Do you know of any intelligent folks who comment on articles they don't bother to read?

Or comment on links they haven't bothered to read?

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.18  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @8.2.17    2 weeks ago

Why would I read anything a tRump supporter posts?

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.2.19  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.18    2 weeks ago
Why would I read anything a tRump supporter posts?

Because it's what a "BLUE Lefty Socialist" is saying ?

You don't want to know what your "Fellow Smurfs" are saying ?

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.2.20  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Texan1211 @8.2.17    2 weeks ago
She was too busy calling me a feckless cunt to actually bother to read before commenting.

I noticed. Just Another jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif Troll !

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.21  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.20    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
8.2.22  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.18    2 weeks ago
Why would I read anything a tRump supporter posts?

Here is a really, really wild guess:

So you can comment intelligently and appropriately to a comment?

naw…….can't be THAT, for sure!

LMMFAO!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
8.2.23  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.1    2 weeks ago

If he loved the "poorly educated" then the Democrats, left and liberals would be praising him.  Instead you all are running around with your hair on fire because you lost an election.

 
 
 
Texan1211
9  Texan1211    2 weeks ago
No you haven't you feckless cunt.  

Oh, but I did. It is clearly there for anyone willing to actually read the links.

heck, I even stressed to you that you would need to read the entire links!

I can tell you simply refuse to do so, or if you did, you simply don't believe your lying eyes!

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @9    2 weeks ago

No, you haven't.  

Why the fuck would I read anything you post or follow any link?

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @9.1    2 weeks ago
No, you haven't.  

But I did, and the people who know how and who bother to READ know it.

Maybe I can find a source more along the lines of "Run Jane run" so it will capture your attention span.

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @9.1    2 weeks ago
Why the fuck would I read anything you post or follow any link?

Who the fuck knows?

Why would you respond to a comment you haven't fucking read, why would you demand proof and then ignore it when it is provided to you?

 
 
 
It Is ME
9.1.3  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @9.1    2 weeks ago
Why the fuck would I read anything you post or follow any link?

So why are you here in the first place ??

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
9.1.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @9.1.2    2 weeks ago

Bingo! Nailed it...

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @9.1.1    2 weeks ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  It Is ME @9.1.3    2 weeks ago
So why are you here in the first place ??

Trolling, trolling, trolling, got to keep them doggies trolling!

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @9.1.6    2 weeks ago

[Removed

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @9.1.7    2 weeks ago
I prefer facts over right wing propaganda outlets such as the Washington Examiner. 

What a hoot!!!!!!!!!

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
It Is ME
9.1.9  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @9.1.7    2 weeks ago
I prefer facts over right wing propaganda outlets such as the Washington Examiner.  

The "Facts" of what AOC said, are in the article....and a vid is provided also.

Hmmmmmm…….I seem to remember "Someone' saying this, just a few minutes ago:

" Shame and a pity that's all you have is to piss all over someone elses' seed."

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @9.1.9    2 weeks ago

" Shame and a pity that's all you have is to piss all over someone elses' seed."

I thought I would return the favor since you do that to me all the time.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
9.1.11  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @9.1.10    2 weeks ago
I thought I would return the favor since you do that to me all the time.

I actually comment on the information on "YOUR" article. jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

You have a hard time with it.....the info in the "Article" that is ! jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

You relegate yourself into that "Name game" thingy when your stumped.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
10  KDMichigan    2 weeks ago

original

 
 
 
Tessylo
11  Tessylo    2 weeks ago

Self portrait KD?

What no fat chick memes?

 
 
 
It Is ME
11.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @11    2 weeks ago
Self portrait KD? What no fat chick memes?

Still Trolling ?

 
 
 
KDMichigan
11.1.1  KDMichigan  replied to  It Is ME @11.1    2 weeks ago

Looking for quarters for the power washer...

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
11.1.2  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  KDMichigan @11.1.1    2 weeks ago
Looking for quarters for the power washer...

Will a hose work?

512

 
 
 
It Is ME
11.1.3  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  KDMichigan @11.1.1    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
It Is ME
11.1.4  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @11.1.2    2 weeks ago
Will a hose work?

From the "Public Goods" ! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

( I think I just threw up in my mouth) jrSmiley_19_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
11.1.5  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  It Is ME @11.1.4    2 weeks ago
( I think I just threw up in my mouth)

don't be rude, big girl's need love'n too.

Wonder if public works has flat bed trucks to haul those citizens around that don't fit on buses?

 
 
 
It Is ME
11.1.6  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @11.1.5    2 weeks ago
Wonder if public works has flat bed trucks to haul those citizens around that don't fit on buses?

Sort of !

384

 
 
 
Tessylo
11.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @11.1.5    2 weeks ago

I should have known not to trust you. 

Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.

'I'm here to have fun really, i dont have problems with your comments to me however now that you have expressed an issue with the memes directed at you I will refrain because it's not fair...sorry Tessylo....i will do better'

[deleted. Stop bring KD into a discussion that he is not involved in and making persnal comments about his family.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
11.1.8  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  It Is ME @11.1.6    2 weeks ago

That's hot, It would be like a threesome. The fish and those two thighs

 
 
 
Tessylo
11.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @11.1.7    2 weeks ago

Well those memes are directed at me so maybe he needs to lay off the off topic fat chick memes.  

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
11.1.10  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Tessylo @11.1.9    2 weeks ago

Mine was a reply to it's me...so checkyoself!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
12  Just Jim NC TttH    2 weeks ago

384

So Mr. Trump must REALLY love this one........................

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

KDMichigan
JBB
Sunshine
Wishful_thinkin
jungkonservativ111
Gordy327
Ozzwald
Tessylo
Ronin2
SteevieGee

bccrane
Freefaller
Just Jim NC TttH
Texan1211
loki12


32 visitors