Woman injures 2 after allegedly driving into traffic as a test of faith

  
Via:  pj  •  one month ago  •  33 comments

Woman injures 2 after allegedly driving into traffic as a test of faith

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


A woman in Pennsylvania allegedly drove her car into oncoming traffic as a test of her faith in God and showed no remorse for her actions, according to authorities.

The incident occurred on Jan. 7 near Weatherly, Pennsylvania when 31-year-old Nadejda Reilly drove into oncoming traffic on Route 93, according to ABC News’ Pittsburgh affiliate station WTAE.

An investigator who spoke to Reilly said that she told him she had been driving around for several hours waiting for a calling from God when she decided to take action into her own hands and drive into an oncoming vehicle.

“Reilly related God took care of her by not having her injured,” wrote Trooper Bruce Balliet in an arrest affidavit. “Reilly expressed no concerns or remorse for the victims. Reilly also stated she did not care if the other people were injured because God would have taken care of them.”

Reilly, from Drums, Pennsylvania, had her $50,000 bail revoked and was charged with aggravated assault and other offenses over allegations that she purposely caused the accident that injured two people in the vehicle that she collided with.

The two people in the car that Reilly collided with were taken to hospital and treated for their injuries.

Reilly’s lawyer, Andrew Theyken Bench, filed a notice with the Carbon County court saying that Reilly planned to waive her formal arraignment but declined to offer further comment on Friday.


Article is Locked

smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
PJ
1  seeder  PJ    one month ago

Sounds like something one of Trump's Christians would do.........  

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2  XDm9mm    one month ago

This sounds like one bat shit crazy zealot doing what bat shit crazy zealots do.

Years (ok..  decades ago) I worked with a bat shit crazy drunk that also 'believed' the "Lord will protect me."   When I confronted him about driving drunk and putting everyone else at risk including me, his response was as I quoted above;  "The Lord will protect me."  He sat kind of stunned when I asked him what about those too young to even know about religion or those who don't believe.   I got the answer I expected....  silence.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
3  Dean Moriarty    one month ago

I always stay a safe distance for the drivers with the God is my co-pilot bumper stickers. You never know when they will let the co-pilot do the driving. 

 
 
 
PJ
3.1  seeder  PJ  replied to  Dean Moriarty @3    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
WallyW
3.1.1  WallyW  replied to  PJ @3.1    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  PJ @3.1    one month ago

Trump took your reproductive rights away now? Please do tell us all about what he did to you!

 
 
 
PJ
3.1.3  seeder  PJ  replied to  WallyW @3.1.1    one month ago
Hopefully, you have not reproduced.

Now, that's not nice especially since I've added to what some would consider the superior race.  I have 3 healthy white males.  All with European ancestry AND no tainted blood in any of them so they're probably on the top of the recruiting list for the nazi or anti immigrant groups.

I'm sorry to report that they're morals are still intact.  They're anti trump like their mother.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  PJ @3.1.3    one month ago

Can you name some of the anti-immigrant groups you are talking about?

And are they really anti-immigrant, or are they anti-illegal-immigrant?

You get the difference, right?

 
 
 
Kathleen
3.2  Kathleen  replied to  Dean Moriarty @3    one month ago

A great way to put that.. lol.

Driving is mostly all judgment. To use no judgment is pretty scary. 

 
 
 
charger 383
4  charger 383    one month ago

The real test of faith will be how she will pay the lawsuits and fines, she also needs to go to jail and have her drivers license revoked forever

 
 
 
PJ
4.1  seeder  PJ  replied to  charger 383 @4    one month ago

I imagine she will be the next face the religious community will raise up.  She will be their next martyr to be praised for her faith in God.  A WH invitation is just around the corner.  

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.1.1  XDm9mm  replied to  PJ @4.1    one month ago
I imagine she will be the next face the religious community will raise up.  She will be their next martyr to be praised for her faith in God.  A WH invitation is just around the corner.  

Just a quick question PJ....   Did you just wake up angry at the world this morning, or is it a normal situation you live with?

 
 
 
PJ
4.1.2  seeder  PJ  replied to  XDm9mm @4.1.1    one month ago

Pj settles down on the chaise and stares up at the ceiling and takes a deep breath

Well Dr. XD - I've been feeling a little angry lately at some of my fellow, or x-fellow, country men and women.  It seems like I've been feeling this way for......oh I don't know, 3+ years.

My eyes have been opened in a sense.  I never realized people could be so fucking cruel and evil.  Oops - sorry about the language.  

Where was I, yes.....I never imagined that so many in this country would sell out their decency and moral convictions for money and to keep their race at the top.  

You see, I'm disappointed and daggonit, I'm M.A.D. mad!  

 
 
 
WallyW
4.1.3  WallyW  replied to  PJ @4.1.2    one month ago
Your comments are neither rational nor logical, and thankfully, are in the minority..

 
 
 
PJ
4.1.4  seeder  PJ  replied to  WallyW @4.1.3    one month ago

No, my position is not the minority.  Those who oppose trump are only growing but you keep telling yourself everyone loves trump but me.  

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.1.5  XDm9mm  replied to  PJ @4.1.2    one month ago
Well Dr. XD - I've been feeling a little angry lately at some of my fellow, or x-fellow, country men and women.  It seems like I've been feeling this way for......oh I don't know, 3+ years.

My eyes have been opened in a sense.  I never realized people could be so fucking cruel and evil.  Oops - sorry about the language.  

Where was I, yes.....I never imagined that so many in this country would sell out their decency and moral convictions for money and to keep their race at the top.  

You see, I'm disappointed and daggonit, I'm M.A.D. mad!  

Well, I'll tell you right now, I'm not a doctor and I didn't sleep in a Holiday Inn last night.  I don't have a degree in psychiatry nor psychology, but I did do a paper in my psychology course decades ago.

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  PJ @4.1    one month ago
I imagine she will be the next face the religious community will raise up.

Which religious community are you claiming will do that?

Can you give us some examples of other religious communities in the US doing such things?

 
 
 
PJ
4.1.7  seeder  PJ  replied to  XDm9mm @4.1.5    one month ago

I'm pretty self aware and don't require paying someone to tell me that I have an issue with the supporters of this president.  

 
 
 
PJ
4.1.8  seeder  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.6    one month ago

I'm not wasting my time providing you with examples that you won't accept.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  PJ @4.1.8    one month ago
I'm not wasting my time providing you with examples that you won't accept. 

Is that leftist for "I got nothing"?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.1.10  1stwarrior  replied to  PJ @4.1.4    one month ago

I know it's your thread, but I haven't read anything in the news that brings Trump into the topic.  Care to enlighten us?

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.10    one month ago

Everything wrong with the world started when Trump beat Abuela.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.1.12  XDm9mm  replied to  PJ @4.1.7    one month ago
I'm pretty self aware and don't require paying someone to tell me that I have an issue with the supporters of this president.  

Like I said, I'm not a doctor, but we are making progress.  You've acknowledged at least what part of the root cause of your angst is.

 
 
 
PJ
4.1.13  seeder  PJ  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.10    one month ago

It's my thread.   Any more questions?  lol

Kidding aside, there's a precedence of this president inviting controversial people to the WH.  Plus we're heading into an election year and he needs to secure his chrisitian voters so I'm speculating that her actions could parlay an invite to the WH.

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.1.14  Texan1211  replied to  PJ @4.1.13    one month ago
o I'm speculating that her actions could parlay an invite to the WH.

Since you seem so sure of it, care to make a little wager on it?

 
 
 
PJ
4.1.15  seeder  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.14    one month ago

No

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
4.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  charger 383 @4    one month ago

If she ever does get her license back, and I imagine she will, because I doubt there are laws that adequately address this type of stupidity, I can't imagine who would sell her auto insurance.  If I were an agent and read this story, I'd rip up the policy while she watched and send her packing.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.2.1  XDm9mm  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.2    one month ago
I can't imagine who would sell her auto insurance.

High risk pools mandated by most states would do so.   It's costly but if you want it, it's there.

Of course, she can do like many others have done.  Buy the insurance, get the "proof" via a certificate, and then immediately cancel the policy.....  until caught again!!

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
4.2.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  XDm9mm @4.2.1    one month ago
mandated

I have a problem with the "mandated" thing.  No business should be forced to assume the risks of behavior that is stupid to the point of possibly being homicidal.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.2.3  XDm9mm  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.2.2    one month ago
No business should be forced to assume the risks of behavior that is stupid to the point of possibly being homicidal.

I'm not sure those pools a private entities.  If memory serves me, it was I believe NY that had a state run pool, and an insurance company only provided the 'back office' things like proof of insurance and claims adjudication (for a fee of course).  The actual funds were state maintained and premiums paid only went through the insurance company for accounting purposes.

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.2.2    one month ago
I have a problem with the "mandated" thing.  No business should be forced to assume the risks of behavior that is stupid to the point of possibly being homicidal.

We require health insurance companies to cover anyone and everyone. Not much difference.

 
 
 
charger 383
4.2.5  charger 383  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.2    one month ago

"I can't imagine who would sell her auto insurance".

I don't think Farmer's Insurance has seen a claim like this,  BummBeBummBumBum

 
 
 
PJ
5  seeder  PJ    one month ago

I'm locking the article because I have to sign off.  Sorry to those who are having a discussion but rules are rules.  

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

lady in black


39 visitors