"Above all else , the devil can not stand to be mocked." "

  
By:  larry-hampton  •  one month ago  •  42 comments

"Above all else , the devil can not stand to be mocked." "

Trump hates to be mocked. He's Putin's bitch. So let's have fun teasing him about it. Let's stop pretending that Russia isn't supporting him when our intelligence community says so.

256


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
Larry Hampton
1  author  Larry Hampton    one month ago

384

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Larry Hampton @1    one month ago

that one is priceless. Putin is playing chess while trmp is playing hungry, hungry hippo

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Larry Hampton @1    one month ago

hungry hungry hippos fed the 'pigs' slop

while Putin strokes his Bishop 

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
2  author  Larry Hampton    one month ago

384

 
 
 
gooseisgone
2.1  gooseisgone  replied to  Larry Hampton @2    one month ago

I think you should stay with the whole "Russia" thing, its worked out so well. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  gooseisgone @2.1    one month ago

199 charged for "fake" Putin your head hoaxes ?

 
 
 
gooseisgone
2.1.2  gooseisgone  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.1    one month ago
"fake"

You summed it up with one word. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.3  igknorantzrulz  replied to  gooseisgone @2.1.2    one month ago

fake hoax

 
 
 
gooseisgone
2.1.4  gooseisgone  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.3    one month ago
fake hoax

You left out Russian, "Fake Russian Hoax" or did you not read the Mueller report.

 
 
 
lib50
2.1.5  lib50  replied to  gooseisgone @2.1.4    one month ago

Sounds like YOU didn't read the report if you are inferring Russia didn't have connections throughout Trumpland.  Mueller laid out connections between Russia and people on teamTrump.  Some of those people are in jail.   The only reason Mueller didn't take things further was because of that 'can't indict a sitting president' Barr crap.  Maybe don't site something you obviously haven't read.  Gop talking points are lies.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
2.1.6  1stwarrior  replied to  lib50 @2.1.5    one month ago

Not true. the folks involved and indicted were outside the Trump team.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.7  igknorantzrulz  replied to  1stwarrior @2.1.6    one month ago

bull

 
 
 
gooseisgone
2.1.8  gooseisgone  replied to  lib50 @2.1.5    one month ago

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

This report or are you talking about another report, help me out here or maybe we're talking about Konstantin Kilimnik.

Maybe don't site something you obviously haven't read.

Can't read the wishful thinking in the report, it's only in the minds of Democrats. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2.1.9  Sean Treacy  replied to  lib50 @2.1.5    one month ago
ut connections between Russia and people on teamTrump.  Some of those people are in jail.   The only reason Mueller didn't take things further was because of that 'can't indict a sitting president'

Please stop saying things that aren't true.

Mueller said there was no evidence any American coordinated or conspired with Russia. This has been told to you repeatedly, yet you keep spreading misinformation.  Please stop spreading lies.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.10  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.9    one month ago

if U actually read the report, you suffer from a comprehension issue. Trump would have been indicted with his lawyer if not the potUS,!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.10    one month ago

That's simply not true. 

You, and others, don't understand what Mueller wrote and said about the DOJ guidelines and it's effect on his obstruction of justice investigation.  First, it has nothing to do with the collusion investigation, where Mueller specifically said there was no coordination with Russia and second, he didn't claim the guidelines stopped him from indicting Trump. Dishonest people have misled you into thinking he did. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.12  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.11    one month ago

do you know what a co conspirator is ?
U R the one who is being lied to.

Many DID NOT COOPERATE with t he investigation as well, while many, like Trump, LIED Through their False teeth about truth.

Just Thousands of random coincidences around Trump and his inner circle. 

I feel sorry for you and your like believers, gang of the deceived receiving a faux version of reality, i doubt , you'll ever see what is actually True, about how taken, will have been, you. Trump did it again the day after Mueller reluctantly testified, as again you've been taken for a ride as L:ied and lied has Trump to you and your gang of blind followers.

Our condolences.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2.1.13  Sean Treacy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.12    one month ago

I know what a co-conspirator is, but I don't think you understand where that came up. It had nothing to do with "Russian collusion."  Cohen wasn't charged with conspiring with Russia. You should probably look up what, exactly, Cohen was charged with before you go any further.. The discussion is about Russia, not campaign finance issues regarding his former mistress. 

You really lack a grasp of what happened and are just throwing together random fragments that lack any coherence. 

Mueller said there was no conspiracy or coordination between anyone connected to Trump and Russia. Period. End of story. Anyone who tells you different is lying. It' right there in the report. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.14  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.13    one month ago

So you believe Trump Jr., son in law, and campaign duesh met in Trump Tower to discuss Adoptions ????

What was Stone found guilty of again  ?

What was Flynn found giuilty of ?

Are you denying Trump asked Russia for help ? in finding Hillary's E-mails, that benefited HIM on live TV?

.

If you want to parse words, i can as well.

Technically i'll give you co conspirator was on election law violation, but to say M<uellers investigation found nothing, is bullshit and you know it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.15  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.14    one month ago
Are you denying Trump asked Russia for help ? in finding Hillary's E-mails, that benefited HIM on live TV?

Yes, You have it right--finally.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2.1.16  Sean Treacy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.14    one month ago

Why don't you ask Mueller?

None of them were charged with  coordinating or conspiring with Russians to interfere in the election.  

Do you think Mueller was lying?  Facts are facts, no matter how inconvenient to the fake narrative of collusion the left has peddled for years. Mueller's report and the actual contents of the indictments of all the people you listed who were indicted prove that no one associated with Trump coordinated or conspired with the Russians to interfere in the election. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.17  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.16    one month ago

They DO NOT PROVE anything besides there was not enough evidence to charge

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.18  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.17    one month ago
They DO NOT PROVE anything besides there was not enough evidence to charge

Well, no shit, Sherlock.

After a rather lengthy investigation, a normal person would conclude that the evidence to charge conspiracy or collusion simply doesn't exist.

Now, feel free to speculate and guess all you want, while the rest of the world deals in facts.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.19  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.18    one month ago

you deal in matter s only fecal

as

plenty of evidence, just not all meeting the burden as to bring forth charges, especially when Mueller felt HE COULD NOT CHARGE A SITTING potUS, that would be up to Congress, and once all was WRONGLY lowered by the Barr, You guys are just blindly biased to a degree that boils ones freezing point cause it is like debating a third grader who was pushed through since pre K

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.20  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.19    one month ago
you deal in matter s only fecal

Dumb.

plenty of evidence, just not all meeting the burden as to bring forth charges, especially when Mueller felt HE COULD NOT CHARGE A SITTING potUS, that would be up to Congress, and once all was WRONGLY lowered by the Barr,

Gee, hate to break it to you, but NO ONE was charged with conspiring with the Russians. And what the fuck is that babble about Barr?

Congress, in its infinite "wisdom", chose to deliberately not charge the President with anything rising out of the Great Mueller Report.

Even unhinged Democrats could see that the Mueller Report had NOTHING on Trump.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.2  KDMichigan  replied to  Larry Hampton @2    one month ago

The only way this meme makes sense is if you are referencing Obama. Wasn't he the bitch that sat on his hands while Russia invaded Crimea? Isn't he the bitch that drew red lines why'll Russia interfered in Syria. Wasn't it Obama that refused Ukraine aid to fight Russia because he was Putin's bitch?

256

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
2.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  KDMichigan @2.2    one month ago
Wasn't it Obama that refused Ukraine aid to fight Russia because he was Putin's bitch?

First, Obama did send lots of support to Ukraine after they were invaded. He also listened to allies in the region like Germany who were hesitant to include "lethal aid" to then President Poroshenko. Between 2014 and 2016, the United States committed more than $600 million in security assistance to Ukraine. President Obama requested Congress approve the lethal aid which they did in the last year of Obama's presidency which wasn't implemented until 2017 when Trump took office but did not include the "javelin missiles" Poroshenko wanted.

And while Trump and his slimy sycophant Republicans like the sniveling Matt Goetz have touted the recent sale of javelins to Ukraine claiming that's what Obama wouldn't do, the weasels forgot to mention "that the Ukrainians cannot actually use the anti-tank missiles in the conflict against pro-Russian separatists based on the terms of the sale."

https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-leaving-out-key-detail-trump-javelin-sale-to-ukraine-2019-11

So no, Obama was never Putin's bitch, but this worthless fool in the white house bending over and taking it certainly is.

“I believe I would get along very nicely with Putin. I don’t think you would need the sanctions,” - DJT

"President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be," - DJT

"Putin and I discussed many important subjects at our earlier meeting. We got along well which truly bothered many haters who wanted to see a boxing match. Big results will come!" - DJT

"I called President Putin of Russia to congratulate him on his election victory" "Getting along with Russia (and others) is a good thing, not a bad thing" - DJT

 "The man (Putin) has very strong control over a country. Now, it's a very different system and I don't happen to like the system, but certainly in that system, he's been a leader. Far more than our president has been a leader." - DJT

"Great move on delay (by V. Putin) - I always knew he was very smart!" - DJT

You can almost hear the 'sluuuurp' as Trump orally services that little piece of shit dictator.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.2.2  KDMichigan  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.2.1    one month ago
First, Obama did send lots of support to Ukraine after they were invaded.

Ah yes the great leader from behind. He is so awesome /s

FYI Trumps words don't compare to what Putin's bitch Obama did. Some of us are capable of understanding the difference.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.2.3  igknorantzrulz  replied to  KDMichigan @2.2.2    one month ago

FYI Trumps words don't compare to what Putin's bitch Obama did. Some of us are capable of understanding the difference.

do you have a decoder ring...?  

 
 
 
Tacos!
3  Tacos!    one month ago
Trump hates to be mocked.

Is there somebody who doesn't?

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1  Split Personality  replied to  Tacos! @3    one month ago

I could make a list of NT members who don't seem to mind at all.  In fact one could infer they revel in the abuse. jrSmiley_72_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tacos!
3.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Split Personality @3.1    one month ago

I think whenever it's done among friends, then it's all in good fun, and it's fine. When critics and enemies do it, I think it's something most people probably resent.

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
3.1.2  author  Larry Hampton  replied to  Tacos! @3.1.1    one month ago

It is also something that adults learn to handle, hopefully with grace and wit. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
3.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Tacos! @3    one month ago
Is there somebody who doesn't?

Dishonest Donald has been mocking everything and everyone who doesn't bow down and kiss his feet, he deserves to be mercilessly mocked for the rest of his miserable life.

As to whether there are those who don't mind being mocked, it's a sign of a healthy mental state to be able to laugh at oneself. If a person has such thin skin that they can't enjoy a joke at their expense and are so sensitive that they lash out at anyone who dares tease or mock them, then they obviously have no real self confidence as they need to rely on constant sycophantic validation to feel any self worth. Trump isn't self confident which is why he lashes out at the mildest of slights, he's just a textbook narcissist.

Individuals with narcissistic personality disorder, according to the DSM-5, exhibit five or more of the following, which are present by early adulthood and across contexts:

  • A grandiose sense of self-importance (Trump)
  • Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love (definitely Trump)
  • Belief that one is special and can only be understood by or associate with special people or institutions (yup, Trump)
  • A need for excessive admiration (Trump)
  • A sense of entitlement (to special treatment) (yup, that checks out Trump)
  • Exploitation of others (has thousands of lawsuits from not paying employees and subcontractors what he owes them)
  • A lack of empathy (yup, definitely Trump)
  • Envy of others or the belief that one is the object of envy (again, no brainer depiction of Trump)
  • Arrogant, haughty behavior or attitudes (obvious Trump)

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder

Deranged Donald deserves all the disrespect and ridicule we can muster. He is a human cancer that poisons everything he touches. He has zero redeeming qualities.

If someone said the same about myself, I'd have to wonder why they would feel that way and do some self-reflection. In Trumps case, I believe he is completely incapable of self reflection which is why he has such paper thin skin.

 
 
 
Tacos!
3.2.1  Tacos!  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.2    one month ago
Dishonest Donald has been mocking everything and everyone who doesn't bow down and kiss his feet

Yeah, he loves to do that. He could sleepwalk to reelection if he could just avoid being a dick.

he deserves to be mercilessly mocked for the rest of his miserable life

Maybe. I don't care what regular people do on the internet, of course, but I do wish politicians would try to stay above the fray and not sink to his level. In 2016, I thought Marco Rubio was doing pretty well until he tried to exchange insults with Trump. I think that was when his campaign finally failed. I think it hurt Cruz, too, although I don't remember him getting quite down to the middle school level like Trump.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.2    one month ago

If you had to wonder about yourself if someone said the same about you, you wouldn't be narcissistic because then you're taking responsibility for your behavior.

 
 
 
It Is ME
4  It Is ME    one month ago

"Let's stop pretending that Russia isn't supporting him when our intelligence community says so."

I'm not pretending ! jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_40_smiley_image.gif

"During the [February 13] briefing, the Intelligence Community did not state that Russia is aiding the re-election of President Trump," a senior official from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) told CBS News."

384

 
 
 
bbl-1
5  bbl-1    one month ago

The Trump is filling the courts.  In time it may be illegal to mock or question the Trump.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  bbl-1 @5    one month ago

Heads on pikes?

 
 
 
Tessylo
6  Tessylo    one month ago

87539964_10158230092104287_6369879345455

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
7  Paula Bartholomew    one month ago

Trump is supposed to be addressing the corona virus epidemic tonight.  He will offer no insight, bad talk his opponents, and make it about him.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
7.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @7    one month ago

Coronavirus, another evil attempting to enter our country, thus why we need that Southern border wall.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


Drakkonis
Dean Moriarty


63 visitors