It's March 3, 2020. WHO WANNA TALK ABOUT HILLARY'S EMAILS?

  
Via:  john-russell  •  one month ago  •  32 comments

It's March 3, 2020. WHO WANNA TALK ABOUT HILLARY'S EMAILS?

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




It's March 3, 2020. WHO WANNA TALK ABOUT HILLARY'S EMAILS?




March 03, 2020 12:42 PM





          Listen, y'all, can we cut the shit and talk about the important stuff? Like fine, "coronavirus" and "steep slide into authoritarian government," sure, whatever, maybe after lunch, but there's something happening with Hillary Clinton's emails.





Like, on top of how she probably still sends emails   to this day , a crime for which she has yet to pay. They are probably like "Yoga tomorrow?" and "Here is that really good book I was telling you about" and "PIZZA PIZZA! BENGHAZI! THE TOP 5 SPIRIT COOKING RECIPES TO MAKE, IN BED!"

Judicial Watch, it is that wingnut jackass "legal" outfit Donald Trump   likes to retweet,   because it is his favorite source of bath salts conspiracy theory bullshit. The guy who runs it, Tom Fitton, who looks like he plays the bishop in Mormon gay porns where the plot is "buttsex," goes on Fox News all the time and breathes sweet nothings up the president's curious B-hole through the television. It is a whole thing.

This is his   Twitter picture.


img.jpg?width=980


Told you he looks like a Mormon gay porner.

Point is, Judicial Watch, which was   founded by superlawyer   Larry Klayman but now they   don't like each other,   likes to do frivolous lawsuits — especially about   #HILLARYSTUFF   — and it managed to actually get a federal judge to agree that Hillary Clinton should be deposed, because "emails."

Stop walking away, this is important!

You might   think   — after the marathon Benghazi Emails investigation by the House Select Committee On Benghazi And Then For Some Reason Emails; and after the exhaustive FBI investigation into Hillary's emails, which cleared her of any wrongdoing; and after the FBI   reopening and then reclosing   the investigation after it "discovered" some "new" Hillary emails 11 days before the 2016 election; and after   the IG investigation   into the FBI's handling of the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails; and after the   FBI's EXTRA additional special super sexxxy review of the FBI investigation   into Hillary's emails; and after the   State Department's years-long look   into Hillary's emails, which also cleared her of wrongdoing — that maybe this "emails" thing had kinda run its course. You would only think that because you are the Deep State, and also very stinky and stupid.

The judge in question is US District Court Judge Royce Lamberth, who was originally appointed by Reagan. It's a FOIA request case about the State Department's handling of Hillary's naughty #emailz, and the judge in his   order   explains what had been going on with it before this week's order that Clinton be deposed:

The Court ordered discovery into three main areas: a) whether Clinton's use of a private email server was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; b) whether the State Department's attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch's request.

Because nobody has ever asked and answered these questions before. And they are some big important questions!

Lamberth writes that it is "understandably so" that Judicial Watch wants more discovery in this crucial life-or-death emails case, and that is why Clinton must sit for a deposition, so we can find out her state of mind when she did the emails. They might also need to ask if she was home alone the WHOLE NIGHT of Benghazi, or if somebody came over for some aggravated lesbianing, like that very smart GOP congresswoman from Alabama   seemed to want to know.

The judge writes that each round of discovery in this case has left the Court with "more questions than answers." Plus, did you know that Judicial Watch revealed on December 19, 2019, that the FBI had found 30 more Hillary emails behind the couch? What kinda casserole recipes is that fucking monster hiding NOW? Is she   emailing them ?

Anyway, the judge says this is all the State Department's fault, for not finding Hillary's emails for Judicial Watch in a timely enough manner. He granted Judicial Watch's requests to depose several of Clinton's former employees at State, and granted their request to depose Hillary Clinton, but   only   on certain very limited subjects, pertaining to "her reasons for using a private server and her understanding of State's records management obligations." Judicial Watch also wants to ask Clinton ALLLLLLLL ABOUT BENGHAZIIIII11!1!1!!, and Judge Lamberth says OK fine, you can ask about "emails, documents or text messages related to the Benghazi attack," but you can't just ask about the government's handling of the Benghazi attack in general.

"It is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton," wrote Lamberth, who may be under the unfortunate impression that we've never heard directly from her before.

Look, if you think all this is insane, just remember that serious litigants with serious FOIA requests require serious judges to sort things out, and that is definitely what is happening right now.

If you want more details than we have provided, you're going to have to read the damned order for yourself. Or you can watch this video from back in September, where serious person Tom Fitton explains the BOMBSHELLS all this discovery is meant to show.

Recently Tom Fitton was   seen on Wonkette   spreading conspiracy theories about former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch doing "wire tapps" to all of Donald Trump's crime friends and family.

You know, in case you still aren't convinced he is a very serious person.

OK, you may now go back to worrying about less important things, like coronavirus or curing cancer or rearranging your spice rack or whatever.




Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
JohnRussell
1  seeder  JohnRussell    one month ago

Wonkette is the best. 

 
 
 
WallyW
1.2  WallyW  replied to  JohnRussell @1    one month ago

It's just a "meaningless" investigation into "innocent" Hillary's activities. What are you afraid of?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.3  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @1    one month ago

Trying to take the place of the "Onion".

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1.3.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3    one month ago

Just likes living on the edge..............of "legal" to post here at NT


LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wonkette/
 
 
 
Sparty On
1.4  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @1    one month ago

Lol ....

And that is all anyone needs to hear from you John to understand where you're coming from.

Nice!

 
 
 
Tessylo
2  Tessylo    one month ago

giphy.gif

 
 
 
WallyW
2.1  WallyW  replied to  Tessylo @2    one month ago

We want to know what the old nag is hiding. What are lefties afraid of?

 
 
 
Snuffy
2.1.1  Snuffy  replied to  WallyW @2.1    one month ago

While it would be nice to know the truth about all of this I have doubts that all questions will be answered.

I would rather she just retire and go away. I know it won't happen as there will always be people who want her opinion of something because they feel she's an expert in politics or such, but I would rather she just go away at this point.

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.1    one month ago

She's like Biden ...... a bad cold that just won't go away .....

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.2    one month ago

She won't go away?

These endless investigations you mean?

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.3    one month ago

She won't go away?

These endless investigations you mean?

No i meant what i said.

She won't go away.   Just like that bad cold no one wants

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.1    one month ago

What 'truth' about all this?  What questions haven't been answered?

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.4    one month ago

No, I meant what I said.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.1.7  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.6    one month ago

Lol ..... one can always count on intelligent repatee from you ......

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.8  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  WallyW @2.1    one month ago
We want to know what the old nag is hiding.

Arent you older than Hillary? 

 
 
 
WallyW
2.1.9  WallyW  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.5    one month ago
What questions haven't been answered?

All of them.  She couldn't remember or recall, never gave a rational answer, evaded the question, or just plain lied

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  WallyW @2.1.9    one month ago

That right there is an outright lie.

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.7    one month ago

What's a repatee?

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.1.12  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.11    one month ago

You can figure it out.   I know you can.

 
 
 
MUVA
3  MUVA    one month ago

Maybe we want to see the 33,000 emails on yoga. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4  seeder  JohnRussell    one month ago

These conspiracy nut crackpots from Judicial Watch want to interrogate Hillary Clinton about Benghazi. 

Evidently they are not aware that a Republican led House committee "interrogated" her for 11 hours in 2015. All 11 hours were about "Benghazi". 

Too bad for Judicial Watch that Hillary isnt running for anything this year, so this whole farce is pointless. 

Oh, there is one point to it - donations come in to Judicial Watch from other right wing conspiracy nut jobs. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @4    one month ago

P.S.

Trump wouldnt last before congressional questioning for 11 minutes let alone 11 hours. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
4.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    one month ago

He could just pull an Obama Admin special and plead the 5th.

They had that maneuver down pat.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.1.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @4.1.1    one month ago
plead the 5th.

I'm not sure he can count that high. 

 
 
 
loki12
5  loki12    one month ago

500 million and Doucheberg is out.  I guess this won’t be his official website anymore.

You were right John. Democrats won’t support the racist fuck.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
5.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  loki12 @5    one month ago

I think the thing that did the most damage to Bloomberg was not his looking uncomfortable at the debates, but the fact that he didnt try to talk like a Democrat. He seemed to hold himself out as a separate 'cavalry' coming to rescue the Democrats. 

He never made a connection with the primary voters. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
5.2  Sparty On  replied to  loki12 @5    one month ago

Its good to see money still can't buy the Presidency.   Someone found that out the hard way in 2016.

 
 
 
Texan1211
5.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Sparty On @5.2    one month ago
Its good to see money still can't buy the Presidency.   Someone found that out the hard way in 2016.

Oh, that can't possibly be true.

We were all assured long ago that the Citizens United ruling would mean that elections were merely bought.

Surely all those good folks who nearly had a stroke over the ruling weren't wrong, were they?

 
 
 
loki12
5.2.2  loki12  replied to  Texan1211 @5.2.1    one month ago

Try to keep up, it was the Russians 1.98 worth of facebook ads that bought the election (s)

 
 
 
Sparty On
5.2.3  Sparty On  replied to  Texan1211 @5.2.1    one month ago

Hillary tried and failed.   Now Bloomberg tried and failed.  

The American people are just not that stupid as a whole yet.   Regardless of the constant  partisan bombardment from the left wing mass media.

 
 
 
Texan1211
5.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  loki12 @5.2.2    one month ago
Try to keep up, it was the Russians 1.98 worth of facebook ads that bought the election (s)

I'm sorry.

At my advanced age, it is getting harder and harder to keep track of every "big thing" they dream up, and it changes so fast!

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


igknorantzrulz
Texan1211
Donald J. Trump Fan #1
The Magic Eight Ball
Tacos!
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom


73 visitors