╌>

Trump Is Terrified of Losing - The Atlantic

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  4 years ago  •  10 comments

By:   Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes (The Atlantic)

Trump Is Terrified of Losing - The Atlantic
His electoral prospects are slim—and he knows it.

The smell of fear coming from Trump's ranking pits is now palpable...


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



His electoral prospects are slim—and he knows it.

August 4, 2020 Quinta Jurecic Contributing writer at The Atlantic and managing editor of LawfareBenjamin Wittes Contributing writer at The Atlantic and editor in chief of LawfareLuke Sharrett / Bloomberg / Getty

President Donald Trump finally seems to have noticed that he's losing the election.

Trump has sought to project confidence about his odds of triumphing over Joe Biden, even as the pandemic has blazed across the country, the economy has tanked, and his poll numbers have sagged. In the midst of an ever-worsening national crisis that his administration has given up on even pretending to contain, Trump has taken solace in extreme selectivity: his high approval ratings within the shrinking Republican Party—96 percent, he noted in a recent tweet—and his approval ratings from Rasmussen Reports, a pollster that has generally shown higher favorability for the president than any other and whose work FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver has described as "mediocre."

But at some point over the past couple of weeks, as the countdown to November 3 crossed the 100-day mark and Trump's polling against Biden failed to substantially improve, the cold light of reality began to pierce the walls of the White House.

The president hasn't admitted publicly that he's losing, of course. That sort of honesty—acknowledging that he might be anything other than a winner or a "killer"—is too much of a humiliation for him. But his tweet suggesting that the election be postponed, along with a flood of other comments meant to undermine public faith in the electoral process, speaks to his anxiety about what might loom in his future. "2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history," he warned, pondering, "Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???" As Maggie Haberman, Jonathan Martin, and Reid J. Epstein of The New York Timeswrote, Trump's tweet was "one of the few clear signs that the president now realizes how deep a hole he has dug for himself in his re-election effort."

A normal political figure, understanding that his untenable position is a function of the coronavirus crisis and the resulting economic catastrophe, would attempt to improve his electoral position by addressing the multilayered crisis itself. But that's not Trump's style.

Doing so, after all, would require acknowledging his failure to date. And although some part of Trump seems to understand that he's losing, no part of him yet seems ready to recognize that the chief reason for that is failure on his part. Such reflection would be hard for even an emotionally healthy politician, as it would require taking some measure of responsibility for more than 150,000 American deaths.

And so he sows doubt about the integrity of the election—a theme to which Trump has pivoted aggressively over the past week. The significance of this effort is not simply, or even chiefly, the authoritarian hint that Trump might delay the election, a suggestion that depends on a power the president does not have and that was rebuked broadly even among the Republican Party faithful in the Senate. The significance, rather, is the suggestion that if the election is held on time—as it will be—and if a lot of people vote by mail, and if Trump loses, that the election should somehow be rendered illegitimate. "Mail ballots are very dangerous for this country because of cheaters," he commented at the White House on July 31.

This game isn't new. Trump played it last election cycle too—constantly warning of rigged polls and fraudulent ballots in the run-up to November 2016—and for the same reason. Remember that Trump didn't expect to win in 2016 any more than anyone else expected him to. The strategy even makes sense—that is, setting aside such matters as respect for democracy and the constitutional system. If you're not going to win in a fair fight, painting the fight as unfair serves a number of useful purposes. Now as then, it creates a grievance-based excuse for a loss. It offers, at least if the race is close, a narrative basis for contesting the outcome, politically, if not legally. And at a purely emotional level, it protects Trump from having to face failure.

Less logical is Trump's other move in recent weeks: his appeal to white voters living what the president has awkwardly termed the "Suburban Lifestyle Dream." Among the demographics with whom Trump's approval ratings have cratered are suburbanites, particularly the white suburban women who helped push him to victory in 2016. Biden, wrote CNN's Harry Enten recently, "is earning a historic amount of support for a Democrat" in the suburbs. And Trump and his campaign seem to have noticed, unleashing efforts to frighten suburb dwellers back to the Republican Party by warning of violence resulting from a Biden presidency and playing on racist themes about the supposed danger of affordable housing. "You will no longer be bothered or financially hurt by having low income housing built in your neighborhood," Trump wrote on Twitter. His campaign ads warn of a crime-ridden dystopia.

Trump is at his most comfortable when stoking crises; this is the man, after all, who began his administration by warning of "American carnage." In an election in which he is at a disadvantage and suddenly facing the terrifying prospect of becoming a loser, harping on fears of racialized violence helps put him back in his comfort zone. It's the campaign equivalent of a security blanket.

The trouble is that there is next to no data that support the notion that, amid the crises the country is currently facing, suburban women are clamoring for protection of the right to redline, living in fear of urban violence encroaching on their suburban paradises, or prioritizing Confederate monuments over disease prevention. Rather, the data suggest the near opposite. As Emily Badger and Nate Cohn of The New York Times recently summarized, as of June, 59 percent of suburban voters disapproved of Trump; even more disapprove of his stances on race, and 65 percent "had a favorable view of the Black Lives Matter movement." In other words, suburban voters not only disapprove of Trump and prefer Biden to him, but they specifically don't approve of his performance with respect to the very racial issues on which he wishes to court them. In fact, they express considerable sympathy for the supposed foe he is trying to pit them against.

Trump is not wrong to try to recover his support among white suburbanites; indeed, he cannot possibly win without doing so, at least to some degree. But appealing to them on the basis of positions relatively few of them hold and issues on which majorities disapprove of his performance makes little sense.

But it's not as though Trump is reading this data and coming up with a responsive strategy. Rather, the strategy derives from Trump's crude habits of thinking: He has a long history of assuming that other people hold the same prejudices that he does. A white Justice Department lawyer who sued Trump Management Company in 1973 for discrimination against Black tenants later recalled Trump commenting to her, "You know, you don't want to live with them either."

The same dynamic is at play in his suburban fearmongering today. He believes at some deep level that the white suburbanite must share his attitudes—even if she is too cowed by cultural mores to admit it. Because he is not capable of training his instincts to respond to reality, the fact that he wants her to see him as her champion means that she must actually do so.

Except that, in fact, the data offer a better window into the reality of voter attitudes than do Trump's instincts. And the election will be held on November 3, with mail-in voting allowed in many jurisdictions. The glimmer of reality that entered the White House remains just a glimmer—enough to change the quality of Trump's denial but not yet enough to shake him awake. Of course, this assumes that anything could.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    4 years ago

Trump is going down hard and he damn well knows it!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @1    4 years ago

Keep believing that, and don't bother to vote.

Everything the left has tossed at Trump over the last four years has bounced off and been discounted by the likely voters. They've heard the same stupid shit for four years now...and none of it has stuck to the wall.

From this point forward, things are going to get very bad politically for the democrats and their sacrificial lamb....Hiden Biden.

The Dem dummies should be trying to bid up the presumptive candidate and extoll all his virtues, but he has none, so they can't.

Next week, he is going to chose a vice presidential candidate that no one knows or cares anything about....which will be seen as pandering to political pressure, and doom his candidacy.

Not too far into the future, the Barr/Durham investigations will begin to bear sour fruit for the Democrats.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JBB  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago

If that is true why is Trump losing so badly?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago

Keep believing that 

That pertains to all of the misinformation in your comment.

don't bother to vote

Same to you.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
1.1.3  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago
The Dem dummies should be trying to bid up the presumptive candidate and extoll all his virtues, but he has none, so they can't.

Stated like a man in touch with his own shortcomings.    

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1.1.4  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @1.1.3    4 years ago

Trump must manage a response to the pandemic. Thus far, he has appeared completely lost.

Trump must manage a collapsed economy. Thus far, he  seems to think that more Covid-19 deaths will prove that he is making the necessary sacrifices.

The country needs leadership. Good luck for that!

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Ender  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago
Not too far into the future, the Barr/Durham investigations will begin to bear sour fruit for the Democrats.

Yep, just in time for the election. Nice how that works out huh.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2  Bob Nelson    4 years ago

The Atlantic does some good stuff. This is clear and concise.

It's fascinating to observe the mimetism of the TrumpTrueBeliever base. They reproduce Trump's positions to perfection. Our contingent here on NT dutifully checks every box.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JBB  replied to  Bob Nelson @2    4 years ago

That is all true. Thanks for stopping by.  It is good seeing you around. It's gonna be dicey till 11-3.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3  TᵢG    4 years ago

Trump should be on edge;  he has lost his main advantages and will not likely recover enough of them to win reelection.

It seems that it is not only Trump who is concerned and behaving a bit 'anxiously'.   A number of individuals seem to be walking around with the proverbial chip on shoulder since the pandemic took down the economy.

 
 

Who is online



101 visitors