╌>

Smash Mouth Posts Hate Mail From Sturgis Backlash, as States Report Rally-Based COVID Spread

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  4 years ago  •  19 comments

By:   Chris Willman, Variety

Smash Mouth Posts Hate Mail From Sturgis Backlash, as States Report Rally-Based COVID Spread

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Entertainment

Smash Mouth Posts Hate Mail From Sturgis Backlash, as States Report Rally-Based COVID Spread





Chris Willman


variety_Light.png August 26, 2020, 6:37 PM EDT








02dfd6d0af0b444b385237f500289a18


Hey there: you’re an all-star super-spreader. Or you might be if you attended the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally in South Dakota earlier this month, where bands including   Smash Mouth   performed for socially undistanced thousands at a time over the course of 10 days, at an event attended by hundreds of thousands in total.

According to the Associated Press, 103 cases directly related to the rally have been reported by the health departments in eight states — South Dakota, Minnesota , Wisconsin, Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming and Washington.

The band has not had much to say about Sturgis or responded to media requests since performing at the rally. However, in an Instagram post four days ago, the group did refer to the backlash, posting a photo of a smashed CD atop an angry letter, which left only selected words visible, like “kills,” “selfish” and “motherf—ers.” The group’s caption for the photo: “Fan mail.”









Smash Mouth plays to packed, unmasked crowd at Sturgis Motorcycle Rally amid pandemic

USA TODAY




5f32ee8376b9c7000177d0a6_1080x1080_FES_v1.jpg

Smash Mouth came to be the public face of the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, in a way that wasn’t necessarily to the band’s liking, just by virtue of being perhaps the most mainstream of the many acts to play the event — but also by virtue of having had singer Steve Harwell captured on video saying, “F— that COVID s—!”






Commenters have glommed on to other Smash Mouth Instagram posts to let their feelings be known. Prior to the photo of the smashed CD they got in the mail, Smash Mouth put up a photo of a sign that indicated their support for liberal causes or beliefs, with phrases including “We believe Black lives matter… women’s rights are human rights… science is real.”

Some respondents weren’t having it. “‘Science is real.’ Epidemiology is a science too,” wrote one user. “I’m proud of this band for standing up for imperative social causes, but that doesn’t mean I can’t still be disappointed about Sturgis.” Wrote another: “Yeah but you had a concert without any social distancing and said f— COVID, so do you really believe that science is real.”

Among the other acts that played Sturgis, but may have felt less heat over it: Quiet Riot, Bone Thugs N Harmony, Kenny Wayne Shepard, Buckcherry, Trapt, Molly Hatchet, Night Ranger, Colt Ford, Lit, Reverend Horton Heat, Jackyl, 38 Special and Drowning Pool. A ZZ Top tribute band called ZZ3 played after ZZ Top itself dropped out. Also canceling prior to the rally were Willie Nelson and Lynyrd Skynyrd.

Proponents of the gathering may contend that just over a hundred cases officially logged by state health departments so far as tied to the Sturgis rally is a fairly small amount for a gathering that South Dakota’s transportation department says drew 460,000 vehicles. But some experts say the spread from the August 7-16 rally has just begun to be felt, and tracked.

“It’s very likely that we will see more transmission,” said Kris Ehresmann, the infectious disease director for the Minnesota Department of Health, in a call with reporters. An official with the department told CBS News that 35 cases had been reported in Minnesota alone among residents who had traveled to Sturgis.





Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Tessylo    4 years ago

Commenters have glommed on to other Smash Mouth Instagram posts to let their feelings be known. Prior to the photo of the smashed CD they got in the mail, Smash Mouth put up a photo of a sign that indicated their support for liberal causes or beliefs, with phrases including “We believe Black lives matter… women’s rights are human rights… science is real.”

Some respondents weren’t having it. “‘Science is real.’ Epidemiology is a science too,” wrote one user. “I’m proud of this band for standing up for imperative social causes, but that doesn’t mean I can’t still be disappointed about Sturgis.” Wrote another: “Yeah but you had a concert without any social distancing and said f— COVID, so do you really believe that science is real.”

Proponents of the gathering may contend that just over a hundred cases officially logged by state health departments so far as tied to the Sturgis rally is a fairly small amount for a gathering that South Dakota’s transportation department says drew 460,000 vehicles. But some experts say the spread from the August 7-16 rally has just begun to be felt, and tracked.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Tessylo    4 years ago

Among the other acts that played Sturgis, but may have felt less heat over it: Quiet Riot, Bone Thugs N Harmony, Kenny Wayne Shepard, Buckcherry, Trapt, Molly Hatchet, Night Ranger, Colt Ford, Lit, Reverend Horton Heat, Jackyl, 38 Special and Drowning Pool. A ZZ Top tribute band called ZZ3 played after ZZ Top itself dropped out. Also canceling prior to the rally were Willie Nelson and Lynyrd Skynyrd.

Hard to believe only Smashmouth is getting heat when all those other bands played too.  A lot of bands no one has heard from in a while.  Must be desperate for money.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @2    4 years ago
Must be desperate for money.  

That has to be the reason Kenny Wayne Shepard and 38 Special played. I liked those bands, too

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1    4 years ago

I liked 38 Special too. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1    4 years ago

My cousin Willie canceled... 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.1.2    4 years ago

I always knew he was smart.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1.4  Bob Nelson  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.3    4 years ago

Runs in the family. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3  Bob Nelson    4 years ago

Let's wait. This could be huge... or a dud. We simply do not know enough about propagation. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Bob Nelson @3    4 years ago

No, I won't wait.  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @3.1    4 years ago

We know that.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4  Ronin2    4 years ago
According to the Associated Press, 103 cases directly related to the rally have been reported by the health departments in eight states — South Dakota, Minnesota,Wisconsin, Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming and Washington.

Only 103? Really? Not thousands, or tens of thousands. Hell the way the media and left lost their minds it should have been all of them.  Just 103.

Now if only the media and the left cared as much about Covid 19 being spread by their not so peaceful protesters, who have been at it since May.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Ronin2 @4    4 years ago
Only 103?

"Let's wait. This could be huge... or a dud. We simply do not know enough about propagation."

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @4    4 years ago

103 is just the beginning.  

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.2.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Tessylo @4.2    4 years ago

I looked at the most recent numbers, for a seed I just put up.

It look very likely that the US is not reporting all its new cases. So... we're flying blind.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @4.2    4 years ago

Just a dud. There's simply no way it can be tracked accurately

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.2.3  Bob Nelson  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2.2    4 years ago
There's simply no way it can be tracked accurately

That's probably true. Which is pretty sad... 

If you're right, then we will never know the extent of Sturgis's consequences... but those consequences will still be real. Ignorance is not good.

We don't know how long this pandemic will last.

If all goes well, we could be getting back to "normal" in  a few months. If things (there are LOTS of things that could go wrong) don't go so well... we could find ourselves two years from now, trying to organize an existence where Covid-19 is a permanent part of our lives.

Seen from today, one is as likely as the other. The more information we collect, the sooner we'll know the future. Ignorance is never good. 

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
4.3  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Ronin2 @4    4 years ago

103 so far. This time I agree with Bob.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4.4  Nerm_L  replied to  Ronin2 @4    4 years ago

Attendance for the 2020 Sturgis rally has been estimated at 366,000 .  The Sturgis rally is pretty much an outdoor event; the town is too small to accommodate 366,000 people.  And, from reporting, the crowd definitely didn't practice social distancing.

The reported cases linked to the Sturgis rally are 103?  Talk about news that isn't.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.4.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Nerm_L @4.4    4 years ago
The reported cases linked to the Sturgis rally are 103? Talk about news that isn't.

The key word being "reported". 

What are we learning? Perhaps that Sturgis was innocuous. Perhaps that our information is inadequate to the point of being misleading. 

Wait..... 

 
 

Who is online

Igknorantzruls
Vic Eldred
Snuffy
JBB
Right Down the Center
evilone
George


170 visitors