╌>

Tucker Carlson Mocks Dr. Jill Biden, Compares Her Degree to Dr. Pepper

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  4 years ago  •  178 comments

By:   Emma Nolan (Newsweek)

Tucker Carlson Mocks Dr. Jill Biden, Compares Her Degree to Dr. Pepper
"Jill Biden is not a doctor, no. Maybe in the same sense Dr. Pepper is," Carlson said on Monday night's installment of Tucker Carlson Tonight.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


CultureTucker CarlsonJill BidenJoe BidenTv

Tucker Carlson has mocked Dr. Jill Biden's title, likening the incoming first lady's title to Dr. Pepper and accused her of using 'Dr.' because she has "status anxiety."

The reactionary Fox News host has waded into the discourse surrounding Joe Biden's wife's honorific which has been heavily debated in recent days.

"Jill Biden is not a doctor, no. Maybe in the same sense Dr. Pepper is," Carlson said on Monday night's installment of Tucker Carlson Tonight.

"In 2007, at the age of 55, she got a doctorate in education, so she's got the same degree as Dr. Bill Cosby."

The Republican and staunch Donald Trump supporter then went on to accuse Dr. Biden of having what he called "status anxiety," saying she "decided to cure that, as so many do in our country, with another pointless title."

Fox News host Tucker Carlson speaks during the National Review Institute's Ideas Summit in Washington, D.C. on March 29, 2019.Chip Somodevilla/GettyRead more

Carlson's attack stems from a piece published in the Wall Street Journal by Joseph Epstein who said that Dr. Biden should not use her doctor title because she has a doctorate in education, and not a medical one.

"Jill Biden should think about dropping the honorific, which feels fraudulent, even comic," Epstein wrote of the incoming first lady's use of the title. He also referred to her as "kiddo" in the piece.

Dr. Biden earned her title upon receiving a doctoral degree in education leadership from the University of Delaware.

The op-ed has sparked intense backlash and claims of misogyny with vice president-elect Kamala Harris' husband, Doug Emhoff pointing to the sexism behind the piece.

Epstein is also being criticized for some of his other op-eds—in 1970, he penned a racist and homophobic essay in Harper's Magazine that used the N-word repeatedly and described non-heterosexual people as "cursed."

Dr. Biden has since hit back at Epstein. The future first lady took to Twitter Sunday night to tweet: "Together, we will build a world where the accomplishments of our daughters will be celebrated, rather than diminished."


Together, we will build a world where the accomplishments of our daughters will be celebrated, rather than diminished. — Dr. Jill Biden (@DrBiden) December 14, 2020

The first lady-elect's spokesperson Michael LaRosa described the op-ed as "pretty gross" while Joe Biden's communications director Kate Bedingfield said: "What patronizing, sexist, elitist drivel. Dr. B earned a doctorate in education, so we call her Doctor. The title Mr. Epstein has earned here is perhaps not fit for mixed company."

Former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton also weighed in on the conversation and stood up for Dr. Biden, tweeting: "Her name is Dr. Jill Biden. Get used to it."


Article is LOCKED by moderator [Split Personality]
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    4 years ago

Damn but Tucker is a twerp. Nicest thing I can say...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @1    4 years ago

Like her placeholder husband, Mrs. Biden is a fair target for ridicule and criticism...just like Melania Trump was.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago

You mean like every Trump was; that is unless they turned on Donald- then they got their 15 minutes of love from the left.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
1.1.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago
Like her placeholder husband

You really have to stop with this nonsense. There is zero evidence of this.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1.1    4 years ago

The entire trump family are crooks. The only honest one I can detect is Mary Trump. None of the trio of Don Jr, Ivanka , or Eric has an honest bone in their body.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @1    4 years ago

Last night Tucker read her dissertation. Have you heard it?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    4 years ago
Tucker Carlson BURIES Jill Biden Over "Incredibly Embarrassing" Doctoral Dissertation

Is his suggestion that Jill Biden is embarrassed? I've never heard that before. I think it's more like Tucker Carlson is feigning embarrassment. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    4 years ago

This stuff seems so petty, it almost leaves one speechless. I've never spent an instant wondering about Jill Biden's dissertation and , guess what?, I'm not going to start now. That's Tucker Carlson and Rush Limbaugh's job. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    4 years ago

I think he is questioning the merits of her getting the degree. Listen to his dissection of that juvenile script.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.2    4 years ago
I've never spent an instant wondering about Jill Biden's dissertation

Have you read it?

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
1.2.6  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.4    4 years ago

Have you? I say it is Liar, Liar Pants on Fire for Tucker.

Link.

Tucker Carlson is driving down the thought processes of any person who watches him.

He starts out likening a heat attack patient showing up at the ER and having her be the doctor. But, as any edumacated person can tell you, Dr. Biden has a PhD. otherwise known as a Doctorate of Philosophy, not an MD., which is a medical doctor. You know that, Vic.

Most people know the difference, but Carlson is playing to the lowest common denominator, as he shows later when he builds a class strawman and makes the sweeping generalization that people who have advanced degrees aren't really any smarter or better than his audience but merely have been granted the tokens of honorifics without really earning them so that they can "rule over you," because, "They've got more merit badges."  So, he is basically saying that anyone with a PhD. does not deserve the respect that is given them. Which, in addition to demeaning the President elect and his wife, was the point of his lie filled rant.

I disagree. Obviously you don't.

As for her dissertation, here is the paragraph that Tucker makes so much hay out of:

The community college classroom is unlike any other classroom in America.
Diversity, rather than homogeneity, is the norm.In an average-sized class of twenty
students at Delaware Tech, for example, most of the seats will be filled with young
students who have just graduated from high school. The majority of these will be female.
At least five seats will be filled with middle-aged men and women who have lost their
jobs due to downsizing and/or outsourcing. One or two seats will be filled with students
who have graduated from a GED program. Some seats will hold older women whose
children have just entered college – now these women are taking the opportunity to earn
college degrees themselves. Three quarters of the class will be Caucasian; one quarter of
the class will be African American; one seat will hold a Latino; and the remaining seats
will be filled with students of Asian descent or non-resident aliens. At least one quarter
of the students will have children – most of them will be single mothers. Some will be
the first in their families to attend college. Few will have taken honors courses in high
school, while many will have taken remedial courses, special education, or vocational
training. Almost two-thirds will be part-time students, with the remaining one-third
attending college on a full-time basis. The socio-economic status will range from middle
to lower class with approximately 67 percent receiving financial aid. Although there is
strength in diversity as a classroom component, the lack of homogeneity in academic
ability makes it difficult to teach to a single standard. In addition to academic concerns,
the social, emotional, and physical needs of the community college student offer their
own unique challenges. As a result, due to the diversity of the student population, student
retention is a major problem faced by the community college.

I see no traces of illiteracy in this or any other of the pages in her dissertation. I could not find the pages that  Tucker said were like "pig latin or dogs barking" ... As a matter of fact, when Tucker gives his estimation of her as "poor, illiterate Jill Biden" and continues on to put down the, "college that considered this crap scholarship" he exposes himself to anyone who takes the time to look at her dissertation as a fraud and a charlatan. Oh, yeah, and she was not looking at the racial makeup  because she was a "Biden", she was giving the rough demographics of a typical class so she could show how diverse the class was. 

As for the financial aid question, she did a survey of students and the question was:

4. How is your education financed?
_____ financial aid                    _____ spouse pay tuition
_____ you pay tuition                _____ scholarships
_____ parents pay tuition          _____ other

So it is entirely possible to get these results:

4. How is your education financed?
 35% financial aid                          2% spouse pays tuition
 26% you pay tuition                      6% scholarships
 28% parents pay tuition                6% other – GI Bill, Vocational
                                                                         Rehab Grants 

because those were the responses and lead to this sentence:

Of the 159 students surveyed, 55 receive financial aid; 41 pay their own tuition bills; 45 students’ parents pay; 3 spouses pay; 9 receive scholarships; and 9 others receive funds through the GI Bill, vocational rehabilitation programs, or grants. Thus, only one quarter of the students are able to finance their education themselves. 

The percentages add to 103 and the students add to 162, because obviously someone gets their money from more than one source.

People need to look at the information when they can get it and verify that it is factual. In this case, Tucker is misrepresenting the whole thing so he can gin up his ratings because the uneducated masses are fleeing to another hate site instead of him. It is good that you are still there, giving one for the gipper...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Thomas @1.2.6    4 years ago
Most people know the difference

Most people have more than half a brain and avoid Carlson's idiocy and lies like the plague.

Tucker is misrepresenting the whole thing so he can gin up his ratings because the uneducated masses are fleeing to another hate site instead of him.

As they say, a Tucker's born every minute...

Anyone watching Tucker Carlson and nodding in agreement is missing quite a few brain cells, especially when he's trying to explain how dumb someone else is to his half-wit viewers.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.8  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    4 years ago

What is wrong with people nowadays?

How petty and pathetic will he go?

Also, are we truly this stupid ... that we do not know the honorific 'Doctor' has been conventionally used in history for those who have earned a doctorate?    If one thinks that 'Doctor' necessarily means M.D. then one might have earned the label 'clueless'.

Tucker Carlson, however, is not clueless.   He knows better.   He is, much to his discredit, engaging in petty partisanship.   Pretty disgusting.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.9  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.8    4 years ago

The RCC used to use Doctor for highly educated priests who had also earned law degrees. Many of them during the reign of King Henry VIII

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.2.10  Split Personality  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.8    4 years ago

He continues to emulate the last clown king of Fox Entertainment, Bill O'Rielly.

Outrageous lies & exaggerations bring viewers and viewers bring advertising $$.

Fox is an entertainment empire.

Real news only occurs on their local affiliates and almost never resembles the crap on Cable entertainment show.

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
1.2.11  Thomas  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.7    4 years ago
Anyone watching Tucker Carlson and nodding in agreement is missing quite a few brain cells, especially when he's trying to explain how dumb someone else is to his half-wit viewers.

 We all know that Vic has a brain and can use it. So your statement isn't entirely correct. That is just the problem. Common thinking folk are swayed to agree because that is what "Everybody who thinks like me" is doing, but they agree without critically analyzing the facts. And, since Donald Trump came along and introduced the concept of "Alternate Facts" (which is just another class of how to lie by telling half-truths or outright falsehoods, but you still get away with it, in short: Propaganda) the people who utilize the same have been conditioned to believe whatever a particular mouthpiece has to say. Hence, we get the breathless promulgation by Vic, who really should know better, of the mouthpiece Tucker without the slightest hint of a check of reality. This is the problem. Period. 

It takes time to do your homework. So we oftentimes don't. If we got our information from a reputable source or sources, we can therefore act on that information with minimal fear that someone is going to pull the rug out from under us. Sometimes reputable sources get it wrong, but that is the exception not the norm. With the rise of "alternate-news sites" of all political persuasions, the information needs to be checked and verified because, as in this case, it is often just flat out wrong and character assassination. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
1.2.12  Thomas  replied to  Thomas @1.2.6    4 years ago

I would like to make a correction.

Most people know the difference, but Carlson is playing to the lowest common denominator, as he shows later when he builds a class strawman and makes the sweeping generalization that people who have advanced degrees aren't really any smarter or better more knowledgeable than his audience but merely have been granted the tokens of honorifics without really earning them so that they can "rule over you,"
 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2  Kavika     4 years ago

Tucker Carlson, who gives a shit what he thinks or says.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @2    4 years ago

Mrs Carlson? And I think the jury is still out on that one

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    4 years ago
"Jill Biden is not a doctor, no. Maybe in the same sense Dr. Pepper is,

This is what you call yahoo comedy. It has an unsurprisingly large audience on Fox News. 

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4  Sunshine    4 years ago

Well kudos to her for getting a doctorate at age 55.  I don't know if I could have.  Maybe if I didn't work and had chefs, maids, and chauffers I could have.  

But yeah, this is petty of Carlson to put it on his show.  He could use his time better.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @4    4 years ago
Maybe if I didn't work and had chefs, maids, and chauffers I could have.  

[Deleted] What is it that you cons are always saying? Pull your self up and don't expect people to help you? 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
4.2  pat wilson  replied to  Sunshine @4    4 years ago
Maybe if I didn't work and had chefs, maids, and chauffers I could have.

She's been working since she was 15, still is. And I doubt she had a chauffeur while Joe was taking the train to DC and back. Where do you get this shit ?  

J ill Tracy Jacobs Biden, 57, has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Delaware, two master’s degrees, from West Chester University and Villanova University, and a doctorate in education from the University of Delaware. She has been a teacher for more than two decades, including time teaching history to emotionally disturbed teenagers. She is now a professor of English at Delaware Technical and Community College.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4.2.1  Sunshine  replied to  pat wilson @4.2    4 years ago

So what?  I have been working since I was 12.  Put myself through college while working full time and raising two small children. Paid off my student loans myself years ago.

She doesn't impress me and nothing to slobber over.  Her family is a bunch of thieves and she lives with it.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
4.2.2  pat wilson  replied to  Sunshine @4.2.1    4 years ago

Carry on.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  pat wilson @4.2    4 years ago

It appears it's not only men who have a problem with strong educated women.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Tessylo  replied to  pat wilson @4.2.2    4 years ago

Tucker, another whiny little bitch, is on another rant about Dr. Biden

Tucker Carlson Calls Jill Biden's Doctoral Dissertation 'Our National Shame'

· General Assignment Reporter, HuffPost
Thu, December 17, 2020, 8:05 AM EST
Days after Tucker Carlson  taunted  Jill Biden  for using the title Dr., the  Fox News  personality on Wednesday claimed to be doing his journalistic duty by critiquing the incoming first lady’s doctoral dissertation.  (See the videos below.)

“Jill Biden’s doctoral dissertation is our national shame,” Carlson announced with shrill outrage on his prime time show.

Biden’s use of the title “Dr.” has stirred attention since a Wall Street Journal column asked her to stop using it because she is not a medical doctor. Former first lady Michelle Obama and others   have sprung to her defense , suggesting the article was sexist.

Carlson, who snidely   compared Biden to “Dr. Pepper” and “Dr. Bill Cosby ” earlier this week, tore apart the 2006 academic paper that presumably earned her a doctorate in education from University of Delaware.

“We’re gonna give it to you in a diagnosis: Dr. Jill needs reading glasses,” Carlson said. “Either that or she’s borderline illiterate. There are typos everywhere, including in the first graph of the introduction. Dr. Jill can’t write ― she can’t really think clearly either. Parts of the dissertation seem to be written in a foreign language using English words. They’re essentially pure nonsense, like pig Latin or dogs barking. The whole thing is just incredibly embarrassing. And not simply to poor, illiterate Jill Biden, but to the college that considered this crap scholarship. Embarrassing, in fact, to our entire system of higher education, to the nation itself. Jill Biden’s doctoral dissertation is our national shame.”

What's incredibly embarrassing are these whiny petty attacks on an intelligent woman.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.2.6  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  pat wilson @4.2    4 years ago
She has been a teacher for more than two decades

Sadly, that isn't something valued by many religious conservatives who ridicule education as they're doing now to Dr. Jill Biden and her level of education they'll never understand or achieve.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.2.6    4 years ago

That will be the trope, meme, whatever for the next 4 years. They will have to diminish Dr Biden every chance they get

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4.2.8  Sunshine  replied to    4 years ago
That you have made the most of your opportunities should in no way diminish those who have done likewise...unless of course, there is a specious political point to be made.

Pointing out her advantages is diminishing?  Did she not have all the luxuries of an entitled person?  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.9  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @4.2.8    4 years ago

Yeah...when it comes across petty and mean

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4.2.11  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.9    4 years ago

When you choose to read it like that I guess it does.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
4.2.12  Split Personality  replied to  Sunshine @4.2.1    4 years ago
Her family is a bunch of thieves and she lives with it.

I am sure you can provide realistic links to prove that, right?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.13  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @4.2.12    4 years ago

No, she can't. Sunshine just pulls shit out of her and flings it at the wall

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
4.2.14  Thomas  replied to  pat wilson @4.2    4 years ago

I wonder how she could be illiterate  and be a professor of English..... (Not really)

You Go, Dr. Jill Biden!

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
5  pat wilson    4 years ago

I don't understand all the bitter, hateful attacks on Jill Biden. She's gotta be one of the most innocuous people in Washington. SMH

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
5.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  pat wilson @5    4 years ago

That is rule #1 in the their playbook...personal attacks on the FLOUTUS.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @5.1    4 years ago

Do you not see the hypocrisy in that comment? How about all the Melania comments?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to    4 years ago

Obviously you don't get the news about what Mrs. Trump is doing (your "third Mrs. Trump" dig aside) She does a hell of a lot behind the scenes that so many miss out on due to her "guilt by association" to the President.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.5  Tessylo  replied to    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
5.1.6  Sunshine  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.1.3    4 years ago

Melania will never be good enough for the snobs no matter what she strives for.  

The orange man bad syndrome takes over.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to    4 years ago

There has been a hell of a lot more than those misguided tennis courts, although done for the staff,  that she has championed. Thanks for affirming you haven't kept up with all of her activities. Of course how could you depending on your daily news feed.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.9  Tessylo  replied to    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to    4 years ago

I am assuming, once again, guilt by association. She is her own woman married to Trump or not. As he is his own equal bully opportunity  man. Being married doesn't mean you have to agree with the spouse on everything.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.1.7    4 years ago

Would you be so kind to tell us just what it is she supposedly "championed" the last 4 years?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6  Greg Jones    4 years ago

What about all the bitter, hateful attacks on Melania Trump?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Greg Jones @6    4 years ago

Maybe if she hadn't done nude photos and then had all the evangelical leaders praising her "beauty"....

Face it, she's an easy target

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
6.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    4 years ago

Not to mention the fact that she and her parents have no more right to citizenship in this country than any other person that this administration has fought tooth and nail to keep out.  You’d think she would have a little more respect for that undeserved honor than to wear a jacket that lets everyone know that she doesn’t care about those who weren’t extended the same courtesy.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.1.1    4 years ago

Trump is anti immigrant yet comes from immigrant grandparents and married two.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.1.2    4 years ago

it seems pretty easy to claim anything you want about Trump with no proof!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.1.1    4 years ago

She really isn't someone who inspires respect and admiration. She got her position by doing nothing more than laying on her back

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @6    4 years ago
What about all the bitter, hateful attacks on Melania Trump?

Why all the conservative defense of the porn star Trump married instead of just paying her off like Stormy Daniels?

Will you tell your daughters as they grow up that you want them to be just like Melania? Is she really a role model for young American girls? Do some porn, then marry an old rich adulterer, oh what an achievement... /s

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.3.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.3    4 years ago

What about all the bitter, hateful attacks of Michelle Obama done by the same people who are all butt hurt now about attacks on Malenia?

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4  Sunshine  replied to  Greg Jones @6    4 years ago
What about all the bitter, hateful attacks on Melania Trump?

Well she deserved it because she had nakked pics...the prunes can't stand it that a women would pose nakked as a young girl and then someday become First Lady.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.4.1  Texan1211  replied to  Sunshine @6.4    4 years ago

I think most of them are just jealous

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.4.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sunshine @6.4    4 years ago
Well she deserved it because she had nakked pics...

So you're saying we should encourage our youth to get into the porn industry when they're young? Should we encourage our young girls to get naked so they might attract fat perverts on their third marriage that are nearly 30 years older than them to "sweep" them off their feet because they're rich? Should we be telling all our girls to emulate Anna Nicole Smith, Stormy Daniels and Melania instead of strong educated women like Eleanor Roosevelt, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Michelle Obama, Dr. Jill Biden, Condi Rice or Laura Bush who was also a school teacher?

Seems like the only reason Melania gets a pass for her speckled past from conservatives is because she happens to be married to their dear leader Donald.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.4.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Texan1211 @6.4.1    4 years ago
I think most of them are just jealous

Of an anorexic entitled former porn star who married a low IQ tub of lard nearly 30 years older than her for money? Not a chance.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.4  Sunshine  replied to  Texan1211 @6.4.1    4 years ago

me too

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.4.5  Tessylo  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.3    4 years ago

Jealous of someone married to [deleted]

[LMFAO!]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4    4 years ago

Prunes or prudes?

I honestly think that if Michele Obama or Jill Biden had nekkid photos of themselves that had been published in men's magazines, you, Greg, and all your other little friends would have a field day with it.

Don't bother denying it. You had plenty of awful things to say about Mrs. Obama. Greg there has certainly had more than his share of insults towards VP-elect Kamala Harris

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.2    4 years ago

That's exactly what she's saying. But because I encouraged my daughter to go to college and get an education instead of hopping on the stripper pole or getting nekkid for Playboy...I'm a prune (maybe she meant prude?)

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.8  Sunshine  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.2    4 years ago

Melania was in the porn industry?

You never have visited Europe have you?  Nakked pics everywhere.

I bet you have no problem with Sports Illustrated do you?  Or Hollywood?  

Get over yourself.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.4.9  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.6    4 years ago
if Michele Obama or Jill Biden had nekkid photos of themselves

We shouldn't even pretend that there is any rationality among Trump supporters. Of course they would be back on their high horses proclaiming the Democrat President a vile pervert if Biden was on his third marriage to a former porn star who was nearly thirty years younger than himself. And that's not even counting what they'd be saying if Biden had over two dozen accusations of sexual assault against him.

I'm sure the conservatives would just claim the dozens of women were lying just to sink his candidacy and saying anyone critical of his porn star wife is just jealous, yeah, those are the religious conservatives I've known for the past five decades… /s

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.10  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.6    4 years ago
You had plenty of awful things to say about Mrs. Obama.

I think Michelle was beautiful when she smiled. I have had plenty of things to say about her statements so you need to post what you felt I said was awful and we can discuss it.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.8    4 years ago

SI doesn't post nude photos, do they?

And this is how you're going to defend your statements? Rather weak.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.12  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.9    4 years ago

As you can see they can't really defend their hypocrisy

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.13  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.6    4 years ago

I really don't care if there were naked photos of any of those women. I think people should be able to do what they choose to do without ridicule... If it harms none, do as you will. Melania posing nude for Playboy harms no one; therefore, people shouldn't care. When "Slick Willy" was getting scrutinized for having an affair with Monica Lewinski; I thought it was asinine, because the only person / people that should've been concerned with that was Hillary and maybe their daughter, because it affected her.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.14  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.10    4 years ago

I don't believe you and if you think I'm going back over 6-7 years of comments you are very much mistaken.

Maybe YOU didn't call her Moochelle or Gorilla Mama, but your buddies did and not one goddamned word of condemnation from you to them. You can't hide under that double standard anymore. You've been exposed

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.15  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.11    4 years ago

What are you babbling about?  They sexualize young women too...no different.  

Get over yourself.  She is the First Lady and never harmed anyone. 

Good grief, the TDS runs deep.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.16  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.14    4 years ago
Maybe YOU didn't call her Moochelle 

Yep, you where wrong again.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.17  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6.4.13    4 years ago

Let's be honest here. If Mrs Obama or Hillary or Dr Biden had posed nude for magazines you know damn good and well those women would be condemned for it. I'm only trying to point out the double standards that conservatives have when it comes to their women. Mock Melania and you get accused of being a misogynist but say one word to somebody who called Mrs. Obama a guerilla or a trans-man you're called a snowflake and that you're triggered.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.18  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.16    4 years ago

That's all you've got???? Nothing about your own double standard???

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.19  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.17    4 years ago
I'm only trying to point out the double standards that conservatives have when it comes to their women.

Well... I don't know what label one would put on me with my views, but I personally wouldn't have cared if any of the other First Ladies posed nude for Playboy. Actually, I've always thought Playboy was far more tasteful than Hustler, which was always Hugh Hefner's biggest competition. Now, Hugh's daughter runs the Playboy franchise.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.20  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.15    4 years ago
What are you babbling about?  They sexualize young women too...no different.  

What the hell are YOU babbling about? Who brought up Europe and Sports Illustrated. I certainly didn't. I assumed you brought those subjects up to make a point but FAIL!

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.21  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.18    4 years ago
That's all you've got???? Nothing about your own double standard???

Show it...post it.  

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.22  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.20    4 years ago
I certainly didn't. 

Well I tried...not my problem you don't understand it.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.4.23  evilone  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6.4.13    4 years ago
When "Slick Willy" was getting scrutinized for having an affair with Monica Lewinski; I thought it was asinine, because the only person / people that should've been concerned with that was Hillary and maybe their daughter, because it affected her.

Supervisors get fired, and companies sued, for this same activity all the time no matter who consented. It's inappropriate and unethical for someone in a position of power to have an affair with a subordinate. Clinton is damned lucky there was taped evidence of consent or he'd be on a sex offender's list right now.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.24  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6.4.19    4 years ago

I do believe you are the only one here that wouldn't make a big deal about Michele or Jill or Kamala posing nude

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.25  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.21    4 years ago

Go pound sand. I already said you probably didn't call Mrs Obama names...or did you forget telling me I was wrong the second time?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.26  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.22    4 years ago

see above

and go pound more sand

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
6.4.28  sandy-2021492  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.17    4 years ago
If Mrs Obama or Hillary or Dr Biden had posed nude for magazines you know damn good and well those women would be condemned for it.

I remember an article back on NV where Michelle Malkin condemned Mrs. Obama for wearing couture to a state dinner (instead of something off the rack), and quite a few people there sided with Malkin.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.4.30  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.18    4 years ago

Would AOC change your mind?

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.31  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.25    4 years ago
Go pound sand. I already said you probably didn't call Mrs Obama names...or did you forget telling me I was wrong the second time?

You made false claims that I said awful things about Michelle Obama and had double standards yet have not provided any proof of either one.  

I am not the one who should pound sand here.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.32  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.4.30    4 years ago

What is your point here?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.33  Trout Giggles  replied to  sandy-2021492 @6.4.28    4 years ago

And let's talk about the bare arms controversy! Whoo- whee, you would have thought she bared her breasts the way they carried on about it

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.35  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.31    4 years ago

Re-read comment number 6.4.14. Then go pound more sand

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.4.36  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.32    4 years ago

Woman gotta eat. And while I realize the woman in the articles more than likely will never become FLOTUS, gotta pay the bills. But this moment in HER history is much the same that the people negative of Mrs. Trump on this thread are bitching about. And AOC is in Congress and says all is AOK

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.38  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  evilone @6.4.23    4 years ago
he'd be on a sex offender's list right now.

How so? She was of legal age.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.39  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Kathleen @6.4.29    4 years ago

Yes, but I agree with TG that there are only a few of us that think that way... and that's sad.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.4.40  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sunshine @6.4    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.41  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.4.36    4 years ago

If you all hadn't made so much over Mrs Obama's looks I wouldn't have cared that Melania posed nude. But then the righteous sanctimonious asshats got up to their pulpits and praised Melania and never said one word about her past work. And declared trmp such a good Christian man. And we have one such such righteous sanctimonious ass hat right here on NT.

That was all bullshit and it was just too much.

I really don't condemn people making money off their looks are if they have to engage in the sex trade to eat, but I will not put up with double standards and hypocrisy from the so-called church going, pearl clutching, Wednesday prayer meetin' bunch of assholes.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.42  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.4.40    4 years ago

oh and here comes one that has said pretty nasty things about Kamala Harris.

And the left hates women......

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.43  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.35    4 years ago

Because other people did, I am culpable too.

Wow, that is much better than making false accustions.  jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

jrSmiley_76_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.44  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6.4.38    4 years ago

Since she was an employee of the WH, it could have been construed as sexual harassment and inappropriate conduct with an employee. I think. Even tho she was of age

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.45  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.43    4 years ago

give it up. Stop making this all about you

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
6.4.46  sandy-2021492  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.33    4 years ago
And let's talk about the bare arms controversy!

I always thought they were jealous of her biceps.  The woman has some great muscle tone.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.47  Trout Giggles  replied to  sandy-2021492 @6.4.46    4 years ago

I know I was jealous

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.48  Sunshine  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.45    4 years ago

I am addressing comments to you that you made about me personally.

If it bothers you, you shouldn't start stupid shit and don't keep responding,.

Very simple.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.49  Sunshine  replied to  Kathleen @6.4.34    4 years ago
I think it’s hypocritical when there is suppose to be equality for women, no matter her choice in a occupation. 

I think so too.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.4.51  evilone  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6.4.38    4 years ago
How so? She was of legal age

She could have easily said it wasn't consensual were their not audio evidence of the contrary.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.52  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sunshine @6.4.48    4 years ago

jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.4.53  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.41    4 years ago
If you all hadn't made so much over Mrs Obama's looks I wouldn't have cared that Melania posed nude.

Of course you have some of my quotes about Mrs. Obama right?

Don't put me in that fucking "you all" bullshit.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.54  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.4.53    4 years ago

Hmmmm....

Maybe you didn't either, but you certainly didn't condemn any of YOUR buddies, either. Never once accused them of misogyny when they said something nasty about Mrs Obama or Kamala Harris did you?

Do you remember all the memes a certain ocean living NT member used to post here? Never saw any comment from you except LOL and votes up

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.4.55  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6.4.19    4 years ago

She not only runs it, but took it out of the red.  It almost went under at one time until she turned it all around.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.57  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.44    4 years ago
it could have been construed as sexual harassment

I would think that it's like any other place of business and that it would have to be complained about to be filed as sexual harassment.

and inappropriate conduct with an employee.

This on the other hand, may be true; I don't know the legality of it for the US Government and it's employees.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.58  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  sandy-2021492 @6.4.46    4 years ago

Right! I only WISH I could have that tone! But I'm a lazy slug.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.59  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  evilone @6.4.51    4 years ago

But she didn't.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.4.60  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.4.55    4 years ago

She sure did!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.4.61  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.54    4 years ago
Do you remember all the memes a certain ocean living NT member used to post here? Never saw any comment from you except LOL and votes up

Cuz they were funny, most of them impossible. Do you remember the retorts with Melania basically the same type meme? In fact have you EVER dissed anyone posting shit about Melania? Of course you didn't. Tit (hehe) for tat.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.4.62  Greg Jones  replied to  evilone @6.4.51    4 years ago
She could have easily said it wasn't consensual were their not audio evidence of the contrary.

Got a link to that audio evidence?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.4.63  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.4.61    4 years ago

I was leaving Melania alone until her ex friend published that book showing that Melania wore that "ask me if I care" jacket to the border in order to show solidarity with her asshole husband. That was the end.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.64  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.4.61    4 years ago

No, I never did, but I can admit it. I enjoyed hammering Melania so I sure as shit ain't gonna rag on others who did. But that's not the point is it? Some here are clammering that they never did and they never did that and we liberals are all fascitic misogynistic pigs for doing it but then can't look themselves in the mirror and admit that they enjoyed the bashing of liberal women. You just admitted that you thought they were funny. A photo of Michele Obama that makes her looks as if she has a penis? And you laughed and laughed... And then the insults about her really being a man.

Good gawd!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.4.65  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @6.4.63    4 years ago

THAT is one steaming pile JR. It was "I really don't care do U" for one thing and it was NOT directed at her trip nor the children at the border.

Grisham doubled down on that nothing-to-see here message in a subsequent tweet. “Today’s visit w the children in Texas impacted @FLOTUS greatly,”  she tweeted . “If media would spend their time & energy on her actions & efforts to help kids - rather than speculate & focus on her wardrobe - we could get so much accomplished on behalf of children. #SheCares #ItsJustAJacket.”

And now we know that the line Grisham was trying to sell was simply wrong. How? Melania Trump told us!

She told ABC News’ Tom Llamas   that she wore the jacket “for the people and for the left-wing media who are criticizing me. And I want to show them that I don’t care.” (The ABC interview happened during Melania Trump’s trip to Africa but aired on Friday night.)

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.4.66  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.3    4 years ago

s-u-r-e thing!

lmao

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.4.67  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.64    4 years ago
A photo of Michele Obama that makes her looks as if she has a penis?

Which, if you recall, was met with the same with Melania Trump.

... And then the insults about her really being a man.

FFS all of those things are impossibilities and are to be laughed at if nothing else for, their absurdity.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.68  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.4.67    4 years ago

Really? So you think the old ocean animal was a hilarious kind of guy for posting those photos? You didn't find anything mean spirited about them?

All righty, Jim

And yeah somebody did it to Melania, too. I kept quiet about it, but should have spoken up. I don't think transgender is anything to laugh at, mock, or be mean spirited about

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.4.69  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.4.68    4 years ago
Really? So you think the old ocean animal was a hilarious kind of guy for posting those photos? You didn't find anything mean spirited about them?

Didn't say that now did I. There have been memes all over that are just shit that someone with too much time on their hands created. They were said/posted to be funny and NOT malicious at all as very VERY few people took them seriously. If they did, well they aren't right in the head.

I'm sorry you were offended.......................

And yeah somebody did it to Melania, too

It was "The Battle of the Impossible Memes" as far as I was concerned. That's it. 

Oh, and BTFW (lol) I laughed at the Melania ones too FYI

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.4.70  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6.4.13    4 years ago
I think people should be able to do what they choose to do without ridicule... If it harms none, do as you will.

Well there is a difference between just your average citizen and those given such a visible platform that has traditionally been used to set a good example for fellow American citizens. And not recognizing the difference between encouraging young girls to work hard, get an education and contribute to society versus taking their clothes off for money, I believe can do serious harm to a society. Even if you don't ridicule such base brainless behavior that takes zero brain power or skill, we shouldn't be elevating it as something young girls should aspire to. Aspiring to be an educated self reliant educated American citizen, that's the ideal for a First Lady, whoring yourself out for nude photos or other to get ahead isn't something I think we should be teaching our daughters is what they should be trying to achieve in their lives and congratulating the porn star when she ends up on the arm of the President.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.4.71  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Kathleen @6.4.27    4 years ago
Some encouragement from their parents, not the First Lady.

I suppose that is until the first lady advocates for children eating their vegetables.

Nobody is telling anyone to go into the porn business.

But the First lady is setting an example, is she not? From porn to marrying rich, apparently a supposed success story to many conservatives.

I don’t care who she is married too.

So you're being 100% impartial when you hear criticism of Melania, it doesn't matter at all that she's married to the Republican President? If she were Joe Biden's wife you'd be just as dismissive of her past and complacent about her utter lack of any achievements other than landing a fat rich husband nearly 30 years her senior? Really?

Most people make up their own minds about what they would like to do.

Well that should take the wind out of the sails of anyone thinking to inspire the younger generation to succeed at anything apparently.

Some encouragement from their parents, not the First Lady.

"Some encouragement"? Not as much encouragement as a parent can possibly muster? Not taking advantage of every opportunity to better oneself and your offspring? Not giving your child every possible opportunity for success as you can while also teaching them the skills they'll need to get through life? Do we really just give up and tell our daughters "Hey, just flash them titties and you'll bag yourself a billionaire, I mean hell, our First lady did it so that's all you need..."? Really? Is this where we have just abandoned all sense in an effort to defend the indefensible?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.4.73  Texan1211  replied to  Kathleen @6.4.72    4 years ago

I hope not, but I fear your message is falling on deaf ears!

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
6.4.74  Sunshine  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.70    4 years ago

You must of hated it when Stormy Daniels was paraded for days all over your left wing media as a hero.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.4.77  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Kathleen @6.4.72    4 years ago
You’re not making any sense. You are twisting everything I said.

I apologize if that's how you interpreted my comment. I wasn't trying to twist anything you said, I was pointing out that traditionally, the First lady of our nation has set an example for young American girls and women. They have been advocates for certain change like encouraging our populace to be concerned with their children's health.

I agree that parents should be the primary source of encouragement, I am just expressing my opinion that, in the past pre-Melania, First ladies have also set an example for young girls in America. They have been relative icons that many have looked up to. Do you feel Melania should be looked up to? Do you think her method of "catching" Trump should be revered?

Listen carefully. Treat others the way you would want to be treated.

Okay, I'm listening, but all I'm hearing is "treat porn stars the way you want to be treated" which is fine, I don't think porn stars should be harassed for their occupations, but I also don't think they should be lauded for making such choices. Do you?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
6.4.78  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.77    4 years ago
"treat porn stars the way you want to be treated" which is fine

if you wish to get 'Fckd" , no ...?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.4.79  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.4.77    4 years ago

Porn star?

Can you name some movies she appeared in?

Can you describe a single sex act she performed professionally?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.4.80  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @6.4.63    4 years ago

She took her "Ask me if I care" cue from the orange slug she is married to.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.81  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.4.69    4 years ago

Cuz they were funny,

You didn't say that? 

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
7  freepress    4 years ago

Funny how Tucker's own network disavows him and in court used the excuse that no harm can come from his disinformation because no one would ever take him seriously. So Tucker is not a true journalist by his own employer's standards and is nothing but an opinionated blowhard talking head. No one takes him seriously, not even his own network.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7.1  Greg Jones  replied to  freepress @7    4 years ago

Same could be said of Don Lemon

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8  Kavika     4 years ago

131922477_10225323190447707_4471143509703198451_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=2&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=mG8VFtPKKHwAX_dUTER&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-2.xx&tp=7&oh=59c27ec339753a1df9eafb67e7f88fa0&oe=6001AD13

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
9  Drakkonis    4 years ago

Tucker is what is called a Pundit, right? I haven't had TV in years so I don't watch these guys. About as close as I get is listening to them on XM radio going back and forth to work. As far as I can tell, these people have one purpose. To take a little truth and turn it into propaganda. Since I don't have TV I probably haven't seen them all but, even on XM or YouTube, I have yet to see one that appears to examine anything honestly. They seem to do their best to present what their audience want to believe rather than actually examining factual aspects of the issue and try to come to honest consensus. 

If I understand correctly, Jill Biden has a doctorate in education. End of story, if that is so. She's entitled to Dr. as an honorific. Anything else is just mean spirited, petty and petulant. What the hell has happened to people that they can't abide truth? If Jill Biden has a Doctorate then the only honest and honorable thing to do is accept it and move on. 

And whoever this Epstein guy is seems about as honorable as a school yard bully making fun of how another student is dressed. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Drakkonis @9    4 years ago
They seem to do their best to present what their audience want to believe

So what then does Tuckers comments say about his largely Trump supporting conservative audience?

She's entitled to Dr. as an honorific. Anything else is just mean spirited, petty and petulant.

Agreed.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
9.1.1  Drakkonis  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1    4 years ago
So what then does Tuckers comments say about his largely Trump supporting conservative audience?

Well, in my experience, pretty much the same thing Chris Hayes and Chris Cuomo's comments says, only to the left. That is, none of them actually try to illuminate truth but, rather, craft a narrative for people who can't be bothered to think for themselves. They all appeal to emotion rather than trying to arrive at something sensible. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
11  Trout Giggles    4 years ago

The comments from the conservatives here are very transparent in their attitudes. They really can't defend Melania Trmp against Jill Biden so they make up all kinds of excuses that they don't care what people do in their lives even if that means becoming a sex worker. 

BUT....would you admit that to your pastor or your priest? I doubt it. Especially the ones who like to portray themselves as such upstanding Christians who condemn liberals as being immoral pieces of shit because we think people should have choices, especially women.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
12  Perrie Halpern R.A.    4 years ago

I have moved this article back to the main forum and will lock the problem thread. Anyone continuing will the personal comments will get a ticket. Please carry on with civil discussion.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
12.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @12    4 years ago

oh. Got it I think it should stay in HD

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
14  Split Personality    4 years ago

Closed, too many bad threads, pending tickets and borderline comments

and no participation by the seeder who still found the time to publish other seeds today.

 
 

Who is online

Ed-NavDoc
Jeremy Retired in NC


396 visitors