Related:
1. Cops Line DC Street To Salute Officer Brian Sicknick Murdered by MAGA Terrorists In Capitol Riot.
2. Military Joint Chiefs condemn 'sedition and insurrection' at US Capitol as federal and local officials scramble to ensure security
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
What the Capitol looks like ahead of impeachment vote (Source: CNN)
President Donald Trump finally did it. His incitement of a deadly riot at the Capitol in Washington ultimately dragged America's most senior military leaders , the Joint Chiefs of Staff, into an unprecedented political crisis. Throughout his presidency, the four-star top brass have been adamant that the Pentagon wouldn't get involved in politics -- even as Trump repeatedly tried to bring it into his partisan orbit.
But after the shocking violence at the Capitol last week and the images of insurrection were shown around the world, the chiefs felt they had to speak, especially to get their message to American troops. Top aides to Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, began to draft what is known as a "Memorandum for the Joint Force," and early on Tuesday the chiefs met to finalize their message. It was their second key meeting in less than a week.
After the riot they had met to talk about what happened and a way ahead.
On the face of it, it is a reminder to troops around the world. The message: "We support and defend the Constitution. Any act to disrupt the Constitutional process is not only against our traditions, values and oath, it is against the law."
But the chiefs well knew the memo would be read across the globe, several defense officials say. They had plenty to say and each word was carefully selected. The chiefs are not partisan, but they have a fine-tuned antenna to the political climate. They know when it is time for them to speak out, as they did after racial unrest last year. And they knew that this memo would put them at odds with Trump days before he left office as commander in chief.
On Tuesday Trump defended his remarks that had inspired his supporters to march on and riot at the Capitol. But the chiefs made their stand by calling out the rioters, saying that "the rights of freedom of speech and assembly do not give anyone the right to resort to violence, sedition and insurrection" -- a statement their commander in chief has refused to make.
The memo also made the critical point that "the US military will obey lawful orders" from civilian leadership. This may be the most important line to remember. The chiefs and combat commanders around the world have given thought to what they'd do if Trump issued an illegal order, and the answer is simple: They would not follow it, according to several Pentagon officials directly familiar with their thinking.
President Donald Trump finally did it. His incitement of a deadly riot at the Capitol in Washington ultimately dragged America's most senior military leaders , the Joint Chiefs of Staff, into an unprecedented political crisis. Throughout his presidency, the four-star top brass have been adamant that the Pentagon wouldn't get involved in politics -- even as Trump repeatedly tried to bring it into his partisan orbit.
On Tuesday Trump defended his remarks that had inspired his supporters to march on and riot at the Capitol. But the chiefs made their stand by calling out the rioters, saying that "the rights of freedom of speech and assembly do not give anyone the right to resort to violence, sedition and insurrection" -- a statement their commander in chief has refused to make.
The issue I see is that the top brass is not at all certain that the 10 - 20 thousand they'll move into position for the 20th will align with them and not with Trump. This is precisely what I warned several months ago [much to Dulay's and possibly others' chagrin]...
I think most of them will. But it only takes a few...
Those few will be delt with quickly by those that will observe their oath of enlistment. Not to worry.
Top brass knows there are fascist co-conspirators in the services. We all know it.
Now the question is, "Will they betray their oaths?"
The problem with this is that fascists like the Oathkeepers redefine the words of their oaths so that overthrowing the government becomes a way of defending it...