╌>

California can't ban indoor worship as Covid precaution, Supreme Court rules

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  perrie-halpern  •  3 years ago  •  11 comments

By:   The Associated Press

California can't ban indoor worship as Covid precaution, Supreme Court rules
The Supreme Court ruled Friday night that California can't totally ban indoor worship as a way to curb the spread of Covid-19.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is telling California it can't enforce a ban on indoor church services because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The high court issued orders late Friday in two cases where churches had sued over coronavirus-related restrictions in the state. The high court said that for now, California can't ban indoor worship in areas where virus cases are surging, but it can cap indoor services at 25 percent of a building's capacity. The justices also declined to stop the state from barring singing and chanting at services.

The court's three liberal justices dissented.

The court's action follows a decision in a case from New York late last year in which the justices split 5-4 in barring the state from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues.

Shortly after, the justices told a federal court to reexamine a similar lawsuit over California's restrictions in light of the ruling.

The Associated Press


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1  Buzz of the Orient    3 years ago

Perrie, this very article was posted already by Texan1211 and as of this moment has 41 comments on it. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1    3 years ago

Maybe on this one, members can actually discuss the case.

Personally, It seems like Scotus would shoot down anything designed to save peoples lives 6-3 based on personal freedoms.

No more seat belts, helmets, face masks or social distancing.  No restrictions on smoking anywhere. Legal conceal & carry for everyone.

Don't worry about texting while speeding, leave it up to the insurance companies and lawyers to sort out justice.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Ender  replied to  Split Personality @1.1    3 years ago

You forgot the caveat, one must be Christian. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2  Ender    3 years ago

You would think that in this day and age people would outgrow superstitions...

Gotta admit though, Barret kinda surprised me. She was not even the hardliner on the case.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1  Split Personality  replied to  Ender @2    3 years ago
You would think that in this day and age people would outgrow superstitions...

If any thing tribalism seems genetic and leads to becoming blind, deaf and dumb even in the face

of tactile objective lessons.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4  CB    3 years ago

As a Christian and Believer I can see the circumstances as is. There is something "challenging" to the faith in this coronavirus dilemma . On one hand we can understand it as a 'time of testing' and on the other hand its continuing separates and tries the meaning of "congregation." Moreover, many churches over many years have taught as doctrine the "gathering" aspect:

Hebrews 10:25 25 not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another-and all the more as you see the Day approaching.

This singular verse is the impetus for modern churches connecting in-house. Now, doctrine is being challenged by nature.

Technology is a blessing, but churches never counted on it being their only source for gathering together and communing with one another. Yes, for the Church-at Large this is a uniquely "trying time" for the present.

 
 

Who is online














456 visitors