Migrant children are still being temporarily separated from relatives under Biden administration
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The Biden administration is still sheltering children separated from close family members in federal facilities for weeks on end -- something immigrant advocates and attorneys had hoped the new administration would resolve by now.
Biden administration officials have signaled they are pivoting away from Trump administration policies they felt were inhumane toward migrants, especially children. But as federal agents grapple with a rising influx of unaccompanied immigrant children at the U.S.-Mexico border, what to do with the children who come with an adult that is not their parent is becoming a rising concern.
The migrant children often arrive with a grandparent, older sibling or other relative but are separated until federal officials can confirm the accompanying adult is their relative, as mandated under U.S. law. The procedure, which is different from the highly controversial Trump administration policy of separating immigrant moms and dads from their children, is designed to protect minors from human traffickers and grant them legal protections.
But it also classifies the youngsters as "unaccompanied minors" and places them in federal shelters until a sponsor or adult is vetted, a process that can take several weeks or even months.
Though not as dramatic as Trump administration-era family separations, which unleashed a furious backlash, separating children from close relatives could be equally detrimental, said Lisa Koop, associate director of legal services at the National Immigrant Justice Center, a legal advocacy group that represents immigrant youth.
"It really does look and feel in many ways like a parent-child separation," Koop said. "The trauma of the separation is very similar."
A growing wave of unaccompanied children at the border is fast becoming President Joe Biden's first major immigration challenge. More than 4,000 migrant children were transferred in January to the custody of the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement, the agency tasked with caring for them once they cross the border -- up from 3,330 in December and nearly four times the number that arrived in October, according to agency statistics.
At a press briefing Friday, White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki re-emphasized that the Biden administration intends to take a different approach to processing the children than former President Donald Trump did, even as the number of minors at the border continues to climb.
"We're going to chart our own path forward," she said. "And that includes treating children with humanity and respect and ensuring they're safe when they cross our borders."
But where to house all the children as they await immigration proceedings remains a daunting question. The resettlement agency oversees about 7,000 beds for the minors due to reduced capacity because of COVID-19 restrictions and this week it had about 7,700 migrant children in its custody, according to the statistics. Some of the excess number of children were being housed in at least one "Influx Care Facility," or temporary shelter, with no state oversight.
Federal officials were housing 224 of the children at a temporary shelter in Carrizo Springs, Texas, which has drawn criticism from advocates due to the facility's remote location and lack of regular inspections. The 700-bed facility was shuttered in July 2019 after the Trump administration faced blowback for poor conditions at a number of temporary shelters housing unaccompanied children. Biden reopened the facility last week.
Among the thousands of children appearing at the border are those who show up with an adult other than their parent. The exact number of those minors is unknown. The resettlement agency referred questions about that group of children to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman on Friday said the agency doesn't keep those stats.
Leah Chavla, a senior policy advisor at the Women's Refugee Commission, a non-profit that helps migrant children, said she's noticed a steady rise in the number of children arriving at the border with an adult other than their guardian and placed into federal custody, though exact numbers are hard to come by.
"We don't have good numbers because CBP doesn't collect data on that," she said. "But there is a lot. We've observed it, we've heard it from service providers. It's happening more so than in the past."
Under the Trafficking Victims Protection and Reauthorization Act of 2008, children who show up with an adult who are not their parent are classified as unaccompanied minors to make sure they're placed in less restrictive facilities, avoid expedited deportation status and their immigration case is presented as an interview in front of an asylum officer rather than a more former court setting.
Advocates have said they want the children who show up with relatives to retain those protections but hoped the Biden administration could reduce the amount of time they spend in federal shelters. For months, advocates have lobbied Biden officials to implement changes to reduce the time those children spend in federal custody.
"It is a very complex situation," said Wendy Young, president of Kids In Need of Defense, an advocacy group for refugee and immigrant children, "and one that we are hoping the new administration will address aggressively."
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said at a White House press briefing this week that his agency is considering locating officials with the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services at Border Patrol stations to more quickly verify if migrant children have sponsors in the United States and reunite them with relatives.
"We are taking a look at where efficiencies can be achieved in the best interest of the child," he said.
Often, parents who have been living in the United States will send for their young children with an older sibling, said Koop, the legal advocate. Other times, a grandparent who has raised the child since birth will take the arduous journey with them and arrive at the U.S. border -- only to be separated from the child for weeks or maybe months, she said.
"There should be a way legally for the children to be essentially reunified in place with the adult caregiver without having to go through the entire system," she said.
Linda Brandmiller, a San Antonio immigration attorney who represents unaccompanied minors, said children arriving at the border with relatives and shuttled through federal shelters has been a challenge for years.
Two years ago, she represented a 10-year-old boy from Mexico who arrived at the border seeking asylum with his 18-year-old sister. Since the sister was old enough, she was placed in an adult facility, while the boy shuttled between federal shelters, she said. Even though he had an uncle living in San Antonio who was a U.S. citizen and willing to sponsor him, it took Brandmiller two months to have the boy released.
Those types of cases are only going to increase as more immigrant families and children arrive at the border, she said. Brandmiller said she understands children need to be protected against possible human traffickers, but verifying next of kin shouldn't take as long as it does.
So far, the process hasn't noticeably improved under the Biden administration, she said.
"The frustration is almost worse," Brandmiller said. "We had expected so much better."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Migrant children are still being temporarily separated from relatives under Biden administration
Tags
Who is online
401 visitors
No surprise that when you practically invite people to come here illegally, they will come running!
The Biden Administration has also renamed those detention centers/cages/migrant child facilities "Reception Centers". It's far more warm-fuzzy Kumbaya and welcoming.
You have to be sure that children, who are with an adult who is not their parent, are not being trafficked and sold to the My Pillow guy.
Amnesty is a powerful magnet.
Indeed it is, and the reason for a surge now.
Democrats need to stop granting amnesty.
Perhaps you can document when the Democrats have granted amnesty.
The last I can see, it was a bipartisan effort in 1986, signed into law by (R) Reagan, who in 1987
granted amnesty by EO to legalize the children of those parents granted amnesty in 1986.
I could.
Then plainly you didn't look very hard.
I did look, Reagan and Bush were champions of amnesty by EO until Obama tried it.
Obama bad.
Got it.
It's all Obama's fault.
The Seven Amnesties Passed by Congress | NumbersUSA
Kind of a lame link.
Congress is neither Republican or Democrat, it is bipartisan with a sprinkle of Independents.
When Congress acts, all a POTUS needs is a signature, not an EO.
Reagan & Bush extended actual amnesty for people in specific situations not covered by the 1986 Immigration Act signed by Reagan.
Obama shielded certain children and students from deportation by EO and many conservatives lost their mind,
he did not grant citizenship, permanent residency or amnesty.
In 2019 Trump was for amnesty, before he was against it, offering a 3 year extension of DACA in exchange for border wall $$ during the government shutdown.
Trump dropped the issue.
Both parties have had to deal with Cuba, Vietnamese boat people and various ME refugee crises,
making it humanitarian, not partisan.
Implying that amnesty is just a Democrat issue is just plain inaccurate.
Reagan was promised a secured border in return for amnesty by Democrats in Congress; the Democrats never followed through on securing the border did they? A little fact that you left out; but whatever works for revisionist history if it proves a point.
Bush Jr was a moron and a terrible president; we were told so repeatedly by those on the left. So if he was for it, then it must have been a horrendous idea.
Amnesty has been proven not to work. It just encourages more illegal immigrants to violate our laws; because they know it won't be long before some other moron politician offers up amnesty again.
Seems again you cannot comprehend. DACA (not even a full amnesty) in return for a secure border. Amnesty by itself if completely worthless; and will have to be granted repeatedly as there will always be more illegal immigrants encouraged to come by the promise of future amnesty.
Let stick to the original comment, shall we?
Congress granted amnesty and two Republican Presidents granted Amnesty.
Trump contemplated it.
But keep on sharing your opinions...
The link was to merely show you how little you looked for info on amnesty.
You remember--when THIS was all you "bothered' to look for:
Take it as a learning experience what can be found on the internet with a minimum of effort.
The comment is still a partisan dog whistle without evidence.
Or you could just ignore what I just taught you.
Nothing to be learned except the silly team games and semantics you play.
Please, have the last word, again.
Nope, I will leave it for you.
Wouldn't want to disappoint!
i like having the first
last word...
It certainly is, especially when it's disguised as "comprehensive immigration reform".
To the best of my knowledge, the USA has had explicitly codified LEGAL immigration laws for well over a century. Castle Clinton (1855) followed by Ellis Island starting in 1892 are well-known legal immigration entry points.
Many of my ancestors legally emigrated to the USA through Ellis Island and were detained for days while their documents were processed, and they went through medical and "mental" testing and evaluations before being approved and released.
Problems with feral kittens happen when you encourage feral cats
Why not?
Now... considering the methods / processes that have been performed by both D and R oversight across DECADES, don't the citizens of Mexico know the process by now what to expect? I mean, seriously... as a parent, if I'd heard about [even if they were just whispers] possibly being separated from my children, grandchildren [which I don't have yet], brother, sister, or friend in a foreign country, I certainly would rethink that move. Yet, they come and cross the border and are appalled by the separation like it's some surprise.
You think asylum seekers are coming from Mexico????
Through the Mexican border. Better?
That's not the point. The point is... no one across our southern border (no matter which country of origin) knows the US processes?
Not really, you specifically said, "citizens of Mexico". Do you think that Mexican citizens are seeking asylum in the US?
How would they know it? Not all people have access to the internet like we do in the U.S. There are many locations in South America, where most of our asylum seekers are from, that do not have electricity or running water. All they know is the propagandized "America, the land of hope and freedom", and head our way to escape and seek a better life.
Seeking a better life isn't grounds for asylum.
Sorry about that.
Asylum or Refugee Status: Who Is Eligible? | Nolo
Some, yes. I'd also imagine there are people seeking asylum that come from Columbia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Costa Rica, etc. as well. But again... that wasn't the point I was making.
Word of mouth. I'd be awfully surprised if word never spread about the US customs processes.
It simply defies all logic that those processes are NOT out there and known.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong?
Seeking a better life for a family, to escape from rapists and murderers targeting them, from where they are coming from, is grounds for asylum.
The only word of mouth would be from those deported. Not exactly people that are going to paint a rosy picture of American asylum practices.
Okay... so that possesses people to think, "Oh hey... I don't believe so and so, I'm going there myself." Or "I'm going to send my children who are 18 and 13 to the border and have them cross and see how that works out." Makes no sense.
There are all kinds of organizations set up to help people immigrate.
To even suggest that our laws aren't known is folly.
I thoughtfully provided the requirements above in post 6.1.5.
Read them or not.