One simple fact proves the latest Biden tax hike is baseless class warfare

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  texan1211  •  3 weeks ago  •  57 comments

By:   Brad Polumbo (MSN)

One simple fact proves the latest Biden tax hike is baseless class warfare
Joe Biden was elected on promises of moderation and "unity," but he has wasted no time early in his presidency advancing multiple huge tax hikes. The latest example is the White House's plan almost to double the top capital gains tax rate, the tax applied on investment growth when assets are sold.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Joe Biden was elected on promises of moderation and "unity," but he has wasted no time early in his presidency advancing multiple huge tax hikes. The latest example is the White House's plan almost to double the top capital gains tax rate, the tax applied on investment growth when assets are sold.

© Provided by Washington Examiner

Economists warn this hike would hurt the economy and reduce investment in small businesses. But economic downsides from taxation are nothing new. What differentiates Biden's latest tax push is that it would punish investors without actually raising much tax revenue. You know, the ostensible purpose of taxation.

Here's why: Past a certain point, higher tax rates don't necessarily guarantee more total tax revenue because peoples' behavior changes in response. For example, a 10% income tax will always raise more revenue than a 100% income tax because no one would work if they had to give up their entire paycheck to Uncle Sam.

In expanding the top capital gains rate to 43.8%, Biden would actually far exceed the capital gains tax rate that raises the most revenue. According to the Tax Policy Center and Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation, the revenue-maximizing capital gains tax rate is closer to 28%.

That's right: Biden wants to raise taxes far beyond the rate at which they raise the most revenue.

"Tax rates above the revenue-maximizing rate are punitive: The government is giving up revenue simply to punish the rich," economist and former Federal Reserve governor Lawrence B. Lindsey explains in the Wall Street Journal.

"It is shocking that this policy got past the economists in the administration, many of whom have had long and distinguished careers," Lindsey continues. "The Biden administration is blowing up one of the key concepts that has united the economics profession: maximizing social welfare. It now believes in taxation purely as a form of punishment and is even willing to sacrifice revenue to carry it out."

At this point, the Biden administration is pushing tax policy that prioritizes punishing success and antagonizing the successful even if it means less government revenue. Raising capital gains taxes this high is the definition of a "lose-lose" scenario.

With this reality in mind, Biden's latest move looks like a stark departure from his "moderate" facade. When it comes to tax policy, a Bernie Sanders-esque class warfare mentality is seemingly driving this White House.

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a Washington Examiner contributor and host of the Breaking Boundaries podcast.

Tags:Opinion, Beltway Confidential, Blog Contributors, Joe Biden, Taxes, Economy, Bernie Sanders, Policy

Original Author:Brad Polumbo

Original Location:One simple fact proves the latest Biden tax hike is baseless class warfare


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Texan1211    3 weeks ago

Biden is for increasing taxes and Congressional Democrats want to lower them for the wealthy.

Gee, I wonder who will win the battle?

 
 
 
Gazoo
Sophomore Silent
1.1  Gazoo  replied to  Texan1211 @1    3 weeks ago

I think i know who will not win, the middle class.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Gazoo @1.1    3 weeks ago
I think i know who will not win, the middle class.

I believe you are right.

I just think it is really odd that some Democrats (a whole lot, in fact) always talk a good game about taxing the rich and "making them pay their fair share"--whatever THAT is while working hard to give the wealthy huge tax cuts.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.2  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gazoo @1.1    3 weeks ago

We in the middle and working classes will be the big losers particularly if we don’t live on the west or northeast coasts of the country.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.1    3 weeks ago

They intend to cut taxes for the rich in their America and raise them on the upper middle class while cutting working class jobs in our America.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.1    3 weeks ago

Their idiot is speaking now.  Who cares!  

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Principal
1.1.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1.4    3 weeks ago
Their idiot is speaking now.  Who cares!

Considering he was talking about the subjects you just were maybe you should. Then you'd be more informed.

There may have even been a few things he said that you MAY even have agreed with. 

Like helping get internet into rural homes, even most of the republican congress that was present stood up when biden talked about China. 

Just so you know, I am very non party !

I firmly believe Both parties have both good and bad ideologies. I also believe very much that this country is much stronger when we are united. 

I research every candidate and vote for the People that I actually believe would be best suited for the position they are applying for. I think they work for us. WE the People.

Not the democrat or republican party. I also believe that straight party line voting is how bad politicians get power over us. 

I missed the first part of Biden's speech but I liked some of what he had to say and didn't like other parts. But that's just me. jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

To each their own. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
PhD Participates
1.1.6  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Gazoo @1.1    3 weeks ago
I think I know who will not win, the middle class.

So do the "middle class" earn more than $400k a year?

The vast majority of Democrats are "middle class" so the whole bullshit narrative Republicans are trying to foment is bullshit, pure and simple. Only dumb shits and Trump turd gurglers believe that ridiculous nonsense that Biden's proposed tax increases will hurt the middle class, and the ones spouting such bullshit are clearly the top 2% who are deathly afraid of having their gravy train curtailed. It's sad that so many conservatives appear to be so fucking gullible.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Principal
1.1.7  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1.4    3 weeks ago
Their idiot is speaking now.  Who cares!  

Many Americans who care about our country.  I haven’t missed one of a President of either party since I became a registered voter in 1978.  

Good XX but one wonders which one is it ?  jrSmiley_19_smiley_image.gif  

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
1.1.8  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.6    3 weeks ago
appear to be so fucking gullible.

thinkin "appear" could disappear, cause they, sadly enough, are that "fucking gullible" .

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.9  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.6    3 weeks ago
It's sad that so many conservatives appear to be so fucking gullible.

Is is just as sad to you that Democrats TALK about raising taxes on the rich, but then are desperately trying to give the wealthy a huge tax break? Are you just as gullible for believing that Democrats MEANT they would raise taxes but you now can see them fighting for the rich?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.10  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.6    3 weeks ago
and the ones spouting such bullshit are clearly the top 2% who are deathly afraid of having their gravy train curtailed. It's sad that so many conservatives appear to be so fucking gullible.

Why are Democrats trying to give the wealthy a huge tax cut by repealing the SALT caps?

Just a simple answer without the usual "witticisms".

No Republican crap, just an HONEST explanation of why Democrats are catering to their rich constituents in places like CA, NY, NJ, etc. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
1.1.11  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.10    3 weeks ago
Just a simple answer without the usual "witticisms".

how about due to OUR LOBBYIST BOUGHT AND PAID FOR POLITICIANS, as TOO MUCH $ is able to be spent to determine laws that which can and will determine who actually pays what.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.12  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1.11    3 weeks ago

So your claim is that Democrats sold out to their wealthy donors.

Good admission on your part, but I'll bet a dollar to a donut that it won't make a bit of difference to you when you vote.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
PhD Participates
1.1.13  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.10    3 weeks ago
Why are Democrats trying to give the wealthy a huge tax cut by repealing the SALT caps?

First, I agree, removing the SALT cap of $10k would help primarily the top 20% of earners and those who live in high cost of living areas like CA and NY. I do think that if those high earners are paying more than $10,000 in State and local taxes (which are far more likely to go directly back into communities than federal taxes) they should be allowed to write those expenses off. It would reduce the amount of federal taxes taken by about $88 billion annually but, if as Democrats suggest, we go after the top 2% and corporations that aren't paying the taxes they actually owe we would raise the amount of taxes taken by between $400 billion to $1 trillion which would more than make up for the loss of revenue the removal of the SALT cap would lose.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.14  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.13    3 weeks ago

We shouldn't allow SALT Deductions at all, IMO.

State and local taxes are different everywhere, federal taxes are separate and different and should be the same everywhere for all Americans.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Participates
1.1.15  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.13    3 weeks ago
I agree, removing the SALT cap of $10k would help primarily the top 20% of earners

Yes, 96% of the benefits counts as "primarily." 

st, we go after the top 2% and

You want to go after the top 2% by enacting a tax cut that saves the average millionaire $44,000 in annual taxes. Makes sense. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Participates
1.1.16  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.14    3 weeks ago

We shouldn't allow SALT Deductions at all, IMO.

Closing tax loopholes like that should be the priority of tax reform.  It's a benefit for wealthy taxpayers that subsidizes some local governments and not others. It's really indefensible if you believe in fair and progressive taxation. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Masters Guide
1.1.17  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.13    3 weeks ago
Democrats suggest, we go after the top 2% and corporations that aren't paying the taxes they actually owe....
If they actually owe them, they're probably actually paying them

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Masters Guide
1.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Texan1211 @1    3 weeks ago

If you wanna tax is capital gains is the only real way to do it. It being as low as it is has been a massive boon to the wealthy for a long time, I dont give a shit about my income tax, that isn’t where I made my money, not even close.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Thrawn 31 @1.2    3 weeks ago

I still don't see why SALT should be deductible for federal income taxes anyway.

Just do away with that deduction entirely.

Sounds fair to me.

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
2  JumpDrive    3 weeks ago
The latest example is the White House's plan almost to double the top capital gains tax rate, the tax applied on investment growth when assets are sold.

This article does not mention that the high rate kicks in only if you make over $1 million/year. This means it affects 0.3% of earners. So this affects only the super rich. You know, the people who use all kinds of dodges like carried interest and stock buy backs to shield massive amounts of income from reasonable taxation. The average small business owner in the US earns about $75K. All of the 'facts' and 'figures' about the correct rate for capital gains are irrelevant bullshit.

The government is giving up revenue simply to punish the rich...

Like so many things, this is projection. The limitation on the SALT deduction was done to punish Democratic states, so Democrats must be doing this for the same reason. Nope. Democrats actually care about people's situation and work continuously to try and improve it. Republicans, on the other hand, would have knocked 20 million working class Americans off healthcare were it not for McCain having a conscience.

When it comes to tax policy, a Bernie Sanders-esque class warfare mentality is seemingly driving this White House.

Yeah, having the top 0.3% to pay more than 23.8% Federal tax on their income, like the rest of us, is class warfare. Republicans are full of shit.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  JumpDrive @2    3 weeks ago
Yeah, having the top 0.3% to pay more than 23.8% Federal tax on their income, like the rest of us, is class warfare. Republicans are full of shit.

If it wasn't so pathetic, i'd find it humorous. Working class played Republicans always in lock step defending the "uber" rich, as they can't 'Lift" themselves but barely on average, as they vote and back policies against their own interests, while appearing to have some, but too blind to see they have been played, and not much work was required to obtain a result certain wons had desired. It's almost as if, if told to jump off that cliff, they would, yet, one not need to jump off a cliff to see and read the Cliff Notes, as they are in the big Red Dogs journal, omitted nocturnal as they remain in the dark, smell gas , and enlighten that spark, culling those heard while not aloud, cause immunity is herd disavowed due to a denial in science, class, and the general fck you, cause you can kiss my ass if you think i care about US wherein, it might convince me it is a slight inconvenience as i will not have such an absurdity affect my immune eye heard a T, just the other day when i talked with so many who will be refusing to enlighten, cause the Con Fuse has already bin lit and the fix is broken, as from words herd spoken, many are chokin an that Bwhich denial cannot asphyxiate all that is wrong when people lean far right and wiggle their nose and ears at science based on baseless fears, that were turned by those that steers the bullship into the rocks grown and thrown out the door with the bathwater odf these glass houses housing many panes, asz the babies are crying while science denying, cause their class was dismissed, and most were already a little tardy, as they are early lately, cause their absent minds prove none to soon to see the lunacy of the lunars eclipsed due to no enlightenmeant for they, that contrive their most important decisions to be cut from incisions of the  continuing divisions on social diseased media matters, cause with all this horse shit, there will be splatters, butt wipes do not matters when it Depends on the means to their booked ends, cause a message of ignorance ruling dowst do descends peep holes looking for a way up and out, and sheltering the richest is a pour not Kool of Aid for those who already a system played, yet, enough not said, but, right now outta here and off to bed, as i live the dream, of working to support a tiny fraction of US, who've bought and paid their way to stay inn the Lobbyists tristam and taught to see how those so tender try and cut those that meet inn the lobby to smooth the rough patch sanded just fine for those who wrote the Laws designed to shield their fat monetary asses, yet the working class GOP pretend to not see the difference in classes, perhaps, a new pear of Glasses...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1    3 weeks ago

WHY ARE DEMOCRATS ATTEMPTING TO GIVE THE WEALTHY A HUGE TAX CUT??????

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
2.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    3 weeks ago

Cherry Pickin knows

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.3  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.2    3 weeks ago

Can't just admit you were snookered by Democrats' tough talk about taxing the wealthy and making them pay their fair share, but now are more interested in cutting them a huge break.

I'd call that being gullible.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
2.1.4  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.3    3 weeks ago
I'd call that being gullible.

Well i would consider you to be the expert. I haven't read up on any of this, so 'i'll not comment yet, but, i will STILL pose the question to you, who has been easier on the wealthy, Dems or the GOP ?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.5  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.4    3 weeks ago

Why are you attempting to change the subject?

Stick to the topic--if that is even possible.

Weird that your failure to read up on this doesn't limit your replies.

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
2.1.6  JumpDrive  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    3 weeks ago
WHY ARE DEMOCRATS ATTEMPTING TO GIVE THE WEALTHY A HUGE TAX CUT??????

THEY'RE NOT. You're probably talking about the elimination of the SALT cap. To get into the top 3% of earners, you have to make $200K. The alternative minimum tax reduces/eliminates the SALT deduction for about 3.5% of the top earners. So, the SALT tax helps out people living in high cost/income states, and keeps the money in-state for better local management of tax revenues -- something conservatives are always saying we should do. Perhaps someone making $200K in your state is wealthy, not in mine where the average home price is $450K.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.7  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JumpDrive @2.1.6    3 weeks ago
THEY'RE NOT.

Crap. Of course they are. Denial is stupid in the face of facts.

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
2.1.8  JumpDrive  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.7    3 weeks ago
Crap. Of course they are. Denial is stupid in the face of facts.

The problem with your 'facts' is that they never seem to take into account the Alternative Minimum Tax. This second calculation of your taxes starts phasing out your deductions at about $500K for individuals and $1M for couples. So, like the increase in the capital gains tax, which almost doubles the capital gains taxes for people making over $1M, high income earners lose the benefits of the SALT deduction.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.9  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JumpDrive @2.1.8    3 weeks ago

see post 2 2 5

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
2.1.10  JumpDrive  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.9    3 weeks ago
see post 2 2 5

Also from taxfoundation.org:

The TCJA broadened the tax base by limiting the amount individuals could deduct in state and local taxes to $10,000. For high-income taxpayers, this cap increased federal taxable income. By itself, this provision would increase federal tax liability. However, high-income taxpayers also received offsetting tax cuts, such as lower statutory tax rates, a much larger Alternative Minimum  Tax Exemption , and a reduction in the  corporate income tax . On net, these taxpayers tended to have a lower liability under current law, even with the capped SALT deduction.

If you think that Republicans would actually hurt the rich, think again. I saw small increase when TCJA happened, probably because the AMT no longer affected me when the cap was raised. I prefer the old system because it kept more money in my state. We only see about 43 cents on the dollar returned, so the SALT deduction helped ameliorate that.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.11  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JumpDrive @2.1.10    3 weeks ago

well, if it doesn't hurt the rich, why are Democrats so adamant about lifting the cap?

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
2.1.12  JumpDrive  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.11    3 weeks ago
well, if it doesn't hurt the rich, why are Democrats so adamant about lifting the cap?

Because it actually does hurt regular people in the high cost states. Duh...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.13  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JumpDrive @2.1.12    3 weeks ago

no it doesn't.

besides, the rich can afford it!

 
 
 
JBB
PhD Principal
2.1.14  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.13    3 weeks ago

You are now complaining that Biden is both cutting and increasing taxes on the wealthy.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.15  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @2.1.14    3 weeks ago

I can't help how you understand what you read.

 
 
 
JBB
PhD Principal
2.1.16  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.15    3 weeks ago

Then how do you explain this article of yours?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.17  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @2.1.16    3 weeks ago

I dont have to explain what others write for you. do i?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JumpDrive @2    3 weeks ago

So why are some Democrats fighting so hard to give the wealthy a tax cut?

 
 
 
JBB
PhD Principal
2.2.1  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2    3 weeks ago

Only if you define the wealthy as those having a big mortgage and big local and state tax bills...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Participates
2.2.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @2.2.1    3 weeks ago

Or if you define the wealthy as the top 1%, who reap the majority of benefits from the SALT tax rebate.

 
 
 
JBB
PhD Principal
2.2.3  JBB  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.2    3 weeks ago

No, those are the truly wealthy Biden and the Democrats are raising taxes on. Get it right!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Participates
2.2.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @2.2.3    3 weeks ago

How can you possibly believe that after all the times the data on the SALT tax issue has been posted here?  Even the NYT now admits it. 

Educate yourself and stop regurgitating empty talking points. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.5  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @2.2.1    3 weeks ago
Only if you define the wealthy as those having a big mortgage and big local and state tax bills...

Bull.

Repealing the cap benefits the wealthy the most.

But don't believe me, believe the facts here:

SALT Cap Repeal: SALT Deduction and Who Benefits From It (taxfoundation.org)

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.6  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @2.2.3    3 weeks ago
No, those are the truly wealthy Biden and the Democrats are raising taxes on. Get it right!

Then giving those wealthy people a huge tax cut is rather stupid, isn't it?

Repealing the cap on SALT deductions favors the very wealthy immensely.

Whether or not you are wiling to admit that or even see it.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Participates
2.2.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.5    3 weeks ago

4% of the benefits of the SALT deduction went to the middle class, and resulted in average savings of $27.  The top 1% (who received the majority of the benefits) saved an average of over $33,000  in their federal bill. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.8  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.7    3 weeks ago

Yeah, I notice all the posters who are for removing the cap don't want to acknowledge the facts and who a cut benefits the most.

Hypocrites--every last one of them.

They just won't 'fess up to wanting tax breaks for the very wealthy.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
2.2.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.8    3 weeks ago

i'll uncle Fester up. I DON'T want tax breaks for the Rich, irregardless of WHO is attempting to push them through, but are you going to attempt to sell US that the Democrats out due the GOP when it comes to helping the uber RICH AVOID THEIR FAIR SHARE....?     C ause Homie don't think you should be going there.

 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.10  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.2.9    3 weeks ago

I made no claim OTHER than the simple fact that there are Democrats trying to give the wealthy a HUGE tax cut.

Spinning and deflecting doesn't change what they are doing, so I don't see why you keep bringing Republicans up when they aren't even the topic here.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
2.2.11  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.10    3 weeks ago
Spinning and deflecting doesn't change what they are doing, so I don't see why you keep bringing Republicans up when they aren't even the topic here

Why is it we never see you call out Republicans for being in the Rich's' pockets ?  The gaul of you attempting to be on higher ground....as your hypocritical hyperbole is hyper happy as anyone can see, due to some Dems being influenced via uber amounts of money, spent to lift their tax burdens, as the pols as usual, reflect where the money originated over the constituents that voted them in. I already state somewhwere in this seed that i find monies from either side subtracting from the 'Uber' rich's tax burden , to be itotal and complete BULLSHIT , so what do you got for me, a couple of Dems touting their lobbyists wishs, yet there are no Repubs ? The GOP is now the party for the really poor, and so many more...????  Yea 'Right' out the Door with that pure hypocrisy lure. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.12  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.2.11    3 weeks ago
Why is it we never see you call out Republicans for being in the Rich's' pockets ? 

Seriously here now, you STILL can't tell what the topic here is? 

Deflect all you want--it's a bad look when you can't discuss what is on topic and have to sadly deflect away.

Troll somewhere else or stay on topic, please.

If you want so desperately to talk about Republicans, seed your own article and swing away!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
Senior Participates
2.2.13  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.12    3 weeks ago
If you want so desperately to talk about Republicans, seed your own article and swing away!

sorry Tex, don't swing that way, but i see what you say and display, so please, just stop, cause you can attempt to play the notion that it is the Dems who are the primary pushers of tax breaks for the wealthy, but anyone who even sporadically picks up a paper, knows the reality of it. I'm dione here for now Tex, but when i come back to play, we'll see again as usual, how many things you attempt to say to AVOID direct questions, all while ive answered them for you already and stated i would not comment on the peppe4red aSALT till better seasoned,. as i've read not about it. So how bout YOU stop with that childish "i must get the last word in" cause when i'm done, don't now where you begin to start ending what happened in the middle of the ocean, yet , most likely another phishing expedition, cause you got the notion, and i'd like to no way hear more, till i do, cause, i'm here for all to ignore, as it's the rule in this ocean

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.14  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.2.13    3 weeks ago

And you can project all the bullshit you can pack into a sentence, it doesn't change any facts here, or what I have stated quite clearly.

Your continuing attempts to deflect are duly noted and discarded.

 
 
 
bbl-1
PhD Quiet
3  bbl-1    3 weeks ago

"Baseless Class Warfare," huh?

Yeah.  Sure.  Try Supply Side Economics on for size.  See how that fits.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  bbl-1 @3    3 weeks ago

oh, jeez, that tired old argument again?

sigh.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



lady in black
JohnRussell
Ronin2
GregTx


51 visitors